EBOLA: A Worldwide Problem-Reaction-Solution Strategy?

cropped-wp-image-1893685289.png

By NoFakeNews

The few that control the majority like to use fraud and deception to misinform the general population.

One of the oldest tricks that’s been used repeatedly by the powers that be on the general public was the introduction of a fake crisis of some sort followed by the mass reaction of the same general public to that fake crisis which was then followed by the implementation of an already established solution to the original problem. This entire scenario is commonly known as a problem – reaction – solution strategy.

Let’s pretend that the powers that be wanted to launch a worldwide vaccination campaign on the general public. How many people do you believe would stand in line, roll up their sleeves, and stick out their arms to receive said medicine? Not too many!

Now let’s pretend that a very nasty hemorrhagic virus that is not well understood by laypersons and medical specialists alike was reported to be the next great world pandemic. Keep in mind that this hemorrhagic virus had been portrayed by the mass media and perceived by the general public as something that could bring about the deaths of many innocent people worldwide.

Finally, let’s pretend that a certain pharmaceutical company had an already patented vaccine waiting to be unveiled in a laboratory that could  supposedly neutralize or prevent the spread of the nasty hemorrhagic disease.

How many people in the general public do you think would demand that health officials make available this miracle vaccine? Oh so many!

Could the Ebola Virus be a worldwide problem – reaction – solution campaign in progress? Is it possible that the Ebola virus is not even real?

Will a vaccination campaign be announced and prepared for worldwide distribution in the future?

It’s important to observe and understand the game being played. It’s been used repeatedly throughout history by the few controlling the many. There’s always some big, bad monster hiding in a vault, waiting to be unlocked and unloaded on society.

It could be a hemorrhagic virus, a deadly bacterial microbe, an imaginary biological weapon, an imaginary nuclear weapon. Take your pick; the monster always serves the same purpose. It pushes or influences the people to move in a direction those in control desire. All of these deceptions are nothing more than smoke and mirrors and sleight of hand theatrics; it’s an incredible magic show.

What do you think about this subject?

The 33 Chiropractic Principles:

By Dr. John L. Reizer

In 1927, Ralph W. Stephenson published the Chiropractic Textbook which brilliantly presented the work of B.J. Palmer (the profession’s developer) to students and other members of the chiropractic profession. If any person has a desire to learn about chiropractic philosophy (rationale) and how it directly relates to health and disease, this book is a must read.

In the book, Stephenson laid out the 33 chiropractic principles which I have listed below for readers.

Dr. Palmer was a genius, an individual way ahead of his time and perhaps even way ahead of the scientific thinkers of today. Many of his concepts, back in the day, were nearly indescribable to students and laypersons because the language needed to be able to discuss said concepts was, for the most part, nonexistent.

In a nutshell, chiropractic philosophy is based on the premise that there is intelligence/organization in all matter. In living things the intelligence organizes, coordinates, and maintains life. In animals and human beings, the  forces of innate intelligence operate through the  nervous system and an interruption of the intelligence’s ability to express itself through living matter can cause some pretty significant health problems.

I wanted to present this material for our visitors so that they are able to read and learn about some pretty amazing concepts.

Enjoy!

By Ralph W. Stephenson, DC

From the Chiropractic Textbook – 1927

1. The Major Premise – A Universal Intelligence is in all matter and continually gives to it all its properties and actions, thus maintaining it in existence.

2.  The Chiropractic Meaning of Life – The expression of this intelligence through matter is the Chiropractic meaning of life.

3. The Union of Intelligence and Matter – Life is necessarily the union of intelligence and matter.

4. The Triune of Life – Life is a triunity having three necessary united factors, namely: Intelligence, Force and Matter.

5. The Perfection of the Triune – In order to have 100% Life, there must be 100% Intelligence, 100% Force, 100% Matter.

6. The Principle of Time – There is no process that does not require time.

7. The Amount of Intelligence in Matter – The amount of intelligence for any given amount of matter is 100%, and is always proportional to its requirements.

8. The Function of Intelligence – The function of intelligence is to create force.

9. The Amount of Force Created by Intelligence – The amount of force created by intelligence is always 100%.

10. The Function of Force – The function of force is to unite intelligence and matter.

11. The Character of Universal Forces – The forces of Universal Intelligence are manifested by physical laws; are unswerving and unadapted, and have no solicitude for the structures in which they work.

12. Interference with Transmission of Universal Forces – There can be interference with transmission of universal forces.

13. The Function of Matter – The function of matter is to express force.

14. Universal Life – Force is manifested by motion in matter; all matter has motion, therefore there is universal life in all matter.

15. No Motion without the Effort of Force – Matter can have no motion without the application of force by intelligence.

16. Intelligence in both Organic and Inorganic Matter – Universal Intelligence gives force to both organic and inorganic matter.

17. Cause and Effect – Every effect has a cause and every cause has effects.

18. Evidence of Life – The signs of life are evidence of the intelligence of life.

19. Organic Matter – The material of the body of a “living thing” is organized matter.

20. Innate Intelligence – A “living thing” has an inborn intelligence within its body, called Innate Intelligence.

21. The Mission of Innate Intelligence – The mission of Innate Intelligence is to maintain the material of the body of a “living thing” in active organization.

22. The Amount of Innate intelligence – There is 100% of Innate Intelligence in every “living thing,” the requisite amount, proportional to its organization.

23. The Function of Innate Intelligence – The function of Innate Intelligence is to adapt universal forces and matter for use in the body, so that all parts of the body will have coordinated action for mutual benefit.

24. The Limits of Adaptation – Innate Intelligence adapts forces and matter for the body as long as it can do so without breaking a universal law, or Innate Intelligence is limited by the limitations of matter.

25. The Character of Innate Forces – The forces of Innate Intelligence never injure or destroy the structures in which they work.

26. Comparison of Universal and Innate Forces – In order to carry on the universal cycle of life, Universal forces are destructive, and Innate forces constructive, as regards to structural matter.

27. The Normality of Innate Intelligence – Innate Intelligence is always normal and its function is always normal.

28. The Conductors of Innate Forces – The forces of Innate Intelligence operate through or over the nerve system in animal bodies.

29. Interference with Transmission of Innate Forces – There can be interference with the transmission of Innate forces.

30. The Causes of Dis-ease – Interference with the transmission of Innate forces causes in-coordination or dis-ease.

31. Subluxations – Interference with transmission in the body is always directly or indirectly due to subluxations in the spinal column.

32. The Principle of Coordination – Coordination is the principle of harmonious action of all the parts of an organism, in fulfilling their offices and purposes.

33. The Law of Demand and Supply – The Law of Demand and Supply is existent in the body in its ideal state; wherein the “clearing house,” is the brain, Innate the virtuous “banker,” brain cells “clerks,” and nerve cells “messengers.”

Embracing Quackery as Science

reizer3

By Dr. John L. Reizer

As a practitioner of chiropractic, I have often found myself in the uncomfortable position of having to defend the professional objective I am licensed to practice. Unfortunately, alternative health care disciplines like chiropractic are relentlessly attacked by mainstream media companies, the petrochemical industry, organized medicine and others. Any healing art that even hints at the idea that health can be attained, regained, or improved from the inside out, without the use of synthetic products and dangerous surgeries, is a sure target for ridicule by the scientific community.

It is quite ironic that what is often embraced by society as science is really quackery.  One of the most frustrating things I have had to witness year after year, are the blatant lies being published and distributed concerning cancer, autoimmune disorders and many other diseases that the drug companies profit from. In most instances, natural health practitioners are unable to point out to healthcare consumers, on a large platform, the illogical nature of mainstream, medical objectives. There is just way too much money at work in the various campaigns that promote such nonsense as real science. Unfortunately, the “global powers that be” closely control the mainstream media productions that are continuously broadcast and greatly influence the masses about what is perceived to be science and quackery.

Several years ago, Angelina Jolie, decided to have elective breast surgery (a double mastectomy to prevent breast cancer in her immediate future). Angelina’s decision was touted by many in the media as something that was positive. She was applauded on television by men and women for being proactive in the fight against breast cancer.

Since Jolie’s announcement about her procedure, others have also decided to have this type of surgery, and have written about how their decisions have changed their lives for the better on Internet blogs. It seems that the self-mutilation of women is now considered a good thing by mainstream medicine. Once again, idiot medicine is being promoted to the masses as the best thing science has to offer.

Deciding to have your breasts cut off to prevent the possible expression of a supposed “breast cancer gene” is tantamount to having your heart removed to prevent a heart attack because your family has a history of heart disease. Why not practice some less invasive procedures first? Why not embrace a healthy diet and lifestyle that makes the expression of breast cancer in certain women less likely? Even if you fully accept the breast cancer gene propaganda currently being showcased as valuable information, there is enough proof that many women carrying this trait never contract breast cancer.

The simple fact is organized medicine is based on a premise that is fundamentally flawed. It is, in its purest form, a type of quackery. Contrary to what petrochemical companies would like us to believe, human beings are not born on this planet with too many organs and a lack of synthetic drugs in their bodies. This paradigm was developed over time by drug companies and has always been congruent with a business culture that strives to keep people on a never ending list of toxic products so that a myriad of symptoms, and their associated diseases, can be managed indefinitely.

There are never any cures offered by modern medicine and there never will be. To create and offer a cure is to remove a profitable disease business from the arsenal of a vast empire. Again, at the risk of seeming redundant, let me write that this has never been the goal of organized medicine and the drug companies that have bought and paid for what we currently believe is scientific and unbiased, medical research.

Outside of emergency medical management and trauma based care, traditional medicine has always caused more problems in human beings than it has eliminated.

The strong promotion of a long list of vaccines to the citizens of the world, as a means to eradicate individual diseases, is perhaps one of the biggest frauds to have ever been unleashed on an unsuspecting society. It is this campaign that has, in all likelihood, created more autoimmune disorders and other diseases in human beings than anything else in the world. What is being advertised by mainstream science as the best way to prevent diseases is actually causing the proliferation of sickness worldwide.

What will we witness next from these medical idiots? Will they encourage the removal of someone’s perfectly healthy brain in order to protect a patient from possible, future brain cancer?

Evidently, it is now customary to embrace quackery as science and science as quackery? The danger of doing so, however, becomes quite obvious when we examine just how unsuccessful America and other countries have become in their attempts to eliminate various maladies that continue to plague humanity.

The Overhyped Measles Epidemic of 2019

By Dr. John Reizer

Recently, there’s been a tremendous amount of disinformation being discussed through the mainstream media about outbreaks and epidemics concerning measles. And of course the media coverage is blaming the present epidemic on anti-vaxxers; those dreaded conspiracy nuts that refuse to receive vaccines and genuflect to the church of medicine.

Public health officials regularly release reports to the mainstream media about epidemics, pandemics and outbreaks of diseases. Then they encourage everybody to rush out to medical facilities in order to receive vaccines to protect themselves and loved ones against the named diseases.

Understand the Deceptive Terminology Being Used

The words Endemic, Epidemic, Pandemic, and Outbreak, are often used interchangeably by government regulating agencies as well as by the mainstream media companies to purposely mislead citizens about the dangers associated with certain diseases that may or may not be affecting or impacting various communities at any given time.

Endemic is the term used to describe a disease that regularly exists in a certain community. For example, measles is supposedly no longer endemic in the United States because there has been an absence of reported, continuous measles transmission cases for 12 months or longer. According to government regulating agencies, the disease is only transmitted in the United States by unvaccinated citizens that visit foreign territories and then bring it back home. These individuals supposedly infect other US citizens that have not been vaccinated.

Epidemic is the term used to describe a disease that has increased its number of reported cases in a community at a rate of one case more than was anticipated by health officials. For example, if a specific community normally expected 5 cases of measles each year based on previously reported health statistics, and suddenly 6 cases were reported, this would be an epidemic.

Pandemic is the term used to describe a situation where several epidemics are being reported throughout a country, in different countries or around the world at the same time.

Outbreak is the term used to describe a disease that has been reported in a community for the very first time or not for several years. Or the cases currently being reported are one case higher than previously reported. For example, if a given community has one case of measles reported in a given year and there are normally no cases reported this would be an outbreak as well as an epidemic.

The reporting of epidemics and pandemics through media sources could be very confusing to the general public. When people hear or read about these terms they often believe that millions of people are being infected with a disease process. Truth be told, the terms epidemic, pandemic and outbreak are usually referencing only a few cases of a disease process that have recently occurred.

It is vitally important that readers understand the lexicon being used within the public health profession before blindly jumping to conclusions and making poor decisions that might end up harming them in the long run.

The mainstream news has been reporting that measles are occurring in the United States at near epidemic proportions. This might seem really frightening to the average citizen. But what these reports are failing to disclose is that in the entire United States, only 314 cases of measles have been reported since January 1, 2019 – March 26, 2019 (at the time of this writing). Only 15 states out of 50 have even reported a measles infection in 2019. There are approximately a little over 328 million people living in the US as of 2019. Is this really a health crisis? When the words epidemic and pandemic are inserted, the reports seem a lot scarier than the raw numbers would indicate.

In addition, the measles virus is not any more dangerous for most human beings than the common cold. You’re talking about a virus that lasts 7-10 days, produces an immune system response of fever, coughing, runny nose and a rash which is how the virus is expelled from the body.

Unless your immune system is severely compromised, the measles, like all childhood illnesses, has a short duration in the human body and it leaves a person with lifelong immunity and a more finely tuned immune system that will have an easier time defending itself against other microbial invaders over the course of a lifetime.

The common cold lasts 1-3 weeks, produces an immune system response of fever, coughing and a runny nose. And again, unless your immune system is severely compromised it’s not a big deal for the average person.

Be Careful When Reviewing Published Health Statistics

Statistics being reported to the general public by government regulating agencies have to be reviewed with a great deal of skepticism. These agencies routinely under-reported polio cases by classifying them as meningitis and they did similar sleight of hand calculations with other diseases after vaccine campaigns were initiated many years ago. According to a whistle blower in the movie VAXXED, they still delete certain statistical data to suit whatever agenda they want to promote.

Many incidents of upper respiratory disorders, pneumonia and rhino viruses (common colds) are most likely being reported by government regulating agencies as influenza cases during the months of October – May (Flu season). This is how the number of Influenza deaths gets pumped up to the 100,000 mark. What most people fail to realize is that a lot of these people are probably dying from other illnesses besides the flu such as the common cold, pneumonia and strep infections. Many of these patients are severely compromised because they take too many drugs, are malnourished or extremely advanced in age.

There’s no vaccine or published cure for the common cold so you rarely see anything being promoted by the medical industrial complex about a simple rhino virus. If a person’s immune system is very weak however, the common cold can be potentially as dangerous to a person as the measles or influenza.

Our perceptions about many things are usually a lot different than the realities associated with such happenings. This phenomenon does not occur by accident. It happens because media companies are constantly reporting information they garner from government sources that has been specifically designed to deceive the public.

If we watch television, read a newspaper, or listen to the radio, we are absorbing disinformation from media companies that affects our lives. This is especially true in the case of healthcare news.

Presently there is an extremely strong campaign taking place by the medical industrial complex to push vaccines on the general population. Likewise, there’s an equally aggressive campaign taking place at the same time that is trying to attack anti-vaxxers and people that display good common sense when it comes to health and how to take care of their bodies. You might say the overall strategy employed by the powers that be is quite pandemic in nature and perhaps the greatest threat to human physiology we’ve observed in a long time.

The Religious Cult of Medicine

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Although a small minority of us don’t think of them and their vocation in this way, medical doctors and the profession of medicine are perceived by the vast majority of people as priests working in a church. The entire structure of the medical profession has been intentionally designed to mirror a religious experience.

When you walk into a house of worship, you enter a domain that is considered sacred by the members of the congregation. Inside a church, temple, synagogue or any other religious chamber, there are specific rules that are generally understood and followed by its members. Out of respect for the belief system, any types of criticism, skepticism or questions concerning the veracity of the organization’s major premise are off limits. In other words, members of religious congregations can never publicly question the church about anything.

In medicine, the doctor (priest, minister, rabbi) customarily wears a white gown (robe) that absolutely identifies him as the high priest in the congregation (practice). Within that practice there are nurses (nuns) that assist the doctor in taking care of patients (members of the congregation) when they become ill (possessed by evil microbes). Patients do not usually question  a doctor’s (minister’s) advice.

There are a variety of techniques (rituals) the profession of medicine uses to rid the body of diseases (evil spirits). Some of these techniques include introducing synthetic drugs (holy water) in patients, mass produced by petrochemical companies. In other situations, doctors cut out diseases in the body by performing surgeries (exorcisms) in an effort to remove infected tissues and organs (possessed body parts).

Question the intentions or integrity of the medical man and his large support group of medical personnel, and you will be looked upon by the citizens of most communities as a nut job (the devil). Question the medical protocols (biblical passages) that have been written by the petrochemical corporations and firmly established within the base curricula of every medical school program in the world, and you will be labeled as a charlatan, a quack or a pseudo-scientist.

The petrochemical companies secretly overseeing prestigious medical journals, the publishers of supposed peer-reviewed research, make certain doctors opposing the allopathic paradigm (drugs are the only way to achieve and maintain health) are always viewed by the vast majority of people as being unscientific.

In the Catholic Church, they teach parishioners that a young soul, entering the world, is compromised by original sin (a weakened immune system). It predisposes that vessel (body) to a life of demonic possession (sickness). The baptismal holy waters of the church (vaccination programs) are the only sure way to wash away the sins (childhood diseases) and set the soul right (create immunity against germs) so that it can enjoy an existence on Earth that is free from Satan’s temptations (bacteria and viral microbes).

I understand there will be plenty of people incensed over what I have written in this article. A person that writes content questioning a particular religion’s philosophy or integrity will not win any popularity contests. And make no mistake; the medical profession is a powerful religion with many followers. That, in itself, is a sad fact, but also the major reason why so many people are walking around sick and don’t understand why.

The faith and trust we have collectively invested, as a society, in medicine is based upon blind faith and not the profession’s ability to get sick people well. There are some pretty screwed up concepts that medical dogma is based upon and when one takes a close look at these ideas, their flaws become very apparent. It is because of this fact that the profession has been cleverly structured and marketed, by its engineers, to appear as a religion.

As a religion, medicine remains off limits from would-be critics and avoids important questions. These questions have needed to be answered for years, and yet they continue to be ignored by medicine’s leaders. Instead, we continue to hear and read about, walkathons, parades and fundraisers that supposedly benefit research for future eradication of diseases that the medical profession and petrochemical corporations have no intention of ever eliminating!

It’s not a coincidence that so many hospitals in the United States and around the world have been named after religious organizations and saints. Let’s face facts, there aren’t any medical facilities named “The Charles Manson Center for Burned Victims’. Medical institutions have been designed and branded in such a way that they are presently perceived, by the masses, as places of worship. Even the doctor’s classic, white lab coat has been designed to instill, in the psyche of health care consumers, a sense of purity when they think of physicians.

Getting people to believe in the value of medicine has been the long-term goal of pharmaceutical companies. Their relentless commitment to this self-serving campaign has turned the public sector into a massive congregation of cheerleaders that ritualistically praise the medical industry. Communities throughout America and around the world regularly donate large amounts of money attempting to build and maintain hospital centers. These organizations are now the center points of all modern communities.

Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of good medical doctors and surgeons in the world and some medical practice objectives can be helpful in saving lives. But most of the successes that can be attributed to modern medicine usually come in the form of emergency based care and not from the area of managing diseases and restoring health to the human body.

If we ever hope to improve the health of human beings and raise the overall quality of healthcare that’s practiced in the United States and other locations throughout the world, we will need to break the stranglehold petrochemical corporations have on the medical profession. These giant companies have hijacked medicine and made it sick. We need to turn our attention away from figuring out ways to pay for medical care and start concentrating on ways to fix the profession so that it stops making people sicker than they already are.

In the future we must evaluate medicine as a profession and not blindly praise its false accomplishments that have, ultimately, been fabricated by drug companies and later promoted in peer-reviewed journals that are owned and operated by the same companies. It’s time for the members of the congregation (the general public) to get off their knees and begin holding traditional medicine (the church) accountable for its actions!

The Medical Industrial Complex: Never A Cure to be Found

wp-image-879162634

By Dr. John Reizer

It’s vitally important to understand how the medical industrial complex operates in order to understand why there have never been any cures to any diseases.

Now I understand that some people like to point out that surgeons can cure tonsillitis, appendicitis, infected gallbladders, and a plethora of other conditions by removing diseased tissues. But that’s not technically a cure because the surgeon is cutting out the disease and not really curing anything. If done often enough, this practice would make the patient disappear.

In addition to those claims, others like to point out that Polio and Smallpox were cured through vaccination programs. This is also not accurate because both of these diseases declined through natural adaptations within human physiology, better sanitation, better public health practices, and some very clever statistical reporting by regulating agencies that reclassified Polio as viral meningitis after vaccines were administered. This is also the case with other diseases that were supposedly brought under control with vaccines. All of these claimed diseases declined in locations where vaccines were not administered, and often at a faster rate than the places where the medications were used. But we never hear about these facts.

In order to cure anything, a physician or the medicine he or she applies would have to cause the diseases involved to be replaced with new, healthy cells and tissues that are able to function normally from a physiological standpoint. This criteria is not even close to being satisfied in modern allopathic medicine. Only the body can cure specific diseases or more appropriately named, physiological expressions.

The medical industrial complex, for the most part, owns the named physiological expressions we commonly refer to as diseases. In reality, there are no diseases in existence. There are only physiological expressions that occur when the body is functioning in a state of ease (health) and also when the body is functioning in a state of dis-ease (loss of health).

Long ago, the medical industrial complex categorized various physiological expressions of dis-ease and named them as individual diseases. They own the rights to the named entities, and the surgical and chemical treatment protocols associated with them.

If you’re not in the medical club, you have no legal rights to claim that you can treat or cure these diseases. And if you attempt to do so, there are regulatory agencies like the FDA that will quickly remind you not to mess with their intellectual property. They don’t fool around with violators that infringe on their territories.

There will never be cures produced by the medical industrial complex because the enterprise was designed to expand the named entities not reduce them. They’re not in business to get rid of diseases, they’re in business to profit from their intellectual property, and that is exactly what they do. One of the easiest ways they create new intellectual property (diseases) is through the administration of vaccines to the human population.

Please understand I am not writing that medical doctors and surgeons can never help a person that has a medical emergency. In certain, limited scenarios they can be the difference between life and death for a patient. But the same practitioners can also kill a person while attempting to manage their disease process through a lengthy treatment protocol.

If we truly want to change physiological expressions in human beings from states of dis-ease to states of ease, we must understand that the body functions as an entire organism. The body is not a group of independent systems as depicted in medical textbooks that function separately from one another. Health cannot and will not be achieved through the application of drugs and surgeries that are targeting individual body systems.

Various physiological expressions of dis-ease that have been disingenuously categorized by medicine as cancers and autoimmune diseases can only be corrected by removing interferences from natural physiological pathways that are causing the body’s chemistry to react in an improper way. Pumping poisonous chemotherapeutic drugs into a compromised patient only makes the body weaker and the patient is not going to survive for more than a few years. The medical statistics show this to be the case. The same goes for radiation therapy, a known cause of cancer.

Not only does the medical industrial complex own the intellectual rights to the named entities, the associated treatment protocols, the pharmaceutical products, the insurance products that pay for the care and the hospital corporations where all the magic takes place, they also control the regulatory agencies, the medical researchers, medical schools, medical curricula and the media companies that constantly advertise their drugs as well as the newscasts that perform medical cheerleading on a daily basis.

Know the game you’re playing and know it well. This information could literally save the lives of you and your loved ones.

This is the real reason there are never any cures in organized medicine, only the long term management of individual diseases until the end of time.

Vaccine Injuries: Where’s the Proof?

By Dr. John Reizer

Throughout my career as a primary healthcare provider, I have encountered a large number of people that refuse to believe vaccines are harmful to human physiology. These individuals don’t believe said medicines can cause the proliferation of diseases worldwide. They don’t believe the medical cartel, at the highest levels, is trying to weaken and harm humans. They want to see the definitive proof (research) that shows children and adults are being irreparably damaged from various vaccines.

When presented with real proof (thousands of parents relating horrific experiences about their damaged children) that demonstrates vaccines are dangerous products, most people refuse to believe the information. In summary, people want proof but don’t believe the proof when it’s placed in front of them.

It’s very hard to remove the forever skepticism of the general population when it comes to challenging conventional medical paradigms. People tend to believe what they have been taught to believe by the different regulatory agencies (trusted sources) and are not willing to modify their beliefs.

Unfortunately, the only way to convince many people about the dangers associated with certain things is to let them experience the damage firsthand.

Sometimes it’s better to let common sense prevail instead of relying on regulatory agencies for information concerning a particular vaccine. Virtually all vaccine and medical research being performed is being done for the benefit of multinational pharmaceutical companies and not for the benefit of healthcare consumers. If you’re waiting for published research to appear on the evening news that details the truth about vaccines and other drugs, you’re going to have a very long wait.

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: Statement on Federal Vaccine Mandate

wp-image-879162634

To:  Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, House Energy and Commerce Committee

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions

Re: Statement federal vaccine mandates

Feb. 26, 2019

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of medical practice is a state function, not a federal one. Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.

A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks? Regulators may intervene to protect the public against a one-in-one million risk of a threat such as cancer from an involuntary exposure to a toxin, or-one-in 100,000 risk from a voluntary (e.g. occupational) exposure. What is the risk of death, cancer, or crippling complication from a vaccine? There are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out a much higher risk of complications, even one in 10,000, for vaccines. Such studies would require an adequate number of subjects, a long duration (years, not days), an unvaccinated control group (“placebo” must be truly inactive such as saline, not the adjuvant or everything-but-the-intended-antigen), and consideration of all adverse health events (including neurodevelopment disorders).

Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court and by Congress. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid some $4 billion in damages, and high hurdles must be surmounted to collect compensation. The damage may be so devastating that most people would prefer restored function to a multimillion-dollar damage award.

The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though somewhat less effective.

The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed by a government agency.

Measles is the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates, and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority, but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity. The last measles death in the U.S. occurred in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Are potential measles complications including death in persons who cannot be vaccinated due to immune deficiency a  justification for revoking the rights of all Americans and establishing a precedent for still greater restrictions on our right to give—or withhold—consent to medical interventions? Clearly not.

Many serious complications have followed MMR vaccination, and are listed in the manufacturers’ package insert, though a causal relationship may not have been proved. According to a 2012 report by the Cochrane Collaboration, “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate” (cited by the National Vaccine Information Center).

Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.

Even disregarding adverse vaccine effects, the results of near-universal vaccination have not been completely positive. Measles, when it does occur, is four to five times worse than in pre-vaccination times, according to Lancet Infectious Diseases, because of the changed age distribution: more adults, whose vaccine-based immunity waned, and more infants, who no longer receive passive immunity from their naturally immune mother to protect them during their most vulnerable period.

Measles is a vexing problem, and more complete, forced vaccination will likely not solve it. Better public health measures—earlier detection, contact tracing, and isolation; a more effective, safer vaccine; or an effective treatment are all needed. Meanwhile, those who choose not to vaccinate now might do so in an outbreak, or they can be isolated. Immunosuppressed patients might choose isolation in any event because vaccinated people can also possibly transmit measles even if not sick themselves.

Issues that Congress must consider:

Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished. Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal is the only incentive to do better.There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being quashed, as is dissent by professionals.There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children’s brains are developing rapidly—any interference with the complex developmental symphony could be ruinous.Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease.

AAPS believes that liberty rights are unalienable. Patients and parents have the right to refuse vaccination, although potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a clear or present danger.

AAPS represents thousands of physicians in all specialties nationwide. It was founded in 1943 to protect private medicine and the patient-physician relationship.

Respectfully yours,

Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

The 3 Biggest Hoaxes of Our Time?

 

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John Reizer 

Founder of NoFakeNews

When you have leverage over a group of people, a country, or a group of countries, you ultimately cash in, capitalize or impose your will on those target groups. Depending on the degree of leverage you have, the cash in period can last for a short duration of time or it can last for decades and possibly even a lot longer than that. If you have leverage because of technological advancements in your possession, that’s one thing. But if you have leverage based on the public’s misguided perception or understanding about said technologies, that’s an entirely different can of worms.

Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort people experience when they simultaneously juggle two or more beliefs that are in direct opposition to one another. It is the psychological distress people experience when they are presented with alternative viewpoints concerning universally accepted truths (conspiracy theories).

In my opinion, there are three mind-bending hoaxes that have been used against the general public.  The hoaxes have afforded certain countries the necessary leverage over others to reshape world politics in a way that was consistent with an agenda of a shadow governing construct.

All of these hoaxes will trigger cognitive dissonance reactions in the average person. The 3 hoaxes are the successful development of a nuclear weapons program by any country, the successful development of a manned and unmanned space travel program by any country and the successful development of a credible disease prevention program (vaccines). All three subjects have been disingenuously presented to the general public as brilliant success stories many years ago and have since been profited from. It is my theory that none of them are true.

Atomic Weapons

For many years we have been told nuclear weapons have been stockpiled by various superpower countries. We have all been exposed to the paradigm that promotes the idea that nuclear weapons have made the world a far safer place even though these horrific devices could theoretically wipe out millions of lives in a few seconds. We’ve also been told nuclear weapons are a deterrent to other potentially dangerous enemies of the United States and its allies and that they ultimately prevent wars and allow peace on earth to exist.

Is it possible that what we have been taught about this subject is based on establishment lies? Is it possible that the powers that be figured out a long time ago that if they created an incredible imaginary weapon and gave that imaginary weapon to a select number of countries, those countries could be used by them to control the political systems of the entire world much easier?

After it was developed, the atomic bomb was allegedly dropped on Japan twice in the 1940’s. The bombs reportedly brought a quick end to World War II. The technology was never used again in any war although the threat of nuclear weapons against humanity and the planet has been publicized ad nauseum.

The only other evidence of atomic weapons being used in history has come in the form of highly secretive government tests. All of these tests have had limited government witnesses and many have been conducted underground or underwater. Any or all of these tests could have been performed with the use of conventional bombs. TNT could have been used to fabricate any particular A-Bomb test.

The continuous threat of nuclear weapons being detonated by terrorists has been so overplayed in Hollywood movie productions throughout the years that people are now programmed to believe it’s only a matter of time before one of these devices will be used against a highly populated city. Yet there have been zero nukes used by crazy terrorists anywhere in the world. This fact alone is more than a little bit strange.

There are many people who believe the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by conventional fire bombings and not by atomic weapons as reported in official historical records. There are some researchers who also claim atomic bombs are impossible to manufacture. The parts of certain buildings that were left intact and the lack of radiation found in Hiroshima and Nagasaki seem to support this claim.

Israel is purported to have a huge inventory of 400 nuclear weapons at their disposal and yet they have never detonated one device in the direction of their Arab neighbors. These are the same Arab neighbors they despise. Are they and every other country in the world bluffing about said technology?

With so many unstable countries and crazy terrorist groups allegedly in existence, and so many nuclear weapons seemingly at their disposal or available for sale, how is it possible that not one nuclear incident has ever occurred?

Do the world leaders of certain countries really walk around with nuclear suitcases and corresponding launch codes? Do nuclear weapons actually exist?

Before you write all of this off as a crazy conspiracy theory, think for a minute about how much leverage certain countries possess over others because of their claimed nuclear arsenals. What if there really are no nukes in existence in the entire world?

Think about all the military spending that’s taken place with regards to nuclear programs. And don’t forget about all the money that’s been budgeted by countries to protect their infrastructures from incoming nuclear weapons.

Space Travel

Space travel, via Mercury, Gemini and Apollo, came out of nowhere and miraculously mastered manned space missions through low earth orbits, the Van Allen Belts, the thermosphere and ultimately achieved several moon landings in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. The technology has never been used again to this day. Are we really to believe that space technology achieved and mastered in the 1960’s has voluntarily been discarded by the powers that be?

From 2005-2009, NASA planned and developed the Constellation Program (CxP). Constellation had the major objectives of completing the International Space Station, resuming manned missions to the moon by the year 2020, and delivering the first manned mission to the planet Mars.

If we read through the lines of official statements that were created and disseminated by the United States Government regarding Constellation, we are encouraged to believe that funding issues and a lack of desire to return to the moon by NASA executives were the reasons President Barack Obama cancelled the program in 2010.

Truth be told, NASA has been attempting to figure out a way to safely transport astronauts through the impenetrable radiation belts and thermosphere that completely surround our earth and protect human beings from lethal cosmic radiation since the days of MercuryGemini and Apollo.

The Van Allen Belts extend some 60,000 kilometers above the surface of our planet and have most likely prevented all human beings from traveling farther than low earth orbits (LEO’s) and into deep space locations.

Every manned space mission, with the exception of Apollo, that has been attempted by NASA or any other space agency in the world has taken place in LEO’s. And there are many skeptics that believe Apollo never left the safety of LEO’s either.

If anyone searches the Internet for information about the Van Allen Belts being a barrier to manned space flights, and particularly the Apollo program, they are immediately met with websites that conclude NASA was able to safely negotiate its astronauts through the radiation zones in question.

A few of the websites that support the notions the Van Allen Belts are not as dangerous as some people have suggested contain impressive looking math to support their conclusions. The authors of such websites maintain that most laypersons have a poor understanding regarding the dangers of cosmic radiation.

It is no small coincidence the search engines have indexed and listed at the top of search results all the articles supporting the idea the Van Allen Belts were conquered by NASA and Apollo. But the fact remains that NASA and its astronauts have never been able to replicate the results they allegedly achieved many years ago with Apollo. And for good reason – they can’t do it!

There are millions of people in the world that believe NASA faked the moon landings. Search “moon landing hoax” and you will uncover many websites discussing conspiracy theories regarding this topic. Readers will also find, at the top of search results, websites strategically positioned to poke holes in the conspiracy theories listed. The powers that be use this technique repeatedly when defending the fake paradigms they have created and pushed on society.

Professional photographers, authors, and scientists have already proven that many of the Apollo photographs supposedly taken on the moon were filmed in studios or on a professionally designed movie set. All of this information has led many people to question the authenticity of Apollo’s success with regards to astronauts visiting the moon in 1969-1972.

The Van Allen belt problem is a serious one for NASA in more ways than most of us can imagine. Not only do the radiation belts preclude NASA from planning manned missions to deep space locations, they also prove that Apollo was a hoax.

According to the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) “Temperatures climb sharply in the lower thermosphere (below 200 to 300 km altitude), then level off and hold fairly steady with increasing altitude above that height. Solar activity strongly influences temperature in the thermosphere. The thermosphere is typically about 200° C (360° F) hotter in the daytime than at night, and roughly 500° C (900° F) hotter when the Sun is very active than at other times. Temperatures in the upper thermosphere can range from about 500° C (932° F) to 2,000° C (3,632° F) or higher.The NCAR and UCAR also claim, “The space shuttle and the International Space Station both orbit Earth within the thermosphere! Not very likely!

Let me point out that just about any metal found in existence has a melting point below the temperatures found in the thermosphere. Lead: 327 degrees C; Magnesium 650 degrees C; Aluminum 660 degrees C; Aluminum Alloys 463-671 degrees C; Gold 1063 degrees C; Copper 1084 degrees C; Steel 1425 – 1540 degrees C; Titanium 1670 degrees C. What kind of magic material did NASA make the Apollo and other imaginary space ships out of?

Let’s face facts. The United States Government and its military strength have never retreated from a strategic military target it has conquered. The moon is, without a doubt, the most strategic military target in the universe to possess when it comes to keeping an eye on our planet. If NASA and Apollo had, in reality, made it through the Van Allen Belts and thermosphere in 1969-1972, they would have continued to visit the moon. Other manned missions to deep space locations would have also been planned and carried out.

Are we supposed to believe, and keep a straight face at the same time, that NASA perfected travel through the radiation belts and thermosphere that surround the earth in 1969 and has never duplicated the accomplishment again? The official position of NASA today is that the technology used to get men to the moon with Apollo years ago was accidentally misplaced and the space agency has to begin from scratch. They actually admit they cannot get to the moon currently because the technology no longer exists.

The telltale evidence NASA never defeated the Van Allen Belts and thermosphere is written within the history of its missions. All of them have taken place in LEO’s. This is, ultimately, why the Space Shuttle program was planned and developed. It was designed to study and solve the radiation issues and extremely hot temperatures preventing astronauts from taking a real giant step for man and a real giant leap for mankind.

Vaccines

Vaccines, through Edward Jenner first came to fruition in the 1790’s and later were quickly credited with the elimination of Small Pox and later Polio. Many new vaccines have been created since Jenner’s initial concoction, but the technology doesn’t work and the diseases have never been eradicated despite being reported to have been.

People have been getting flu shots for years each autumn and every year the flu season commences shortly thereafter. Is the flu vaccine preventing the disease or spreading it rapidly across the population base? I think it’s pretty clear that flu vaccines are a fraud that makes the disease run rampant in a given location. It is my contention that all vaccines being used today are completely useless in conferring any type of immunity against any and all diseases. Truth be told, they are creating diseases and causing the proliferation of said diseases worldwide.

The majority of people in the world will take healthy children to medical doctors for wellness checkups. The doctors will vaccinate these healthy children with a broth of toxic, carcinogenic chemicals (49 doses) and expect said patients to become healthier throughout their lives. This strategy makes no sense whatsoever and you don’t have to have a high level degree in education to see the problem with this line of thinking. You don’t put pollutants into a pristine looking lake and expect the body of water to become even cleaner. It’s a ridiculous concept. The vaccine paradigm is a ridiculous concept and it’s the real reason we have Autism, autoimmune disorders, and a rainbow of colored ribbons dedicated to the cancer industry.

20190217_220123

Conclusion:

I believe nuclear weapons, space travel, and  medical vaccines are 3 subjects that have changed our world in ways that are far different than most people realize. All three hoaxes are continuously kept alive via the same deceptive reporting practices of the mainstream media and its handler intelligence agencies operating throughout the world.

What do you think about this post?