medicine

Vaccine Injuries: Where’s the Proof?

NoFakeNews2 Comments

By Dr. John Reizer

Throughout my career as a primary healthcare provider, I have encountered a large number of people that refuse to believe vaccines are harmful to human physiology. These individuals don’t believe said medicines can cause the proliferation of diseases worldwide. They don’t believe the medical cartel, at the highest levels, is trying to weaken and harm humans. They want to see the definitive proof (research) that shows children and adults are being irreparably damaged from various vaccines.

When presented with real proof (thousands of parents relating horrific experiences about their damaged children) that demonstrates vaccines are dangerous products, most people refuse to believe the information. In summary, people want proof but don’t believe the proof when it’s placed in front of them.

It’s very hard to remove the forever skepticism of the general population when it comes to challenging conventional medical paradigms. People tend to believe what they have been taught to believe by the different regulatory agencies (trusted sources) and are not willing to modify their beliefs.

Unfortunately, the only way to convince many people about the dangers associated with certain things is to let them experience the damage firsthand.

Sometimes it’s better to let common sense prevail instead of relying on regulatory agencies for information concerning a particular vaccine. Virtually all vaccine and medical research being performed is being done for the benefit of multinational pharmaceutical companies and not for the benefit of healthcare consumers. If you’re waiting for published research to appear on the evening news that details the truth about vaccines and other drugs, you’re going to have a very long wait.

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: Statement on Federal Vaccine Mandate

NoFakeNews1 Comment

wp-image-879162634

To:  Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, House Energy and Commerce Committee

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions

Re: Statement federal vaccine mandates

Feb. 26, 2019

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of medical practice is a state function, not a federal one. Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.

A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks? Regulators may intervene to protect the public against a one-in-one million risk of a threat such as cancer from an involuntary exposure to a toxin, or-one-in 100,000 risk from a voluntary (e.g. occupational) exposure. What is the risk of death, cancer, or crippling complication from a vaccine? There are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out a much higher risk of complications, even one in 10,000, for vaccines. Such studies would require an adequate number of subjects, a long duration (years, not days), an unvaccinated control group (“placebo” must be truly inactive such as saline, not the adjuvant or everything-but-the-intended-antigen), and consideration of all adverse health events (including neurodevelopment disorders).

Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court and by Congress. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid some $4 billion in damages, and high hurdles must be surmounted to collect compensation. The damage may be so devastating that most people would prefer restored function to a multimillion-dollar damage award.

The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though somewhat less effective.

The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed by a government agency.

Measles is the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates, and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority, but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity. The last measles death in the U.S. occurred in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Are potential measles complications including death in persons who cannot be vaccinated due to immune deficiency a  justification for revoking the rights of all Americans and establishing a precedent for still greater restrictions on our right to give—or withhold—consent to medical interventions? Clearly not.

Many serious complications have followed MMR vaccination, and are listed in the manufacturers’ package insert, though a causal relationship may not have been proved. According to a 2012 report by the Cochrane Collaboration, “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate” (cited by the National Vaccine Information Center).

Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.

Even disregarding adverse vaccine effects, the results of near-universal vaccination have not been completely positive. Measles, when it does occur, is four to five times worse than in pre-vaccination times, according to Lancet Infectious Diseases, because of the changed age distribution: more adults, whose vaccine-based immunity waned, and more infants, who no longer receive passive immunity from their naturally immune mother to protect them during their most vulnerable period.

Measles is a vexing problem, and more complete, forced vaccination will likely not solve it. Better public health measures—earlier detection, contact tracing, and isolation; a more effective, safer vaccine; or an effective treatment are all needed. Meanwhile, those who choose not to vaccinate now might do so in an outbreak, or they can be isolated. Immunosuppressed patients might choose isolation in any event because vaccinated people can also possibly transmit measles even if not sick themselves.

Issues that Congress must consider:

Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished. Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal is the only incentive to do better.There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being quashed, as is dissent by professionals.There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children’s brains are developing rapidly—any interference with the complex developmental symphony could be ruinous.Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease.

AAPS believes that liberty rights are unalienable. Patients and parents have the right to refuse vaccination, although potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a clear or present danger.

AAPS represents thousands of physicians in all specialties nationwide. It was founded in 1943 to protect private medicine and the patient-physician relationship.

Respectfully yours,

Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

Are Anti-Vaxxers Crazy?

NoFakeNews3 Comments

By Dr. John Reizer

Anti-vaxxer terminology – a creation of the pharmaceutical industry that has been used to identify and discredit any persons or groups that are in opposition to the current vaccine paradigm.

Anti-vaxxer – a person who refuses to vaccinate their child because they believe the medication is more dangerous than the benefits they allegedly offer.

Are anti-vaxxers crazy, paranoid conspiracy theorists? More important, are anti-vaxxers causing the members of society to become more at risk from dangerous and contagious diseases than they should be? These are both fair questions to explore because a lot of medical experts have been bringing up these questions on national television programs as well as other mainstream media forums.

According to some mainstream medical sources, many diseases are currently returning or making a comeback due to anti-vaxxers who refuse to vaccinate their children.

First of all let me preface my little article by writing that if vaccines truly conferred immunity to the people receiving them, there would be absolutely no need for the vaccinated patients to fear outbreaks of certain diseases coming from the unvaccinated folks. The only people at risk, theoretically speaking, should be those individuals not vaccinated.

Truth be told, a minority of American healthcare consumers have become a lot more educated in the past 5-10 years and have intelligently concluded that the risks associated with these medicines far out-way the published benefits. This in itself is a scary concept for the drug manufacturers (vaccine makers) who have a financial obligation to their shareholders to make profits. And that is exactly what they have been doing each year. These multinational corporations are making billions of dollars annually while putting out products that are supposedly designed to prevent the spread of diseases. In actuality, the vaccine programs of today have most likely caused the proliferation of many diseases at breakneck speed.

In response to an increasingly educated healthcare consumer, big pharma and its far reaching tentacles (the mainstream media, the government regulating agencies it controls through an endless bankroll of dollars and too many political lobbyists to count) have launched an all out war against anti-vaxxers. Anti-vaxxers have been made to look like crazy people. Because a small segment of society has decided to question the advice of a large consortium of pharmaceutical corporations, they have been targeted for ridicule and eventual elimination.

Make no mistakes regarding the facts. According to many professionals and doctors that are labeled as vaccine critics, these medicines are dangerous and contain ingredients that can make human beings extremely sick. In many instances the physiological reactions to vaccine ingredients are quite irreversible and capable of causing autoimmune dysfunction that leads to a lifelong struggle for many people.

The ingredient thimerosol is still to this day commonly found in many vaccines. It is reported as being safe by drug makers in small quantities. It has been linked to autism by some researchers and remains a concern for many parents. But by no means whatsoever is thimerosol the only harmful ingredient in these drugs.

If you are physically harmed by a vaccine product, you cannot sue the vaccine maker or the doctor that administered the poison in a regular court of law. Gee, that sure doesn’t seem very fair. But that’s the way the law reads. You can only try to recover damages in a special vaccine court where the awards are limited to $250,000. Good luck trying to collect anything in this venue.

Vaccine proponents like to jump up and down screaming that national vaccine programs were the reason childhood diseases like measles, mumps, polio and others declined over the years. This is not true by any stretch of the imagination because these diseases were already declining before the various vaccines were ever introduced.

In many countries where there were not vaccines offered, the same diseases also declined in the general population. The reason this occurred can be attributed to natural adaptive tendencies of human physiology to disease processes and better nutrition and hygiene practices that were employed over time.

When vaccines are administered to patients, they bypass the normal portal of entry that the body is used to and this can stress out or even harm the immune system and cause autoimmune problems. Diseases like Lupus, Rheumatoid arthritis, Diabetes, Psoriasis, and many cancers have likely connections to vaccines.

Once you decide to get a vaccine you cannot decide at a later date to reverse your decision. So you better make damn sure you have done your research before you roll up your sleeve and voluntarily agree to get jabbed. And when you do your research be warned that most of said research you will find populating the top portions of most search engines has been rigged to appear in those positions by the powers that be. Most of the top tier results will yield the research data pharmaceutical companies have paid for.

It’s not easy to find the truth about vaccines because the regulating agencies have been bought off and can no longer be trusted as evidenced in the movie Vaxxed.

Disclaimer

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

Michigan State University, USA Gymnastics and the US Olympic Committee need to be Held Accountable

Gina Flores3 Comments

By Gina Flores

Editor-in-Chief

The recent sentencing of former Olympic physician, Dr. Larry Nassar to 175 years in prison for sexually abusing more than 150 women and girls is only a very small victory for the survivors involved. Some of the women recently had a chance to publicly address this monster in a courtroom setting. And although his victims may have obtained some form of closure from being able to participate in such a process, it’s more likely than not they will all have to deal with the presence of deep psychological scars from their abuse for the remainder of their lives.

How does a predator like Larry Nassar get away with sexually abusing young, female athletes for the past two decades? How is it possible that Larry Nassar was allowed to behave in such a horrible way for so long and not be held accountable and put out of his misery by the US Olympic Committee or his former employers, USA Gymnastics and Michigan State University? All of these are fair questions that need to be addressed and fully investigated from a legal standpoint in the months that follow. This is an obvious can of worms that needs to be cracked wide open; a real rabbit hole that undoubtedly is extremely deep!

USA Gymnastics and the US Olympic Committee need to be punished immediately and the first thing that comes to my mind are the future Olympic Games scheduled for the summer of 2020.

There is no good reason, in my opinion, why the United States women’s gymnastics team should be allowed to participate under the American flag in those games. It’s time to punish the enabling organizations that played a key part in these horrific crimes.

Larry Nassar is a sick predator and will be locked up for the remainder of his life. That’s a good thing! USA Gymnastics and the US Olympic Committee, on the other hand, allowed this animal to survive and hunt his prey for over 20 years. This is inexcusable and should not be tolerated by the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

The women athletes from the United States Gymnastics team should only be allowed to participate in the 2020 summer games under the Olympic flag. A similar scenario has been put in place for Russia’s Olympic team in February, 2018 in South Korea because of their involvement in systematic, rampant doping. Discipline handed down by the IOC in this manner would allow the enabling organizations at fault, and not the women athletes, to be properly punished.

If the IOC does not punish team USA, it would demonstrate a disturbing double standard within the construct of that organization as well as their total lack of concern for past, present, and future Olympic athletes.

All of the players involved in these organizations need to resign or be removed from their positions. This includes presidents, board members, trustees and executives at any and all levels.

What do you think about this story?

Australian Medical Doctor Reveals The Truth About Deadly Vaccines

NoFakeNews7 Comments

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews

If you write a post or commentary that shines the light of day on the truth about vaccines and the damage they are doing to human beings, you will quickly be labeled a conspiracy theorist, quack, lone nutter, or a junk scientist. Medical science (Isn’t that an oxymoron?) and the pharmaceutical companies worldwide that underwrite and control the profession of medicine continue to promote the false paradigm that more vaccines equate to a healthier and happier population base.

The vaccine industry is big business and it produces astronomical profits for the most powerful corporations in the world. This is why we will not see a decrease in the number of vaccine products being manufactured in the foreseeable future. Instead, we will see additional vaccines being introduced and more innocent people being irreparably harmed over time.

Every year the number of children being seriously injured because of vaccines increases. The cases very rarely, if ever, make it into the mainstream news. Vaccine injuries reported to medical physicians are usually not recorded as such and get lost in an intentionally manufactured statistical abyss. Make no mistake about this subject matter, there is a concerted effort by medicine and Big Pharma to keep a lid on the biggest secret within the medical profession; vaccines are the lifeblood of medicine and the etiological cause of autoimmune disorders as well as many physiological expressions of cancer and other diseases.

Every once in a while a brave medical doctor will step forward and spill the truth about the serious and shocking dangers associated with vaccines. An Australian medical doctor, John Piesse has written the following open letter:

“I have been encountering cases of vaccine injury for over 40 years. In June it was a happy, healthy nearly 5-year-old whose parents were required to put her on a catch-up schedule, in order to get her into kindergarten. She won’t be going to kinder. She’s in a wheel-chair, brain-damaged. Her life ruined. Then came a friend’s father who died after a flu vaccine, and last week a 4 year old boy, made autistic by a catch-up schedule.”

“In 1988, the US National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was created. It has paid out over US$3.5 billion to the vaccine-injured. The NVICP was set up to protect vaccine manufacturers from ruinous costs of litigation by vaccine-damaged people. It was deemed preferable to have ‘unavoidably unsafe’ vaccines than no vaccines. Unfortunately the protection provided to vaccine manufacturers also reduced incentives to develop safer vaccines in USA.”

“Vaccines contain health-damaging ingredients, not the least aluminium – a known neurotoxin…“ CLICK HERE TO READ THE ENTIRE LETTER

In addition to Dr. Piesse spilling the beans about vaccines, ABC News has recently reported and simultaneously downplayed an apparent connection between flu jabs and miscarriage in pregnant women.

If you want to label Dr. Piesse and others like him as conspiracy theorists, it’s your prerogative. Labels and names are not going to physically harm these brave professionals, but the vaccines we continue to distribute to healthcare consumers worldwide will undoubtedly destroy the lives of your children and loved ones. How many children have to die from vaccines before people wake up?

LAWSUIT COULD END WATER FLUORIDATION ONCE AND FOR ALL BY DEMONSTRATING ITS NEUROTOXICITY

Gina Flores2 Comments

Alex Pietrowski, Staff Writer
Waking Times

The practice of water fluoridation in the United States has been under growing scrutiny for years by a public that has become conscious of the fact that adding toxic chemicals which are proven to be harmful to human health and children’s development to public water is medication without consent.

Never-the-less, the effort to stop fluoridation of municipal water supplies has been an uphill battle against entrenched financial interests and against dated ideas about health. While each year we hear news of cities heeding the concerns of their citizens and stopping fluoridation, without a major victory at the national level, people will be fighting this for years to come, all the while consuming toxic chemicals in the one thing we cannot live without, water.

The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is reporting on a major development to cut the head off of this snake, and an unprecedented lawsuit is now holding promise for a national reversal of municipal water fluoridation.

Based on neurotoxicity studies, the “EPA has been served with a petition that includes more than 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing the risks of water fluoridation to human health.”

As noted by FAN in a recent press release:

“This case will present the first time a court will consider the neurotoxicity of fluoride and the question of whether fluoridation presents an unreasonable risk under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

And, in contrast to most other legal challenges of Agency actions, TSCA gives us the right to get the federal court to consider our evidence ‘de novo’ — meaning federal courts are to conduct their own independent review of the evidence without deference to the EPA’s judgment.”

The lawsuit has been served along with a petition containing thousands of signatures of concerned and well-informed citizens, and includes more than 2500 pages of documents detailing the harm inherent in poisoning the pubic with fluoride.

In detail, the complaint is an attempt to demonstrate how this practice violates the Toxic Substances Control Act.

“The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), along with a coalition of environmental and public health groups has filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to their denial of our petition under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) seeking a ban on water fluoridation.

We believe this lawsuit is an unprecedented opportunity to end the practice once and for all in the U.S., and potentially throughout the world, based on the well-documented neurotoxicity of fluoride. You may read the official complaint here.” [Source]

Read: 18 SCIENTIFICALLY VALIDATED REASONS TO END PUBLIC WATER FLUORIDATION

Final Thoughts

The negative effects of consuming fluoridated water are well-documented, and the body of evidence continues to grow. In 2012 a major Harvard study presented a study demonstrating water fluoridation lowers IQ. In 2016 a study demonstrated a link between increased diabetes and water fluoridation. In 2015 the EPA had to issue new guidelines for safe levels of fluoride, reducing the amount, citing the potential for fluoridated water damages teeth, which ironically, is the very condition which we are told is the reason we need fluoride in the first place.

Public water fluoridation is slowly being defeated, and this lawsuit may play a major role in this fight.

 

About the Author

Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.

This article (Lawsuit Could End Water Fluoridation Once and For All by Demonstrating its Neurotoxicity) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

The Foods We Consume Might Actually Be Killing Us

NoFakeNews3 Comments

Dr. John Reizer

According to many health care experts, it’s getting increasingly difficult to stay healthy due to the types of foods we continue to consume as a society.

Food additives such as Aspartame and MSG (Monosodium glutamate) are believed by many to cause irreparable harm to human beings. Despite the large number of warnings coming from scientists and doctors, large corporations continue to oversee the lacing of our foodstuffs with harmful chemicals.

Aspartame, a controversial artificial sweetener, has been classified by some doctors and medical researchers as a neuro-excitotoxin capable of causing harmful lesions within the human nervous system. Russell Blaylock, a retired neurosurgeon and former professor at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, is one of the physicians that has publicly stated his views about the dangers of this product.

Aspartame was introduced into food products and soft drinks, around the world, by the pharmaceutical company, G.D. Searle during the same time frame that Donald Rumsfeld, former Defense Secretary of the United States, was the company’s acting CEO. Later, Searle was taken over by Monsanto, a corporation believed by many to have very close ties to the CIA.

Monsanto, a developer of many controversial products, is a major producer of genetically modified organisms/foods (GMO’s). The average human’s diet is thoroughly littered with GMOs. It is certainly reasonable to assume that the large increase in the number of autoimmune diseases throughout the general population is directly tied to the world’s population embracing so many attenuated foods.

Based on statistics that clearly demonstrate a decline in our nation’s health over time, and a core understanding, centered on common sense, that altering the genes of various seeds could preclude the human body from being able to discern between a food and a poison, one could connect-the-dots and come to the logical conclusion that GMOs are quite dangerous.

Unfortunately, the level of danger we face, when it comes to GMOs, is unknown. Genetically modified seeds are protected from all forms of scientific research or review. Companies that produce these products have licensing agreements that legally prohibit the testing of their seeds by any scientific body.

In addition to GMOs, it’s been stated by many experts within the farming industry that patented herbicides and pesticides are to blame for many of the diseases people around the world are now experiencing.

We are certainly a product of the foods we consume and so when one takes a closer look at the true lack of quality embedded within our food supplies, it’s easier to comprehend why modern society suffers with such a high number of health challenges. It’s time for people to understand that the foods we consume might actually be killing us.

What do you think about this subject?

Smartphone Addiction: It’s Like Electronic Heroin

NoFakeNews1 Comment

By Dr. John Reizer

Most people are well aware of the dangers associated with taking certain street and prescription drugs. We’ve all heard the horror stories about a particular person getting hopelessly addicted to cocaine or heroin. These chemicals as well as many others are, undoubtedly, very dangerous substances.

Although most users begin taking said drugs voluntarily, it doesn’t take long before they have become full blown addicts. Chemical drug dependency is a serious problem that takes many months, and in some cases many years to successfully conquer. Most people are unable to kick a chemical drug habit without the help of a fully trained medical staff.

The human nervous system is wired in such a way that when we take part in pleasurable activities, certain chemicals are released inside the brain that cause us to want to continue the pleasurable experiences. One of those chemicals is called Dopamine.

The neurotransmitter Dopamine allows us to feel very happy and the more the chemical is released inside the brain, the happier we will feel. Pleasurable experiences like eating and having sex cause Dopamine to be released inside the brain. The taking of certain drugs like heroin also causes a lot of Dopamine to be released inside the brain and this in turn causes a very euphoric state that drug users often report experiencing.

With continued drug use, the brain eventually reduces the amount of Dopamine that is released and it becomes more difficult to feel the same level of pleasure that was initially experienced by the user. In order to reach the same level of pleasure, more of the drug is required each time and the cycle goes on and on.

It is easy for most people in today’s world to understand that a chemical modality, like heroin, could cause a person to become hopelessly addicted. But it’s not so easy for members of society to understand that the same mechanisms that are causing people to become drug addicts are also capable of causing people to become addicted to computers and Smartphones.

Electronic addiction is very real and millions of people are becoming electronic addicts even as I write these words. And if you believe that this is all taking place because of some unfortunate accident – think again! The telecommunication corporations are well aware of the fact that their products are habit forming. They know that when you first start off, your data package will be small. But just like a nicotine junkie increases the number of cigarette packs they smoke a day each year, the Smartphone user will also increase the amount of data they require over time.

Smartphone users repeatedly stimulate pathways inside the human brain that cause the release of Dopamine which rewards the user with a pleasurable experience. This scenario recurs over and over again and eventually more electronic stimulation is required to reach the same level of pleasure that was present initially.

In this situation the modality used to trigger the Dopamine release is electronic in nature and not a chemical product. Chemical modality or electronic modality, it doesn’t matter; the same addictive result is accomplished. Smartphone users can become so addicted that they cannot go more than ten minutes at a time without checking text messages, emails, Facebook, Instagram and other social media applications. When a Smartphone user picks up his or her device, it’s similar to a nicotine addict picking up a cigarette and taking a puff.

Are you a Smartphone addict? How many hours do you spend on one of these gadgets? Do you get stressed when you put your phone down? Are you afraid you’re missing something important online? Do you get stressed when your phone battery is getting low?

What do you think about this subject?