Big Pharma Doesn’t Want Healthy People

Dr. John L. Reizer

Author of The Target List novel

Like any business, drug companies want more customers. Unlike any other business, these multinational corporations have the means to create lifelong customers because they can get their prospects chemically addicted to dangerous, synthetic compounds that have been specifically designed for that purpose.

Think about the people in your life that take prescription medicines. You probably know an aunt or uncle that takes a pill to control hypertension, diabetes, cholesterol, or some other chronic condition. Maybe the person you know taking a prescribed drug is a parent or a sibling. Maybe you’re the person addicted to a prescription drug. How long have you been taking the same pill for a medically diagnosed condition? Has it been days, weeks, months or years? Chances are good that the people you know taking prescription drugs have been doing so for an extended period of time. Chances are equally good that the people you know taking medications aren’t planning on kicking their habits anytime soon.

The drug companies are in business to create and sell addictive, chemical products perceived by the members of society to be necessary in order to create a healthy, functioning body. People actually believe, in today’s world, the only way to control diabetes, high blood pressure and high cholesterol is through prescription drugs. The average person doesn’t give much consideration to the idea of getting off the sofa to partake in an exercise program. Most people want instant gratification. They want to be healthy without having to put serious effort into their campaigns. They’d rather take a prescription drug than walk a few miles everyday to improve some flagged chemistry profile that was discovered in a lab test ordered by a physician.

There are many healthcare experts openly questioning recommended, published guidelines pertaining to blood pressure and cholesterol. For years, allopathic medicine supported the idea that a good systolic blood pressure was 100 + a person’s age. If a person was 65 years old, an acceptable blood pressure reading, according to the old guidelines, was around 165/80. But that didn’t bode well for Big Pharma’s plan to medicate most of the U.S. population. The solution, lower the published guidelines so millions of people could instantly be reclassified as having hypertension. Suddenly, there was a need for a lot more drugs to be prescribed to all those people diagnosed with high blood pressure.

It’s the opinion of some natural healthcare practitioners that cholesterol guidelines have also been published at a lower level than is attainable by the body through natural measures. The current guidelines are practically unattainable without synthetic drugs. There are serious questions being asked by some scientists about the dangers of Statin drugs which artificially lower cholesterol levels in human beings, and about how low cholesterol might negatively impact the immune system over time.

As long as there continues to be lazy and apathetic people in the world, drug companies will continue to prosper.

It’s pretty ironic that we commonly associate the drug business with healthcare when, in fact, it’s sickness care this industry and its associated professions are pedaling.

The countless drugs being produced by a myriad of companies are not designed to make people healthy. They are designed to control and suppress the symptoms associated with physiological disorders. Many of these symptoms are important and strategic attempts by the body to naturally heal bodily tissues.

To heal the body from the inside out is a concept not often addressed, for the most part, by members of organized medicine or the pharmaceutical industry. To address, in a public forum, the idea that human beings could possibly resolve physiological obstacles without the use of synthetically made products, that have U.S. and international patents firmly attached to them, would be considered pseudo-science by many traditional healthcare professionals. Individual doctors and scientists having the nerve to broach publicly any ideas that might rub friction into conventional, medical dogma of the present day, are usually ostracized from their colleagues, supervisors and profession. To go against the grain, in the medical world, is to commit professional suicide.

The drug corporations; the medical schools and associated textbooks they produce for such institutions; the insurance companies they indirectly own or control; the media companies that sponsor drug advertisements or are directly owned by parent companies that have ownership ties to drug companies; the research scientists that are paid by funds coming from institutions and grants with close ties to drug companies, and the profitability factor associated with selling pharmaceutical products that are inexpensive to produce and sold, in many instances, at a 1000% markup in price to healthcare consumers are the enabling components allowing this national health crisis to continue year after year. Meanwhile, we have politicians and people up in arms, arguing about what’s the best way to pay for prescription drugs that are killing many of us. What’s the best solution? Obamacare? Trumpcare? Forget about paying for this crap. We need to stop producing these poisons right now if we ever hope to get people back to a true state of health.

The statistics compiled by the World Health Organization (WHO) demonstrate a very disturbing trend for people living in America. Despite the fact our nation has the best and most sophisticated healthcare technology in the world, we continue to have a lot of unhealthy people walking around. If one were to put two and two together, a simple conclusion could be drawn that would clearly point to prescription drugs as being the major culprit that’s been dragging the entire nation’s health status into the toilet when compared to other countries throughout the world keeping similar statistics.

As I’ve written many times before, in various books and articles, Big Pharma does not gain anything, from a financial perspective, by developing products that would cure any specific disease process. To find a cure is counter productive to the drug industry’s goal of expanding its business. To find a cure means, in effect, to destroy business. There’s no money to be made when people are functioning in a healthy manner. The money and potential profit are all based on a nation filled with sick and dying citizens. The more sick people there are, the better the profits will be for Big Pharma.

Most of what healthcare consumers understand about health has come from textbooks and media presentations that are completely controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. With today’s media construct, there are very few sources people can access to get reliable, unbiased information on the subject of health. At NoFakeNews, we are attempting to provide readers with reliable information about health and other important subjects.

On a closing note, I believe it’s important to remind everybody to become active participants when it comes to their health and well being. Commit to a daily exercise program; drink plenty of clean, non-fluoridated water; eat a healthy, balanced diet, and refrain from visiting medical physicians unless you encounter an emergency situation that cannot be stabilized without the presence of medical personnel. By using a little common sense, when reviewing options that might affect your health, you can decrease the odds of becoming dependent on prescription drugs and being harmed by drug companies that are not in business to make you healthy.

Disclaimer

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research

The Dreaded Flu Season (Again)?

cropped-cropped-400dpilogo2.jpg

Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List novel

Every year in the United States between the months of October and May, people are inundated with flu vaccination ads and news programs that are generated by pharmaceutical companies and government agencies such as the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

The mass marketing campaigns are relentless and cleverly designed to encourage (scare) citizens into getting the annual flu jab in order to supposedly boost human immunity against Influenza.

It’s frustrating for me, on a personal level, to watch the same campaign rolled out nationally and promoted by the powers that be every single year. You can count on it just like Halloween, Thanksgiving and Christmas. Flu season is officially on the US calendar and you can expect to see the agenda being pushed on every “Fakestream News” company in existence.

Did you ever wonder where the Influenza virus hides during the months of June – September? Does it go to some other part of the world for a yearly holiday? Like magic, it suddenly reappears in October and people are told to protect themselves with flu immunizations once again. Do you smell something fishy with this storyline?

Is it possible that the flu vaccine campaign is actually the cause of the flu season? Is it possible the reason that flu season begins every October is because people begin receiving flu shots every September?

Before you roll up your sleeve, stick out your arm and let someone stick you with any vaccine, you better do your research and understand that all vaccines are medicinal concoctions, and they carry potential risks to your health and well being. Don’t think for one second that there aren’t consequences attached to receiving vaccines of any kind.

There are plenty of research studies that show a connection between vaccines and neurological diseases such as Autism and Guillain-Barre syndrome. There are also plenty of attorneys that specialize in representing people that have been injured by these dangerous drugs. 

Watch the video below to see what can happen from getting one flu shot. Get informed and stay informed about your health and what you put inside your body!

 

Disclaimer!

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a healthcare specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make healthcare decisions based upon their own independent research.

What Does it Mean to be Healthy?

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List Novel

All life has the natural ability to adapt to its surrounding environment. Whether we are discussing very small organisms or the most complex forms of life (human beings); living things must either adapt to their environment or cease to exist.

How adequately or inadequately life adapts to its surroundings is the true measuring stick of an organism’s level of health. This formula is applicable to both microscopic organisms and human beings.

When a person becomes physically or emotionally compromised, (run down, overworked, over-stressed, malnourished, etc.) his or her natural abilities to adapt to environmental stresses become less than what they should. Naturally occurring microbes, that humans normally coexist with, suddenly pose a serious threat to physiological systems when a particular individual is unable to properly adapt to environmental challenges. In other words, we become unhealthy when we lose our natural adaptive tendencies.

We don’t catch influenza because we come in contact with a specific virus. We become infected because our immunological defenses, that allow us to adapt to that viral microbe, are weakened or compromised. Bacteria and viral opportunists, that we regularly encounter, are only as strong as our natural, adaptive tendencies allow them to be. This is why only five out of ten people will come down with the flu or another sickness that has crossed everybody’s path. The five individuals that remained healthy weren’t just lucky. They adapted more appropriately, in an immunological sense, than the five people that contracted a particular strain of influenza.

Catch a flu virus or some other type of bacterial infection and your body will immediately begin a plan of attack in an effort to adapt to the challenging, microbial invader. In most situations, human physiology will activate a fever to kill off the bacteria or virus affecting your body. Most of these opportunistic organisms cannot survive in higher temperature ranges and so the body modifies its internal thermostat, making it impossible for them to survive. The body’s ability to adapt is absolutely amazing.

Unfortunately, in many situations, human beings do a plethora of things that interfere with the body’s innate abilities to adapt to its environment. Taking fever reducing drugs is one of them. Because we have been misled by drug companies, that have a financial interest in teaching us bad health practices, we commonly believe fever is a bad thing and that it can cause brain damage. In reality, fever is a friend and will minimize the duration and severity of most common illnesses that are generated from opportunistic bacteria and viruses.

There are many things that you can do on a daily basis that will improve your body’s ability to adapt to its surrounding environment. Consuming drugs, vaccines, artificial sweeteners, unnatural food additives, and other toxins are not some of them.

Consuming fruits, vegetables, non fluoridated water, and eating properly will help your body adapt to its environment more efficiently.

Because the intelligence that regulates your body’s physiology, and allows you to adapt to your environment, operates directly through the nervous system, it’s vitally important you have your spine checked by a chiropractor several times each year for tiny vertebral misalignments called subluxations. If left unchecked, spinal subluxations can inhibit the functioning capability of the nervous system and will cause the human body to adapt less efficiently to its surrounding environment. This translates into an unhealthy individual.

When people finally begin to understand and respect the fact that true health originates from a living thing’s ability to properly adapt to its immediate surroundings, we will finally begin to see a marked improvement in the overall health of our population.

Disclaimer!

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

The Target List Audiobook Review by Author L.S. Fellows

By L.S. Fellows, Author

The story begins with a “doctor” casting a wand over a young girl and curing her of a terminal disease. But it is some time before Clyde Daniel and his associate Donna are ready to share their breakthrough with the world.

However, it seems the world – or rather Big Pharma – is neither ready nor willing to accept this new radio wave technology. Many among us would query their hesitancy. Why would anyone not welcome such technology? Isn’t the point of Big Pharma to find cures for those pernicious diseases? Of course it is. But, such ‘cures’ come at a price – the cost of research is reflected in the amount charged for any new wonder drug.

Now, if patients no longer need to take daily medication to ease their pain and suffering as a result of chronic illness and diseases, then the demand for such pills and potions becomes redundant.

Oops!

Could big pharmaceutical companies be holding out against cures for today’s killer diseases? Is it all about money after all?

The short chapters really keep the pace taut and tense in this thought-provoking story. The narration adds to the tension, the personality of the main characters comes through, as does excitement for the wand’s potential in regards to the future of healthcare.

I could happily have listened to more about the characters and the conspiracies they face in bringing the wand to market, but I have to admit that the brevity of the story delivers the desired shock factor. It certainly had me thinking about the role of Big Pharma and the drugs industry and made me ever more thankful for European healthcare systems on which I currently rely. That said, if only there really could be something available like the wand … how amazing would that be?

Highly recommended for fans of medical thrillers: sharp, pacy and thought-provoking.

Why They Attack Alternative Healthcare

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Author of The Target List

Throughout the relatively short history of modern healthcare, there have been continuous attempts to undermine the credibility of alternative healthcare professions. Very powerful organizations have carefully designed and implemented impressive strategies to make natural healthcare disciplines and their practitioners look like quacks and charlatans.

Professionals are routinely hired by undisclosed, secret entities to give false interviews, write defamatory books, construct disingenuous websites and participate in broad scale efforts that target healthcare consumers and help create, for them, false perceptions about natural healthcare practices.

The funding of these activities, although difficult to trace for the average person, obviously originate from petrochemical corporations. Due to a number of legal factors, it is often quite cumbersome to point fingers at specific business entities, as well as others that might be involved with the inner workings of such conspiratorial activities.

As one might suspect, the targets and casualties on the battlefield are always the same. Any healthcare professions, modalities, or treatment protocols that go against the grain of conventional medical theories are fair game.

Debunking agents are used on a regular basis to keep society firmly aligned with the parameters of acceptable thinking regarding many genres that make up our fabric of perceived reality. This is true in the healthcare arena as well.

Any idea or concept that challenges the accepted thinking patterns of everyday people are quickly identified and dealt with in an expeditious manner by specialists that are paid to write and publish biased comments on websites and blogs. If, for example, a large minority of the population suddenly began to question the authenticity of something that was being reported by the mainstream media, trained debunkers are always ready to spring into action. These people, through the implementation of strategic campaigns, can quickly minimize the damage being caused by a controversial voice within the population base.

Broad scale debunking can make sure that the majority of the population continues to perceive reality the way that the media originally intended.

Major petrochemical/pharmaceutical companies have a lot at stake in the very lucrative disease care industry. In order for these large multinational companies to remain profitable and powerful, society must continue to believe in certain erroneous concepts. As long as people continue to believe the maintenance of human health can be achieved through vaccines and that the suppression of symptoms in human physiology is the way to cure diseases, people will remain sick and pharmaceutical companies will continue to rake in astronomical profits.

Alternative healthcare professions often point out significant flaws that are absolutely inherent within the framework of traditional medicine’s illogical theories. Because of this fact, it has been a longstanding goal of established medicine’s controllers (Big Pharma) to retain the services of credible appearing scientists and other professionals that can write or convey damaging remarks about a particular alternative healthcare profession.

Very simply explained, when someone or something is intelligently challenging the credibility of a lucrative industry like traditional medicine, and they have damaging evidence that could blow the doors off the barn so to speak, and prove that many theoretical applications used within the medical profession are, in fact, the truest forms of quackery in existence, a major problem is created for the powers that be.

The only way for Big Pharma to activate a campaign of damage control is to discredit the people and the professions that are posing the most legitimate threat, at a particular time, to established medical dogma. This is why alternative healthcare concepts are not embraced by science. This is why many alternative healthcare professions are publicly attacked and their objectives and benefits never see the light of day. What you will find out, if you take the time to study this subject matter, is that what is often promoted by the mainstream as science is actually quackery and what is often labeled by the same groups as quackery is true science.

Quite a few web addresses have been designed to make potential viewers wary of alternative healthcare services. It is easy to land on such disingenuous websites. All you have to do is find a search engine and type in an alternative healthcare practice methodology that is in opposition to traditional medicine and you will see such websites populate your computer screen. The sites all claim to be there to protect the general public from harmful alternative healthcare professions. Are you kidding me? Have you ever read the drug warnings that accompany prescription and non prescription drugs? Dangerous and extremely toxic drugs are what healthcare consumers need to be protected from, not natural healthcare professions and practitioners that are often licensed by state agencies to offer their beneficial services.

My advice to healthcare consumers that come across anti-alternative healthcare websites is to realize that this type of content is being purposely placed in the public domain by powerful organizations that have direct connections to the Medical Establishment. The ultimate goal of Big Pharma is to make healthcare consumers believe that alternative healthcare disciplines are all based on pseudo-scientific principles.

Remember to keep in mind that in most situations the differences between scientific and pseudo-scientific studies have to do with who or what entities are paying for the research being performed. If a given study is being funded by a petrochemical company, that has a biased interest in the research taking place, it is usually referred to by the mainstream thinkers as scientific. If, on the other hand, a particular study is being funded by a non biased organization, or has been privately funded by someone that wants the truth to be revealed about something they have deemed important, it is often viewed by the mainstream thinkers as pseudo science.

What do you think about this subject?

An Interview with Dr. John Reizer

By Gina Flores

Recently, I had the pleasure of interviewing NoFakeNews founder and author, Dr. John Reizer about his recent novel, The Target List. Here’s what he had to say:

Gina: How does it feel to have written a pretty damn good novel?

John: I am happy with the way the story turned out. There are always aspects of a story that I think that I should have done a bit differently, but I think most writers have the same feelings regarding their books. This story is special to me because of the underlying message it attempts to convey to readers and listeners.

Gina: It seems to me from looking at all the reviews on Amazon and Audible that your story has been well received by most readers. Were you expecting such positive reviews and feedback?

John: Well you know, I didn’t know what to expect. Usually, my books receive very little in the way of reviews. When you’re an unknown author swimming in a sea of established authors, it’s hard to get people to read your work, let alone rate and review it. I think, initially , I believed there would be more negative reviews than positive ones. And not because of my writing abilities, but because the storyline is based on a very polarizing subject. Anytime you write something negative about traditional medicine or the pharmaceutical industrial complex, you’re inviting and opening yourself up to hostile reader reviews.

Gina: Have you received any bad or hostile reviews?

John: I haven’t really received too many negative reviews for The Target List. There have been a few 2 and 3 star ratings, but not everybody is going to fall in love with your story.

Gina: Do you like the way the audiobook turned out?

John: Oh yes! I think Allen Grunerud did such a great job with the book. The audiobook has been on and off of Amazon’s Top 100 list for Medical Thrillers. It’s been spending a lot of time on the list this past week. I am so happy with the way he produced the project. And his work has been positively reviewed on Audible. There have been lots of great reviews on that platform and that’s a direct result of Allen’s narration skills.

Gina: What’s next for this story?

John: I am collaborating with a screenwriter to hopefully turn the story into a low budget movie thriller. That’s the plan at least. I think you have to aim high and see how things shake out. But, honestly, I have a good feeling about The Target List moving forward. Regardless of what happens from this point, the rest is frosting on the cake for me. This story has already exceeded my original expectations.

Gina: Are you working on another story?

John: I have delayed beginning my next novel because I have been involved with the screenplay project. That’s going to take several months to complete so I want to wait until that’s wrapped up before concentrating on something new. But I am having fun with this book and I am still writing articles everyday for NoFakeNews.

UNITED STATES CITIZENS or Corporations ?

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List

When people around the world think of the United States, they envision in their minds the giant landmass that makes up the 48 contiguous states located in the North American continent, and of course Alaska and Hawaii. But what most people, including Americans, don’t realize is that there are two countries in play here. And to be completely accurate, there is really one country in play, the landmass that makes up America, and a federal corporation, Washington, DC. Could this be true? Are there two United States in existence?

According to some sources, The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a second and separate government within the continental United States of America. The foreign country (corporation) exists within a 20 mile sliver of land located between the states of Maryland and Virginia and is commonly known as the American Capital, Washington, DC.

Now I have to be perfectly honest with my readers with regards to this subject. This is an extremely polarizing topic that has been debated by many scholars and legal minds for a very long time. Most conventional legal opinions I have looked up classify the information in this post I am writing about as nonsense. But just because something has been labeled as nonsense by the vast majority of people doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s not the truth. So despite the naysayers, let’s press on and look into this information a bit further.

The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 was a cleverly written and deceptive piece of legislation that created a separate country (corporation) within America. The new corporation became known as THE UNITED STATES or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or THE US or the USA. You’ll notice that the corporate titles are in all CAPITAL LETTERS. I am not writing it that way for emphasis, but rather for the purpose of showing that the titles represent a legal corporation that has been registered as such.

Legal corporations are written in capital letters. So when I write the UNITED STATES I am referring to the 20 miles of land located between the states of Maryland and Virginia and not the huge landmass that exists in the North American continent.

According to minority sources, THE UNITED STATES is a foreign corporation doing business in America. The President of THE UNITED STATES is the Chief Executive Officer of the corporation and that is why the US President is located in Washington, DC.

This very complex legal theory goes on to suggest that the individual states have voluntarily opted in to become separate franchises of the registered corporation located in Washington, DC. This would mean that the individual states are also sub-corporations themselves and legally attached to the foreign corporation in Washington, DC. Wow, this gets complicated, but don’t leave now because it gets even better.

According to one source I reviewed, when people are born in America, a small sampling of their DNA is collected in the hospital and routinely held for a certain number of days. If that sample of genetic material is not claimed by the child’s birth parents, the federal government considers the live person dead. Now obviously the child is not really dead, but for legal purposes, the child is considered dead and the government replaces the live child’s name with a corporate name. So if John Smith is born to Mr. and Mrs. Smith. John Smith, in the eyes of the federal government is renamed as JOHN SMITH, the corporate entity and is referred to as a corporation for the remainder of his life by the government.

When JOHN SMITH does business with the federal government from this point forward, he will always be addressed with capital letters. This applies to social security cards, birth certificates, bank statements, credit cards, etc. JOHN SMITH has been turned into a corporate entity by the federal government and issued a birth certificate (a registration number).

The UNITED STATES (the corporation) operates under admiralty or maritime law (the law of the sea) while the united states (the country) operates under common law (the law of the land). There is a big difference between the two laws and for the sake of brevity, I am not going to go through all of the differences in this post. But please feel free to look up this information because it is extremely interesting and confusing at the same time.

There are also two different flags used depending on whether you are referring to the united states or THE UNITED STATES. THE UNITED STATES flag has a gold fringe included in its design. The united states flag does not. The flags look very similar, but they’re not the same. It’s pretty deceptive if you want my opinion.

Image result for gold fringe flag

Image result for american flag

Whenever you step inside a federal building or court room, you will always encounter a flag with the gold fringe. This lets people know that you’re in a facility that is operating under admiralty/maritime law.

The UNITED STATES views its citizens as vessels or ships at sea. When you’re in your mother’s womb, your floating in amniotic fluid (the sea). You come through the birth canal and are birthed by a doctor. Ships pass through canals as well. In a sense, phonetically speaking, you’re docked (doctor) and the merchandise is delivered. Just like when a ship is berthed and its merchandise is delivered, a certificate is created with a registration number. When a child is born, a birth certificate is created with a registration number. Later, a social security number is created for the citizen. The corporate entity (person) is given citizenSHIP.

The federal government requires its citizens to have many different licenses throughout their lives in order to do business with the corporation. All of these documents are addressed to citizens with their names in CAPITAL LETTERS.

Now here’s the kicker…

The federal government uses its citizens (corporate assets) as collateral to work with other countries, that are also set up as giant corporations with corporate assets (people). We are, in a sense, legal slaves to the government. Our corporate worth is valued  and based upon what the corporate assets can make for the parent corporation (the federal government) over a lifetime of working and paying taxes. That value can be used as collateral when doing business with other corporations (countries).

What do you think about this subject?

Edward Snowden Story Doesn’t Add Up (COINTELPRO)?

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List

I just had an opportunity to read the latest propaganda from the mainstream news media regarding whistleblower, Edward Snowden.

CNN has reported in an article dated October 24, 2019 that according to Edward Snowden, the United States government has never had any contact with extraterrestrial aliens. Snowden also claimed that the United States really did go to the moon and that the conspiracy theorists are wrong. Snowden said that people who believe in conspiracies were just trying to make their lives more interesting and also trying to make sense out of everything taking place in the world.

Snowden said in his interview, and I am paraphrasing again, that he would have known if the United States had had actual contact with aliens because he looked at classified materials. There was no mentioning of contact with aliens in the classified documents he stole.

The classified materials probably read something like this:

“In case anybody ever hacks into these super secret NSA files, we would like to state for the record that we have never had any conversations with extraterrestrial aliens. Also, we did visit the moon with Apollo and all the people who believe we’re lying through our teeth are wrong.”

Do people really believe that top-secret classified encrypted files stored in the most secure computer systems in the world were hacked by this moron? I mean this story is about as believable as the Apollo astronauts going to the moon with 1969 space technology. There were trash cans built better than the Apollo spacecrafts.

Is it possible that the US security agencies wanted people to believe that Edward Snowden hacked these files for other nefarious reasons? Is Edward Snowden part of a COINTELPRO (Counterintelligence Program/Propaganda) operation. I am thinking yes.

Don’t you love how the mainstream media, under the direct supervision of our beloved intelligence agencies can just make things so beautifully clear for the American public.

Remember Joe Taxpayer, there’s nothing to see here. Don’t pay any attention to the man behind the curtain. Conspiracies don’t exist and yes, we went to the moon. And we’ll be going to Mars in 200 years, and there’s no such thing as little green men. Just move along like good little boys and girls and watch lots of sports, reality television and don’t forget to take all your medications.

If you’ve been watching the 2019 World Series, the commercials are really playing up NASA and the moon missions. Games one and two of the World Series have taken place in Houston, Texas. NASA has a big presence in Houston.

In one commercial, Buzz Aldrin is telling his grandson that they found a baseball on the moon and that astronauts will be going to Mars very soon. NASA can’t even get out of low earth orbits (LEO’s) and they’re talking about going to Mars? How about getting to the moon again. No other country in the world has landed a human being on the moon since Apollo. You would think in 50 years, some country would be able to accomplish this goal if it were actually possible.

What do you think about this story?

 

Global Warming/Climate Change: Hoax or Real Deal?

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List

I have been reading, viewing and hearing information about global warming/climate change for years. I am not a big fan of the mainstream media, but occasionally I am forced to take in these products like everybody else.

I was watching the daily weather forecast yesterday and they were talking about climate change. On another day, I was in a doctor’s office and the television in the waiting room had a program discussing how global warming was melting away the glaciers at the North Pole. I turned away from the television and picked up a magazine from a coffee table in the same waiting room and there was an article about how the ocean water temperatures have been steadily rising over the past decade.

It doesn’t matter what media products you encounter, they’re all reporting the same message. Evidently, human beings are making planet Earth warmer, and unless we collectively do something drastic in the immediate future, the entire planet will be doomed.

If climate change is a real issue (and I am not convinced that it is), the members of society should be given some specific instructions by various governments on how to resolve this potentially catastrophic global crisis.

I keep trying to find the official recommendations to resolve this serious problem. Believe me, I don’t want polar bears and other arctic animals to run out of ice. I am a caring person and I am completely serious about wanting to find a solution.

I know for a fact that human beings are polluting this planet. And it wouldn’t surprise me if climate change was a real phenomenon. But it’s so hard to trust the messenger, with regards to this subject, because it has lied to the members of society so many times in the past about equally important subjects.

But just for the sake of being overly cautious about a really important place (Earth), let’s give the powers that be the benefit of the doubt. Let’s say that global warming is a real thing and that it has been taking place for many years. What do the governments of the world want us to do to resolve the situation, other than paying more taxes and fees (Carbon Footprint Taxes) in order to offset the carbon emissions that are being released  by each living and breathing person?

I guess I could wash my towels and dirty laundry every fourth day instead of every third day. I could definitely adjust my thermostat in my home and office to a setting that conserves energy. I could stop buying plastic bottles in the grocery store. I could stop eating meat because that was one of the suggestions I read about in National Geographic or some other publication. I guess that I could also stop breathing and exhaling as much air as I have been, but that might be a tricky one to pull off.

From what I have observed, this problem of climate change is firmly centered around the massive energy corporations that are continuously polluting this planet beyond belief. Carbon emissions are coming from automobiles and factories that burn fossil fuels 24 hours a day. And until the powers that be are willing to refrain from these lucrative practices and offer citizens of the world free energy technologies and clean running automobiles that have existed for many decades, all the other little things like delaying your laundry chores and not eating meat won’t put a dent in this problem.

Governments around the globe can collect carbon footprint taxes from now until the end of time, but that’s not going to keep the planet from getting warmer. Carbon taxes will not slow down climate change. Carbon taxes will only harm the citizens of the world, financially speaking, and continue to enrich the companies and powers that be that are causing the problem in the first place.

What do yo think about this subject?