LAWSUIT COULD END WATER FLUORIDATION ONCE AND FOR ALL BY DEMONSTRATING ITS NEUROTOXICITY

Alex Pietrowski, Staff Writer
Waking Times

The practice of water fluoridation in the United States has been under growing scrutiny for years by a public that has become conscious of the fact that adding toxic chemicals which are proven to be harmful to human health and children’s development to public water is medication without consent.

Never-the-less, the effort to stop fluoridation of municipal water supplies has been an uphill battle against entrenched financial interests and against dated ideas about health. While each year we hear news of cities heeding the concerns of their citizens and stopping fluoridation, without a major victory at the national level, people will be fighting this for years to come, all the while consuming toxic chemicals in the one thing we cannot live without, water.

The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is reporting on a major development to cut the head off of this snake, and an unprecedented lawsuit is now holding promise for a national reversal of municipal water fluoridation.

Based on neurotoxicity studies, the “EPA has been served with a petition that includes more than 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing the risks of water fluoridation to human health.”

As noted by FAN in a recent press release:

“This case will present the first time a court will consider the neurotoxicity of fluoride and the question of whether fluoridation presents an unreasonable risk under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

And, in contrast to most other legal challenges of Agency actions, TSCA gives us the right to get the federal court to consider our evidence ‘de novo’ — meaning federal courts are to conduct their own independent review of the evidence without deference to the EPA’s judgment.”

The lawsuit has been served along with a petition containing thousands of signatures of concerned and well-informed citizens, and includes more than 2500 pages of documents detailing the harm inherent in poisoning the pubic with fluoride.

In detail, the complaint is an attempt to demonstrate how this practice violates the Toxic Substances Control Act.

“The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), along with a coalition of environmental and public health groups has filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to their denial of our petition under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) seeking a ban on water fluoridation.

We believe this lawsuit is an unprecedented opportunity to end the practice once and for all in the U.S., and potentially throughout the world, based on the well-documented neurotoxicity of fluoride. You may read the official complaint here.” [Source]

Read: 18 SCIENTIFICALLY VALIDATED REASONS TO END PUBLIC WATER FLUORIDATION

Final Thoughts

The negative effects of consuming fluoridated water are well-documented, and the body of evidence continues to grow. In 2012 a major Harvard study presented a study demonstrating water fluoridation lowers IQ. In 2016 a study demonstrated a link between increased diabetes and water fluoridation. In 2015 the EPA had to issue new guidelines for safe levels of fluoride, reducing the amount, citing the potential for fluoridated water damages teeth, which ironically, is the very condition which we are told is the reason we need fluoride in the first place.

Public water fluoridation is slowly being defeated, and this lawsuit may play a major role in this fight.

 

About the Author

Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.

This article (Lawsuit Could End Water Fluoridation Once and For All by Demonstrating its Neurotoxicity) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

Advertisements

Are You Sure The Earth Is Round?

By Gina Flores

When presented with new ideas that are in opposition to major concepts that have been in our lives since the time we were very young children, it’s almost impossible for humans to objectively evaluate these hypotheses. Very often the early brainwashing we undergo in formal indoctrination centers (public schools) is so powerful that there is little chance for the average person to be able to make sense of the truth later in life. Even when the truth is blatantly obvious, most of us will still cling desperately to the lies we’ve been force fed earlier in our lives.

I have had an opportunity to look over many photographs that have been taken by NASA during its alleged manned and unmanned missions to the moon and Mars. The one thing I have found to be consistent with many of these public domain photographs is that they have been intentionally obfuscated. Said photographs have been sanitized so that they don’t reveal the intelligently designed structures that would have been readily visible without the presence of obfuscation techniques. I think these photos were all taken right here on Earth.

I now believe there is a very real possibility that none of NASA’s photographic catalogs are genuine and that they have been made available to citizens in an effort to promote a fake space program. I believe this space program has never executed a successful manned or unmanned mission to another celestial body. At this point I am not sure that space travel is possible even in low earth orbits.

Look at the following video below and try to do so with complete objectivity. Many readers will be unable to do so, but for those of you that can, you will begin to see that what we have always been told was science fiction throughout our lives is in actuality very plausible and backed by science.

The flat earth model above depicts the North Pole as being in the center of the model and the South Pole as the white color that makes up the peripheral portion of the entire disc.

The Ruling Class, Their Minions And How They View The Masses

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

If you are a regular reader of NoFakeNews, you already understand the difference between the have and have-nots in modern day society. Despite what the masses have been taught throughout their formal education, all men and women are not created equal. Nor have the masses ever enjoyed the same privilege in life as the elite members of society. At least this is how the elite ruling class views the world and our place in it. This elitist viewpoint has been firmly etched in the minds of the power elite for as long as history has been recorded. And if the ruling class has their way, nothing will change anytime soon.

According to the Ruling Class Preservation Society (RCPS), ruling class members are the main beneficiaries of social disparity. They are a relatively small group of individuals who seem to enjoy the most social power, wealth and privilege compared to the rest of society which they regularly refer to as the masses.

When the RCPS writes about the ruling class, they are referring to less than 1% of the entire human population. They are not referring to John or Jane Dough that is a millionaire and quite affluent as compared to most ordinary people in society. They are writing about individuals that have so much wealth and power that they regularly affect and influence global policies and decisions that will greatly impact the rest of the population. They are referring to the elite bloodlines that have been bred into the ruling class.

According to the RCPS, “No one can escape the major influence of the ruling class on their lives, actions or thinking, including the ‘rebels’ of society.”

The ruling class belief system has been handed down through the ages via various secret societies and reintroduced in modern times by certain “elite” academic institutions where younger bloodline elitists are methodically molded into thinking the same way as their predecessors. The ruling class members and their minions wholeheartedly believe they are the real rulers of the world and that everybody else in society (the masses) is not entitled to such privilege.

The ruling class mistakenly believe the dogma they have been taught; a ruling class’s presence in society is a normal function of society and that society in general cannot survive without the 1% running the show.

Truth be told, the power elite have been manipulated through the ages by a super intelligent race of beings that are not from this world. At the highest levels, the ruling class order (also known as the Establishment/Illuminati) is most assuredly aware of this information. This is a topic we have written about in great detail on NoFakeNews.

The RCPS and its members have a common goal of preserving their way of life no matter what that cost might be. They believe they are the natural rulers and that the masses are their servants. The RCPS’s focus is to keep the masses educated about the importance of their position of servitude in society as well as the importance of the ruling class’s position of ruling. They accomplish these philosophical goals through disinformation campaigns executed through the media companies they own and have great influence over. They also accomplish these goals by creating policies that affect public education curricula in countries throughout the entire world.

Check out the RCPS website by clicking here!

THE RCPS VIEW OF THE 1% AND THE MASSES IN SOCIETY

America Wake Up! We’re On The Precipice Of WWIII

Gina Flores

While most Americans continue to remain in a trance-like state, preoccupied with watching reality television and other forms of mass produced entertainment, it appears to anyone with his or her eyes wide open that the world is inching dangerously closer, each day, towards World War III.

The problem with most citizens living in the United States is that they secretly like to glorify war and have no real understanding about the horrors associated with armed conflicts. Americans watch too many war movies and television shows that intentionally glamorize war, violence and killing. It’s a form of sick and twisted entertainment that many people have become hopelessly addicted to.

Most American civilians have obviously not had to endure the terrible atrocities of war. They have not had to run for cover because of bombs being dropped in their communities. America is not a place where we have had to deal with bombs being dropped on us by jets or missiles (excluding Pearl Harbor). When Americans think of bombs exploding in a war scenario, they envision those explosions being detonated in the Middle East or on some foreign territory.

As each day passes, the leaders of various governments continue to make foolish decisions that are needlessly placing the lives of billions of people in harm’s way. Although any armed conflicts of war in our future will most likely begin with conventional weapons and troops being deployed, it’s also very likely that before these battles conclude, they will feature the launching of many nuclear warheads that will definitely destroy the lives and properties of millions of people around the entire planet.

In a nuclear war no country will be able to claim victory. The direct damage to our planet, its food chain, and life in general will be unbelievable. And for those people that foolishly believe American soil will be off limits to these deadly attacks, like they have been in the past, they should definitely think again.

It’s time that we all wake up and recognize that the leaders of various countries are completely out of touch with reality. These people are warmongers, and the media whores that praise war and the military industrial complex are pushing a dangerous agenda that will end badly for all of us.

What do you think about this subject?

 

Airline Companies Have A License To Rob Passengers

Gina Flores

There’s no doubt about it; airline companies have a license to rob passengers blind. In case any of you have not had a chance to see the new video that went viral of a passenger being forcibly removed by police/security from a United Airlines domestic flight in the United States earlier this week, you can take a look at it below.

According to numerous sources, the passenger was forcibly removed by security because the airline company had overbooked the flight and needed additional seats for company employees. After asking for volunteers to give up seats with compensation included, and not receiving any takers, United officials randomly selected passengers already seated on the plane and asked them to exit the aircraft. One of the passengers refused to leave and the company called in a security officer to remove the man by force.

My question to United Airlines and the airline industry as a whole is the following: why are you overbooking flights that are, for all intents and purposes, nonrefundable? You routinely sell passengers very expensive seats on your aircraft that cannot be refunded. If the passenger doesn’t show up, the seat is already paid for. Why in the hell are you permitted to resell the same seat a second, third, or fourth time? The answer is GREED!

Not only do you sell a passenger a nonrefundable ticket, you routinely charge passengers additional fees for luggage storage, food, and to sit together with loved ones and friends.

If I want to attend a music concert to see my favorite performer, I have to purchase a ticket for a seat. If I decide not to show up for the event, they don’t resell my seat. It remains empty because I have the ticket for that show. The airlines are getting away with robbery by overbooking nonrefundable seats and then asking passengers to disrupt their itineraries.

Granted, there are times when people have some flexibility within their itineraries and they can give up a seat in exchange for compensation. That’s okay in my book. But the air carrier should not be able to forcibly remove a ticketed passenger, for purposes of greed and incompetence, that has already been seated on the plane.

What do you think about this subject?