South Dakota Bill 1235 Would Outlaw Vaccine and Medical Mandates

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List

A new 2020 South Dakota House Bill has been introduced that would end all vaccine and medical mandates.

House Bill 1235, if passed, could make South Dakota a safe haven for many U.S. citizens seeking refuge and relief from the cartel of pharmaceutical companies that have hijacked organized medicine and the regulatory bodies that oversee the profession.

Read more about the introduction of the bill here.

Other U.S. states need to take notice of this bill and introduce similar legislation for citizens.

Please share this information with others. You can read more about the story here.

The Coronavirus: They’re Trying to Sell A Vaccine

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List Audiobook

What is the ultimate objective of the powers that be with regard to the coronavirus that is getting so much coverage on the national and international mainstream media? Simply put, they want to roll out a new vaccine and sell it to everyone.

In order to accomplish their objective, they  have to make it seem like the disease is going to be the end of the world. They want us to believe the coronavirus is more of a threat than it is.

Deceptive Terminology Being Used

The words EndemicEpidemicPandemic, and Outbreak, are often used interchangeably by government regulatory agencies as well as by the mainstream media companies to purposely mislead citizens about the dangers associated with certain diseases that may or may not be affecting various communities at any given time.

Endemic is the term used to describe a disease that regularly exists in a certain community. For example, measles is supposedly no longer endemic in the United States because there has been an absence of reported, continuous measles transmission cases for 12 months or longer. According to government regulating agencies, the disease is only transmitted in the United States by unvaccinated citizens that visit foreign territories and then bring it back home. These individuals supposedly infect other US citizens that have not been vaccinated.

Epidemic is the term used to describe a disease that has increased its number of reported cases in a community at a rate of one case more than was anticipated by health officials. For example, if a specific community normally expected 5 cases of measles each year based on previously reported health statistics, and suddenly 6 cases were reported, this would be an epidemic.

Pandemic is the term used to describe a situation where several epidemics are being reported throughout a country, in different countries or around the world at the same time.

Outbreak is the term used to describe a disease that has been reported in a community for the very first time or not for several years. Or the cases currently being reported are one case higher than previously reported. For example, if a given community has one case of measles reported in a given year and there are normally no cases reported, this would be an outbreak as well as an epidemic.

The reporting of epidemics and pandemics through media sources are very confusing to the general public. When people hear or read about these terms they often believe that millions of people are being infected with a disease process. Truth be told, the terms epidemic, pandemic, and outbreak are usually referencing only a few cases of a disease process that have recently occurred.

It is vitally important that readers understand the lexicon being used within the public health profession before blindly jumping to conclusions and making poor decisions that might end up harming them in the long run.

The coronavirus, if one exists, is being made to appear more of a problem than it is. If viruses actually spread like the CDC and other regulatory agencies claimed, we’d have all died long ago.

We have been brainwashed by movies and now believe synthetic vaccines are the only solution to resolve the fake plagues being creatively released into society by regulatory agencies that are financially influenced by big pharma.

Turn off the mainstream news. They are lying to us.

Should We Feel Confident Trusting the CDC?

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List Audiobook

The question that has been repeatedly asked of me through the years by readers of NoFakeNews is: Should We Feel Confident Trusting The CDC?

I have read numerous articles that have attempted to tackle this subject and of course, I have viewed the movie VAXXED that for all intents and purposes crushes any credibility this regulatory agency claims to have with regards to overseeing the safety and effectiveness of vaccine products that continue to be manufactured by pharmaceutical companies.

According to the CDC, they are a government regulatory agency that works to protect the American public.

The CDC claims it is completely free from the outside influences of corporations and it has no conflicts of interest that could possibly influence its policy-making decisions.

But can Americans really feel confident that this regulatory body is assessing information and writing policy recommendations that affect all healthcare consumers without biases and that the regulatory body is completely free from the outside influences of the pharmaceutical corporations and others that regularly donate monetary funds to them?

The links below give me some reasons to believe conflicts of interest regularly occur:

Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Safety Research – Gayle DeLong

Conflicts of Interest Report in Vaccine Policy Making by Congress

Ethical Violations of the CDC cited by The Office of Inspector General

The CDC Foundation (From Their Website)

“Established by Congress as an independent, nonprofit organization, the CDC Foundation is the sole entity authorized by Congress to mobilize philanthropic partners and private-sector resources to support CDC’s critical health protection mission.

“The CDC Foundation helps the CDC save and improve lives by unleashing the power of collaboration between CDC, philanthropies, corporations, organizations,, and individuals to protect the health, safety, and security of America and the world. Since 1995, the CDC Foundation has launched approximately 1,000 programs and raised over $740 million. The CDC Foundation managed over 300 CDC-led programs in the United States and in more than 130 countries last year.

“Because CDC is a federal agency, all scientific findings resulting from CDC research are available to the public and open to the broader scientific community for review. Funding for CDC’s work provided through the CDC Foundation is not contingent on the outcomes of research or other scientific activity being favorable to one or more partners. The CDC Foundation works with the CDC to ensure that programs will have a meaningful impact for CDC and public health, and complement CDC’s priorities and ongoing work.  The CDC and CDC Foundation each have review procedures in place to safeguard against possible conflicts of interest.”

In my considered opinion, the CDC Foundation seems to be a clever way for corporations, many of which are drug and vaccine makers to influence the regulatory agency with regards to specific products.

Take a few moments to read this article that discusses in great detail the conflicts of interest the CDC had concerning giving advice to healthcare consumers about the anti-viral, Tamiflu.

CDC’s Gift Review Process (From their Website)

“CDC ensures that when we engage with the private sector, we are good stewards of the funds entrusted to us. We maintain our scientific integrity by participating in a gift review process that is rigorous and transparent. CDC’s gift acceptance policy requires a comprehensive gift review prior to accepting a gift. This includes CDC Foundation (CDCF) gifts and gifts given directly to CDC, whether they are monetary or non-monetary. On May 1, 2014, CDC implemented a unified process for reviewing and documenting possible conflicts of interest (COI) related to gifts provided to CDC via CDCF. In April 2015, CDC extended the process to include the review of all monetary gifts directly provided to CDC. In 2016, this process was strengthened and institutionalized in the most recent revision of the CDC’s gift policy. From 2017 to today, CDC has focused on refining its gift review processes to ensure that the acceptance of gifts continues to be legally and ethically sound.”

Are you kidding me? Do people really believe that many of these donors are not influencing the CDC?

 

Funding Received in Fiscal Year 2019.Congressional Appropriations-$7,339,025,000. CDC Foundation-$13,221,109; Direct Gifts-$12,670,712;

 

The list below represents a history of CDC Foundation corporate donors and partners. Notice the incredible number of pharmaceutical companies included within the list. How can the CDC and our government write there are no conflicts of interest taking place?
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • 360 thinc, ltd.
  • 3M
  • 3M Pharmaceuticals
  • AB Biodisk
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • AbbVie Inc.
  • Academic Press
  • Accenture
  • ACE Construction Group
  • Acme Cargo Express Singapore
  • ActionSprout
  • Adis International
  • Adobe
  • Advanstar Communications, Inc.
  • Advantage Healthcare, Inc.
  • Aetna, Inc.
  • Affimedix, Inc.
  • AFLAC
  • AG Communications, LLC
  • Agilent Technologies
  • AGL Networks LLC
  • AGL Resources, Inc.
  • AirTran Airways
  • AkzoNobel N.V.
  • Alaska Center for Pediatrics
  • Alere North America, Inc.
  • Allergan, Plc
  • AlphaGraphics
  • Alston + Bird, LLP
  • The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
  • American Petroleum Institute
  • Amgen Inc.
  • The Analytica Group
  • Analytic Services Inc.
  • Annar Diagnostica
  • Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
  • Anthem, Inc.
  • Apatel.com, Inc.
  • Appalachian Power
  • Applied BioCode, Inc.
  • Applied Biosystems
  • Arch Chemicals, Inc.
  • Ark Sciences, Inc.
  • Arrowsmith Consulting, LLC
  • Ascend Media
  • ASI Holdings Inc.
  • Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
  • Astra Merck, Inc.
  • AstraZeneca PLC
  • AT&T Corp.
  • AT&T Georgia
  • Atkinson & Associates, LLC
  • Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Company
  • The Atlanta Journal Constitution
  • Atlanta Magazine
  • Autodesk, Inc.
  • Aventis Pasteur
  • Aventis Pasteur Limited
  • Aventis Pharmaceuticals

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL LIST OF DONORS

 

How are healthcare consumers supposed to have confidence in the advice the CDC publishes about vaccines and other pharmaceutical products when the regulatory agency receives funding, either directly or indirectly, from a large consortium of pharmaceutical companies that manufacture products the CDC are writing policies on?

 

Big Pharma And The Mandatory Vaccine Agenda: It’s Going to Affect (Infect) Everybody

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List Novel

According to the law, people have certain constitutional rights to refuse medical care in the United States. However, there are specific situations where those rights can be suspended and citizens can be forced, through the power of the government, to receive medical treatment whether they want it or not.

EXAMPLES:

If a person is deemed mentally incompetent due to alcohol, drugs, brain injury, or they have been diagnosed with a mental disorder, medical treatment can be administered against their will.

Parents and legal guardians cannot refuse medical treatment for a child that is considered life-sustaining and they cannot deny a child medical care that is considered necessary by the medical profession. In cases where parents attempt to interfere with this process, the child can be legally kidnapped by the government so that the medical care deemed necessary can be administered.

If the government determines that a patient is suffering from a communicable disease that poses an immediate threat to the community at large or himself, the government has the ability to apply medical treatment to the individual by force.

Although the exceptions to our rights to refuse medical treatment listed above might seem benevolent in nature, they could ultimately become problematic for people looking to keep themselves and their families healthy in the immediate future.

Undoubtedly, there are times when emergency medical care needs to be administered to patients of all ages in order to sustain life. I don’t think anyone of sound mind would argue this point. An emergency medical trauma team can be the difference between life and death in many instances. In addition, there are certainly times when a patient is not of sound mind for one reason or another and medical decisions must be made on their behalf in an effort to save a person’s life.

But there is an inherent flaw within the construct of the law that places all healthcare consumers at risk of being harmed by the medical profession that is supposed to protect them. That flaw in the law came about long after those exceptions listed above were written. The lawmakers didn’t take into consideration that the medical profession would become hijacked in the future by a cartel of gangsters.

What most people don’t realize is that organized medicine has been hijacked by the medical-industrial complex. A very large consortium of pharmaceutical companies has methodically and strategically taken over the medical profession.

Big pharma controls the medical research being performed, the treatment protocols, the diagnostic tests, the medical curricula being taught in medical schools, the hospital corporations, the physicians and the other staff members working within the medical system. It is a monopolistic design that has been cleverly crafted through time by very intelligent overseers. More importantly, the construct is firmly in place and it’s not working to get sick people well. It’s working instead to keep people unhealthy in order to increase the profits for drugmakers.

The mandatory vaccine agenda is well underway. Its mission and prime objective from its inception have been to ensure that every citizen in the United States receives synthetically made medicines that supposedly make human beings immune to a never-ending list of dangerous diseases.

The peer-reviewed research that proves vaccines are safe, effective products to defeat dangerous diseases has been paid for by for-profit pharmaceutical companies. In reality, vaccines weaken and destroy the human immune system over time and cause the proliferation of diseases worldwide.

Think about the following scenario; a person goes to a drugstore in late August and is offered a free vaccine to prevent the Influenza virus from infecting them. Millions of Americans routinely receive flu jabs under the guise the medicine will protect them from getting the flu. The reality of the situation yields a completely different result than what healthcare consumers originally bargained for. As a result of millions of people getting flu shots, the flu season is unleashed. This happens every single year without fail.

When people are given the flu shot, they transmit the virus to others in their communities through a biological process called viral shedding. There are plenty of people that become infected with Influenza every fall and winter because of the flu vaccine campaigns that are sponsored by the medical profession. The flu season is cleverly seeded annually by the drug companies that later profit from selling a plethora of pharmaceutical products that are perceived as necessary by people suffering from the flu.

Do people honestly believe drugstores and medical clinics that profit, when healthcare consumers become ill, are interested in giving out free vaccines that will make people healthier? Do we really believe that drugstores want to make less money and see people remain healthy? Remember, these are big corporations and they’re not in business to make less money than they can.

There is a massive campaign underway to mandate vaccines for every citizen young and old. Big pharma has the money to buy state senators, congress and any other assets they deem necessary to get the laws passed that can see their agenda come to fruition.

There are many people that believe global warming will destroy our planet in the next hundred years. It is my belief that we have a bigger problem than global warming that will ultimately destroy the human race and that is the medical-industrial complex. At the current rate, it is going, drugs and vaccines will totally destroy human physiology and the genetic information it passes on to its offspring. It’s a dire situation and not many people are cognizant of the fact that a problem even exists.

This Is How We End Up Taking Prescription Drugs Our Entire Lives

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List novel

We’re born into this world, mostly, as healthy human beings. You don’t find many newborns taking prescription drugs. As we progress through the childhood years, our parents are encouraged, through clever marketing campaigns, to take their children to medical physicians for wellness checkups. And so our parents, not knowing any better, follow the advice.

Little Johnny’s first visit to the pediatrician begins with being weighed, followed by a thorough physical examination. After the doctor makes sure the child has ten toes and fingers, he or she begins to push the medical-industrial complex’s agenda to vaccinate the hell out of every child.

“You see, Mr & Mrs. Clueless, little Johnny’s immune system is not strong enough to defend him against all the terrible microbes in the environment,” the pediatrician begins the industry’s pitch.  “Even though the amazing intelligence that designed all 37 trillion cells inside Johnny’s body and organized them into a flawlessly functioning human being is still present and working to keep him healthy every second he’s alive, Johnny must receive all 58 of his scheduled vaccines. Without these amazing drugs that have been manufactured by for-profit pharmaceutical companies, Johnny will get a childhood disease that will cause him mild symptoms for a week or two that pale in comparison to the possible side effects of the actual drugs.”

And so the assault on Johnny’s immune system begins. If he’s lucky, he’ll be strong enough to survive the initial encounter with the medical maniac and not need to be hospitalized. If he’s unlucky, he’ll end up paralyzed, irreparably harmed or dead. And if he’s like most people, he’ll remain asymptomatic for many years until the vaccines he’s previously received cause him to contract cancer or some other type of autoimmune disorder that will require costly medical management in the form of expensive prescription drugs.

As Johnny grows older, he’s continuously marketed to by a large consortium of drug companies that stress to him the importance of getting annual physical checkups from medical specialists. And Johnny, not knowing any better, follows the advice. He visits a general practitioner that performs another thorough physical examination. The good doctor draws some blood and sends it to a lab for analysis. When the results are returned, the physician tells Johnny that his cholesterol is slightly elevated and that he will need to take a prescription drug for the remainder of his life to help his body maintain a healthy level of cholesterol.

A few years later, Johnny visits another medical doctor who examines him and finds that his blood pressure is slightly elevated. Johnny is told that he will need to take a pill for the rest of his life to maintain healthy blood pressure in his body. Without this life-saving drug, Johnny is told he can expect to have serious health problems. So Johnny accepts the advice and fills the prescription.

A few more wellness checkups throughout Johnny’s life will lead to additional life-saving drugs being prescribed for him. And if Johnny hasn’t kicked the proverbial bucket by then, there’s a good chance he’ll have been taking five or six prescription drugs every day for many years.

This is how Johnny and other healthcare consumers like him end up taking prescription drugs throughout their entire lives and never think twice about the illogicality of doing so.

Merry Christmas!

 

Trying to Improve Nature’s Blueprints

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of  The Target List

I have been trying to think of a situation where a human being’s educated mind has made or developed a technology that actually improved nature’s blueprints. In other words, the technology I am trying to think of would have to be capable of  improving nature’s designs and overall ability to produce its products. Or better yet, it would make nature’s products better than nature’s original designs. It’s really hard to come up with examples because I don’t believe any exist.

I am not talking about technologies that make life easier for humans or for companies manufacturing things. There are countless examples of those things.

Can you think of any scientific breakthroughs that have made the oxygen we breathe purer and better molecularly designed than its natural form?

What about water? Have there been any great scientific accomplishments with regards to making that life requiring chemical better than what nature’s blueprint has provided?

It’s pretty easy to see, once you examine this hypothetical question, there are never going to be situations where the human educated mind will be able to improve upon the naturally occurring systems on the planet that allow for the sustainability of life.

The educated mind, while being very clever and capable of inventing technologies that can make us more comfortable, cannot improve upon nature’s blueprints. The educated mind is unable to match wits with the innate logic of nature.

And because this is the truth, I have to ask the question; why in the hell would anyone, with an ounce of grey matter in his or her cranium, let a pharmaceutical company convince him their toxic products are able to balance out the body’s natural chemistry?

No vaccines can ever bring balance to a natural, physiological system that’s out of balance.

No vaccines can improve the design or strength of the human immune system, It’s physiologically impossible.

This is still going to be the truth if you don’t understand what I am writing in this post. And it will  be the truth if you label me an antivaxxer. You see, it’s just the truth!

What do you think about this subject?

The Dreaded Flu Season (Again)?

cropped-cropped-400dpilogo2.jpg

Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List novel

Every year in the United States between the months of October and May, people are inundated with flu vaccination ads and news programs that are generated by pharmaceutical companies and government agencies such as the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

The mass marketing campaigns are relentless and cleverly designed to encourage (scare) citizens into getting the annual flu jab in order to supposedly boost human immunity against Influenza.

It’s frustrating for me, on a personal level, to watch the same campaign rolled out nationally and promoted by the powers that be every single year. You can count on it just like Halloween, Thanksgiving and Christmas. Flu season is officially on the US calendar and you can expect to see the agenda being pushed on every “Fakestream News” company in existence.

Did you ever wonder where the Influenza virus hides during the months of June – September? Does it go to some other part of the world for a yearly holiday? Like magic, it suddenly reappears in October and people are told to protect themselves with flu immunizations once again. Do you smell something fishy with this storyline?

Is it possible that the flu vaccine campaign is actually the cause of the flu season? Is it possible the reason that flu season begins every October is because people begin receiving flu shots every September?

Before you roll up your sleeve, stick out your arm and let someone stick you with any vaccine, you better do your research and understand that all vaccines are medicinal concoctions, and they carry potential risks to your health and well being. Don’t think for one second that there aren’t consequences attached to receiving vaccines of any kind.

There are plenty of research studies that show a connection between vaccines and neurological diseases such as Autism and Guillain-Barre syndrome. There are also plenty of attorneys that specialize in representing people that have been injured by these dangerous drugs. 

Watch the video below to see what can happen from getting one flu shot. Get informed and stay informed about your health and what you put inside your body!

 

Disclaimer!

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a healthcare specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make healthcare decisions based upon their own independent research.

Why They Attack Alternative Healthcare

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Author of The Target List

Throughout the relatively short history of modern healthcare, there have been continuous attempts to undermine the credibility of alternative healthcare professions. Very powerful organizations have carefully designed and implemented impressive strategies to make natural healthcare disciplines and their practitioners look like quacks and charlatans.

Professionals are routinely hired by undisclosed, secret entities to give false interviews, write defamatory books, construct disingenuous websites and participate in broad scale efforts that target healthcare consumers and help create, for them, false perceptions about natural healthcare practices.

The funding of these activities, although difficult to trace for the average person, obviously originate from petrochemical corporations. Due to a number of legal factors, it is often quite cumbersome to point fingers at specific business entities, as well as others that might be involved with the inner workings of such conspiratorial activities.

As one might suspect, the targets and casualties on the battlefield are always the same. Any healthcare professions, modalities, or treatment protocols that go against the grain of conventional medical theories are fair game.

Debunking agents are used on a regular basis to keep society firmly aligned with the parameters of acceptable thinking regarding many genres that make up our fabric of perceived reality. This is true in the healthcare arena as well.

Any idea or concept that challenges the accepted thinking patterns of everyday people are quickly identified and dealt with in an expeditious manner by specialists that are paid to write and publish biased comments on websites and blogs. If, for example, a large minority of the population suddenly began to question the authenticity of something that was being reported by the mainstream media, trained debunkers are always ready to spring into action. These people, through the implementation of strategic campaigns, can quickly minimize the damage being caused by a controversial voice within the population base.

Broad scale debunking can make sure that the majority of the population continues to perceive reality the way that the media originally intended.

Major petrochemical/pharmaceutical companies have a lot at stake in the very lucrative disease care industry. In order for these large multinational companies to remain profitable and powerful, society must continue to believe in certain erroneous concepts. As long as people continue to believe the maintenance of human health can be achieved through vaccines and that the suppression of symptoms in human physiology is the way to cure diseases, people will remain sick and pharmaceutical companies will continue to rake in astronomical profits.

Alternative healthcare professions often point out significant flaws that are absolutely inherent within the framework of traditional medicine’s illogical theories. Because of this fact, it has been a longstanding goal of established medicine’s controllers (Big Pharma) to retain the services of credible appearing scientists and other professionals that can write or convey damaging remarks about a particular alternative healthcare profession.

Very simply explained, when someone or something is intelligently challenging the credibility of a lucrative industry like traditional medicine, and they have damaging evidence that could blow the doors off the barn so to speak, and prove that many theoretical applications used within the medical profession are, in fact, the truest forms of quackery in existence, a major problem is created for the powers that be.

The only way for Big Pharma to activate a campaign of damage control is to discredit the people and the professions that are posing the most legitimate threat, at a particular time, to established medical dogma. This is why alternative healthcare concepts are not embraced by science. This is why many alternative healthcare professions are publicly attacked and their objectives and benefits never see the light of day. What you will find out, if you take the time to study this subject matter, is that what is often promoted by the mainstream as science is actually quackery and what is often labeled by the same groups as quackery is true science.

Quite a few web addresses have been designed to make potential viewers wary of alternative healthcare services. It is easy to land on such disingenuous websites. All you have to do is find a search engine and type in an alternative healthcare practice methodology that is in opposition to traditional medicine and you will see such websites populate your computer screen. The sites all claim to be there to protect the general public from harmful alternative healthcare professions. Are you kidding me? Have you ever read the drug warnings that accompany prescription and non prescription drugs? Dangerous and extremely toxic drugs are what healthcare consumers need to be protected from, not natural healthcare professions and practitioners that are often licensed by state agencies to offer their beneficial services.

My advice to healthcare consumers that come across anti-alternative healthcare websites is to realize that this type of content is being purposely placed in the public domain by powerful organizations that have direct connections to the Medical Establishment. The ultimate goal of Big Pharma is to make healthcare consumers believe that alternative healthcare disciplines are all based on pseudo-scientific principles.

Remember to keep in mind that in most situations the differences between scientific and pseudo-scientific studies have to do with who or what entities are paying for the research being performed. If a given study is being funded by a petrochemical company, that has a biased interest in the research taking place, it is usually referred to by the mainstream thinkers as scientific. If, on the other hand, a particular study is being funded by a non biased organization, or has been privately funded by someone that wants the truth to be revealed about something they have deemed important, it is often viewed by the mainstream thinkers as pseudo science.

What do you think about this subject?

Gary Null’s Movie on Vaccines

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List 

I wanted to share this very informative video presentation by Gary Null about vaccines.

We’re constantly being desensitized by the mainstream media to the dangers these medications pose to everybody. We’re being brainwashed into believing these products are beneficial and can cause no harm to healthcare consumers.

Watch the video below: