The Overhyped Measles Epidemic of 2019

By Dr. John Reizer

Recently, there’s been a tremendous amount of disinformation being discussed through the mainstream media about outbreaks and epidemics concerning measles. And of course the media coverage is blaming the present epidemic on anti-vaxxers; those dreaded conspiracy nuts that refuse to receive vaccines and genuflect to the church of medicine.

Public health officials regularly release reports to the mainstream media about epidemics, pandemics and outbreaks of diseases. Then they encourage everybody to rush out to medical facilities in order to receive vaccines to protect themselves and loved ones against the named diseases.

Understand the Deceptive Terminology Being Used

The words Endemic, Epidemic, Pandemic, and Outbreak, are often used interchangeably by government regulating agencies as well as by the mainstream media companies to purposely mislead citizens about the dangers associated with certain diseases that may or may not be affecting or impacting various communities at any given time.

Endemic is the term used to describe a disease that regularly exists in a certain community. For example, measles is supposedly no longer endemic in the United States because there has been an absence of reported, continuous measles transmission cases for 12 months or longer. According to government regulating agencies, the disease is only transmitted in the United States by unvaccinated citizens that visit foreign territories and then bring it back home. These individuals supposedly infect other US citizens that have not been vaccinated.

Epidemic is the term used to describe a disease that has increased its number of reported cases in a community at a rate of one case more than was anticipated by health officials. For example, if a specific community normally expected 5 cases of measles each year based on previously reported health statistics, and suddenly 6 cases were reported, this would be an epidemic.

Pandemic is the term used to describe a situation where several epidemics are being reported throughout a country, in different countries or around the world at the same time.

Outbreak is the term used to describe a disease that has been reported in a community for the very first time or not for several years. Or the cases currently being reported are one case higher than previously reported. For example, if a given community has one case of measles reported in a given year and there are normally no cases reported this would be an outbreak as well as an epidemic.

The reporting of epidemics and pandemics through media sources could be very confusing to the general public. When people hear or read about these terms they often believe that millions of people are being infected with a disease process. Truth be told, the terms epidemic, pandemic and outbreak are usually referencing only a few cases of a disease process that have recently occurred.

It is vitally important that readers understand the lexicon being used within the public health profession before blindly jumping to conclusions and making poor decisions that might end up harming them in the long run.

The mainstream news has been reporting that measles are occurring in the United States at near epidemic proportions. This might seem really frightening to the average citizen. But what these reports are failing to disclose is that in the entire United States, only 314 cases of measles have been reported since January 1, 2019 – March 26, 2019 (at the time of this writing). Only 15 states out of 50 have even reported a measles infection in 2019. There are approximately a little over 328 million people living in the US as of 2019. Is this really a health crisis? When the words epidemic and pandemic are inserted, the reports seem a lot scarier than the raw numbers would indicate.

In addition, the measles virus is not any more dangerous for most human beings than the common cold. You’re talking about a virus that lasts 7-10 days, produces an immune system response of fever, coughing, runny nose and a rash which is how the virus is expelled from the body.

Unless your immune system is severely compromised, the measles, like all childhood illnesses, has a short duration in the human body and it leaves a person with lifelong immunity and a more finely tuned immune system that will have an easier time defending itself against other microbial invaders over the course of a lifetime.

The common cold lasts 1-3 weeks, produces an immune system response of fever, coughing and a runny nose. And again, unless your immune system is severely compromised it’s not a big deal for the average person.

Be Careful When Reviewing Published Health Statistics

Statistics being reported to the general public by government regulating agencies have to be reviewed with a great deal of skepticism. These agencies routinely under-reported polio cases by classifying them as meningitis and they did similar sleight of hand calculations with other diseases after vaccine campaigns were initiated many years ago. According to a whistle blower in the movie VAXXED, they still delete certain statistical data to suit whatever agenda they want to promote.

Many incidents of upper respiratory disorders, pneumonia and rhino viruses (common colds) are most likely being reported by government regulating agencies as influenza cases during the months of October – May (Flu season). This is how the number of Influenza deaths gets pumped up to the 100,000 mark. What most people fail to realize is that a lot of these people are probably dying from other illnesses besides the flu such as the common cold, pneumonia and strep infections. Many of these patients are severely compromised because they take too many drugs, are malnourished or extremely advanced in age.

There’s no vaccine or published cure for the common cold so you rarely see anything being promoted by the medical industrial complex about a simple rhino virus. If a person’s immune system is very weak however, the common cold can be potentially as dangerous to a person as the measles or influenza.

Our perceptions about many things are usually a lot different than the realities associated with such happenings. This phenomenon does not occur by accident. It happens because media companies are constantly reporting information they garner from government sources that has been specifically designed to deceive the public.

If we watch television, read a newspaper, or listen to the radio, we are absorbing disinformation from media companies that affects our lives. This is especially true in the case of healthcare news.

Presently there is an extremely strong campaign taking place by the medical industrial complex to push vaccines on the general population. Likewise, there’s an equally aggressive campaign taking place at the same time that is trying to attack anti-vaxxers and people that display good common sense when it comes to health and how to take care of their bodies. You might say the overall strategy employed by the powers that be is quite pandemic in nature and perhaps the greatest threat to human physiology we’ve observed in a long time.

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: Statement on Federal Vaccine Mandate

wp-image-879162634

To:  Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, House Energy and Commerce Committee

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions

Re: Statement federal vaccine mandates

Feb. 26, 2019

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of medical practice is a state function, not a federal one. Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.

A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks? Regulators may intervene to protect the public against a one-in-one million risk of a threat such as cancer from an involuntary exposure to a toxin, or-one-in 100,000 risk from a voluntary (e.g. occupational) exposure. What is the risk of death, cancer, or crippling complication from a vaccine? There are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out a much higher risk of complications, even one in 10,000, for vaccines. Such studies would require an adequate number of subjects, a long duration (years, not days), an unvaccinated control group (“placebo” must be truly inactive such as saline, not the adjuvant or everything-but-the-intended-antigen), and consideration of all adverse health events (including neurodevelopment disorders).

Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court and by Congress. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid some $4 billion in damages, and high hurdles must be surmounted to collect compensation. The damage may be so devastating that most people would prefer restored function to a multimillion-dollar damage award.

The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though somewhat less effective.

The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed by a government agency.

Measles is the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates, and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority, but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity. The last measles death in the U.S. occurred in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Are potential measles complications including death in persons who cannot be vaccinated due to immune deficiency a  justification for revoking the rights of all Americans and establishing a precedent for still greater restrictions on our right to give—or withhold—consent to medical interventions? Clearly not.

Many serious complications have followed MMR vaccination, and are listed in the manufacturers’ package insert, though a causal relationship may not have been proved. According to a 2012 report by the Cochrane Collaboration, “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate” (cited by the National Vaccine Information Center).

Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.

Even disregarding adverse vaccine effects, the results of near-universal vaccination have not been completely positive. Measles, when it does occur, is four to five times worse than in pre-vaccination times, according to Lancet Infectious Diseases, because of the changed age distribution: more adults, whose vaccine-based immunity waned, and more infants, who no longer receive passive immunity from their naturally immune mother to protect them during their most vulnerable period.

Measles is a vexing problem, and more complete, forced vaccination will likely not solve it. Better public health measures—earlier detection, contact tracing, and isolation; a more effective, safer vaccine; or an effective treatment are all needed. Meanwhile, those who choose not to vaccinate now might do so in an outbreak, or they can be isolated. Immunosuppressed patients might choose isolation in any event because vaccinated people can also possibly transmit measles even if not sick themselves.

Issues that Congress must consider:

Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished. Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal is the only incentive to do better.There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being quashed, as is dissent by professionals.There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children’s brains are developing rapidly—any interference with the complex developmental symphony could be ruinous.Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease.

AAPS believes that liberty rights are unalienable. Patients and parents have the right to refuse vaccination, although potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a clear or present danger.

AAPS represents thousands of physicians in all specialties nationwide. It was founded in 1943 to protect private medicine and the patient-physician relationship.

Respectfully yours,

Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

The 3 Biggest Hoaxes of Our Time?

 

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John Reizer 

Founder of NoFakeNews

When you have leverage over a group of people, a country, or a group of countries, you ultimately cash in, capitalize or impose your will on those target groups. Depending on the degree of leverage you have, the cash in period can last for a short duration of time or it can last for decades and possibly even a lot longer than that. If you have leverage because of technological advancements in your possession, that’s one thing. But if you have leverage based on the public’s misguided perception or understanding about said technologies, that’s an entirely different can of worms.

Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort people experience when they simultaneously juggle two or more beliefs that are in direct opposition to one another. It is the psychological distress people experience when they are presented with alternative viewpoints concerning universally accepted truths (conspiracy theories).

In my opinion, there are three mind-bending hoaxes that have been used against the general public.  The hoaxes have afforded certain countries the necessary leverage over others to reshape world politics in a way that was consistent with an agenda of a shadow governing construct.

All of these hoaxes will trigger cognitive dissonance reactions in the average person. The 3 hoaxes are the successful development of a nuclear weapons program by any country, the successful development of a manned and unmanned space travel program by any country and the successful development of a credible disease prevention program (vaccines). All three subjects have been disingenuously presented to the general public as brilliant success stories many years ago and have since been profited from. It is my theory that none of them are true.

Atomic Weapons

For many years we have been told nuclear weapons have been stockpiled by various superpower countries. We have all been exposed to the paradigm that promotes the idea that nuclear weapons have made the world a far safer place even though these horrific devices could theoretically wipe out millions of lives in a few seconds. We’ve also been told nuclear weapons are a deterrent to other potentially dangerous enemies of the United States and its allies and that they ultimately prevent wars and allow peace on earth to exist.

Is it possible that what we have been taught about this subject is based on establishment lies? Is it possible that the powers that be figured out a long time ago that if they created an incredible imaginary weapon and gave that imaginary weapon to a select number of countries, those countries could be used by them to control the political systems of the entire world much easier?

After it was developed, the atomic bomb was allegedly dropped on Japan twice in the 1940’s. The bombs reportedly brought a quick end to World War II. The technology was never used again in any war although the threat of nuclear weapons against humanity and the planet has been publicized ad nauseum.

The only other evidence of atomic weapons being used in history has come in the form of highly secretive government tests. All of these tests have had limited government witnesses and many have been conducted underground or underwater. Any or all of these tests could have been performed with the use of conventional bombs. TNT could have been used to fabricate any particular A-Bomb test.

The continuous threat of nuclear weapons being detonated by terrorists has been so overplayed in Hollywood movie productions throughout the years that people are now programmed to believe it’s only a matter of time before one of these devices will be used against a highly populated city. Yet there have been zero nukes used by crazy terrorists anywhere in the world. This fact alone is more than a little bit strange.

There are many people who believe the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by conventional fire bombings and not by atomic weapons as reported in official historical records. There are some researchers who also claim atomic bombs are impossible to manufacture. The parts of certain buildings that were left intact and the lack of radiation found in Hiroshima and Nagasaki seem to support this claim.

Israel is purported to have a huge inventory of 400 nuclear weapons at their disposal and yet they have never detonated one device in the direction of their Arab neighbors. These are the same Arab neighbors they despise. Are they and every other country in the world bluffing about said technology?

With so many unstable countries and crazy terrorist groups allegedly in existence, and so many nuclear weapons seemingly at their disposal or available for sale, how is it possible that not one nuclear incident has ever occurred?

Do the world leaders of certain countries really walk around with nuclear suitcases and corresponding launch codes? Do nuclear weapons actually exist?

Before you write all of this off as a crazy conspiracy theory, think for a minute about how much leverage certain countries possess over others because of their claimed nuclear arsenals. What if there really are no nukes in existence in the entire world?

Think about all the military spending that’s taken place with regards to nuclear programs. And don’t forget about all the money that’s been budgeted by countries to protect their infrastructures from incoming nuclear weapons.

Space Travel

Space travel, via Mercury, Gemini and Apollo, came out of nowhere and miraculously mastered manned space missions through low earth orbits, the Van Allen Belts, the thermosphere and ultimately achieved several moon landings in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. The technology has never been used again to this day. Are we really to believe that space technology achieved and mastered in the 1960’s has voluntarily been discarded by the powers that be?

From 2005-2009, NASA planned and developed the Constellation Program (CxP). Constellation had the major objectives of completing the International Space Station, resuming manned missions to the moon by the year 2020, and delivering the first manned mission to the planet Mars.

If we read through the lines of official statements that were created and disseminated by the United States Government regarding Constellation, we are encouraged to believe that funding issues and a lack of desire to return to the moon by NASA executives were the reasons President Barack Obama cancelled the program in 2010.

Truth be told, NASA has been attempting to figure out a way to safely transport astronauts through the impenetrable radiation belts and thermosphere that completely surround our earth and protect human beings from lethal cosmic radiation since the days of MercuryGemini and Apollo.

The Van Allen Belts extend some 60,000 kilometers above the surface of our planet and have most likely prevented all human beings from traveling farther than low earth orbits (LEO’s) and into deep space locations.

Every manned space mission, with the exception of Apollo, that has been attempted by NASA or any other space agency in the world has taken place in LEO’s. And there are many skeptics that believe Apollo never left the safety of LEO’s either.

If anyone searches the Internet for information about the Van Allen Belts being a barrier to manned space flights, and particularly the Apollo program, they are immediately met with websites that conclude NASA was able to safely negotiate its astronauts through the radiation zones in question.

A few of the websites that support the notions the Van Allen Belts are not as dangerous as some people have suggested contain impressive looking math to support their conclusions. The authors of such websites maintain that most laypersons have a poor understanding regarding the dangers of cosmic radiation.

It is no small coincidence the search engines have indexed and listed at the top of search results all the articles supporting the idea the Van Allen Belts were conquered by NASA and Apollo. But the fact remains that NASA and its astronauts have never been able to replicate the results they allegedly achieved many years ago with Apollo. And for good reason – they can’t do it!

There are millions of people in the world that believe NASA faked the moon landings. Search “moon landing hoax” and you will uncover many websites discussing conspiracy theories regarding this topic. Readers will also find, at the top of search results, websites strategically positioned to poke holes in the conspiracy theories listed. The powers that be use this technique repeatedly when defending the fake paradigms they have created and pushed on society.

Professional photographers, authors, and scientists have already proven that many of the Apollo photographs supposedly taken on the moon were filmed in studios or on a professionally designed movie set. All of this information has led many people to question the authenticity of Apollo’s success with regards to astronauts visiting the moon in 1969-1972.

The Van Allen belt problem is a serious one for NASA in more ways than most of us can imagine. Not only do the radiation belts preclude NASA from planning manned missions to deep space locations, they also prove that Apollo was a hoax.

According to the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) “Temperatures climb sharply in the lower thermosphere (below 200 to 300 km altitude), then level off and hold fairly steady with increasing altitude above that height. Solar activity strongly influences temperature in the thermosphere. The thermosphere is typically about 200° C (360° F) hotter in the daytime than at night, and roughly 500° C (900° F) hotter when the Sun is very active than at other times. Temperatures in the upper thermosphere can range from about 500° C (932° F) to 2,000° C (3,632° F) or higher.The NCAR and UCAR also claim, “The space shuttle and the International Space Station both orbit Earth within the thermosphere! Not very likely!

Let me point out that just about any metal found in existence has a melting point below the temperatures found in the thermosphere. Lead: 327 degrees C; Magnesium 650 degrees C; Aluminum 660 degrees C; Aluminum Alloys 463-671 degrees C; Gold 1063 degrees C; Copper 1084 degrees C; Steel 1425 – 1540 degrees C; Titanium 1670 degrees C. What kind of magic material did NASA make the Apollo and other imaginary space ships out of?

Let’s face facts. The United States Government and its military strength have never retreated from a strategic military target it has conquered. The moon is, without a doubt, the most strategic military target in the universe to possess when it comes to keeping an eye on our planet. If NASA and Apollo had, in reality, made it through the Van Allen Belts and thermosphere in 1969-1972, they would have continued to visit the moon. Other manned missions to deep space locations would have also been planned and carried out.

Are we supposed to believe, and keep a straight face at the same time, that NASA perfected travel through the radiation belts and thermosphere that surround the earth in 1969 and has never duplicated the accomplishment again? The official position of NASA today is that the technology used to get men to the moon with Apollo years ago was accidentally misplaced and the space agency has to begin from scratch. They actually admit they cannot get to the moon currently because the technology no longer exists.

The telltale evidence NASA never defeated the Van Allen Belts and thermosphere is written within the history of its missions. All of them have taken place in LEO’s. This is, ultimately, why the Space Shuttle program was planned and developed. It was designed to study and solve the radiation issues and extremely hot temperatures preventing astronauts from taking a real giant step for man and a real giant leap for mankind.

Vaccines

Vaccines, through Edward Jenner first came to fruition in the 1790’s and later were quickly credited with the elimination of Small Pox and later Polio. Many new vaccines have been created since Jenner’s initial concoction, but the technology doesn’t work and the diseases have never been eradicated despite being reported to have been.

People have been getting flu shots for years each autumn and every year the flu season commences shortly thereafter. Is the flu vaccine preventing the disease or spreading it rapidly across the population base? I think it’s pretty clear that flu vaccines are a fraud that makes the disease run rampant in a given location. It is my contention that all vaccines being used today are completely useless in conferring any type of immunity against any and all diseases. Truth be told, they are creating diseases and causing the proliferation of said diseases worldwide.

The majority of people in the world will take healthy children to medical doctors for wellness checkups. The doctors will vaccinate these healthy children with a broth of toxic, carcinogenic chemicals (49 doses) and expect said patients to become healthier throughout their lives. This strategy makes no sense whatsoever and you don’t have to have a high level degree in education to see the problem with this line of thinking. You don’t put pollutants into a pristine looking lake and expect the body of water to become even cleaner. It’s a ridiculous concept. The vaccine paradigm is a ridiculous concept and it’s the real reason we have Autism, autoimmune disorders, and a rainbow of colored ribbons dedicated to the cancer industry.

20190217_220123

Conclusion:

I believe nuclear weapons, space travel, and  medical vaccines are 3 subjects that have changed our world in ways that are far different than most people realize. All three hoaxes are continuously kept alive via the same deceptive reporting practices of the mainstream media and its handler intelligence agencies operating throughout the world.

What do you think about this post?

Mainstream Media Lies

cropped-cropped-400dpilogo2.jpg

Dr. John L. Reizer

Are you tired of all the headlines about fake news? Do you feel like throwing up your arms and yelling, “ENOUGH ALREADY?”

We’ve repeatedly made our point, in plenty of articles on this website, about the fact that mainstream media companies are spewing out massive amounts of fake news all over the world.

We started writing our articles concerning fake news back in February, 2012. In those days there weren’t many people making a fuss about fake news stories. If for some reason you happened to access a search engine and looked up something about fake news six years ago, your results would have been quite limited. Today, the same search query would yield an unbelievable amount of interesting content for researchers.

Let’s be perfectly candid about this subject; fake news stories currently being promoted by the mainstream news companies are part of a global agenda and their targeted audience is not limited to just a few strategic countries. Simply written, it’s all part of a very cleverly designed mind control program; a program that flourishes under the direct supervision of powerful intelligence agencies worldwide that in turn take their orders from a covert governing construct that prefers to work in the shadows versus the light of day. Did you think all these media companies were producing fake news just for the hell of it? Collectively speaking, they’re a powerful tool owned by the Establishment.

The creation and implementation of this mind control campaign was given careful consideration by a lot of very smart people. It has existed everywhere and anywhere in the world you could access a television or radio signal for many years. Pick a country of your choice and I can show you evidence the population living there is being influenced by fake news stories that originate from a mainstream media company.

The mind control agenda is also thoroughly represented in print media products such as newspapers and magazines. Go into any bookstore in the US or Europe and examine the wide selection of magazines and newspapers available; they’re all owned by the same four or five parent companies that control media propaganda currently being generated around the globe.

The same agenda has also infiltrated the movie and entertainment industries. Again, these companies are very interconnected and owned by a small group of corporations, relatively speaking.

Whether it was by intentional design or not, people in the United States were introduced to an onslaught of information concerning fake news in 2016. The US presidential election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton generated plenty of materials concerning mainstream media companies being the major purveyors of fake news stories.

While it’s certainly true that most people in the US and Europe are far more aware of fake news stories being produced by mainstream media companies than ever before, it is also true that the vast majority of people in the same regions reflexively and almost hypnotically rely on said corporations for daily information that ultimately ends up affecting and shaping their beliefs about current worldly events.

It’s been proven quite convincingly that mainstream media corporations lied to Americans about the 2016 US presidential election. If said companies lied to viewers in the US about this information, what else have they been lying to us about?

The answer is anything and everything you can possibly think of. The global mainstream media corporations lie about politics, history, religion, war, terrorism, science, medicine, healthcare, technology, off world issues, space travel capabilities, and we’re just getting warmed up. They will lie about anything to support their agenda.

There’s a saying: “Once a liar always a liar.” Ironically, there’s a lot of truth embedded in that saying. People that have a history of lying don’t change their approach later in life. It’s what they do even when they swear to you they’re not.

That same understanding about liars can and should be applied by everybody when accessing information from mainstream media products. Remember that these companies have already been proven to be the disseminators of lies and fake news propaganda. They don’t just embellish the truth. They discard or ignore the truth and report the opposite to the public.

If you want to know what’s really happening concerning a particular world event, think the complete opposite of what’s being reported in the mainstream media and in most situations you will have the truthful explanation to whatever subject is being discussed.

Let’s practice an exercise to help readers get the hang of how this works with regards to the mainstream media’s reporting of various topics:

  1. If you see a report that claims a spacecraft has landed on Mars, understand that no spacecraft has visited the planet.
  2. If you see a health report that claims vaccines are safe and prevent the spread of diseases, understand that vaccines are not safe and cause the proliferation of diseases in targeted areas of the population.
  3. If you see a report that claims diet drinks are good for you, understand that diet drinks are harmful to human beings.
  4. If you see a report that claims fluoridated water is helpful to humans in preventing dental caries, understand that fluoridated water is a poison and harmful to a person’s physiology.

Once you relearn to think this way when absorbing mainstream media products, you will finally be able to use said companies to figure out what’s really happening in the world.

Remember… They’re Lying to You!

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

 

Remember, when you turn on the television this evening, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you access a cell phone today to check the news, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you read the newspaper, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you read any national magazine publications, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you watch a television program that discusses medical advancements, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you watch a television program that discusses politics, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you watch a television program that discusses space travel, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you watch a program that discusses science, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you watch a television program that discusses religion, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you watch a television program that discusses ancient history, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you read an article that states vaccines are safe, they’re lying to you!

Remember, when you access mainstream news companies through any means possible, they’re lying to you!

Do you get the general idea? They’re lying to you!

Michigan State University, USA Gymnastics and the US Olympic Committee need to be Held Accountable

By Gina Flores

Editor-in-Chief

The recent sentencing of former Olympic physician, Dr. Larry Nassar to 175 years in prison for sexually abusing more than 150 women and girls is only a very small victory for the survivors involved. Some of the women recently had a chance to publicly address this monster in a courtroom setting. And although his victims may have obtained some form of closure from being able to participate in such a process, it’s more likely than not they will all have to deal with the presence of deep psychological scars from their abuse for the remainder of their lives.

How does a predator like Larry Nassar get away with sexually abusing young, female athletes for the past two decades? How is it possible that Larry Nassar was allowed to behave in such a horrible way for so long and not be held accountable and put out of his misery by the US Olympic Committee or his former employers, USA Gymnastics and Michigan State University? All of these are fair questions that need to be addressed and fully investigated from a legal standpoint in the months that follow. This is an obvious can of worms that needs to be cracked wide open; a real rabbit hole that undoubtedly is extremely deep!

USA Gymnastics and the US Olympic Committee need to be punished immediately and the first thing that comes to my mind are the future Olympic Games scheduled for the summer of 2020.

There is no good reason, in my opinion, why the United States women’s gymnastics team should be allowed to participate under the American flag in those games. It’s time to punish the enabling organizations that played a key part in these horrific crimes.

Larry Nassar is a sick predator and will be locked up for the remainder of his life. That’s a good thing! USA Gymnastics and the US Olympic Committee, on the other hand, allowed this animal to survive and hunt his prey for over 20 years. This is inexcusable and should not be tolerated by the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

The women athletes from the United States Gymnastics team should only be allowed to participate in the 2020 summer games under the Olympic flag. A similar scenario has been put in place for Russia’s Olympic team in February, 2018 in South Korea because of their involvement in systematic, rampant doping. Discipline handed down by the IOC in this manner would allow the enabling organizations at fault, and not the women athletes, to be properly punished.

If the IOC does not punish team USA, it would demonstrate a disturbing double standard within the construct of that organization as well as their total lack of concern for past, present, and future Olympic athletes.

All of the players involved in these organizations need to resign or be removed from their positions. This includes presidents, board members, trustees and executives at any and all levels.

What do you think about this story?

What Happens in Vegas Stays In Vegas: Maybe Not

wp-image-282249783

By Gina Flores

Writer for NoFakeNews

There’s a famous marketing slogan that was branded especially for the Las Vegas tourism industry some years back. The slogan states, “What Happens in Vegas Stays in Vegas”.

Las Vegas, nicknamed “Sin City” is the gambling and entertainment capital of the United States and maybe even the entire world. It’s certainly not your average city, but it is similar to just about any other city in the United States in that it has schools, colleges, churches, parks, recreation and fitness centers, residential homes, sports franchises and lots of people living there as permanent residents. All these people have jobs and earn a living locally. A lot of Vegas residents have jobs that are in some way connected to the tourist and gaming industries.

I’ve been to Vegas on a few different occasions and admit it’s an exciting place. And just maybe because of all the glitter, sparkling lights, fancy casinos, and it’s famous reputation for being one of the most visited destinations in the world by tourists year after year, it’s often shielded by the powers that be from really negative news stories.

The Las Vegas massacre that occurred on October 1, 2017 is not the kind of story that America’s biggest adult playground wants to be connected to. It’s exactly this kind of news that can quite literally destroy businesses and scare people out of town for a very long time.

I am sitting here, pulling my hair out, trying to figure out why the authorities in charge of this investigation, the deadliest shooting event in American history, seem to be covering up key facts of the case. They seem to be hellbent on selling a false narrative that there was only one lunatic behind all the death and destruction; Stephen Paddock did it, he acted alone!

I don’t believe that scripted load of crap for one second and from the amount of videos and eyewitnesses popping up everyday telling a story that is in direct conflict with the false narrative being pedaled by the mainstream media (officialdom), neither do a lot of other intelligent people.

So why the cover up? There are probably a number of answers to that very important question. Let me write about a few of my theories:

  1. The Las Vegas tourist industry might be able to endure a scenario where a lone nutter opens fire on thousands of its tourists. It could probably sell such a concept to people and say that this guy acted alone and was just crazy. It was a freak, isolated event that will never happen again. Maybe Stephen Paddock had a brain tumor, was depressed, pissed off at the casino where he lost money, or maybe he was on antidepressant drugs? People could certainly handle that story line a lot easier than knowing this shooting stunt was a well orchestrated and coordinated terrorist attack carried out by people with sophisticated military skills and a whole lot of weapons that no ordinary citizen could ever hope to acquire.
  2. This was a mission pulled off by black ops agents and backed and funded by domestic or foreign intelligence agencies. Everything was coordinated from the inside and the people running the mission used Paddock as a patsy who was murdered prior to the attack and then made to look like the lone gunman. If this were the case, the agents could have hacked into government computer files, made it look like the shooter (Paddock) had purchased guns when in actuality he hadn’t. Paddock was most likely chosen because he was easy to frame, had the monetary assets that made it believable that he could acquire such an impressive arsenal of weapons. Let’s face it, those guns weren’t cheap and not just anybody could afford them. But a millionaire could.
  3. Paddock was involved in the shootings, but did not act alone and was killed by someone else involved who thought he was a security risk. Again, the multiple shooter scenario is not a good thing for the Las Vegas tourist industry.

Whatever the truth might turn out to be, it is doubtful, in my considered opinion, that a lone gunman was responsible for everything that transpired. It’s not logical, and the shooter’s profile just doesn’t match with someone that was capable of pulling off such a horrific crime. In addition to that, a photo of the suicide scene where Paddock’s dead body rested was intentionally leaked by the authorities. It looked staged with bullets placed around his corpse in an organized pattern. Jeff Rense (www.rense.com) did an excellent job in assessing and analyzing the photo. Click here to read his work.

What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas might be the slogan, but in this situation, because of all the eyewitnesses and videos taken, the slogan may not apply. It’s beginning to look like the truth about this tragedy might be revealed to the public after all despite the mainstream media’s attempt to cconceal it.

What do you think about this story?

 

Las Vegas: Here We Go Again

wp-image-282249783

By Gina Flores

Writer for NoFakeNews

And now another significant event has taken place where lots of  innocent people have been injured or lost their lives. This time the venue was a country music concert in Las Vegas, Nevada.

And once again the official narrative that’s been etched in stone is that a lone gunman was responsible for the entire massacre.

AND ONCE AGAIN THERE ARE LOADS OF VIDEOS AND WITNESSES COMING OUT OF THE WOODWORK THAT CONTRADICT THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE.

Anyone with half a brain is thinking that an older man like Stephen Paddock couldn’t have done all this damage without the help of other shooters. Perhaps he was already dead prior to the first shots being fired. Will we ever know the truth? It’s not likely.

Are you tired of being played by the powers that be? Are you tired of being lied to by the mainstream media and the official authorities in charge of investigations in Las Vegas, San Bernardino, Paris, Madrid, New York City and other locations where similar horrific events have occurred?

I am frustrated by all of these senseless killings that are being engineered to look like lone nutters or, in other cases, terrorist groups are responsible.

We at NoFakeNews are saddened by the loss of our fellow human beings and are praying for those injured and currently fighting for their lives.

Ursula Haverbeck: Jailed For Her Views About The Holocaust

cropped-cropped-400dpilogo2.jpg

 

It is illegal to question the holocaust (holocaust denial) in the following  countries:

  1. Austria
  2. Belgium
  3. Czech Republic
  4. France
  5. Germany
  6. Hungary
  7. Israel
  8. Liechtenstein
  9. Lithuania
  10. Luxembourg
  11. Netherlands
  12. Poland
  13. Portugal
  14. Romania
  15. Switzerland.

The following countries do not have laws against holocaust denial:

  1. Afghanistan
  2. Albania
  3. Algeria
  4. Andorra
  5. Angola
  6. Antigua and Barbuda
  7. Argentina
  8. Armenia
  9. Australia
  10. Azerbaijan
  11. Bahamas, The
  12. Bahrain
  13. Bangladesh
  14. Barbados
  15. Belarus
  16. Belize
  17. Benin
  18. Bhutan
  19. Bolivia
  20. Bosnia and Herzegovina
  21. Botswana
  22. Brazil
  23. Brunei
  24. Bulgaria
  25. Burkina Faso
  26. Burundi
  27. Cambodia
  28. Cameroon
  29. Canada (as of R. v. Zundel)
  30. Cape Verde
  31. Cayman Islands
  32. Central African Republic
  33. Chad
  34. Chile
  35. China PR
  36. Colombia
  37. Comoros
  38. Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  39. Congo, Republic of the
  40. Costa Rica
  41. Cote d’Ivoire
  42. Cuba
  43. Cuba
  44. Cyprus
  45. Denmark
  46. Djibouti
  47. Dominica
  48. Dominican Republic
  49. Ecuador
  50. Egypt
  51. El Salvador
  52. Equatorial Guinea
  53. Eritrea
  54. Estonia
  55. Ethiopia
  56. Faroe Islands
  57. Fiji
  58. Finland
  59. Gabon
  60. Gambia, The
  61. Georgia
  62. Ghana
  63. Greece
  64. Grenada
  65. Guatemala
  66. Guinea
  67. Guinea-Bissau
  68. Guyana
  69. Haiti
  70. Holy See (Vatican City)
  71. Honduras
  72. Iceland
  73. India
  74. Indonesia
  75. Iran
  76. Iraq
  77. Ireland
  78. Italy
  79. Jamaica
  80. Japan
  81. Jersey
  82. Jordan
  83. Kazakhstan
  84. Kenya
  85. Kiribati
  86. Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of
  87. Korea, Republic of
  88. Kuwait
  89. Kyrgyzstan
  90. Laos
  91. Latvia
  92. Lebanon
  93. Lesotho
  94. Liberia
  95. Libya
  96. Liechtenstein
  97. Macedonia (FYROM)
  98. Madagascar
  99. Malawi
  100. Malaysia
  101. Maldives
  102. Mali
  103. Malta
  104. Mauritania
  105. Mauritius
  106. Mexico
  107. Micronesia, Federated States of
  108. Moldova
  109. Monaco
  110. Mongolia
  111. Montenegro
  112. Morocco
  113. Mozambique
  114. Myanmar
  115. Namibia
  116. Nauru
  117. Nepal
  118. New Zealand
  119. Nicaragua
  120. Niger
  121. Nigeria
  122. Norway
  123. Oman
  124. Pakistan
  125. Palau
  126. Palestine
  127. Panama
  128. Papua New Guinea
  129. Paraguay
  130. Peru
  131. Philippines
  132. Puerto Rico
  133. Qatar
  134. Rwanda
  135. Saint Kitts and Nevis
  136. Saint Lucia
  137. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  138. Samoa
  139. San Marino
  140. São Tomé and Príncipe
  141. Saudi Arabia
  142. Senegal
  143. Serbia
  144. Seychelles
  145. Sierra Leone
  146. Singapore
  147. Slovakia
  148. Slovenia
  149. Solomon Islands
  150. Somalia
  151. South Africa
  152. Spain
  153. Sri Lanka
  154. Sudan
  155. Suriname
  156. Swaziland
  157. Sweden
  158. Syria
  159. Taiwan
  160. Tajikistan
  161. Tanzania
  162. Thailand
  163. Timor-Leste
  164. Togo
  165. Tonga
  166. Trinidad and Tobago
  167. Tunisia
  168. Turkey
  169. Turkmenistan
  170. Tuvalu
  171. Uganda
  172. Ukraine
  173. United Arab Emirates
  174. United Kingdom
  175. United States
  176. Uruguay
  177. Uzbekistan
  178. Vanuatu
  179. Venezuela
  180. Vietnam
  181. Western Sahara
  182. Yemen
  183. Zambia
  184. Zimbabwe

What do you think about holocaust denial laws?