Dr. John Reizer
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
Dr. John Reizer
For some time now, I have been telling people on NoFakeNews through my writings that the world is not what it appears to be.
For the most part, readers here understand that a select few control the many, and those few have worked hard to paint a picture of reality that is pretty far removed from what is happening behind the scenes.
This website and its associated content are not meant for everyone. The subjects I write about are not appropriate for all audiences. If you don’t clearly understand what I am discussing in the newer posts on the platform, you should reference the writings archived from earlier years.
I am not here to try and convince anyone about anything! Feel free to believe or not believe what you want.
Modern society developed organically and independently without steering mechanisms or outside influences from nonhuman overseers.
Our human technologies and infrastructures worldwide have developed through trial and error.
Technological development on Earth was almost nonexistent for billions of years before blossoming into its current level of complexity in a couple hundred years.
Modern society developed under the supervision and guidance of nonhuman overseers who stay hidden and in the shadows.
Our human technologies and infrastructures have existed forever, outside the illusion of time, and have been repeatedly reintroduced into many different human civilizations that have been reset on Earth.
Our historical narratives and understanding of everything associated with modern society have been predicated on disinformative content that has obfuscated our understanding of reality.
We are, in fact, infinite existing souls who have chosen to download into animal and human avatars within the construct of a computer simulation, otherwise known as Earth. It is a closed system and is inescapable through the medium commonly known as outer space.
Additionally, there is a small percentage of human avatars who understand the simulation’s construct and are trying to hijack the game codes from its designer.
Constructed by our civilization or left over from another?
Did the same builders of the construction shacks build the Capitol Complex?
Is this evidence of a prior technologically advanced civilization?
Is this a mountain or a giant tree stump from a prior time when the size of living avatars was much larger than today?
What is this place we call Earth, and how much do we really know about its truthful history? Sure, we’re taught many facts about geography and history in public schools, but how reliable is the information we’re force-fed from a very early age until now?
Could many intelligent and technologically advanced civilizations have walked this Matrix before us?
Has the advanced technology we have today been here many times before our civilization?
Are we actually living on a spinning ball hurtling through space at thousands of miles per hour, or are we living in a simulated construct that regularly gets reset, and each time, the size and form of all its living avatars are much different?
Imagine, in one set, a game board the size of a fish bowl with life-sized avatars proportioned to those dimensions.
After a reset, a much larger stage is set, complete with new avatars whose size and dimensions are a hundred times those of the prior one.
Many people might dismiss such ideas as nonsense, yet there’s evidence that much larger beings and plants have lived on Earth before us.
Our DNA (the computer code for the living avatars in the Matrix simulation) determines our physical expressions. I believe our controllers can modify these codes and expressions and can completely alter the representation of life forms in different resets!
As long as “they” have us believing in Democrats, Republicans, and Independents, “they” have us believing in a scripted narrative that was pre-designed in advance to control the minds of humanity’s avatars.
As long as “they” have us believing in religious and scientific teachings, “they” have us firmly entrenched in officialdom and unable to recall the truthful nature of the Matrix construct.
As long as “they” have us believing we’re living on a ball or flat disc in outer space, and arguing over the geometric shape of Earth, “they” have us believing in something other than the truth, in my opinion.
Is Earth a baseball, a pancake, or a simulated exercise designed to convince human beings that existence is something much different than it is? I believe the evidence is overwhelming in support of the idea that we are all experiencing life here in a 3-D holographic simulation.
While we can now confirm with confidence that prior technologically advanced civilizations predated ours, as evidenced by the Old-World buildings scattered throughout the realm, we still don’t know for sure how many resets have actually occurred here. I believe that thousands upon thousands of resets have transpired in our Matrix, and the Old-World Buildings we have come upon and are still in existence represent only the most recent few resets in a never-ending cycle of cataclysmic events that are innately connected to the programmatic design of the simulated construct.
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
Dr. John Reizer
The controlling powers have to know what society’s members are thinking at all times, which is why the Internet and search engines were so important to reinstall and reintroduce into the current civilization set.
I believe the Internet, AI, and so many other amazing technologies have existed in our realm far longer than most people can comprehend. It’s all been here before, and its reemergence into our current society is no accident, but rather an important part of our controllers’ plan to have a proverbial finger constantly on the pulse of society’s members.
Our controllers need to know the mental trends of society, what people in general are thinking about, and how much of the scripted false narratives being fed to the masses by corporate media outlets are being embraced and accepted as reality by the public at any given time.
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
Dr. John Reizer
According to officialdom, influenza begins its assault on society during the colder weather. The CDC and other medical sources tell us that influenza viruses spread faster in colder weather conditions.
We’re already seeing in the mainstream media reports of increased influenza in many regions of the United States.
In 2026, the US has experienced unprecedented heat so far. So, how does the flu prosper in these incredibly crazy hot temperatures?
I would say that the time of year has more to do with the onset of influenza than outside temperatures. The time of year and flu also relate to the annual flu jab administration campaign, which always begins in late August and runs through October.
In my opinion, the raw data shows a clear connection between the introduction of flu vaccines and the national uptick in flu cases.
My conspiratorial mind knows full well that vaccines are used to cause the proliferation of diseases realm-wide.
But I’m taking off my conspiratorial hat for a moment as I write this article and only looking at the statistical data on when vaccines are regularly introduced to the public and how, soon after, influenza cases begin to appear more widely each year.
I believe that when you look at when annual flu shot programs begin and when flu cases start to show up in the public setting, it’s pretty damn evident that the vaccines are a causal factor in the uptick in flu diagnoses.
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
Dr. John Reizer
There’s an experiment that’s been repeated many times, and the results aren’t something the ball Earthers care to discuss.
A laser is placed on flat land, and it’s pointed at a distant target many miles away that, according to the Earth curvature calculator, should not be possible to hit. Because we are allegedly on a ball, not a flat Earth, the laser beam shouldn’t be able to hit a target that’s physically that far away and below the horizon line.
But the laser does hit the target that, according to the math, should be way beneath the horizon, so far, in fact, that the phenomenon of refraction should not be able to account for the laser striking the target. The only logical explanation is that the calculator is flawed and / or the Earth is not the ball shape claimed by scientific consensus.
The controlling powers have their science people running around crazy, trying to provide damage control, making comments about atmospheric conditions that bend light and overestimating the alleged effects of refraction in a desperate attempt to explain something that’s, for all intents and purposes, unexplainable.
I still read on Google presently how sailors hundreds of years ago proved the Earth was a ball. According to the disinformation, sailors could see ships in the distance drop below the horizon as they sailed away. Of course, we know that’s not an accurate observation because today we have high-powered binoculars and telescopes that let us bring those sailing vessels back into focus, even if they supposedly went below the horizon due to the Earth’s curvature.
Once again, officialdom’s enforcers will try to explain the visual evidence by blaming atmospheric conditions and refraction. While refraction can, to some degree, explain the ability to see things beyond the horizon, it can’t explain the visual observation of objects that have traveled farther than refraction can cancel out.
Folks don’t fall for the bullshit that the bullshitters like to dole out. They’re lying to us about everything, including the shape of our Earth.
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
Dr. John Reizer
I recently asked Google a hypothetical question about the shape of Earth and how “scientific consensus” might affect the answer the AI model returns to me, the user.
My Query:
Google, if the Earth were truly a flat construct as perceived by human sensory organs, but “scientific consensus”, which is highly influenced by corporate money and political input, incorrectly reported the Earth was a globe based on the highly indexed information coming from .gov and .edu websites, what shape would you or other AI models tell me the Earth is?
I don’t believe any experiment performed on Earth can 100 percent definitively prove that Earth is a spinning oblate spheroid traveling through the vacuum of space.
Scientific consensus and the scientific community may disagree with me, but unless you go to space for yourself and see the evidence firsthand, you can’t be certain, and there are more than enough reasons to doubt the so-called trusted sources telling us the heliocentric model of Earth is accurate.
Let’s be perfectly honest about looking out windows on Earth, in airplanes, and at looking at ships on the ocean’s horizon. None of those things allow humans to perceive a ball-shaped Earth.
Additionally, a motorized Foucault pendulum situated in front of planetariums inside museums that allegedly prove the Earth is a spinning ball is pure nonsense, and there are a plethora of physics people who will tell you that swinging pendulums don’t prove the shape or spin of the Earth.
There’s nothing from our vantage point on Earth that would lead anyone to believe the Earth is a spinning ball, and that, my friends, is the truth!
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
Dear Visitors,
Thank you for visiting NoFakeNews and taking the time to explore the work I publish here.
This website is a vital independent platform for sharing ideas, research, commentary, and perspectives that I believe deserve discussion and examination but won’t appear in mainstream media outlets.
Keeping a website like this one up and running takes time, effort, and resources. If you find value in the information and work presented here, please consider supporting the platform and its author. The best way to do that is to purchase, read, and honestly rate the different books I write.
Additionally, sharing this website with others helps put my content in front of people seeking a more truthful understanding of our realm. I genuinely appreciate you telling family, friends, and acquaintances about NoFakeNews.
Thank you for being here and for supporting independent authorship.
Sincerely,
Dr. John Reizer
Author and creator of NoFakeNews
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
By John Reizer
Satirical Fiction
BELGIUM — It’s more than likely Georges Lemaître may have had a rather unusual evening with several fellow Catholic priests before developing his famous idea about the Big Bang Theory and an expanding universe.
The year was 1927, and the gathering had started innocently enough.
There was wine. Actually, there was a lot of wine. Eventually, someone apparently asked a question that would change cosmology forever:
“Father Lemaître, where did the universe come from?”
Lemaître stared into his wine glass for several seconds. “You better give me another glass,” he replied.
After another generous pour, Lemaître began drawing large circles, arrows, and a plethora of strange-looking mathematical symbols on a piece of paper. “Imagine,” he said, pointing at the paper, “everything in the universe was squeezed into one tiny place.”
One of the other priests squinted at the drawing. “You mean like this wine bottle?”
“Exactly!” said Lemaître, downing another glass.
One of the priests objected. “But Father, if everything was once together, what happened?”
Lemaître stood up dramatically, a little wobbly from the consumption of alcohol, and said, “It exploded! Then, it began expanding.”
The room fell silent.
Then the other priests burst out laughing and yelled at the same time, “The universe exploded?”
“Something like that,” Lemaître said, trying to keep his balance while in an upright position.
“And has it been expanding ever since?” asked another priest.
Lemaître nodded, then tripped over his feet and landed on the floor. “Now you’re thinking!” he said, looking up at his colleagues from the ground.
At this point, one of the priests suggested that perhaps the entire universe was expanding because everyone present had consumed too much wine.
Lemaître tried to get up but slipped again, laughing in the process. “Impossible,” he yelled out.
“Why?” Another priest asked.
“Because I’ve only had three bottles.”
The other priests looked at the empty bottles.
There were seven of them.
By midnight, Lemaître had developed what later became known as the ‘Primeval Atom’ hypothesis. At the time, he called it “that thing I just thought of after drinking too much wine.”
The next morning, Lemaître examined his notes and discovered that half of his calculations were upside down.
He stared at them for several minutes before saying, “Gentlemen, I think I have discovered something very important.”
“What’s that?” one of the other priests asked.
“I’m going to need a helluva lot more coffee.”
This was the 1927 scientific consensus:
This was what science believed not long ago and defended as the best explanation for the universe’s existence. I believe it makes more sense than the Big Bang Theory.
Do you see how crazy “scientific consensus” and the theories behind these conclusions really are? Yet, academics will sit upon their high horses, proclaiming that they have the ideas and math to prove their ridiculous concepts.
The words “scientific consensus” really mean nobody’s challenging the official line of bullshit currently in play, no matter how illogical or stupid the hypothesis might be.
Throughout the years, people have pointed out serious flaws with ideas protected by scientific consensus.
People challenged Albert Einstein and were immediately attacked by groups calling them Antisemites. Many of Einstein’s theories and ideas have been proven false. Others also claim he was involved in plagiarism and patent theft. Who really knows the truth about the history we’re taught?
There are also folks saying things about Stephen Hawking and that entire narrative, although he has been spared any scrutiny because who in the hell wants to criticize someone in a wheelchair?
Perhaps that’s why he was wheeled out there in the first place as a genius. Maybe it was because it was unpopular or not politically correct to attack a genius in a wheelchair.
Hawking had ALS for 55 years! The average person with that disease makes it about 2 -5 years. Do you see anything peculiar with the narrative?
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
Dr. John Reizer
When I write that the controlling powers edit and rewrite history, I’m not kidding. In fact, they’ve rewritten history all the way backwards 13.8 billion years ago. Read on…
So, according to a Catholic priest (cosmologist) named Georges Lemaître, the universe as we know it began with an explosion (the Big Bang). The explosion was preceded by nothingness, or the absence of any matter whatsoever, except for one atom.
Evidently, before the explosion, a single particle miraculously manifested itself into existence. Then, it for some strange reason, exploded and created a debris field in all directions that began to fill a void of infinite space.
As that debris field expanded outward, it formed what we know today as planets, stars, galaxies, and anything else.
According to Georges Lemaitre, the Big Bang explosion happened 13.8 billion years ago.
Georges Lemaitre
So, let us get this straight: according to a Catholic priest, everything in existence and all of nature exists because of a random explosion of one particle. What kind of wine was this guy drinking?
How can people place all their faith in science when science is predicated on a theory that is so ridiculous it beggars belief?
I remember listening to public school science teachers growing up, explaining that the Big Bang explosion came from one atom.
Realizing how ridiculously implausible the Big Bang idea is, the powers that be have edited the original theory over the years.
Presently, if you access a search engine and ask if the Big Bang was an explosion, the answer returned will be: NO!
That description evokes an explosion in my mind. And no, I think Georges said that there was an explosion! 🤣
So, let me get this straight… There wasn’t a Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago; there was an already intact universe that could fit on the head of a pin, and it suddenly, for no good reason, became extremely hot and volatile, and began stretching and expanding outward rapidly.
According to official accounts, the Big Bang name originated from the scientist Fred Hoyle, who criticized the absurdity of the idea. I agree with Fred! 🤣
Even though there wasn’t an explosion, the theory is still called the Big Bang, a name conjured up by a scientist making fun of the theory.
That makes a helluva lot of sense; let’s name the theory of where all of existence originated from after a guy who was making fun of Georges Lemaitre’s idea.
Then there’s this little problem: if everything in the Universe has always existed and once fit on the head of a pin, that means all the planets and stars were once much closer to one another. This means that years based on or calculated by the orbits of planets around stars could have been much shorter than they are today. Hypothetically, a hundred million years could have transpired in a matter of hours or even shorter periods if the universe were contracted enough to fit on the head of a pin. That means Earth and everything else might not be nearly as old as we think, because the length of all the past years may not be equal to the length of the years that occurred as the universe expanded. That’s an entirely different can of worms, for sure.
I or anyone else could construct, in theory, a model of a fictional universe and invent artificial parameters and physical objects positioned into an area of imaginary defined space. Once those parameters are established, mathematical formulas and equations can be used and applied to validate and determine how physical objects move in that imaginary existence.
I laugh when I listen to scientists explain how math proves the Big Bang Theory is legitimate. In my view, all the math does is validate the movements of physical matter through a theoretical framework, a product of Georges Lemaitre’s imagination.
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five members of the research team are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. When two researchers escape the attack, they soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list.
If you want to support NoFakeNews, read and honestly rate these books!
