Watch the movie “VAXXED” by clicking here.
Watch the movie “VAXXED” by clicking here.
By Dr. John L. Reizer
Editor at NoFakeNews
If you write a post or commentary that shines the light of day on the truth about vaccines and the damage they are doing to human beings, you will quickly be labeled a conspiracy theorist, quack, lone nutter, or a junk scientist. Medical science (Isn’t that an oxymoron?) and the pharmaceutical companies worldwide that underwrite and control the profession of medicine continue to promote the false paradigm that more vaccines equate to a healthier and happier population base.
The vaccine industry is big business and it produces astronomical profits for the most powerful corporations in the world. This is why we will not see a decrease in the number of vaccine products being manufactured in the foreseeable future. Instead, we will see additional vaccines being introduced and more innocent people being irreparably harmed over time.
Every year the number of children being seriously injured because of vaccines increases. The cases very rarely, if ever, make it into the mainstream news. Vaccine injuries reported to medical physicians are usually not recorded as such and get lost in an intentionally manufactured statistical abyss. Make no mistake about this subject matter, there is a concerted effort by medicine and Big Pharma to keep a lid on the biggest secret within the medical profession; vaccines are the lifeblood of medicine and the etiological cause of autoimmune disorders as well as many physiological expressions of cancer and other diseases.
Every once in a while a brave medical doctor will step forward and spill the truth about the serious and shocking dangers associated with vaccines. An Australian medical doctor, John Piesse has written the following open letter:
“I have been encountering cases of vaccine injury for over 40 years. In June it was a happy, healthy nearly 5-year-old whose parents were required to put her on a catch-up schedule, in order to get her into kindergarten. She won’t be going to kinder. She’s in a wheel-chair, brain-damaged. Her life ruined. Then came a friend’s father who died after a flu vaccine, and last week a 4 year old boy, made autistic by a catch-up schedule.”
“In 1988, the US National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was created. It has paid out over US$3.5 billion to the vaccine-injured. The NVICP was set up to protect vaccine manufacturers from ruinous costs of litigation by vaccine-damaged people. It was deemed preferable to have ‘unavoidably unsafe’ vaccines than no vaccines. Unfortunately the protection provided to vaccine manufacturers also reduced incentives to develop safer vaccines in USA.”
“Vaccines contain health-damaging ingredients, not the least aluminium – a known neurotoxin…“ CLICK HERE TO READ THE ENTIRE LETTER
In addition to Dr. Piesse spilling the beans about vaccines, ABC News has recently reported and simultaneously downplayed an apparent connection between flu jabs and miscarriage in pregnant women.
If you want to label Dr. Piesse and others like him as conspiracy theorists, it’s your prerogative. Labels and names are not going to physically harm these brave professionals, but the vaccines we continue to distribute to healthcare consumers worldwide will undoubtedly destroy the lives of your children and loved ones. How many children have to die from vaccines before people wake up?
By Dr. John L. Reizer
Editor at NoFakeNews
Throughout the relatively short history of modern health care there have been continuous attempts to undermine the credibility of alternative healthcare professions. Very powerful organizations have carefully designed and implemented impressive strategies to make natural healthcare disciplines and their practitioners look like quacks and charlatans. Professionals are routinely hired by undisclosed, secret entities to give false interviews, write defamatory books, construct disingenuous websites and participate in broad scale efforts that target healthcare consumers and help create, for them, false perceptions about natural health care practices.
The funding of these activities, although difficult to trace for the average person, obviously originate from petrochemical corporations. Due to a number of legal factors, it is often quite cumbersome to point fingers at specific business entities, as well as others that might be involved with the inner workings of such conspiratorial activities. As one might suspect, the targets and casualties on the battlefield are always the same. Any healthcare professions, modalities, or treatment protocols that go against the grain of conventional medical theories are fair game.
Debunking agents are used on a regular basis to keep society firmly aligned with the parameters of acceptable thinking regarding many genres that make up our fabric of perceived reality. This is true in the health care arena as well. Any idea or concept that challenges the accepted thinking patterns of everyday people are quickly identified and dealt with in an expeditious manner by specialists that are paid to write and publish biased comments on websites and blogs. If, for example, a large minority of the population suddenly began to question the authenticity of something that was being reported by the mainstream media, trained debunkers are always ready to spring into action. These people, through the implementation of strategic campaigns, can quickly minimize the damage being caused by a controversial voice within the population base. Broad scale debunking can make sure that the majority of the population continues to perceive reality the way that the media originally intended.
Major petrochemical/pharmaceutical companies have a lot at stake in the very lucrative disease care industry. In order for these large multinational companies to remain profitable and powerful, society must continue to believe in certain erroneous concepts. As long as people continue to believe the maintenance of human health can be achieved through vaccines and that the suppression of symptoms in human physiology is the way to cure diseases, people will remain sick and pharmaceutical companies will continue to rake in astronomical profits.
Alternative healthcare professions often point out significant flaws that are absolutely inherent within the framework of traditional medicine’s illogical theories. Because of this fact, it has been a longstanding goal of established medicine’s controllers (Big Pharma) to retain the services of credible appearing scientists and other professionals that can write or convey damaging remarks about a particular alternative healthcare profession.
Very simply explained, when someone or something is intelligently challenging the credibility of a lucrative industry like traditional medicine, and they have damaging evidence that could blow the doors off the barn so to speak, and prove that many theoretical applications used within the medical profession are, in fact, the truest forms of quackery in existence, a major problem is created for the powers that be. The only way for Big Pharma to activate a campaign of damage control is to discredit the people and the professions that are posing the most legitimate threat, at a particular time, to established medical dogma. This is why alternative health care concepts are not embraced by science. This is why many alternative health care professions are publicly attacked and their objectives and benefits never see the light of day. What you will find out, if you take the time to study this subject matter, is that what is often promoted by the mainstream as science is actually quackery and what is often labeled by the same groups as quackery is true science.
Quite a few web addresses have been designed to make potential viewers wary of alternative healthcare services. It is easy to land on such disingenuous websites. All you have to do is find a search engine and type in an alternative healthcare practice methodology that is in opposition to traditional medicine and you will see such websites populate your computer screen. The sites all claim to be there to protect the general public from harmful alternative health care professions. Are you kidding me? Have you ever read the drug warnings that accompany prescription and non prescription drugs? Dangerous and extremely toxic drugs are what health care consumers need to be protected from, not natural health care professions and practitioners that are often licensed by state agencies to offer their beneficial services.
My advice to health care consumers that happen upon anti-alternative health care websites is to realize that this type of content is being purposely placed in the public domain by powerful organizations that have direct connections to the Medical Establishment. The ultimate goal of Big Pharma is to make healthcare consumers believe that alternative health care disciplines are all based on pseudo-scientific principles.
Remember to keep in mind that in most situations the differences between scientific and pseudo-scientific studies have to do with who or what entities are paying for the research being performed. If a given study is being funded by a petrochemical company, that has a biased interest in the research taking place, it is usually referred to by the mainstream thinkers as scientific. If, on the other hand, a particular study is being funded by a non biased organization, or has been privately funded by someone that wants the truth to be revealed about something they have deemed important, it is often viewed by the mainstream thinkers as pseudo science.
What do you think about this subject?
By Dr. John Reizer
Editor at NoFakeNews
I have previously written about my feelings concerning the dangers associated with consuming Fluoride through drinking water. Many municipalities and bottled water companies in the United States routinely add Fluoride to drinking water under the false pretext that it prevents dental caries in human beings. While water fluoridation is not as common of a practice throughout portions of Europe, many provinces around the world also continue to add Fluoride to public water supplies.
There is no evidence that adding Fluoride to drinking water benefits human physiology in any way whatsoever. There is, however extensive evidence that humans consuming this neurotoxin are doing damage to their overall health.
Many proponents of this dangerous practice use the argument that in small doses, Fluoride added to drinking water has no adverse effects on human neurophysiology. This claim is not true because the neurotoxin, Fluoride accumulates in human bones and teeth. Fluoride is a toxic poison that also can accumulate in brain and nervous tissues over time (Pineal Gland).
“A meta-analysis of 27 cross-sectional studies of children exposed to fluoride in drinking water, mainly from China, suggests an average IQ decrement of about seven points in children exposed to raised fluoride concentrations.44 Confounding from other substances seemed unlikely in most of these studies. Further characterisation of the dose–response association would be desirable.” – The Lancet – 2/14/14
Fluoride is an industrial chemical known to cause developmental neurotoxicity in human beings. – (Source: The Lancet).
Most toothpaste products contain the poison, Fluoride and thus a poison warning disclaimer is always printed on the product’s packaging. Remember, Fluoride accumulates in the human body so the argument that it is safe in small doses is illogical and untruthful.
What do you think about this subject?
The practice of water fluoridation in the United States has been under growing scrutiny for years by a public that has become conscious of the fact that adding toxic chemicals which are proven to be harmful to human health and children’s development to public water is medication without consent.
Never-the-less, the effort to stop fluoridation of municipal water supplies has been an uphill battle against entrenched financial interests and against dated ideas about health. While each year we hear news of cities heeding the concerns of their citizens and stopping fluoridation, without a major victory at the national level, people will be fighting this for years to come, all the while consuming toxic chemicals in the one thing we cannot live without, water.
The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is reporting on a major development to cut the head off of this snake, and an unprecedented lawsuit is now holding promise for a national reversal of municipal water fluoridation.
Based on neurotoxicity studies, the “EPA has been served with a petition that includes more than 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing the risks of water fluoridation to human health.”
As noted by FAN in a recent press release:
“This case will present the first time a court will consider the neurotoxicity of fluoride and the question of whether fluoridation presents an unreasonable risk under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
And, in contrast to most other legal challenges of Agency actions, TSCA gives us the right to get the federal court to consider our evidence ‘de novo’ — meaning federal courts are to conduct their own independent review of the evidence without deference to the EPA’s judgment.”
The lawsuit has been served along with a petition containing thousands of signatures of concerned and well-informed citizens, and includes more than 2500 pages of documents detailing the harm inherent in poisoning the pubic with fluoride.
In detail, the complaint is an attempt to demonstrate how this practice violates the Toxic Substances Control Act.
“The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), along with a coalition of environmental and public health groups has filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to their denial of our petition under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) seeking a ban on water fluoridation.
We believe this lawsuit is an unprecedented opportunity to end the practice once and for all in the U.S., and potentially throughout the world, based on the well-documented neurotoxicity of fluoride. You may read the official complaint here.” [Source]
The negative effects of consuming fluoridated water are well-documented, and the body of evidence continues to grow. In 2012 a major Harvard study presented a study demonstrating water fluoridation lowers IQ. In 2016 a study demonstrated a link between increased diabetes and water fluoridation. In 2015 the EPA had to issue new guidelines for safe levels of fluoride, reducing the amount, citing the potential for fluoridated water damages teeth, which ironically, is the very condition which we are told is the reason we need fluoride in the first place.
Public water fluoridation is slowly being defeated, and this lawsuit may play a major role in this fight.
Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.
This article (Lawsuit Could End Water Fluoridation Once and For All by Demonstrating its Neurotoxicity) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.