The Fake News Companies Are Powerless When We Refuse To Watch Them

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

Depending on the source you tap, the definition of Fake News can vary quite a bit. If you were to ask the global controllers of free thinking, otherwise known as the mainstream media, what the definition of Fake News is, they would undoubtedly explain it in this way: Fake News is any publicly reported information that originates from alternative media websites and is not properly aligned with what the mainstream media corporations have agreed upon and deem suitable for dissemination to the citizenry of the world. In other words any information that has not been fact checked or sanitized for public consumption by the handful of media corporations that have a monopoly to distribute propaganda worldwide is to be considered by the masses as Fake News.

On the other hand, if you were to ask the alternative media what the definition of Fake News is, they would undoubtedly explain it in a more truthful manner: Fake News is any publicly reported information that originates from the mainstream media.

There is this incredibly gigantic, public illusion that people have a real choice when it comes to selecting where they receive daily news. But when you take the time to carefully examine those choices it becomes increasingly apparent that there is only one primary source of news and information out there being embraced by the masses. That primary source of information is being distributed to and reported by all of those media outlets that we mistakenly believe are operating as individual entities. It’s all based on illusion and sleight of hand operations.

If you have the opportunity to do so, watch two or three news stations at the same time and observe how close the same stories are reported at particular times within a given hour of the day. They’re all pretty much synchronized together so no matter what station you’re tuned to, you get the same propaganda delivered to you. This is not by accident. Everything has been manufactured and formatted in a specific manner so that the masses can be hypnotized together, every single day.

News cycles that operate on an hourly basis are designed to repetitively program people throughout the day. After people hear the same stories hour after hour, they become brainwashed into believing that this is what is actually happening. Most people have lost their abilities to think for themselves. Almost everything that people have an opinion about has been inserted in their minds by mainstream media corporations.

The recent flooding of headlines in the mainstream media about Fake News is a concerted effort by the powers that be to crush alternative media. They have launched this campaign because they are terrified that too many people are waking up from the hypnotic trance they’ve been locked in for so many years. There are more people than ever before that have begun to question the veracity of the stories being reported on by corporate media companies. These same people are now turning their attention to alternative media to get a clearer understanding about what is taking place in the world. This is a dangerous situation for those few and powerful elitists that want to ultimately maintain control over the powerless members of society.

It’s time for people to fully wake up and understand that the television and media stations they’ve been plugged into their entire lives have been lying to them. They’re still lying to them right now as I write these words about science, medicine, space exploration, North Korea, Russia, religion, healthcare, medicine and just about anything else imaginable.

Turn off and disconnect from the Fake News companies. They are absolutely powerless if we refuse to watch them.

What do you think about this subject?

Advertisements

Do You Still Watch The News?

By Megan

A Guest Writer for NoFakeNews

Some years ago, an esteemed colleague of mine relayed an incident in which she was ridiculed for choosing not to watch the news by a young man who also accused her of being apathetic, ignorant, and uninformed because of this decision. Truth be told, I don’t watch the news either, and surprisingly neither do a startling number of the people I have conversed with over the years.

My friend and colleague didn’t watch the news because she didn’t trust the news and neither do I. When I was in graduate school I had an opportunity to study under a professor that changed the way I viewed the world.

Dr. John Reizer told me many years ago that it’s not just the news, but rather the entire mainstream media that should not be trusted. Dr. Reizer, at the time, explained how all major forms of media in the United States and around the world were owned and operated by a few multinational corporations. He used to explain in his lectures how said corporations would promote the agendas the powers that be desired to be promoted through television programming and print media publications. In his opinion, society was being disingenuously led to believe that it had various choices to receive information from competitive companies that were in reality owned and controlled by an extremely small number of parent corporations. He’d always explain that our collective perception of reality was very far removed from reality.

15 years have passed since I sat in those lectures in the Upstate of South Carolina, but I have always remembered what Dr. Reizer taught our class. I learned many things in graduate school about the human body and how to keep it healthy. Perhaps the most important thing I learned in college was how to really think for myself and to really understand how easily people can become influenced by the media and news companies that constantly surround us with a never ending stream of propaganda.

What my professor was writing and lecturing about years ago has now become the center-point of many important conversations in the present day. Dr. Reizer you were years ahead of your time with regards to this subject matter.  It’s nice to see that you have created this wonderful website and are still, to this day, committed to teaching people about the fake news and media companies.

What about you? Do you still watch the news?

LAWSUIT COULD END WATER FLUORIDATION ONCE AND FOR ALL BY DEMONSTRATING ITS NEUROTOXICITY

Alex Pietrowski, Staff Writer
Waking Times

The practice of water fluoridation in the United States has been under growing scrutiny for years by a public that has become conscious of the fact that adding toxic chemicals which are proven to be harmful to human health and children’s development to public water is medication without consent.

Never-the-less, the effort to stop fluoridation of municipal water supplies has been an uphill battle against entrenched financial interests and against dated ideas about health. While each year we hear news of cities heeding the concerns of their citizens and stopping fluoridation, without a major victory at the national level, people will be fighting this for years to come, all the while consuming toxic chemicals in the one thing we cannot live without, water.

The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is reporting on a major development to cut the head off of this snake, and an unprecedented lawsuit is now holding promise for a national reversal of municipal water fluoridation.

Based on neurotoxicity studies, the “EPA has been served with a petition that includes more than 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing the risks of water fluoridation to human health.”

As noted by FAN in a recent press release:

“This case will present the first time a court will consider the neurotoxicity of fluoride and the question of whether fluoridation presents an unreasonable risk under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

And, in contrast to most other legal challenges of Agency actions, TSCA gives us the right to get the federal court to consider our evidence ‘de novo’ — meaning federal courts are to conduct their own independent review of the evidence without deference to the EPA’s judgment.”

The lawsuit has been served along with a petition containing thousands of signatures of concerned and well-informed citizens, and includes more than 2500 pages of documents detailing the harm inherent in poisoning the pubic with fluoride.

In detail, the complaint is an attempt to demonstrate how this practice violates the Toxic Substances Control Act.

“The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), along with a coalition of environmental and public health groups has filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to their denial of our petition under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) seeking a ban on water fluoridation.

We believe this lawsuit is an unprecedented opportunity to end the practice once and for all in the U.S., and potentially throughout the world, based on the well-documented neurotoxicity of fluoride. You may read the official complaint here.” [Source]

Read: 18 SCIENTIFICALLY VALIDATED REASONS TO END PUBLIC WATER FLUORIDATION

Final Thoughts

The negative effects of consuming fluoridated water are well-documented, and the body of evidence continues to grow. In 2012 a major Harvard study presented a study demonstrating water fluoridation lowers IQ. In 2016 a study demonstrated a link between increased diabetes and water fluoridation. In 2015 the EPA had to issue new guidelines for safe levels of fluoride, reducing the amount, citing the potential for fluoridated water damages teeth, which ironically, is the very condition which we are told is the reason we need fluoride in the first place.

Public water fluoridation is slowly being defeated, and this lawsuit may play a major role in this fight.

 

About the Author

Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.

This article (Lawsuit Could End Water Fluoridation Once and For All by Demonstrating its Neurotoxicity) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

Are You Sure The Earth Is Round?

By Gina Flores

When presented with new ideas that are in opposition to major concepts that have been in our lives since the time we were very young children, it’s almost impossible for humans to objectively evaluate these hypotheses. Very often the early brainwashing we undergo in formal indoctrination centers (public schools) is so powerful that there is little chance for the average person to be able to make sense of the truth later in life. Even when the truth is blatantly obvious, most of us will still cling desperately to the lies we’ve been force fed earlier in our lives.

I have had an opportunity to look over many photographs that have been taken by NASA during its alleged manned and unmanned missions to the moon and Mars. The one thing I have found to be consistent with many of these public domain photographs is that they have been intentionally obfuscated. Said photographs have been sanitized so that they don’t reveal the intelligently designed structures that would have been readily visible without the presence of obfuscation techniques. I think these photos were all taken right here on Earth.

I now believe there is a very real possibility that none of NASA’s photographic catalogs are genuine and that they have been made available to citizens in an effort to promote a fake space program. I believe this space program has never executed a successful manned or unmanned mission to another celestial body. At this point I am not sure that space travel is possible even in low earth orbits.

Look at the following video below and try to do so with complete objectivity. Many readers will be unable to do so, but for those of you that can, you will begin to see that what we have always been told was science fiction throughout our lives is in actuality very plausible and backed by science.

The flat earth model above depicts the North Pole as being in the center of the model and the South Pole as the white color that makes up the peripheral portion of the entire disc.

Ursula Haverbeck: Jailed For Her Views About The Holocaust

cropped-cropped-400dpilogo2.jpg

 

It is illegal to question the holocaust (holocaust denial) in the following  countries:

  1. Austria
  2. Belgium
  3. Czech Republic
  4. France
  5. Germany
  6. Hungary
  7. Israel
  8. Liechtenstein
  9. Lithuania
  10. Luxembourg
  11. Netherlands
  12. Poland
  13. Portugal
  14. Romania
  15. Switzerland.

The following countries do not have laws against holocaust denial:

  1. Afghanistan
  2. Albania
  3. Algeria
  4. Andorra
  5. Angola
  6. Antigua and Barbuda
  7. Argentina
  8. Armenia
  9. Australia
  10. Azerbaijan
  11. Bahamas, The
  12. Bahrain
  13. Bangladesh
  14. Barbados
  15. Belarus
  16. Belize
  17. Benin
  18. Bhutan
  19. Bolivia
  20. Bosnia and Herzegovina
  21. Botswana
  22. Brazil
  23. Brunei
  24. Bulgaria
  25. Burkina Faso
  26. Burundi
  27. Cambodia
  28. Cameroon
  29. Canada (as of R. v. Zundel)
  30. Cape Verde
  31. Cayman Islands
  32. Central African Republic
  33. Chad
  34. Chile
  35. China PR
  36. Colombia
  37. Comoros
  38. Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  39. Congo, Republic of the
  40. Costa Rica
  41. Cote d’Ivoire
  42. Croatia
  43. Cuba
  44. Cyprus
  45. Denmark
  46. Djibouti
  47. Dominica
  48. Dominican Republic
  49. Ecuador
  50. Egypt
  51. El Salvador
  52. Equatorial Guinea
  53. Eritrea
  54. Estonia
  55. Ethiopia
  56. Faroe Islands
  57. Fiji
  58. Finland
  59. Gabon
  60. Gambia, The
  61. Georgia
  62. Ghana
  63. Greece
  64. Grenada
  65. Guatemala
  66. Guinea
  67. Guinea-Bissau
  68. Guyana
  69. Haiti
  70. Holy See (Vatican City)
  71. Honduras
  72. Iceland
  73. India
  74. Indonesia
  75. Iran
  76. Iraq
  77. Ireland
  78. Italy
  79. Jamaica
  80. Japan
  81. Jersey
  82. Jordan
  83. Kazakhstan
  84. Kenya
  85. Kiribati
  86. Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of
  87. Korea, Republic of
  88. Kuwait
  89. Kyrgyzstan
  90. Laos
  91. Latvia
  92. Lebanon
  93. Lesotho
  94. Liberia
  95. Libya
  96. Liechtenstein
  97. Macedonia (FYROM)
  98. Madagascar
  99. Malawi
  100. Malaysia
  101. Maldives
  102. Mali
  103. Malta
  104. Mauritania
  105. Mauritius
  106. Mexico
  107. Micronesia, Federated States of
  108. Moldova
  109. Monaco
  110. Mongolia
  111. Montenegro
  112. Morocco
  113. Mozambique
  114. Myanmar
  115. Namibia
  116. Nauru
  117. Nepal
  118. New Zealand
  119. Nicaragua
  120. Niger
  121. Nigeria
  122. Norway
  123. Oman
  124. Pakistan
  125. Palau
  126. Palestine
  127. Panama
  128. Papua New Guinea
  129. Paraguay
  130. Peru
  131. Philippines
  132. Puerto Rico
  133. Qatar
  134. Rwanda
  135. Saint Kitts and Nevis
  136. Saint Lucia
  137. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  138. Samoa
  139. San Marino
  140. São Tomé and Príncipe
  141. Saudi Arabia
  142. Senegal
  143. Serbia
  144. Seychelles
  145. Sierra Leone
  146. Singapore
  147. Slovakia
  148. Slovenia
  149. Solomon Islands
  150. Somalia
  151. South Africa
  152. Spain
  153. Sri Lanka
  154. Sudan
  155. Suriname
  156. Swaziland
  157. Sweden
  158. Syria
  159. Taiwan
  160. Tajikistan
  161. Tanzania
  162. Thailand
  163. Timor-Leste
  164. Togo
  165. Tonga
  166. Trinidad and Tobago
  167. Tunisia
  168. Turkey
  169. Turkmenistan
  170. Tuvalu
  171. Uganda
  172. Ukraine
  173. United Arab Emirates
  174. United Kingdom
  175. United States
  176. Uruguay
  177. Uzbekistan
  178. Vanuatu
  179. Venezuela
  180. Vietnam
  181. Western Sahara
  182. Yemen
  183. Zambia
  184. Zimbabwe

What do you think about holocaust denial laws?