No Jab, No Job! What will people do?

Dr. John Reizer

The controlling powers want the global population vaccinated with COVID-19 bioweapons as soon as possible. The powers that be have offered people beer, lottery tickets, vacations, money, and other perks. Now, they are turning up the pressure and telling society members that they might as well take their medicine like good little boys and girls because the shots will be made mandatory shortly.

The US military is about to force its servicemen and servicewomen to take the shots or face court-martial proceedings.

Corporate America is rolling out draconian mandates daily. More and more companies are requiring employees to take the vaccines or lose their jobs.

Is your job worth more to you than your life?

I don’t think we have to waste time thinking about a stupid question. How valuable are our jobs to us, our spouse, and other loved ones if we die? If we lose a job, another assignment can be acquired. Jobs are important, but a life is irreplaceable.

In 2010, I walked away from a good-paying job, health benefits, and a retirement plan. I did so for personal reasons that I will not share here. I decided to return to private practice, where I was once again the boss. I started from scratch with zero patients. I had a lot of confidence in my abilities to do what I had done on several occasions — I built a new practice.

The new practice quickly replaced the income I had given up when I left my previous employer. After a few years, the practice doubled in size, and it’s been growing ever since.

I like working for myself and being the boss. I dislike people telling me what days I must work or when I can take a vacation. I work 15 hours a week and get paid well for the time I see patients. I like my boss, and most importantly, I like the fact that he’s never going to require me to take a COVID-19 vaccine.

The point I am making is that no matter what job a person has, they can always get another one or start their own business. If we die, we can’t start a new life and be helpful to our surviving family members.

The answer to the question in the title of this post should be a no-brainer; no job is ever worth risking our health and life. If an employer threatens to fire us unless we receive the COVID-19 jab — we need to leave that job!

Once we fully understand and embrace the idea that there are always other career options available as long as we are alive and kicking, a sense of calmness will enter our minds. The perceived leverage a boss has over us concerning mandatory vaccines will fade away. Don’t be afraid to walk away from an employer asking its employees to risk their lives by taking an experimental medicine!




  hours  minutes  seconds


The Target List Movie — World Premiere!

For Movie Viewing Options visit:

Watch The Target List Movie — August 15th!

Stop taking vaccines and stop giving them to your children!


The Target List Movie is Coming Soon to Amazon Prime!

The Target List pilot movie is a high-energy, fast-paced medical-action-thriller.

The pilot movie is a shorter version of the full feature screenplay written by MJ Palo and John Reizer.

Interviews with the cast members from The Target List pilot movie will be featured here weekly. Stay tuned for important announcements about the release of the movie’s official poster and trailer.

Take a look at some behind-the -scenes photos from the movie set:

All Photos © 2021 by Mad-Wife Productions


The Target List is now in post-production, where the sound design, music score, and VFX enhancements are being incorporated into the film.

Click Here to Visit The Target List Movie Page for Important Updates


It’s Time to Sue the Colleges, Universities and Businesses Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines for Students and Employees!

Dr. John Reizer

The laws are plain and straightforward concerning experimental drug products and experimental medical procedures administered to the human population. This practice cannot occur without the explicit consent of the individual.

The informed consent I am writing about stems from the 1947 Nuremberg Code which states the following:

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him/her to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is a prior reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
  10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

All COVID-19 vaccines currently being administered to the human population are being done so through an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), which means that they are unapproved products in the eyes of the United States FDA!

All COVID-19 vaccines are untested, unsafe, experimental drug products that cannot be mandated by anyone or any business structure. All of the products operating under the label of a EUA must be administered by first giving the recipients informed consent and the right to refuse said products at any time whatsoever.

Various federal laws back up what I am writing, including a precedent-setting case where six United States soldiers sued and won a court case against the US Department of Defense.

Regardless of the federal laws in place that prohibit the COVID-19 vaccines from being made mandatory, colleges, universities, and US businesses believe that they can disregard the laws. These institutions cannot violate the laws and must be sued in a court of law so that the applicable laws can be applied.

Once the already established laws are applied by formally suing the offending institutions breaking them, a precedent will be established, and this epidemic of US businesses breaking federal laws will come to an end.


The Target List Movie is Coming Soon!

Interviews with the cast members from The Target List pilot movie are coming here soon. Stay tuned for important announcements about the release of the movie’s official trailer and poster.


The Target List is now in post-production, where the sound design, music score, and VFX enhancements are being incorporated into the film. I have viewed the Director’s cut of the movie and was very impressed with how well everything turned out.

Click Here to Visit The Target List Movie Page for Important Updates


In the United States, Jacobson vs. Massachusetts Must be Retested in the Courts!

Dr. John Reizer

The COVID-19 vaccines that have been rushed to market to create immunity against the alleged sars-cov-2 virus that has never been isolated in totality from human or animal hosts contain no viral isolates and are experimental drugs!

The COVID-19 vaccines are all untested, unproven, and unsafe medicinal concoctions that have never been approved for humans. Instead, the products have been granted Emergency Use Authorizations by the FDA. What exactly does this mean?

An Emergency Use Authorization allows for the distribution and administration of an untested, unsafe, and unapproved drug product to the clueless public.

EUA’s are temporary allowances for experimental drugs to be used during government-defined public health emergencies. Under normal circumstances, people wouldn’t be allowed to touch these medicines with a 200-feet pole.

No government under any circumstances whatsoever can order or force the public to take drug products, let alone an experimental one! The controlling powers are bluffing about vaccine mandates and vaccine passports.

The Constitutionality of Vaccine Mandates and Vaccine Passports

The entire narrative centered around vaccine mandates and vaccine passports being constitutional is based on an outdated SCOTUS decision from the early 1900s known as Jacobson vs. Massachusetts. The case would never hold up in modern times because there are known side effects to all vaccine products unknown when this case was decided.

The presiding justices who ruled on the case stated that their decision to rule against Jacobson was made because the vaccine, at that time, was determined not to be more dangerous to the public than the disease it was allegedly preventing.

If Jacobson vs. Massachusetts was ever retested in a modern legal setting, it would be overturned because of the known adverse reactions that have been scientifically proven to be associated with all current vaccines.

Having written all of that, let me further note that Jacobson vs. Massachusetts shouldn’t apply to untested, unsafe, experimental vaccines that have been rolled out and administered to people under an Emergency Use Authorization. All of the COVID-19 vaccines are classified as experimental medicines, and they cannot be forced upon any human being at any time whatsoever. Jacobson vs. Massachusetts allegedly has legal precedence or teeth concerning FDA-approved vaccines becoming mandatory during a pandemic — and that’s a legal can of worms that needs to be revisited and thoroughly retested through the courts as soon as possible.

If the controlling powers can roll out a plethora of new toxic vaccines in less than a year, a new challenge to Jacobson vs. Massachusetts through the courts can surely be expedited in record time to reverse an outdated and antiquated legal decision from over a hundred years ago.

Using Jacobson vs. Massachusetts to help Americans determine the constitutionality of mandatory vaccines and vaccine passports amid a world pandemic is tantamount to using century-old road maps to drive from New York to California. It’s a ridiculous scenario because many roads have been closed and new ones cut over the years. It’s outdated information, and the Jacobson vs. Massachusetts decision was made through the reliance of the scientific information available in the early 1900s.


We Reject the Official Narrative About the COVID-19 World Pandemic



The Target List Movie on Amazon Prime!

In association with River Rose Productions, Mad Wife Productions has announced that The Target List movie will begin filming on April 10, 2021. The movie will be released on Amazon Prime in the summer of 2021.

The Story:

After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, two members of a research team are shot by an assassin. The remaining two researchers barely escape the attack, only to find themselves framed for murder. Now they need to prove their innocence while running from both the police and the assassin hired to kill them by the big pharma.

Screenplay by MJ Palo and John Reizer

Based on the novel by John Reizer 

Visit The Target List IMDb Movie Page For Updates

The Target List Cast:

Help Me Expose Big Pharma!


State Of New York Bill if Passed Would Mandate Covid-19 Vaccines and Imprison Violaters


The elected officials who wrote, sponsored, or support this bill in the future should be removed from their public office positions and arrested for crimes against humanity!

Thank you, Tim, for finding and passing on this important information.

The Capitol Switchboard:

Sample phone scripts for New York A-416:

I am calling as a citizen of the State of New York and your constituent asking you to VOTE NO on A-416. On January 6 you will be asked to vote on Assembly Bill A-416 to amend the authority of the Governor in health emergencies. This bill will authorize the Governor and health officials to seize New Yorkers and force-vaccinate them without due process. A-416 cannot be supported as it violates several provisions of the New York Constitution. These are very serious violations that will result if A-416 is passed. We cannot allow that to happen. In defense of the rights of every New Yorker I am strongly requesting you VOTE NO. Thank you for your time and service.

NOTE: Here is a sample script created by Liberty First Legal, INC. for every New Yorker to use if they want to contact their representatives and demand they vote NO!

Dear Assemblyman (insert name)

I am writing as a citizen of the State of ________ and your constituent asking you to VOTE NO on A-416.

On January 6 you will be asked to vote on Assembly Bill A-416 to amend the authority of the Governor in health emergencies. This bill will authorize the Governor and health officials to seize New Yorkers and force-vaccinate them without due process.

A-416 cannot be supported as it violates several provisions of the New York Constitution.

1. A-416 removes every New Yorker’s Right to due process before forcing them into the custody of health officials. New Yorkers will not be given their right to a trial as required by Article I sec 1 and Article VI Sec 18a of the New York Constitution.

2. This bill arbitrarily reduces the well-established standard of strict scrutiny required for the infringement of these fundamental rights to the lesser standard of “clear and convincing evidence” which will be determined solely by the Governor or some executive bureaucrat in violation of the essential principle of separation of powers.

3. A-416 is a bold violation of Article 1 sec 5 and Article 1 sec 12 of the New York Constitution as it potentially deprives every New Yorker of their inherent Rights to due process before a search and seizure of their property and their body.

These are just a few, but very serious violations that will result if A-416 is passed. We cannot allow that to happen. In defense of the rights of every New Yorker, I am strongly requesting you VOTE NO. Thank you for your time and service.


compiled from:

Big Pharma Controls the Prestigious Research Journals Promoting Organized Medicine’s Alleged Accomplishments

Dr. John Reizer

For many years, I have been writing that the prestigious medical research journals worldwide are ultimately owned or controlled by the big pharma companies mass-producing toxic medicines for human guinea pigs.

When you try and explain to people how this scheme works, you get the classic cognitive dissonance eye roll back in your face. Regardless of what healthcare consumers believe, this is how the system has been set up to work, and this is how organized medicine has garnered so much undeserved public respect over the years.

I recently read an article in The New England Journal of Medicine that meticulously explained how individual American states should go about getting mandatory Covid-19 vaccine policies implemented into law.

The publishing of trash such as this is proof of how compromised and bought off medical journals have become.

Click Here to Read Article From The New England Journal of Medicine:


  • Covid-19 is not adequately contained in the state.
  • The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has recommended vaccination for the groups for which a mandate is considered.
  • The supply of vaccine is sufficient to cover the population groups for which a mandate is being considered.
  • Available evidence about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine has been transparently communicated.
  • The state has created infrastructure to provide access to vaccination without financial or logistic barriers, compensation to workers who have adverse effects from a required vaccine, and real-time surveillance of vaccine side effects.
  • In a time-limited evaluation, the vaccine’s voluntary uptake among high-priority groups has fallen short of the level required to prevent epidemic spread.

As you read through the article, let the recommendations the authors suggest sink in your brain so that you can understand what these people are proposing. Understand that they want the public to be forced into house arrest, unable to work and earn money until they have been forcibly administered an untested and unsafe vaccine product against a virus that doesn’t exist.

How is it possible that highly educated people can be bought off by a world governing construct to endorse such draconian policies that will ultimately bring great harm and injury to fellow human beings? The incredible size, sophistication, and evil associated with the world plandemic operation beggars belief.


The Target List Movie is coming to Amazon Prime!

We’re About to Expose Big Pharma!

$1,300.00 GIVEN SO FAR. (THANK YOU)!!!


We’re only $700.00 away from our goal!


The Target List IMDb Official Movie Page 

Casting and Filming:
The auditions will be held October-November 2020 (check updates and cast announcements here), and filming is scheduled for March 2021.

Get Ready to be Pressured 24/7 to take the Toxic Covid-19 Vaccine

By Dr. John Reizer

Are you ready to be pressured by television commercials, social media ads, network programming, text messages, doctors, nurses, neighbors, and family members to take the Covid-19 vaccine? The pressure to get vaccinated has already begun. As I write these words, celebrities are taping commercials and promo spots to convince you and me to get vaccinated.

I saw a television spot this afternoon that told me the only way we are going to get out of the world pandemic and being locked down is through science. The commercial kept telling me repeatedly that science is good, and science will lead us back to health again. As the commercial explained how great science is, there were pictures of syringes being filled with vaccines in the background.

This is the strategy the Satanists, pedophiles, rapists, murders, and psychopaths, otherwise known as our government leaders have decided on to coerce everybody into voluntarily taking the alleged mandatory vaccine that is coming.

Science means taking toxic vaccines. The powers that be are going to try and convince everybody that vaccines are scientific and that we should all feel guilty for not believing in the benevolence and efficacy of science-based medicine.

Everybody and their uncle is going to tell you to take this vaccine. The pressure to genuflect to the church of medicine will be immense, but you have to be strong and stay firm in your decision not to take this toxic brew. The vaccine will not protect you from a fake virus!

Mandatory Vaccines – A Psyop and a Bluff!

First of all, if the powers that be could actually make the Covid-19 vaccine mandatory, which they cannot, there would be no need for all the marketing and guilt tactics that will be forthcoming. If something could be made mandatory and that law could be upheld by the US Supreme Court like Allen Dershowitz claims, why would the powers that be need to go through the trouble of convincing people to take the product?

Why don’t the controlling powers just roll out the troops and start knocking on doors and begin injecting people against their will? Do we really believe that mandatory vaccine policy is enforceable in America? This will never happen in the United States. The idea of mandatory vaccines being forced upon screaming citizens is science fiction — it’s not going to happen! NASA’s got a better chance of going to the moon, and that’s not happening either.

The powers that be are going to scare the hell out of everybody. They’re going to guilt the hell out of everybody. They’re going to try and make people think that vaccines will become mandatory. They’re going to try and convince people that they should take the vaccine for the common good of the country. They’re going to try and convince people that they’re unpatriotic if they don’t agree to accept the vaccine.

We are about to witness another psyop within a bigger psyop. The lies are unending. The idea that mandatory vaccines are coming is the next psyop.

The POTUS made a statement that vaccines will be delivered by the military with warp speed. You’ll notice he didn’t say that vaccines will be made mandatory, and troops will forcefully administer the products to willing and unwilling citizens. The POTUS leaves the scenario up to your imagination that is heavily influenced by the network programming people watch around the clock.

We are being played yet again. Don’t fall for it. The controlling powers bluff and lie about everything, and most people fall for the lies hook, line, and sinker.

Every single elected American leader is on board with the world pandemic fakery. Lose the idea that Democrats and Republicans are different from one another. They are in the same club — and you’re not!

President Trump: Vaccine will be Distributed by the US Military!

Nothing is going to slow this process down! This vaccine is absolutely going to be distributed with force by the US Military.

They’re looking for 30,000 fools to be guinea pigs for the next stage of the test trials. We are witnessing perhaps one of the most significant scientific frauds in modern history. It leaves me speechless. I think we are all in serious trouble!

– Dr. Reizer

Are Mandatory Vaccine Laws Protected by the Constitution?

By Dr. John Reizer

Many Americans have been recently asking the question: Are mandatory vaccine laws protected by the Constitution? If you type this question into a search engine on the Internet, you are going to be inundated with a plethora of legal opinions that thoroughly discuss the subject. The majority of the views will tell you that the federal government has a constitutional right to exercise mandatory vaccine laws.

The legal opinions referenced above are mostly made and influenced by a case that was decided by the SCOTUS on February 20, 1905, Jacobson v. Massachusetts. In that case, the Supreme Court decided that an individual’s liberty is not absolute and subject to police powers.

The decision handed down stated, “in every well-ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand” and that “[r]eal liberty for all could not exist under the operation of a principle which recognizes the right of each individual person to use his own, whether in respect of his person or his property, regardless of the injury that may be done to others.”

The court also ruled that mandatory vaccinations are not arbitrary or oppressive so long as they do not “go so far beyond what was reasonably required for the safety of the public.”

Now, I want to preface my remarks about this case by stating I am not a lawyer (although I do have an online Juris Doctorate that I worked really hard on many years ago), and I am not an expert on legal issues and have never pretended to be one. But strictly from a layperson’s perspective, I have to write that I agree with Robert F. Kennedy’s position that mandatory vaccine laws are unconstitutional.

Jacobson v. Massachusetts was heard and decided by the SCOTUS in 1905. That’s a long time ago, and there’s been a lot of new information uncovered about vaccines and the devastating effects they have on human physiology. A new argument could and should be laid out to retest and reverse this old and antiquated legal decision.

I believe that Jacobson v. Massachusetts could be successfully challenged and overturned in light of some of the new, damaging evidence that has been turned up about the vaccine industry. There are over 150 chronic diseases that the FDA has attributed to vaccinations, and there is a specialized National Vaccine Injury Compensation Court that was expressly set aside to hear vaccine injury cases and limit their awards to $250,000 to protect the big pharma industry. In addition to this, the soon to be released Covid-19 vaccine will have complete liability immunity from any injuries the product might potentially inflict on human lives.

In my opinion, Jacobson v. Massachusetts would yield a much different decision if heard in the year 2020. And I have spoken with a few lawyer friends who unequivocally agree with me. The minority dissenters in the case, Justices Brewer and Peckham, would likely have had more support from the majority ruling justices who heard the case if they had been made aware of the real dangers associated with the oxymoron known as vaccine science.

I think it is time to retest Jacobson v. Massachusetts in a modern-day legal setting, and one that takes into consideration the full extent of the safety issues associated with vaccines. These products have become overly oppressive in nature for all human beings because they pose serious health threats to the general public they have, in theory, been designed to protect. The current health risks stemming from vaccine products extend far beyond what the justices in 1905 considered safe for the general public.

In my opinion, the federal government will not try to mandate vaccines in the future because they would be afraid to place Jacobson v. Massachusetts in the line of fire of a real test. It has been tested in limited capacities in the past, but not with the argument that takes into consideration the case I have laid out in this post.

I think the powers that be would love to keep this precedent-setting decision right where it lies. To open it up to a brand new, real test scenario is opening a can of worms they can’t afford to open. If the decision was ever reversed, the controllers would lose their leverage and ability to populate search engines with articles that tell us that the federal government’s right to impose mandatory vaccines is protected by the US Constitution.

I, for one, would love to see this case revisited and put through a new legal test using the argument I have outlined.  Any lawyers out there that have more expertise than me concerning this subject, please feel free to weigh in on the conversation.