Simply Written: They Don’t Want Us To Connect The Dots

Dr. John Reizer

I really believe that what we are witnessing today from the mainstream media is nothing more than a strategic and very concerted effort to intentionally obfuscate an important image of our world. This image, if viewed without distortion, would undoubtedly make it easier for the vast majority of people to make sense of what’s currently taking place in different countries.

As a child I used to solve connect the dots puzzles frequently. I am certain most readers can remember doing similar activities. The puzzles, for very young children, had fewer dots and many lines already filled in. With regards to the simple ones, it was pretty apparent from the onset what image was going to be revealed when the puzzle was completed. Some of the more advanced puzzles, for older students, were not so easy to figure out. These exercises featured pages of dots scattered about everywhere and had fewer lines already filled in. It was nearly impossible to visualize what the final image would be.

Many of the stories that are reported on by the mainstream news companies have a hidden objective to dis-inform people about what’s taking place domestically as well as abroad. There are thousands of stories being thrown around each month for the public to chew on. Many of the bigger stories are directly and intimately connected, but they’re not presented by the media in a way that allows viewers to see that the content is related. Headline stories are often reported so that they appear to be non-related. The powers that be don’t want you to connect the dots.

The human brain is wired so that it focuses on patterns. The mainstream media companies are doing their best to make sure that our brains cannot home in on said patterns that would reveal what is really happening on a bigger and more worldly scale.

The intended objective of the mainstream media, that is owned and operated by the Deep State/Illuminati, is to create confusion and misunderstanding about global events. They want people to become so unsure about what’s happening in the world that they throw their arms in the air and give up on trying to solve the puzzle.

At NoFakeNews we have attempted to help readers fill in some of the lines and connect the dots to this very gigantic puzzle. By doing so we hope that over the past 5 years we have produced a clearer image of what’s currently transpiring in the world for everyone.

Advertisements

Was the Syrian Gas Attack A False Flag Event Conducted by the Deep State?

By Gina Flores

One of the many wonderful things I admire about our unique forum and its contributors is that we continue to write what we believe to be the truth no matter where the truth might happen to take us. Sometimes the facts of a situation are hard to swallow because they go against what society has been disingenuously led to believe. I feel that this is certainly the case with regards to the situation that took place in Syria on April 4, 2017.

This past week Americans were told by the fake media outlets and its government that the Syrian government poisoned its own people with a lethal nerve agent. This horrific act was quickly condemned by the Trump administration. President Trump followed his condemnation of the Syrian government’s act by launching 59 Tomahawk missiles at the Syrian military base where the lethal nerve gas was purported to have originated from.

This military action infuriated the Russian government and Russian president, Vladimir Putin. The Russian foreign ministry released the following statement:

“The United States conducted strikes against Syrian government troops in the early hours of April 7, using chemical weapons attacks in Idlib Province as a pretext.

“The US opted for a show of force, for military action against a country fighting international terrorism without taking the trouble to get the facts straight.

“It is not the first time that the US chooses an irresponsible approach that aggravates problems the world is facing, and threatens international security. The very presence of military personnel from the US and other countries in Syria without consent from the Syrian government or a UN Security Council mandate is an egregious and obvious violation of international law that cannot be justified. While previous initiatives of this kind were presented as efforts to combat terrorism, now they are clearly an act of aggression against a sovereign Syria. Actions undertaken by the US today inflict further damage to the Russia-US relations.

“Russia has expressed on numerous occasions that it was ready to cooperate on resolving the most urgent issues the world is facing today, and that fighting international terrorism was a top priority. However, we will never agree to unsanctioned action against the legitimate Syrian government that has been waging an uncompromising war on international terrorism for a long time.

“Seeking to justify military action Washington has totally distorted what had happened in Idlib. The US could not have failed to grasp the fact that the Syrian government troops did not use chemical weapons there. Damascus simply does not have them, as confirmed a number of times by qualified experts. This was the conclusion reached by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). Over the recent years this organisation inspected almost all the facilities linked or possibly linked to Syria’s chemical weapons programme. As for Idlib, the terrorists operating there used to produce toxic land mines intended for use in Syria and Iraq. These manufacturing facilities were put out of operation in a military operation carried out by the Syrian air force.

“The US pretends that it does not understand obvious things, turning a blind eye to the use of chemical weapons in Iraq, officially confirmed by Baghdad. The US refuses to believe the evidence provided by certified documents confirming the use of chemical weapons by terrorists in Aleppo. In doing so, the US is abetting international terrorism and making it stronger. New WMD attacks can be expected.

“There is no doubt that the military action by the US is an attempt to divert attention from the situation in Mosul, where the campaign carried out among others by US-led coalition has resulted in hundreds of civilian casualties and an escalating humanitarian disaster.

“It is obvious that the cruise missile attack was prepared in advance. Any expert understands that Washington’s decision on air strikes predates the Idlib events, which simply served as a pretext for a show of force.

“Russia suspends the Memorandum of Understanding on Prevention of Flight Safety Incidents in the course of operations in Syria signed with the US.

“We call on the UN Security Council to hold an emergency meeting to discuss the latest developments.”

According to the official story that’s been released and continuously parroted by the mainstream media, President Bashar al-Assad of Syria used Sarin gas, a lethal nerve agent, on his own people. Videos were then released by the mainstream media showing civilians and children choking and vomiting from the effects of the poison. An emotional President Trump reacted swiftly by ordering a military action against the Syrian government. Almost immediately the Trump administration received praise from the media whores that have routinely attacked him prior to this point in time. It’s pretty damn ironic that it took an outright act of war to get the mainstream media to offer their support for the new American president.

Just one week earlier, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson commented, “The longer-term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people.” In other words, the Trump administration was taking the new position that any regime change in Syria concerning the Assad government would not be decided by the United States. This was a drastic change in US foreign policy and one that the “Deep State” probably didn’t like very much.

It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever that President Assad would decide to gas his own people and focus such negative attention onto his own regime. This is especially true considering that he was extremely close to defeating ISIS and had finally gotten the US off his back.

Enter the false flag operation; a Problem – Reaction – Solution campaign designed by the Deep State to incite the wrath of the western world concerning Assad and Syria. This operation is just what the Deep State needed in order to get Trump and the United States back on track to carry out plans for a regime change in Syria.

A regime change in Syria has been the ultimate goal of the Deep State for many years and it really didn’t matter whether Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump was elected to the the US Presidency. The plan has never changed from its inception. It’s unbending and not up for debate. What the Illuminati wants, it gets. This has become even more apparent than ever before now that this latest false flag event has taken place and the US military responded by attacking Syria with 59 missiles.

Here are some important questions Americans should be asking: Was President Trump duped into committing a military action by the Deep State? Is President Trump part of the Deep State, disingenuously portraying himself as an outsider? Have we all been duped by the Deep State/Illuminati masters once again? Was Hillary Clinton a Tsunami storm and Donald Trump a mushroom cloud in the making? We will probably never know the answers to such questions. What I do know is that once again the American public is being played like a violin and there might be some very dire consequences in our immediate future.

Are these people in the Deep State completely insane? Do they actually want a global nuclear war between the United States and Russia? Unfortunately, I think this has been their plan for the longest time.

What do you think about this subject?

Nuclear War Is On The Horizon: “This Is Not Just Talk… Action Has Been Taken”

Jeremiah Johnson
October 10th, 2016
SHTFplan.com

As the U.S. elections draw nearer, the amount of bellicose rhetoric from politicians and key military commanders (in truth, “politicians” as well) has been increasing.  The main focus of that rhetoric has been directed toward Russia, and is also “blathered” in the direction of China, North Korea, and Iran when it suits U.S. political interests.  The problem is that all of it is not just talk: action has been taken, especially regarding Russia and the Syrian theatre of operations.

Within the past several weeks, the U.S. has bombed Syrian troops, killing 62 outside of Deor ez-Zor in airstrikes and then admitting to doing so “mistakenly.”  The Russians responded by firing up a UN/coalition convoy almost immediately after.  Russian naval artillery then took out a command post with approximately 30 “coalition” officers, some of them being Americans.  The U.S. then made itself responsible (indirectly) for an attack on the Russian Embassy in Damascus, Syria: anti-Assad Islamic militants did the job, and these have support with funding and materials of the U.S.

These “cat-and-mouse” exchanges have not been new by any means, as evidenced by the aerial “Top-Gun” provocative fly-by’s that have been occurring all year long, in Syria as well as in Eastern Europe.  The U.S. has retracted the cease fire agreement and suspended all operations and discussions with Russia pertaining to Syria.  What is new is the level that the rhetoric has reached…rhetoric that is no longer rhetorical but actually constitutes direct threats against Russia.

On September 29, 2016 the Washington Post reported these words from U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter:

“Across the Atlantic, we’re refreshing NATO’s nuclear playbook – to better integrate conventional and nuclear deterrence, to ensure we plan and train like we’d fight, and to deter Russia from thinking it can benefit from a nuclear use in a conflict with NATO.”

The irony of that statement is evident.  While the U.S. emplaces missile batteries in Germany, Romania, and Moldova, Russia has not responded by placing missiles in either Cuba or Venezuela, two countries she holds strong ties with both militarily and economically.  Carter champions deterrence while simultaneously works to increase U.S. nuclear and conventional buildups in Eastern Europe.  But it doesn’t stop there with his words.  This was reported by George Ourfalian of AFP in an article entitled US Using Syrian Crisis to ‘Wage a Surrogate War’ Against Russia, on October 4, 2016:

“US State Department spokesman John Kirby has made strong statements regarding Russia’s involvement in Syria, claiming that if Russia will not cooperate with the US, Moscow will keep sending troops home in body bags.”

Strong words, and quite bellicose originating with a State Department spokesman completely removed from harm’s way.  Then this came out today, the date of this writing on October 5th as reported by Alex Jones’ Prison Planet:

“I want to be clear to those who wish to do us harm…. the United States military – despite all of our challenges, despite our [operational] tempo, despite everything we have been doing – we will stop you and we will beat you harder than you have ever been beaten before. Make no mistake about that.” 

General Mark Milley, U.S. Army Chief of Staff

Milley was directing these words toward Russia.  He went on to describe the next coming war, as such:

“[The next war will] be highly lethal, unlike anything our Army has experienced at least since World War II,” and would involve fighting in “highly populated urban areas.”

Did the General mean overseas, or in the United States?  The Russians are currently (until the 7th of October) conducting nuclear evacuation drills involving over 40 million people.  Everyone from Putin and his general staff to local Moscow reporters believe that a nuclear war started by the United States is just on the horizon.  Just this week, Putin shelved an agreement between Russia and the U.S. to reduce the amount of Plutonium that can be converted into nuclear warheads.

That agreement had been forthcoming since Obama initiated it in 2012, but Putin was straightforward in his reasoning behind cancelling things on Russia’s end from PrepBlog on10/3/16 that because of U.S. belligerence, Russia needs:

“…urgent measures to defend the security of the Russian Federation.”

Putin and the Russian people believe the U.S.’s actions are going to lead to a nuclear conflict initiated by the United States.  The leadership of the U.S. is made up of politicians who began their careers as Marxist-Socialists.  Traitors now have their fingers on the triggers of the nuclear warheads, aided by “yes-men” of the general staffs who will not remember their oaths to the Constitution of the United States and the American people.  They will ignore that these charges take precedence above any orders given by a petty, dope-smoking, Marxist community organizer of dubious citizenship who was “emplaced” into office to destroy the country.

Instead of statesmen and diplomats, we now have self-interested, politically-motivated belligerents backing Russia and other nations into corners and pushing them toward war.  How long the war of words will be continued is unknown; however, when the missiles begin to fly you can be certain of something.  You can rest assured that the men who spoke those words will be in bunkers and other safe places and out of harm’s way…paid for by the American taxpayer.


Jeremiah Johnson is the Nom de plume of a retired Green Beret of the United States Army Special Forces (Airborne).  Mr. Johnson is also a Gunsmith, a Certified Master Herbalist, a Montana Master Food Preserver, and a graduate of the U.S. Army’s SERE school (Survival Evasion Resistance Escape).  He lives in a cabin in the mountains of Western Montana with his wife and three cats. You can follow Jeremiah’s regular writings at SHTFplan.com or contact him here.

This article may be republished or excerpted with proper attribution to the author and a link to www.SHTFplan.com.