The Medical Industrial Complex: Never A Cure to be Found

wp-image-879162634

By Dr. John Reizer

It’s vitally important to understand how the medical industrial complex operates in order to understand why there have never been any cures to any diseases.

Now I understand that some people like to point out that surgeons can cure tonsillitis, appendicitis, infected gallbladders, and a plethora of other conditions by removing diseased tissues. But that’s not technically a cure because the surgeon is cutting out the disease and not really curing anything. If done often enough, this practice would make the patient disappear.

In addition to those claims, others like to point out that Polio and Smallpox were cured through vaccination programs. This is also not accurate because both of these diseases declined through natural adaptations within human physiology, better sanitation, better public health practices, and some very clever statistical reporting by regulating agencies that reclassified Polio as viral meningitis after vaccines were administered. This is also the case with other diseases that were supposedly brought under control with vaccines. All of these claimed diseases declined in locations where vaccines were not administered, and often at a faster rate than the places where the medications were used. But we never hear about these facts.

In order to cure anything, a physician or the medicine he or she applies would have to cause the diseases involved to be replaced with new, healthy cells and tissues that are able to function normally from a physiological standpoint. This criteria is not even close to being satisfied in modern allopathic medicine. Only the body can cure specific diseases or more appropriately named, physiological expressions.

The medical industrial complex, for the most part, owns the named physiological expressions we commonly refer to as diseases. In reality, there are no diseases in existence. There are only physiological expressions that occur when the body is functioning in a state of ease (health) and also when the body is functioning in a state of dis-ease (loss of health).

Long ago, the medical industrial complex categorized various physiological expressions of dis-ease and named them as individual diseases. They own the rights to the named entities, and the surgical and chemical treatment protocols associated with them.

If you’re not in the medical club, you have no legal rights to claim that you can treat or cure these diseases. And if you attempt to do so, there are regulatory agencies like the FDA that will quickly remind you not to mess with their intellectual property. They don’t fool around with violators that infringe on their territories.

There will never be cures produced by the medical industrial complex because the enterprise was designed to expand the named entities not reduce them. They’re not in business to get rid of diseases, they’re in business to profit from their intellectual property, and that is exactly what they do. One of the easiest ways they create new intellectual property (diseases) is through the administration of vaccines to the human population.

Please understand I am not writing that medical doctors and surgeons can never help a person that has a medical emergency. In certain, limited scenarios they can be the difference between life and death for a patient. But the same practitioners can also kill a person while attempting to manage their disease process through a lengthy treatment protocol.

If we truly want to change physiological expressions in human beings from states of dis-ease to states of ease, we must understand that the body functions as an entire organism. The body is not a group of independent systems as depicted in medical textbooks that function separately from one another. Health cannot and will not be achieved through the application of drugs and surgeries that are targeting individual body systems.

Various physiological expressions of dis-ease that have been disingenuously categorized by medicine as cancers and autoimmune diseases can only be corrected by removing interferences from natural physiological pathways that are causing the body’s chemistry to react in an improper way. Pumping poisonous chemotherapeutic drugs into a compromised patient only makes the body weaker and the patient is not going to survive for more than a few years. The medical statistics show this to be the case. The same goes for radiation therapy, a known cause of cancer.

Not only does the medical industrial complex own the intellectual rights to the named entities, the associated treatment protocols, the pharmaceutical products, the insurance products that pay for the care and the hospital corporations where all the magic takes place, they also control the regulatory agencies, the medical researchers, medical schools, medical curricula and the media companies that constantly advertise their drugs as well as the newscasts that perform medical cheerleading on a daily basis.

Know the game you’re playing and know it well. This information could literally save the lives of you and your loved ones.

This is the real reason there are never any cures in organized medicine, only the long term management of individual diseases until the end of time.

Aborted Babies Used in Vaccines

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John Reizer

In addition to being extremely toxic, vaccines are also made from aborted human fetuses. Although this is probably shocking to most of us, it is not surprising to the people working in this industry. There are questionable bioethical practices performed in the field of medical research everyday.

Many scientists and the corporate structures they work for have very little regard for human life. To these people life is merely something that’s happened by chance and something that is eventually going to malfunction.

According to these individuals, we’re all the product of bad genetics and we will eventually express those bad genetics in the form of various diseases.

Mainstream science and medicine believe that the suppressive medical therapies practiced throughout the world are the only logical way to defeat physiological inadequacies in the human body.

Anyone who has ever had an opportunity to dissect a human cadaver should instantly realize that life on this planet has come to fruition from intelligent design. There’s an innate striving within all life that seeks to regulate itself and adapt to its ever changing environment. This is why human and animal medicine, through suppressive therapies, have over time made the people and animals on our planet weaker than they should be.

Vaccines are a bad idea for people and animals alike regardless of how many medical professionals jump up and down screaming otherwise. And these drugs contain toxins and human parts that should sicken all of us both physiologically and psychologically speaking.

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: Statement on Federal Vaccine Mandate

wp-image-879162634

To:  Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, House Energy and Commerce Committee

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions

Re: Statement federal vaccine mandates

Feb. 26, 2019

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of medical practice is a state function, not a federal one. Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.

A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks? Regulators may intervene to protect the public against a one-in-one million risk of a threat such as cancer from an involuntary exposure to a toxin, or-one-in 100,000 risk from a voluntary (e.g. occupational) exposure. What is the risk of death, cancer, or crippling complication from a vaccine? There are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out a much higher risk of complications, even one in 10,000, for vaccines. Such studies would require an adequate number of subjects, a long duration (years, not days), an unvaccinated control group (“placebo” must be truly inactive such as saline, not the adjuvant or everything-but-the-intended-antigen), and consideration of all adverse health events (including neurodevelopment disorders).

Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court and by Congress. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid some $4 billion in damages, and high hurdles must be surmounted to collect compensation. The damage may be so devastating that most people would prefer restored function to a multimillion-dollar damage award.

The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though somewhat less effective.

The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed by a government agency.

Measles is the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates, and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority, but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity. The last measles death in the U.S. occurred in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Are potential measles complications including death in persons who cannot be vaccinated due to immune deficiency a  justification for revoking the rights of all Americans and establishing a precedent for still greater restrictions on our right to give—or withhold—consent to medical interventions? Clearly not.

Many serious complications have followed MMR vaccination, and are listed in the manufacturers’ package insert, though a causal relationship may not have been proved. According to a 2012 report by the Cochrane Collaboration, “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate” (cited by the National Vaccine Information Center).

Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.

Even disregarding adverse vaccine effects, the results of near-universal vaccination have not been completely positive. Measles, when it does occur, is four to five times worse than in pre-vaccination times, according to Lancet Infectious Diseases, because of the changed age distribution: more adults, whose vaccine-based immunity waned, and more infants, who no longer receive passive immunity from their naturally immune mother to protect them during their most vulnerable period.

Measles is a vexing problem, and more complete, forced vaccination will likely not solve it. Better public health measures—earlier detection, contact tracing, and isolation; a more effective, safer vaccine; or an effective treatment are all needed. Meanwhile, those who choose not to vaccinate now might do so in an outbreak, or they can be isolated. Immunosuppressed patients might choose isolation in any event because vaccinated people can also possibly transmit measles even if not sick themselves.

Issues that Congress must consider:

Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished. Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal is the only incentive to do better.There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being quashed, as is dissent by professionals.There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children’s brains are developing rapidly—any interference with the complex developmental symphony could be ruinous.Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease.

AAPS believes that liberty rights are unalienable. Patients and parents have the right to refuse vaccination, although potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a clear or present danger.

AAPS represents thousands of physicians in all specialties nationwide. It was founded in 1943 to protect private medicine and the patient-physician relationship.

Respectfully yours,

Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

Childhood Vaccine Warning Labels Should be advertised on Television

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John Reizer

Wouldn’t it be great if every mandated or recommended childhood vaccine was required to be advertised on television each evening along with their applicable warning labels and associated ingredients?

20190218_212629

Drug companies would cringe at the thought of having to advertise certain vaccines that have already been forced upon the public. They would have to disclose all the side effects in any ads and that would scare healthcare consumers. That’s why you never see the Rubella, tDap, chickenpox or Measles vaccines featured in ads like other drugs being pushed on a daily basis.

If the government mandated the public consumption of drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis for precautionary measures, do you think big pharma would continue to advertise these products? No!

Can you imagine if the government mandated the taking of antidepressants for everyone because studies found that too many people were depressed and it was causing an epidemic of suicidal behavior in the nation?

Do you think the mandated consumption of antidepressants would infuriate the public? Or would they sit back and roll up their sleeves and get jabbed? Would we see medical cheerleaders posting remarks on social media about what a good idea it was to mandate the public consumption of antidepressants or whatever poison the legal drug cartel wanted to sell?

It’s complete insanity that a governing body can force its citizens to take any drug. All drugs come with serious risks and no one should ever be forced to take any drug without their consent.

What do you think about this subject?