What Happens in Vegas Stays In Vegas: Maybe Not

wp-image-282249783

By Gina Flores

Writer for NoFakeNews

There’s a famous marketing slogan that was branded especially for the Las Vegas tourism industry some years back. The slogan states, “What Happens in Vegas Stays in Vegas”.

Las Vegas, nicknamed “Sin City” is the gambling and entertainment capital of the United States and maybe even the entire world. It’s certainly not your average city, but it is similar to just about any other city in the United States in that it has schools, colleges, churches, parks, recreation and fitness centers, residential homes, sports franchises and lots of people living there as permanent residents. All these people have jobs and earn a living locally. A lot of Vegas residents have jobs that are in some way connected to the tourist and gaming industries.

I’ve been to Vegas on a few different occasions and admit it’s an exciting place. And just maybe because of all the glitter, sparkling lights, fancy casinos, and it’s famous reputation for being one of the most visited destinations in the world by tourists year after year, it’s often shielded by the powers that be from really negative news stories.

The Las Vegas massacre that occurred on October 1, 2017 is not the kind of story that America’s biggest adult playground wants to be connected to. It’s exactly this kind of news that can quite literally destroy businesses and scare people out of town for a very long time.

I am sitting here, pulling my hair out, trying to figure out why the authorities in charge of this investigation, the deadliest shooting event in American history, seem to be covering up key facts of the case. They seem to be hellbent on selling a false narrative that there was only one lunatic behind all the death and destruction; Stephen Paddock did it, he acted alone!

I don’t believe that scripted load of crap for one second and from the amount of videos and eyewitnesses popping up everyday telling a story that is in direct conflict with the false narrative being pedaled by the mainstream media (officialdom), neither do a lot of other intelligent people.

So why the cover up? There are probably a number of answers to that very important question. Let me write about a few of my theories:

  1. The Las Vegas tourist industry might be able to endure a scenario where a lone nutter opens fire on thousands of its tourists. It could probably sell such a concept to people and say that this guy acted alone and was just crazy. It was a freak, isolated event that will never happen again. Maybe Stephen Paddock had a brain tumor, was depressed, pissed off at the casino where he lost money, or maybe he was on antidepressant drugs? People could certainly handle that story line a lot easier than knowing this shooting stunt was a well orchestrated and coordinated terrorist attack carried out by people with sophisticated military skills and a whole lot of weapons that no ordinary citizen could ever hope to acquire.
  2. This was a mission pulled off by black ops agents and backed and funded by domestic or foreign intelligence agencies. Everything was coordinated from the inside and the people running the mission used Paddock as a patsy who was murdered prior to the attack and then made to look like the lone gunman. If this were the case, the agents could have hacked into government computer files, made it look like the shooter (Paddock) had purchased guns when in actuality he hadn’t. Paddock was most likely chosen because he was easy to frame, had the monetary assets that made it believable that he could acquire such an impressive arsenal of weapons. Let’s face it, those guns weren’t cheap and not just anybody could afford them. But a millionaire could.
  3. Paddock was involved in the shootings, but did not act alone and was killed by someone else involved who thought he was a security risk. Again, the multiple shooter scenario is not a good thing for the Las Vegas tourist industry.

Whatever the truth might turn out to be, it is doubtful, in my considered opinion, that a lone gunman was responsible for everything that transpired. It’s not logical, and the shooter’s profile just doesn’t match with someone that was capable of pulling off such a horrific crime. In addition to that, a photo of the suicide scene where Paddock’s dead body rested was intentionally leaked by the authorities. It looked staged with bullets placed around his corpse in an organized pattern. Jeff Rense (www.rense.com) did an excellent job in assessing and analyzing the photo. Click here to read his work.

What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas might be the slogan, but in this situation, because of all the eyewitnesses and videos taken, the slogan may not apply. It’s beginning to look like the truth about this tragedy might be revealed to the public after all despite the mainstream media’s attempt to cconceal it.

What do you think about this story?

 

Las Vegas: Here We Go Again

wp-image-282249783

By Gina Flores

Writer for NoFakeNews

And now another significant event has taken place where lots of  innocent people have been injured or lost their lives. This time the venue was a country music concert in Las Vegas, Nevada.

And once again the official narrative that’s been etched in stone is that a lone gunman was responsible for the entire massacre.

AND ONCE AGAIN THERE ARE LOADS OF VIDEOS AND WITNESSES COMING OUT OF THE WOODWORK THAT CONTRADICT THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE.

Anyone with half a brain is thinking that an older man like Stephen Paddock couldn’t have done all this damage without the help of other shooters. Perhaps he was already dead prior to the first shots being fired. Will we ever know the truth? It’s not likely.

Are you tired of being played by the powers that be? Are you tired of being lied to by the mainstream media and the official authorities in charge of investigations in Las Vegas, San Bernardino, Paris, Madrid, New York City and other locations where similar horrific events have occurred?

I am frustrated by all of these senseless killings that are being engineered to look like lone nutters or, in other cases, terrorist groups are responsible.

We at NoFakeNews are saddened by the loss of our fellow human beings and are praying for those injured and currently fighting for their lives.

Is America’s Disbelief Regarding 9-11 Growing?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

When we take the time to revisit some of the truly horrific moments in history that have traumatized the collective psyche of Americans, (Oklahoma City, Columbine, WACO, Pearl Harbor, 9-11) many of us are not emotionally affected because we only remember the headlines that were attached to those significant dates. What we have lost and continue to lose, as the years pass us by, are the memories of so many innocent human beings (the real story content) that unfortunately lost their lives simply because they were at the wrong place at the wrong time.

There are more people than ever before questioning the government’s official version of 9-11. According to many independent polls, which have been conducted by Internet and mainstream news sources, most Americans believe in various alternative (conspiracy) theories regarding September 11 instead of the government’s published account.

Take a look below at one of the newest documentaries to come out regarding September 11, 2001. It’s titled, Incontrovertible – New 9/11 Documentary by Tony Rooke.

Three Tall White Men Were The Shooters at San Bernardino

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

According to an eyewitness that worked at the Inland Medical Center in San Bernardino, California, three tall white men were responsible for the shootings that killed 14 people and injured 21 others. Sally Abdelmageed and another eyewitness, Juan Hernandez told CBS news on the day of the shootings that the three shooters all had athletic builds and were wearing military fatigues. See interviews on video below:

Keep in mind that these interviews took place very soon after the shootings occurred. The massive media mind control blitz that instructed viewers around the world to inaccurately believe that a Muslim husband and wife were responsible for the attack had not yet begun.

In most instances, the closest the public will ever get to seeing the truth about a false flag operation is right after the incident takes place. After the initial interviews are conducted that often reveal the truth about what transpired, fake witnesses are often inserted and made available to reporters. The script gets rolling from there and the truth is permanently buried from that point forward.

We’re watching a movie here people. If you believe that the two dead suspects were responsible for the shootings in California, you have been hoodwinked by a massive psychological operations mission.

WAKE THE FLOCK UP, SHEEPLE!

REPORTERS ALLOWED TO STORM SAN BERNARDINO SHOOTERS’ APARTMENT, REVEAL POTENTIAL EVIDENCE ON LIVE TV

Editor’s Note: Yet another reason people think this event was staged. When have you ever seen a crime scene of an open investigation in a terrorist mass shooting treated this way?

2015-12-04_17-15-46

Earlier today, we brought you the latest from the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California that left 14 dead and 21 injured after husband and wife Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik stormed a holiday party with assault rifles.

On Thursday, the FBI indicated that Farook may have had ties to “tangential” terrorists and the media was rife with speculation that the Chicago-born, county health inspector may have been radicalized by Malik, who he married in 2013 in Saudi Arabia.

We predicted that it wouldn’t be long before the mass media “discovered” the San Bernardino equivalent of the Syrian passport found in Paris and sure enough, earlier today, CNN reported that authorities believe Malik pledged allegiance to ISIS leader Bakr-al Baghdadi in a Facebook post as the attacks were unfolding.

Shortly thereafter, Reuters reported that Islamic State media have confirmed that the group’s followers were responsible for the attack. 

Then, just when you thought the media circus might die down for the day, the landlord of the home where Farook and Malik resided pried open the “door” (which is actually a piece of plywood after the FBI stormed the home) and allowed the media to enter and rummage through everything from photos, to passports, to driver’s licenses, to the crib of the couple’s six month-old baby.

Here’s more from The LA Times:

On Friday morning, reporters were allowed by a landlord to enter the apartment of Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik.

A man was seen using a crowbar to open the plywood-covered front door, allowing a rush of reporters, photographers and videographers to spill into the home.

The chaotic scene of reporters and TV cameras going through the apartment was broadcast live on news channels.

Reporters were shown on networks rifling through what appeared to be personal information, including driver’s licenses. Some were shown going through photos and entering closets.

The scene had been closed off since the shooting. It was not immediately clear if law enforcement officials had allowed the apartment to be accessed.

Los Angeles Times reporter Kate Mather was among the reporters allowed in.

In the apartment, there were small black tables in the middle of the main room. On one table was a copy of the Koran.

Another table had a lengthy list of dozens of items that the FBI had seized as part of their investigation.

The list included Christmas lights, an iPhone, several boxes and bags of various types of ammunition, letters, a passport and gun accessories.

An FBI spokerperson said the bureau had “finished its investigation,” but they were kind enough to leave a “receipt” documenting the items confiscated.

Here’s a clip which is largely representative of the melee:

And here are some screenshots and a few particularly egregious highlights which some social media users have described as “journalistic malpractice.”

And here’s a clip that will likely live in media infamy:

*  *  *  Obviously, this is an attempt to create a giant media spectacle out of the incident, which is broadly consistent with how the mainstream outlets cover all tragedies only this time around, they’re exposing potential evidence. Not only that, it doesn’t seem to have occurred to anyone that now every reporter whose face was shown in the various videos inside the home will henceforth be known in the Islamic world as someone who’s willing to exploit images of a child’s crib for the sake of entertaining America’s mindless masses. You can bet ISIS will use this very same footage to make a point in future propaganda videos.  Oh, and in case you were wondering what hangs above the couple’s upstairs bathroom, the LA Times’ Kate Mather has you covered:

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by of Zero Hedge.

Ken O’Keefe: The Real Terrorists are the US, Britain, and Israel

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

Ken O’Keefe speaks about machinations currently in play by the powers that be. This man says what others are afraid to mention in a public forum. If you really want to know what is happening in the world, take the time to watch the two videos below:

 

 

 

Just an Observation about What’s Blatantly Obvious

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

 Today I have been reading through streams of information from the various media sources relating to the Paris shootings. My heart and prayers go out to the families that lost loved ones at this horrible crime scene.

My conspiratorial wired brain forces me to look for explanations connected to such heinous crimes that most people would never consider because they would find them far too uncomfortable.

Most people in society routinely rely on traditional media sources to spoon feed them explanations about everything that occurs in the world. The next thing that happens is those explanations are mindlessly parroted by the same members of society until they become officialdom.

The powers that be have many agendas in play and will never stop their machinations until they have completed what has been ultimately planned for the longest time imaginable.

In the real world, not the one we inaccurately view through the eyes of corporate media companies, there are regular happenings that sometimes get in the way of important agendas that have been designed and implemented by a global elite management team that is far more evil than you or I could ever imagine. When these happenings occur, they need to be quickly removed from public view before society’s collective understanding of the world transforms into something not desired by the few that control the many.

Let’s review what has transpired most recently in the mainstream media. A huge sex scandal is currently in progress that involves the Royal Family (Prince Andrew) and former President Bill Clinton. Evidently, a lawsuit that is six or seven years old has recently come under public scrutiny and the details of this legal action might have made some people in very high places quite uncomfortable.

Much of what could potentially come out about the Royal Family and Mr. Clinton has been previously discussed by certain authors and conspiracy theorists for many years. To have the information corroborated at this point in time is not exactly what the elite power-brokers of the world want to see take place. And although the powers that be control, to a very large extent, what is fed to the media viewing public, they cannot prevent the release and distribution of every piece of news that comes down the pike. Occasionally, some of the news that gets released through the mainstream media is detrimental to their important agendas. This is especially true in situations where certain individuals in prominent positions are linked to morally questionable acts.

Some sources have suggested that what’s being reported about the Prince and former United States President is merely the tip of an enormous iceberg; an iceberg that has the capability of sinking Hillary Clinton’s ambitions of being an American president. More important, the iceberg could corroborate the many accusations of conspiracy authors that, for the longest time, have been screaming the unthinkable about certain individuals in the highest positions of power.

I ask the following question: Was the Paris shooting a false flag operation designed to reposition the public’s eye away from a sex scandal of enormous proportions and back onto another terror plot organized by radical Muslims?

What do you think about this subject?