By Dr. John Reizer
Recently, there’s been a tremendous amount of disinformation being discussed through the mainstream media about outbreaks and epidemics concerning measles. And of course the media coverage is blaming the present epidemic on anti-vaxxers; those dreaded conspiracy nuts that refuse to receive vaccines and genuflect to the church of medicine.
Public health officials regularly release reports to the mainstream media about epidemics, pandemics and outbreaks of diseases. Then they encourage everybody to rush out to medical facilities in order to receive vaccines to protect themselves and loved ones against the named diseases.
Understand the Deceptive Terminology Being Used
The words Endemic, Epidemic, Pandemic, and Outbreak, are often used interchangeably by government regulating agencies as well as by the mainstream media companies to purposely mislead citizens about the dangers associated with certain diseases that may or may not be affecting or impacting various communities at any given time.
Endemic is the term used to describe a disease that regularly exists in a certain community. For example, measles is supposedly no longer endemic in the United States because there has been an absence of reported, continuous measles transmission cases for 12 months or longer. According to government regulating agencies, the disease is only transmitted in the United States by unvaccinated citizens that visit foreign territories and then bring it back home. These individuals supposedly infect other US citizens that have not been vaccinated.
Epidemic is the term used to describe a disease that has increased its number of reported cases in a community at a rate of one case more than was anticipated by health officials. For example, if a specific community normally expected 5 cases of measles each year based on previously reported health statistics, and suddenly 6 cases were reported, this would be an epidemic.
Pandemic is the term used to describe a situation where several epidemics are being reported throughout a country, in different countries or around the world at the same time.
Outbreak is the term used to describe a disease that has been reported in a community for the very first time or not for several years. Or the cases currently being reported are one case higher than previously reported. For example, if a given community has one case of measles reported in a given year and there are normally no cases reported this would be an outbreak as well as an epidemic.
The reporting of epidemics and pandemics through media sources could be very confusing to the general public. When people hear or read about these terms they often believe that millions of people are being infected with a disease process. Truth be told, the terms epidemic, pandemic and outbreak are usually referencing only a few cases of a disease process that have recently occurred.
It is vitally important that readers understand the lexicon being used within the public health profession before blindly jumping to conclusions and making poor decisions that might end up harming them in the long run.
The mainstream news has been reporting that measles are occurring in the United States at near epidemic proportions. This might seem really frightening to the average citizen. But what these reports are failing to disclose is that in the entire United States, only 314 cases of measles have been reported since January 1, 2019 – March 26, 2019 (at the time of this writing). Only 15 states out of 50 have even reported a measles infection in 2019. There are approximately a little over 328 million people living in the US as of 2019. Is this really a health crisis? When the words epidemic and pandemic are inserted, the reports seem a lot scarier than the raw numbers would indicate.
In addition, the measles virus is not any more dangerous for most human beings than the common cold. You’re talking about a virus that lasts 7-10 days, produces an immune system response of fever, coughing, runny nose and a rash which is how the virus is expelled from the body.
Unless your immune system is severely compromised, the measles, like all childhood illnesses, has a short duration in the human body and it leaves a person with lifelong immunity and a more finely tuned immune system that will have an easier time defending itself against other microbial invaders over the course of a lifetime.
The common cold lasts 1-3 weeks, produces an immune system response of fever, coughing and a runny nose. And again, unless your immune system is severely compromised it’s not a big deal for the average person.
Be Careful When Reviewing Published Health Statistics
Statistics being reported to the general public by government regulating agencies have to be reviewed with a great deal of skepticism. These agencies routinely under-reported polio cases by classifying them as meningitis and they did similar sleight of hand calculations with other diseases after vaccine campaigns were initiated many years ago. According to a whistle blower in the movie VAXXED, they still delete certain statistical data to suit whatever agenda they want to promote.
Many incidents of upper respiratory disorders, pneumonia and rhino viruses (common colds) are most likely being reported by government regulating agencies as influenza cases during the months of October – May (Flu season). This is how the number of Influenza deaths gets pumped up to the 100,000 mark. What most people fail to realize is that a lot of these people are probably dying from other illnesses besides the flu such as the common cold, pneumonia and strep infections. Many of these patients are severely compromised because they take too many drugs, are malnourished or extremely advanced in age.
There’s no vaccine or published cure for the common cold so you rarely see anything being promoted by the medical industrial complex about a simple rhino virus. If a person’s immune system is very weak however, the common cold can be potentially as dangerous to a person as the measles or influenza.
Our perceptions about many things are usually a lot different than the realities associated with such happenings. This phenomenon does not occur by accident. It happens because media companies are constantly reporting information they garner from government sources that has been specifically designed to deceive the public.
If we watch television, read a newspaper, or listen to the radio, we are absorbing disinformation from media companies that affects our lives. This is especially true in the case of healthcare news.
Presently there is an extremely strong campaign taking place by the medical industrial complex to push vaccines on the general population. Likewise, there’s an equally aggressive campaign taking place at the same time that is trying to attack anti-vaxxers and people that display good common sense when it comes to health and how to take care of their bodies. You might say the overall strategy employed by the powers that be is quite pandemic in nature and perhaps the greatest threat to human physiology we’ve observed in a long time.
By Dr. John Reizer
Throughout my career as a primary healthcare provider, I have encountered a large number of people that refuse to believe vaccines are harmful to human physiology. These individuals don’t believe said medicines can cause the proliferation of diseases worldwide. They don’t believe the medical cartel, at the highest levels, is trying to weaken and harm humans. They want to see the definitive proof (research) that shows children and adults are being irreparably damaged from various vaccines.
When presented with real proof (thousands of parents relating horrific experiences about their damaged children) that demonstrates vaccines are dangerous products, most people refuse to believe the information. In summary, people want proof but don’t believe the proof when it’s placed in front of them.
It’s very hard to remove the forever skepticism of the general population when it comes to challenging conventional medical paradigms. People tend to believe what they have been taught to believe by the different regulatory agencies (trusted sources) and are not willing to modify their beliefs.
Unfortunately, the only way to convince many people about the dangers associated with certain things is to let them experience the damage firsthand.
Sometimes it’s better to let common sense prevail instead of relying on regulatory agencies for information concerning a particular vaccine. Virtually all vaccine and medical research being performed is being done for the benefit of multinational pharmaceutical companies and not for the benefit of healthcare consumers. If you’re waiting for published research to appear on the evening news that details the truth about vaccines and other drugs, you’re going to have a very long wait.
Below is a great interview between Jon Rappoport and an anonymous retired vaccine researcher. Click the link below to read the entire transcript and be sure to share this information with as many people as possible.
By Dr. John Reizer
In addition to being extremely toxic, vaccines are also made from aborted human fetuses. Although this is probably shocking to most of us, it is not surprising to the people working in this industry. There are questionable bioethical practices performed in the field of medical research everyday.
Many scientists and the corporate structures they work for have very little regard for human life. To these people life is merely something that’s happened by chance and something that is eventually going to malfunction.
According to these individuals, we’re all the product of bad genetics and we will eventually express those bad genetics in the form of various diseases.
Mainstream science and medicine believe that the suppressive medical therapies practiced throughout the world are the only logical way to defeat physiological inadequacies in the human body.
Anyone who has ever had an opportunity to dissect a human cadaver should instantly realize that life on this planet has come to fruition from intelligent design. There’s an innate striving within all life that seeks to regulate itself and adapt to its ever changing environment. This is why human and animal medicine, through suppressive therapies, have over time made the people and animals on our planet weaker than they should be.
Vaccines are a bad idea for people and animals alike regardless of how many medical professionals jump up and down screaming otherwise. And these drugs contain toxins and human parts that should sicken all of us both physiologically and psychologically speaking.
To: Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, House Energy and Commerce Committee
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions
Re: Statement federal vaccine mandates
Feb. 26, 2019
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of medical practice is a state function, not a federal one. Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.
A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks? Regulators may intervene to protect the public against a one-in-one million risk of a threat such as cancer from an involuntary exposure to a toxin, or-one-in 100,000 risk from a voluntary (e.g. occupational) exposure. What is the risk of death, cancer, or crippling complication from a vaccine? There are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out a much higher risk of complications, even one in 10,000, for vaccines. Such studies would require an adequate number of subjects, a long duration (years, not days), an unvaccinated control group (“placebo” must be truly inactive such as saline, not the adjuvant or everything-but-the-intended-antigen), and consideration of all adverse health events (including neurodevelopment disorders).
Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court and by Congress. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid some $4 billion in damages, and high hurdles must be surmounted to collect compensation. The damage may be so devastating that most people would prefer restored function to a multimillion-dollar damage award.
The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though somewhat less effective.
The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed by a government agency.
Measles is the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates, and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority, but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity. The last measles death in the U.S. occurred in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Are potential measles complications including death in persons who cannot be vaccinated due to immune deficiency a justification for revoking the rights of all Americans and establishing a precedent for still greater restrictions on our right to give—or withhold—consent to medical interventions? Clearly not.
Many serious complications have followed MMR vaccination, and are listed in the manufacturers’ package insert, though a causal relationship may not have been proved. According to a 2012 report by the Cochrane Collaboration, “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate” (cited by the National Vaccine Information Center).
Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.
Even disregarding adverse vaccine effects, the results of near-universal vaccination have not been completely positive. Measles, when it does occur, is four to five times worse than in pre-vaccination times, according to Lancet Infectious Diseases, because of the changed age distribution: more adults, whose vaccine-based immunity waned, and more infants, who no longer receive passive immunity from their naturally immune mother to protect them during their most vulnerable period.
Measles is a vexing problem, and more complete, forced vaccination will likely not solve it. Better public health measures—earlier detection, contact tracing, and isolation; a more effective, safer vaccine; or an effective treatment are all needed. Meanwhile, those who choose not to vaccinate now might do so in an outbreak, or they can be isolated. Immunosuppressed patients might choose isolation in any event because vaccinated people can also possibly transmit measles even if not sick themselves.
Issues that Congress must consider:
Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished. Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal is the only incentive to do better.There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being quashed, as is dissent by professionals.There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children’s brains are developing rapidly—any interference with the complex developmental symphony could be ruinous.Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease.
AAPS believes that liberty rights are unalienable. Patients and parents have the right to refuse vaccination, although potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a clear or present danger.
AAPS represents thousands of physicians in all specialties nationwide. It was founded in 1943 to protect private medicine and the patient-physician relationship.
Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons
By Dr. John Reizer
Wouldn’t it be great if every mandated or recommended childhood vaccine was required to be advertised on television each evening along with their applicable warning labels and associated ingredients?
Drug companies would cringe at the thought of having to advertise certain vaccines that have already been forced upon the public. They would have to disclose all the side effects in any ads and that would scare healthcare consumers. That’s why you never see the Rubella, tDap, chickenpox or Measles vaccines featured in ads like other drugs being pushed on a daily basis.
If the government mandated the public consumption of drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis for precautionary measures, do you think big pharma would continue to advertise these products? No!
Can you imagine if the government mandated the taking of antidepressants for everyone because studies found that too many people were depressed and it was causing an epidemic of suicidal behavior in the nation?
Do you think the mandated consumption of antidepressants would infuriate the public? Or would they sit back and roll up their sleeves and get jabbed? Would we see medical cheerleaders posting remarks on social media about what a good idea it was to mandate the public consumption of antidepressants or whatever poison the legal drug cartel wanted to sell?
It’s complete insanity that a governing body can force its citizens to take any drug. All drugs come with serious risks and no one should ever be forced to take any drug without their consent.
What do you think about this subject?
By Dr. John Reizer
Founder of NoFakeNews
When you have leverage over a group of people, a country, or a group of countries, you ultimately cash in, capitalize or impose your will on those target groups. Depending on the degree of leverage you have, the cash in period can last for a short duration of time or it can last for decades and possibly even a lot longer than that. If you have leverage because of technological advancements in your possession, that’s one thing. But if you have leverage based on the public’s misguided perception or understanding about said technologies, that’s an entirely different can of worms.
Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort people experience when they simultaneously juggle two or more beliefs that are in direct opposition to one another. It is the psychological distress people experience when they are presented with alternative viewpoints concerning universally accepted truths (conspiracy theories).
In my opinion, there are three mind-bending hoaxes that have been used against the general public. The hoaxes have afforded certain countries the necessary leverage over others to reshape world politics in a way that was consistent with an agenda of a shadow governing construct.
All of these hoaxes will trigger cognitive dissonance reactions in the average person. The 3 hoaxes are the successful development of a nuclear weapons program by any country, the successful development of a manned and unmanned space travel program by any country and the successful development of a credible disease prevention program (vaccines). All three subjects have been disingenuously presented to the general public as brilliant success stories many years ago and have since been profited from. It is my theory that none of them are true.
For many years we have been told nuclear weapons have been stockpiled by various superpower countries. We have all been exposed to the paradigm that promotes the idea that nuclear weapons have made the world a far safer place even though these horrific devices could theoretically wipe out millions of lives in a few seconds. We’ve also been told nuclear weapons are a deterrent to other potentially dangerous enemies of the United States and its allies and that they ultimately prevent wars and allow peace on earth to exist.
Is it possible that what we have been taught about this subject is based on establishment lies? Is it possible that the powers that be figured out a long time ago that if they created an incredible imaginary weapon and gave that imaginary weapon to a select number of countries, those countries could be used by them to control the political systems of the entire world much easier?
After it was developed, the atomic bomb was allegedly dropped on Japan twice in the 1940’s. The bombs reportedly brought a quick end to World War II. The technology was never used again in any war although the threat of nuclear weapons against humanity and the planet has been publicized ad nauseum.
The only other evidence of atomic weapons being used in history has come in the form of highly secretive government tests. All of these tests have had limited government witnesses and many have been conducted underground or underwater. Any or all of these tests could have been performed with the use of conventional bombs. TNT could have been used to fabricate any particular A-Bomb test.
The continuous threat of nuclear weapons being detonated by terrorists has been so overplayed in Hollywood movie productions throughout the years that people are now programmed to believe it’s only a matter of time before one of these devices will be used against a highly populated city. Yet there have been zero nukes used by crazy terrorists anywhere in the world. This fact alone is more than a little bit strange.
There are many people who believe the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by conventional fire bombings and not by atomic weapons as reported in official historical records. There are some researchers who also claim atomic bombs are impossible to manufacture. The parts of certain buildings that were left intact and the lack of radiation found in Hiroshima and Nagasaki seem to support this claim.
Israel is purported to have a huge inventory of 400 nuclear weapons at their disposal and yet they have never detonated one device in the direction of their Arab neighbors. These are the same Arab neighbors they despise. Are they and every other country in the world bluffing about said technology?
With so many unstable countries and crazy terrorist groups allegedly in existence, and so many nuclear weapons seemingly at their disposal or available for sale, how is it possible that not one nuclear incident has ever occurred?
Do the world leaders of certain countries really walk around with nuclear suitcases and corresponding launch codes? Do nuclear weapons actually exist?
Before you write all of this off as a crazy conspiracy theory, think for a minute about how much leverage certain countries possess over others because of their claimed nuclear arsenals. What if there really are no nukes in existence in the entire world?
Think about all the military spending that’s taken place with regards to nuclear programs. And don’t forget about all the money that’s been budgeted by countries to protect their infrastructures from incoming nuclear weapons.
Space travel, via Mercury, Gemini and Apollo, came out of nowhere and miraculously mastered manned space missions through low earth orbits, the Van Allen Belts, the thermosphere and ultimately achieved several moon landings in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. The technology has never been used again to this day. Are we really to believe that space technology achieved and mastered in the 1960’s has voluntarily been discarded by the powers that be?
From 2005-2009, NASA planned and developed the Constellation Program (CxP). Constellation had the major objectives of completing the International Space Station, resuming manned missions to the moon by the year 2020, and delivering the first manned mission to the planet Mars.
If we read through the lines of official statements that were created and disseminated by the United States Government regarding Constellation, we are encouraged to believe that funding issues and a lack of desire to return to the moon by NASA executives were the reasons President Barack Obama cancelled the program in 2010.
Truth be told, NASA has been attempting to figure out a way to safely transport astronauts through the impenetrable radiation belts and thermosphere that completely surround our earth and protect human beings from lethal cosmic radiation since the days of Mercury, Gemini and Apollo.
The Van Allen Belts extend some 60,000 kilometers above the surface of our planet and have most likely prevented all human beings from traveling farther than low earth orbits (LEO’s) and into deep space locations.
Every manned space mission, with the exception of Apollo, that has been attempted by NASA or any other space agency in the world has taken place in LEO’s. And there are many skeptics that believe Apollo never left the safety of LEO’s either.
If anyone searches the Internet for information about the Van Allen Belts being a barrier to manned space flights, and particularly the Apollo program, they are immediately met with websites that conclude NASA was able to safely negotiate its astronauts through the radiation zones in question.
A few of the websites that support the notions the Van Allen Belts are not as dangerous as some people have suggested contain impressive looking math to support their conclusions. The authors of such websites maintain that most laypersons have a poor understanding regarding the dangers of cosmic radiation.
It is no small coincidence the search engines have indexed and listed at the top of search results all the articles supporting the idea the Van Allen Belts were conquered by NASA and Apollo. But the fact remains that NASA and its astronauts have never been able to replicate the results they allegedly achieved many years ago with Apollo. And for good reason – they can’t do it!
There are millions of people in the world that believe NASA faked the moon landings. Search “moon landing hoax” and you will uncover many websites discussing conspiracy theories regarding this topic. Readers will also find, at the top of search results, websites strategically positioned to poke holes in the conspiracy theories listed. The powers that be use this technique repeatedly when defending the fake paradigms they have created and pushed on society.
Professional photographers, authors, and scientists have already proven that many of the Apollo photographs supposedly taken on the moon were filmed in studios or on a professionally designed movie set. All of this information has led many people to question the authenticity of Apollo’s success with regards to astronauts visiting the moon in 1969-1972.
The Van Allen belt problem is a serious one for NASA in more ways than most of us can imagine. Not only do the radiation belts preclude NASA from planning manned missions to deep space locations, they also prove that Apollo was a hoax.
According to the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) “Temperatures climb sharply in the lower thermosphere (below 200 to 300 km altitude), then level off and hold fairly steady with increasing altitude above that height. Solar activity strongly influences temperature in the thermosphere. The thermosphere is typically about 200° C (360° F) hotter in the daytime than at night, and roughly 500° C (900° F) hotter when the Sun is very active than at other times. Temperatures in the upper thermosphere can range from about 500° C (932° F) to 2,000° C (3,632° F) or higher.” The NCAR and UCAR also claim, “The space shuttle and the International Space Station both orbit Earth within the thermosphere! Not very likely!
Let me point out that just about any metal found in existence has a melting point below the temperatures found in the thermosphere. Lead: 327 degrees C; Magnesium 650 degrees C; Aluminum 660 degrees C; Aluminum Alloys 463-671 degrees C; Gold 1063 degrees C; Copper 1084 degrees C; Steel 1425 – 1540 degrees C; Titanium 1670 degrees C. What kind of magic material did NASA make the Apollo and other imaginary space ships out of?
Let’s face facts. The United States Government and its military strength have never retreated from a strategic military target it has conquered. The moon is, without a doubt, the most strategic military target in the universe to possess when it comes to keeping an eye on our planet. If NASA and Apollo had, in reality, made it through the Van Allen Belts and thermosphere in 1969-1972, they would have continued to visit the moon. Other manned missions to deep space locations would have also been planned and carried out.
Are we supposed to believe, and keep a straight face at the same time, that NASA perfected travel through the radiation belts and thermosphere that surround the earth in 1969 and has never duplicated the accomplishment again? The official position of NASA today is that the technology used to get men to the moon with Apollo years ago was accidentally misplaced and the space agency has to begin from scratch. They actually admit they cannot get to the moon currently because the technology no longer exists.
The telltale evidence NASA never defeated the Van Allen Belts and thermosphere is written within the history of its missions. All of them have taken place in LEO’s. This is, ultimately, why the Space Shuttle program was planned and developed. It was designed to study and solve the radiation issues and extremely hot temperatures preventing astronauts from taking a real giant step for man and a real giant leap for mankind.
Vaccines, through Edward Jenner first came to fruition in the 1790’s and later were quickly credited with the elimination of Small Pox and later Polio. Many new vaccines have been created since Jenner’s initial concoction, but the technology doesn’t work and the diseases have never been eradicated despite being reported to have been.
People have been getting flu shots for years each autumn and every year the flu season commences shortly thereafter. Is the flu vaccine preventing the disease or spreading it rapidly across the population base? I think it’s pretty clear that flu vaccines are a fraud that makes the disease run rampant in a given location. It is my contention that all vaccines being used today are completely useless in conferring any type of immunity against any and all diseases. Truth be told, they are creating diseases and causing the proliferation of said diseases worldwide.
The majority of people in the world will take healthy children to medical doctors for wellness checkups. The doctors will vaccinate these healthy children with a broth of toxic, carcinogenic chemicals (49 doses) and expect said patients to become healthier throughout their lives. This strategy makes no sense whatsoever and you don’t have to have a high level degree in education to see the problem with this line of thinking. You don’t put pollutants into a pristine looking lake and expect the body of water to become even cleaner. It’s a ridiculous concept. The vaccine paradigm is a ridiculous concept and it’s the real reason we have Autism, autoimmune disorders, and a rainbow of colored ribbons dedicated to the cancer industry.
I believe nuclear weapons, space travel, and medical vaccines are 3 subjects that have changed our world in ways that are far different than most people realize. All three hoaxes are continuously kept alive via the same deceptive reporting practices of the mainstream media and its handler intelligence agencies operating throughout the world.
What do you think about this post?
By Dr. John Reizer
Anti-vaxxer terminology – a creation of the pharmaceutical industry that has been used to identify and discredit any persons or groups that are in opposition to the current vaccine paradigm.
Anti-vaxxer – a person who refuses to vaccinate their child because they believe the medication is more dangerous than the benefits they allegedly offer.
Are anti-vaxxers crazy, paranoid conspiracy theorists? More important, are anti-vaxxers causing the members of society to become more at risk from dangerous and contagious diseases than they should be? These are both fair questions to explore because a lot of medical experts have been bringing up these questions on national television programs as well as other mainstream media forums.
According to some mainstream medical sources, many diseases are currently returning or making a comeback due to anti-vaxxers who refuse to vaccinate their children.
First of all let me preface my little article by writing that if vaccines truly conferred immunity to the people receiving them, there would be absolutely no need for the vaccinated patients to fear outbreaks of certain diseases coming from the unvaccinated folks. The only people at risk, theoretically speaking, should be those individuals not vaccinated.
Truth be told, a minority of American healthcare consumers have become a lot more educated in the past 5-10 years and have intelligently concluded that the risks associated with these medicines far out-way the published benefits. This in itself is a scary concept for the drug manufacturers (vaccine makers) who have a financial obligation to their shareholders to make profits. And that is exactly what they have been doing each year. These multinational corporations are making billions of dollars annually while putting out products that are supposedly designed to prevent the spread of diseases. In actuality, the vaccine programs of today have most likely caused the proliferation of many diseases at breakneck speed.
In response to an increasingly educated healthcare consumer, big pharma and its far reaching tentacles (the mainstream media, the government regulating agencies it controls through an endless bankroll of dollars and too many political lobbyists to count) have launched an all out war against anti-vaxxers. Anti-vaxxers have been made to look like crazy people. Because a small segment of society has decided to question the advice of a large consortium of pharmaceutical corporations, they have been targeted for ridicule and eventual elimination.
Make no mistakes regarding the facts. According to many professionals and doctors that are labeled as vaccine critics, these medicines are dangerous and contain ingredients that can make human beings extremely sick. In many instances the physiological reactions to vaccine ingredients are quite irreversible and capable of causing autoimmune dysfunction that leads to a lifelong struggle for many people.
The ingredient thimerosol is still to this day commonly found in many vaccines. It is reported as being safe by drug makers in small quantities. It has been linked to autism by some researchers and remains a concern for many parents. But by no means whatsoever is thimerosol the only harmful ingredient in these drugs.
If you are physically harmed by a vaccine product, you cannot sue the vaccine maker or the doctor that administered the poison in a regular court of law. Gee, that sure doesn’t seem very fair. But that’s the way the law reads. You can only try to recover damages in a special vaccine court where the awards are limited to $250,000. Good luck trying to collect anything in this venue.
Vaccine proponents like to jump up and down screaming that national vaccine programs were the reason childhood diseases like measles, mumps, polio and others declined over the years. This is not true by any stretch of the imagination because these diseases were already declining before the various vaccines were ever introduced.
In many countries where there were not vaccines offered, the same diseases also declined in the general population. The reason this occurred can be attributed to natural adaptive tendencies of human physiology to disease processes and better nutrition and hygiene practices that were employed over time.
When vaccines are administered to patients, they bypass the normal portal of entry that the body is used to and this can stress out or even harm the immune system and cause autoimmune problems. Diseases like Lupus, Rheumatoid arthritis, Diabetes, Psoriasis, and many cancers have likely connections to vaccines.
Once you decide to get a vaccine you cannot decide at a later date to reverse your decision. So you better make damn sure you have done your research before you roll up your sleeve and voluntarily agree to get jabbed. And when you do your research be warned that most of said research you will find populating the top portions of most search engines has been rigged to appear in those positions by the powers that be. Most of the top tier results will yield the research data pharmaceutical companies have paid for.
It’s not easy to find the truth about vaccines because the regulating agencies have been bought off and can no longer be trusted as evidenced in the movie Vaxxed.
The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!