The Religious Cult of Medicine

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Although a small minority of us don’t think of them and their vocation in this way, medical doctors and the profession of medicine are perceived by the vast majority of people as priests working in a church. The entire structure of the medical profession has been intentionally designed to mirror a religious experience.

When you walk into a house of worship, you enter a domain that is considered sacred by the members of the congregation. Inside a church, temple, synagogue or any other religious chamber, there are specific rules that are generally understood and followed by its members. Out of respect for the belief system, any types of criticism, skepticism or questions concerning the veracity of the organization’s major premise are off limits. In other words, members of religious congregations can never publicly question the church about anything.

In medicine, the doctor (priest, minister, rabbi) customarily wears a white gown (robe) that absolutely identifies him as the high priest in the congregation (practice). Within that practice there are nurses (nuns) that assist the doctor in taking care of patients (members of the congregation) when they become ill (possessed by evil microbes). Patients do not usually question  a doctor’s (minister’s) advice.

There are a variety of techniques (rituals) the profession of medicine uses to rid the body of diseases (evil spirits). Some of these techniques include introducing synthetic drugs (holy water) in patients, mass produced by petrochemical companies. In other situations, doctors cut out diseases in the body by performing surgeries (exorcisms) in an effort to remove infected tissues and organs (possessed body parts).

Question the intentions or integrity of the medical man and his large support group of medical personnel, and you will be looked upon by the citizens of most communities as a nut job (the devil). Question the medical protocols (biblical passages) that have been written by the petrochemical corporations and firmly established within the base curricula of every medical school program in the world, and you will be labeled as a charlatan, a quack or a pseudo-scientist.

The petrochemical companies secretly overseeing prestigious medical journals, the publishers of supposed peer-reviewed research, make certain doctors opposing the allopathic paradigm (drugs are the only way to achieve and maintain health) are always viewed by the vast majority of people as being unscientific.

In the Catholic Church, they teach parishioners that a young soul, entering the world, is compromised by original sin (a weakened immune system). It predisposes that vessel (body) to a life of demonic possession (sickness). The baptismal holy waters of the church (vaccination programs) are the only sure way to wash away the sins (childhood diseases) and set the soul right (create immunity against germs) so that it can enjoy an existence on Earth that is free from Satan’s temptations (bacteria and viral microbes).

I understand there will be plenty of people incensed over what I have written in this article. A person that writes content questioning a particular religion’s philosophy or integrity will not win any popularity contests. And make no mistake; the medical profession is a powerful religion with many followers. That, in itself, is a sad fact, but also the major reason why so many people are walking around sick and don’t understand why.

The faith and trust we have collectively invested, as a society, in medicine is based upon blind faith and not the profession’s ability to get sick people well. There are some pretty screwed up concepts that medical dogma is based upon and when one takes a close look at these ideas, their flaws become very apparent. It is because of this fact that the profession has been cleverly structured and marketed, by its engineers, to appear as a religion.

As a religion, medicine remains off limits from would-be critics and avoids important questions. These questions have needed to be answered for years, and yet they continue to be ignored by medicine’s leaders. Instead, we continue to hear and read about, walkathons, parades and fundraisers that supposedly benefit research for future eradication of diseases that the medical profession and petrochemical corporations have no intention of ever eliminating!

It’s not a coincidence that so many hospitals in the United States and around the world have been named after religious organizations and saints. Let’s face facts, there aren’t any medical facilities named “The Charles Manson Center for Burned Victims’. Medical institutions have been designed and branded in such a way that they are presently perceived, by the masses, as places of worship. Even the doctor’s classic, white lab coat has been designed to instill, in the psyche of health care consumers, a sense of purity when they think of physicians.

Getting people to believe in the value of medicine has been the long-term goal of pharmaceutical companies. Their relentless commitment to this self-serving campaign has turned the public sector into a massive congregation of cheerleaders that ritualistically praise the medical industry. Communities throughout America and around the world regularly donate large amounts of money attempting to build and maintain hospital centers. These organizations are now the center points of all modern communities.

Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of good medical doctors and surgeons in the world and some medical practice objectives can be helpful in saving lives. But most of the successes that can be attributed to modern medicine usually come in the form of emergency based care and not from the area of managing diseases and restoring health to the human body.

If we ever hope to improve the health of human beings and raise the overall quality of healthcare that’s practiced in the United States and other locations throughout the world, we will need to break the stranglehold petrochemical corporations have on the medical profession. These giant companies have hijacked medicine and made it sick. We need to turn our attention away from figuring out ways to pay for medical care and start concentrating on ways to fix the profession so that it stops making people sicker than they already are.

In the future we must evaluate medicine as a profession and not blindly praise its false accomplishments that have, ultimately, been fabricated by drug companies and later promoted in peer-reviewed journals that are owned and operated by the same companies. It’s time for the members of the congregation (the general public) to get off their knees and begin holding traditional medicine (the church) accountable for its actions!

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: Statement on Federal Vaccine Mandate

wp-image-879162634

To:  Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, House Energy and Commerce Committee

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions

Re: Statement federal vaccine mandates

Feb. 26, 2019

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of medical practice is a state function, not a federal one. Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.

A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks? Regulators may intervene to protect the public against a one-in-one million risk of a threat such as cancer from an involuntary exposure to a toxin, or-one-in 100,000 risk from a voluntary (e.g. occupational) exposure. What is the risk of death, cancer, or crippling complication from a vaccine? There are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out a much higher risk of complications, even one in 10,000, for vaccines. Such studies would require an adequate number of subjects, a long duration (years, not days), an unvaccinated control group (“placebo” must be truly inactive such as saline, not the adjuvant or everything-but-the-intended-antigen), and consideration of all adverse health events (including neurodevelopment disorders).

Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court and by Congress. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid some $4 billion in damages, and high hurdles must be surmounted to collect compensation. The damage may be so devastating that most people would prefer restored function to a multimillion-dollar damage award.

The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though somewhat less effective.

The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed by a government agency.

Measles is the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates, and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority, but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity. The last measles death in the U.S. occurred in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Are potential measles complications including death in persons who cannot be vaccinated due to immune deficiency a  justification for revoking the rights of all Americans and establishing a precedent for still greater restrictions on our right to give—or withhold—consent to medical interventions? Clearly not.

Many serious complications have followed MMR vaccination, and are listed in the manufacturers’ package insert, though a causal relationship may not have been proved. According to a 2012 report by the Cochrane Collaboration, “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate” (cited by the National Vaccine Information Center).

Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.

Even disregarding adverse vaccine effects, the results of near-universal vaccination have not been completely positive. Measles, when it does occur, is four to five times worse than in pre-vaccination times, according to Lancet Infectious Diseases, because of the changed age distribution: more adults, whose vaccine-based immunity waned, and more infants, who no longer receive passive immunity from their naturally immune mother to protect them during their most vulnerable period.

Measles is a vexing problem, and more complete, forced vaccination will likely not solve it. Better public health measures—earlier detection, contact tracing, and isolation; a more effective, safer vaccine; or an effective treatment are all needed. Meanwhile, those who choose not to vaccinate now might do so in an outbreak, or they can be isolated. Immunosuppressed patients might choose isolation in any event because vaccinated people can also possibly transmit measles even if not sick themselves.

Issues that Congress must consider:

Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished. Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal is the only incentive to do better.There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being quashed, as is dissent by professionals.There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children’s brains are developing rapidly—any interference with the complex developmental symphony could be ruinous.Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease.

AAPS believes that liberty rights are unalienable. Patients and parents have the right to refuse vaccination, although potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a clear or present danger.

AAPS represents thousands of physicians in all specialties nationwide. It was founded in 1943 to protect private medicine and the patient-physician relationship.

Respectfully yours,

Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

How Often do you Touch Your Smartphone in One Day?

20170612_1237001484777566.png

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

I recently came back from a vacation where I left my Smartphone in a hotel safe for most of the week. There were a few things I noticed during this period of time.

Number one, I noticed myself repeatedly reaching for the device on my right hip where I usually carry the phone. It was difficult, initially,  for me to stop this obsessive behavior. After several hours, the urge to grab my Smartphone subsided somewhat and I began to feel more relaxed.

Number two, I became very cognizant of just how many people around me were staring at their electronic phones.

I was at a world famous theme park and while waiting in a long line for almost two hours, I watched this family of four people that were absolutely glued to four individual devices. They rarely broke their concentration (trance) the entire time, and they weren’t the only ones doing this.

Number three, I realized after the first day my level of anxiety about everything almost disappeared. I also realized that most people in the world have become slaves to these instruments. It’s a serious problem, a worldwide electronic addiction that undoubtedly causes psychological and physiological distress to the human body.

According to a 2017 study, the average person has a difficult time going more than ten minutes without checking their phones. Many people check their phones up to 80 times a day. Some people are so addicted to electronic devices they cannot go longer than four minutes without checking them.

Another study performed by comScore reported that American Smartphone users regularly log 73.8 hours a month on their devices. It’s absolute insanity. Regardless, facts are facts and people are hopelessly addicted to these electronic gadgets.

ELECTRONIC ADDICTION

We’ve all heard horror stories about a particular person getting addicted to Cocaine or Heroin. These chemicals as well as many others are, undoubtedly, very dangerous substances.

Although most users begin taking addictive drugs voluntarily, it doesn’t take long before they have become full blown addicts. Chemical drug dependency is a serious problem worldwide that takes many months, and in some cases many years to successfully conquer. Most people are unable to kick a chemical drug habit without the help of a fully trained medical staff.

The human nervous system is wired in such a way that when we take part in pleasurable activities, certain chemicals are released inside the brain that cause us to want to continue the pleasurable experiences. One of those chemicals is called Dopamine.

The neurotransmitter Dopamine allows us to feel very happy and the more the chemical is released inside the brain, the happier we will feel. Pleasurable experiences cause Dopamine to be released. The taking of certain drugs like Heroin and Cocaine causes a lot of Dopamine to be dumped in the brain and this in turn causes a very euphoric state that drug users often report experiencing.

With continued drug use, the brain eventually reduces the amount of Dopamine it receives and because of this fact it becomes more difficult to experience the same level of pleasure that was initially felt by the drug user. In order to reach the same state of euphoria, more of the drug is required each time and the cycle goes on and on.

It’s easy for most people to understand how a chemical modality, like Heroin, could cause a person to become hopelessly addicted. But it’s not so easy for people to understand how the same mechanisms that are causing people to become drug addicts are also capable of causing people to become addicted to computers and Smartphones.

Electronic addiction is a real thing and millions of people are becoming electronic addicts. And if you believe this is all taking place because of some unfortunate accident – think again!

The telecommunication corporations are well aware of the fact that their products are habit forming. They know that when you first start off, your data package will be small. But just like a nicotine junkie increases the number of cigarettes they smoke a day each year, the Smartphone user will also increase the amount of data they require over time.

Smartphone users repeatedly stimulate neural-pathways inside the human brain that cause the release of Dopamine which rewards the user with a pleasurable experience. This scenario recurs over and over again and eventually more electronic stimulation is required to reach the same level of pleasure that was present initially.

In this situation the modality used to trigger the Dopamine release is electronic in nature and not a chemical product. Chemical modality or electronic modality, it doesn’t matter; the same addictive result is accomplished.

Smartphone users become so addicted that they cannot go more than a few minutes at a time without checking text messages, emails, Facebook, Instagram and other social media applications. When a Smartphone user picks up his or her device, it’s like a nicotine addict picking up a cigarette and taking a puff.

How often do you touch your Smartphone in a day?

What it Really Means to be Healthy

By Dr. John Reizer

Occasionally, a patient will ask me a question about how they can become healthier. As a natural health care practitioner, I become excited when someone takes the time to ask an intelligent question about improving their overall health and well being. In many situations, people are preoccupied with getting rid of symptoms and avoiding discomfort. They’re not necessarily concerned about solving a specific health problem.

It’s refreshing to encounter that special individual that shows an interest in something other than covering up a particular symptom that is affecting their body at that point in time.

I think a lot of us fail to understand what it really means to be healthy. Health is certainly more than just the absence of symptoms and diseases. People drop dead every day of the week that had no prior signs or symptoms associated with an illness. I’ve heard people make the statement, “He was the picture of health right before he died.” No, obviously, he wasn’t! Knowing that so many people are confused about what it actually means to be healthy, I thought it would be a good idea for me to write a brief article about this subject.

All life has the natural ability to adapt to its surrounding environment. Whether we are discussing very small organisms or the most complex forms of life (human beings); living things must either adapt to their environment or cease to exist.

How adequately or inadequately life adapts to its surroundings is the true measuring stick of an organism’s level of health. This formula is applicable to both microscopic organisms and human beings.

When a person becomes physically or emotionally compromised, (run down, overworked, overstressed, malnourished, etc.) his or her natural abilities to adapt to environmental stresses become less than what they should. Naturally occurring microbes, that humans normally coexist with, suddenly pose a serious threat to physiological systems when a particular individual is unable to properly adapt to environmental challenges. In other words, we become unhealthy when we lose our natural adaptive tendencies.

We don’t catch influenza because we come in contact with a specific virus. We become infected because our immunological defenses, that allow us to adapt to that viral microbe, are weakened or compromised. Bacteria and viral opportunists, that we regularly encounter, are only as strong as our natural, adaptive tendencies allow them to be. This is why only five out of ten people will come down with the flu or another sickness that has crossed everybody’s path. The five individuals that remained healthy weren’t just lucky. They adapted more appropriately, in an immunological sense, than the five people that contracted a particular strain of influenza.

Catch a flu virus or some other type of bacterial infection and your body will immediately begin a plan of attack in an effort to adapt to the challenging, microbial invader. In most situations, human physiology will activate a fever to kill off the bacteria or virus affecting your body. Most of these opportunistic organisms cannot survive in higher temperature ranges and so the body modifies its internal thermostat, making it impossible for them to survive. The body’s ability to adapt is absolutely amazing.

Unfortunately, in many situations, human beings do a plethora of things that interfere with the body’s innate abilities to adapt to its environment. Taking fever reducing drugs is one of them. Because we have been misled by drug companies, that have a financial interest in teaching us bad health practices, we commonly believe fever is a bad thing and that it can cause brain damage. In reality, fever is a friend and will minimize the duration and severity of most common illnesses that are generated from opportunistic bacteria and viruses.

There are many things that you can do on a daily basis that will improve your body’s ability to adapt to its surrounding environment. Consuming drugs, vaccines, artificial sweeteners, unnatural food additives, and other toxins are not some of them.

Consuming fruits, vegetables, non fluoridated water, and eating properly will help your body adapt to its environment more efficiently.

Because the intelligence that regulates your body’s physiology, and allows you to adapt to your environment, operates directly through the nervous system, it’s vitally important you have your spine checked by a chiropractor several times each year for tiny vertebral misalignments called subluxations. If left unchecked, spinal subluxations can inhibit the functioning capability of the nervous system and will cause the human body to adapt less efficiently to its surrounding environment. This translates into an unhealthy individual.

When people finally begin to understand and respect the fact that true health originates from a living thing’s ability to properly adapt to its immediate surroundings, we will finally begin to see a marked improvement in the overall health of our population.

Disclaimer!

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research

The Colorful Business of Pretending to Fight Cancer

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John Reizer

Inman, SC – It’s October and that means there are pink ribbons on display wherever you happen to turn. Breast cancer awareness is being promoted across television stations throughout the United States as it always is during the tenth month of the calendar year.

There are various colored ribbons that have been assigned to different types of cancer by the powers that be. Some healthcare consumers have learned the color code so well, the mere mention of a specific colored ribbon elicits a reflex in a particular person’s brain. PINK = BREAST CANCER.

The answer to cancer has become a colorful business and what a lucrative business it is. Don’t keep sending support organizations your hard earned money. Don’t keep walking in their walkathons. Don’t give them your spare change at the movie theater. Maybe they’ve called you on the phone, or perhaps someone has visited your private residence and asked you for a monetary contribution? Don’t give them a penny.

The problem with this entire scenario is that our donations to cancer support organizations will not help to eradicate any of these diseases. The money is collected and immediately earmarked for research to create more drugs that will manage various cancers indefinitely while causing additional problems for patients that the pharmaceutical companies will profit from.

The cancer fighting foundations have allegedly been at war with the big “C” for a helluva long time and without any results to speak of. This is a money grab and big pharma is behind the entire effort.

If you really want to help eliminate cancer in the future, stop consuming unhealthy foods, artificial sweeteners, poisonous vaccines, fluoridated water, prescription and over the counter drugs. In addition, stop supporting the different cancer foundations that do absolutely nothing to help eliminate any types of cancer.

If this post infuriates you, it’s because you’re a victim of an ingenious mass marketing campaign that’s been sucking the money and life out of society for many decades. And it’s not going to stop anytime soon. Wake up and start thinking about what you’re being presented with regards to the fight against cancer. Pharmaceutical companies want your money to keep flowing in their direction. They have no intention of ever curing even one disease.

What do you think about this subject?

 

Disclaimer!

The material in this article is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be medical advice. For full disclaimer information, please refer to the disclaimer page on this website.

Space Farce: The Sixth Branch of the US Armed Services

wp-image-1706290015

By Gina Flores

Duisburg, Germany – According to President Donald Trump, Space Force will become the sixth branch of the US Armed Services by 2020.

A US Space Force will allegedly perform military missions in outer space and do so under the guidance of the  US Airforce.

It all sounds so futuristic and quite sophisticated; like an episode from the old cartoon, The Jetsons. The only problem with the concept on the table is that the United States and every other sovereign territory in existence lack the technology and know how to enter outer space. It’s never going to get off the ground so to speak.

Oh, they’re going to roll out a presentation complete with CGI cinematography, and it will look pretty damn realistic. But you can be assured that they’re not creating any real Space Force that’s going to fly above low earth orbits (LEO’s).

20181009_202445

Look, I’m on the Moon and it’s cold!

I know it’s hard for the average American to comprehend the truth about current space technology, NASA, and the Apollo moon missions, but the truth is that no manned or unmanned space missions have ever gotten above LEO’s. The photos we have been offered of foreign worlds are Hollywood productions. It’s all fake!

People can continue to  debate this issue for many more years. It’s not going to change the fact that there’s never been additional missions to the moon since the early 70’s. Why is this the case? Quite simply written, the hoax became too difficult to pull off.

Does anyone with even a few functiong brain cells honestly believe that Americans went to the moon in 1969 and just quit after that? Where have you ever observed the same behavior from the American government? Don’t people realize how much of a strategic location the moon would be to any government with regards to keeping an eye on the Earth? Building a military installation on the moon would allow a specific country to practically rule the world with military supremacy.

In today’s environment there are too many computer savvy people that have the skillset to detect a great fraud when it’s presented. It’s too dangerous for any space agency to create future hoaxes claiming astronauts are walking on a foreign celestial body.

Space Farce will be created and US taxpayers will undoubtedly fund this new branch of the Armed Services, however those funds will potentially be used for other black operations the public will never be privy to.

Large UFO Next to Sun?

wp-image-282249783

By Gina Flores

NoFakeNews

Duisburg, Germany – An interesting story broke on September 6, 2018 when the Solar Sunspot Observatory in the state of New Mexico was closed abruptly by the FBI for unknown security reasons. Conspiracy theories were immediately placed into motion on the Internet about aliens invading earth when authorities refused to elaborate on the specific reasons for the facility’s closure.

During the time the observatory was closed, an Indiana woman, Gina Hill captured photographs of a huge disc like UFO and smaller ones near the sun’s surface. (See Video Below)

What do you think about this story?

Video By Gina Hill

Religion And Science: The Two Most Dangerous Forms Of Mind Control

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

Most people attempt to validate information they come upon by inputting the data in question into one of two mental cylinders where it is quickly processed and analyzed, by our brains, for a final decision – valid or invalid. The two mental cylinders the vast majority of us use are religion and science.

Religion is something most of us do not question. Our belief in a particular religion directly influences what we will consider in life as being possible or impossible as well as permissible or impermissible.

We are suddenly born into a world where our birth location, ultimately, determines the belief construct we will develop and follow for the remainder of our lives. If you happen to be born in America, you’ll probably be raised in the Christian or Jewish faith. If you are born in Iran, chances are pretty good you will follow the Muslim faith. Other worldly locations will yield completely different ideologies for people to follow.

At the conception point of our individual belief systems, we have zero knowledge about where certain ideas have originated from. We are usually not afforded an opportunity to question the stories, timelines or illogicality of certain religious concepts. To do so would be considered blasphemy by many. Instead, we are born and expeditiously inserted into a religion, determined solely by birth location, without having had the chance to say anything whatsoever about our involuntary induction into a formal congregation that has some very rigid, and often dangerous, ideas.

As we progress from children to adults, the belief systems assigned to us at birth are continuously reinforced, by the members in our immediate communities, until such beliefs become a part of our deepest core beliefs. Once our core beliefs have been established, we’ll defend them to the very day we die. Not knowing very much about the strange customs, rituals and ceremonies attached to specific religions, we still aggressively defend them, go to war, and kill fellow human beings in the name of God.

Attempt for even a moment to question the irrational demands associated with a particular belief system, and you will become the target of ridicule and likely be ostracized from said congregation. You will, undoubtedly, be looked upon by members of your community as one who has been possessed by a demon and not worthy of being in the presence of others that fully support the preconceived ideas that have, forever, been etched into the psyche of the sheeple population.

The pressure to conform and pledge allegiance to a specific belief system is too great for the average person. Most of us immediately cave under such intense pressure and reluctantly agree to become I-Robot. We decide not to question the fundamental concepts associated with certain ideologies in order that we can have some semblance of peace in our lives. We do this so that we are not thrown out of the social graces of our families and friends. Thus the first mental cylinder is created and firmly positioned in its appropriate place to assist us in the validation of daily data we routinely encounter.

Science is another ideology that, for the most part, is not questioned. It is, in fact, a safety net that has been conveniently stretched beneath the many religions currently in existence. For those people that happen to slip through the cracks, so to speak, found in formalized religions, there exists science to safely catch them before they fall completely away from the conventional thinking world.

The institution of science, in some respects, is even more powerful than formalized religion. It is a belief construct respected and endorsed by the educated people of the world. The laws of science are unbendable. Scientific laws remain rigid and unforgiving ideas that can be even more dangerous than religious concepts that are routinely accepted exclusively through blind faith and without any proof whatsoever.

Science can be demonstrated through mathematics. Science is, after all, the explanations associated with everything in the physical world. It is the opposite of religion, the rationale for everything in the spiritual realm. Its proof can be replicated through experimentation. Water freezes at 32 degrees Fahrenheit. Step out of an airplane at 37,000 feet and gravity will kill you every time, unless you’re wearing a parachute that will reduce the amount of speed associated with your freefall to earth. Science can even calculate the exact rate of speed you will be falling just before you hit the ground. Science is taught to us, early on, in black and white concepts with no shades of gray in-between.

What we are not taught about science, however, is that the physical world we live in is much more complex in its design than what our genetically-gifted sensibilities can consciously demonstrate to us. The perceptions of various frequencies, by human senses, allow us to mistakenly assume we are constantly experiencing total reality at any given period of time. In actuality, we are only experiencing, through a five sense world, a very narrow sliver of reality. Much of what is total reality (what’s really out there in the universe) exists in frequency ranges that are far removed from what humans can sense.

The truth of the matter is that science can only validate for us the physical portions of reality our senses can properly comprehend. For example, a radio can only tune into the limited number of frequencies it’s been designed to access. There are a plethora of other radio signals bouncing around the universe. The fact that a specific, limited instrument can not access them doesn’t, for one second, change the fact that they are very real and part of a legitimate reality construct.

Although science can sometimes be a useful tool to help us make sense of the physical world we mistakenly confuse as complete and total reality, it is unable to give us insight about other, more invisible, parts of reality that exist further up and down the reality spectrum.

The powers that be understand the limitations of science as it pertains to the sensory spectrum of perceived reality versus complete and total reality. Knowing how things really are, compared to the way they are routinely presented to the sheeple population, is an important component in the process of keeping the members of society confused about what’s real and what’s possible to attain. It’s ultimately a game of power and control. Those individuals that have the true knowledge about the way things work have the power to control others. A select few have the true knowledge and that’s how and why a few can control the direction and lives of many. Thus the second mental cylinder is created and firmly positioned in its appropriate place to assist us with the validation of daily data we routinely encounter.

While orthodox science, a completely controlled campaign by those in the know, can effectively keep most people in the box and powerless to fight against the few, it’s also important to understand that religious dogma has the same objective and effect on the human psyche. It’s nothing more than a rehash of the same fantastic stories that have been used over and over again on different civilizations and repackaged under different names for many thousands of years. The stories, most of them astrological in nature, have been personified over time for the sole purpose of controlling large segments within a population base for specified geographic locations.

The careful control and distribution of information is of paramount importance to the powers that be. Their power over humanity is ultimately achieved through creating confusion, ignorance and apathy within the masses. They ultimately accomplish this goal by using the two most dangerous forms of mind control in existence: religion and science!

In the end it’s up to the people to become more educated about world events and realize that collectively they have the ability to end this ridiculous exercise in futility if and when they decide to wake up, get off their knees and embrace the true power that the universe has afforded them.