Fluoride is A Known Neurotoxin – The Lancet

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews

I have previously written about my feelings concerning the dangers associated with consuming Fluoride through drinking water. Many municipalities and bottled water companies in the United States routinely add Fluoride to drinking water under the false pretext that it prevents dental caries in human beings. While water fluoridation is not as common of a practice throughout portions of Europe, many provinces around the world also continue to add Fluoride to public water supplies.

There is no evidence that adding Fluoride to drinking water benefits human physiology in any way whatsoever. There is, however extensive evidence that humans consuming this neurotoxin are doing damage to their overall health.

images

Many proponents of this dangerous practice use the argument that in small doses, Fluoride added to drinking water has no adverse effects on human neurophysiology. This claim is not true because the neurotoxin, Fluoride accumulates in human bones and teeth. Fluoride is a toxic poison that also can accumulate in brain and nervous tissues over time (Pineal Gland).

“A meta-analysis of 27 cross-sectional studies of children exposed to fluoride in drinking water, mainly from China, suggests an average IQ decrement of about seven points in children exposed to raised fluoride concentrations.44 Confounding from other substances seemed unlikely in most of these studies. Further characterisation of the dose–response association would be desirable.” – The Lancet – 2/14/14

Fluoride is an industrial chemical known to cause developmental neurotoxicity in human beings. – (Source: The Lancet).

Most toothpaste products contain the poison, Fluoride and thus a poison warning disclaimer is always printed on the product’s packaging. Remember, Fluoride accumulates in the human body so the argument that it is safe in small doses is illogical and untruthful.

What do you think about this subject?

LAWSUIT COULD END WATER FLUORIDATION ONCE AND FOR ALL BY DEMONSTRATING ITS NEUROTOXICITY

Alex Pietrowski, Staff Writer
Waking Times

The practice of water fluoridation in the United States has been under growing scrutiny for years by a public that has become conscious of the fact that adding toxic chemicals which are proven to be harmful to human health and children’s development to public water is medication without consent.

Never-the-less, the effort to stop fluoridation of municipal water supplies has been an uphill battle against entrenched financial interests and against dated ideas about health. While each year we hear news of cities heeding the concerns of their citizens and stopping fluoridation, without a major victory at the national level, people will be fighting this for years to come, all the while consuming toxic chemicals in the one thing we cannot live without, water.

The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is reporting on a major development to cut the head off of this snake, and an unprecedented lawsuit is now holding promise for a national reversal of municipal water fluoridation.

Based on neurotoxicity studies, the “EPA has been served with a petition that includes more than 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing the risks of water fluoridation to human health.”

As noted by FAN in a recent press release:

“This case will present the first time a court will consider the neurotoxicity of fluoride and the question of whether fluoridation presents an unreasonable risk under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

And, in contrast to most other legal challenges of Agency actions, TSCA gives us the right to get the federal court to consider our evidence ‘de novo’ — meaning federal courts are to conduct their own independent review of the evidence without deference to the EPA’s judgment.”

The lawsuit has been served along with a petition containing thousands of signatures of concerned and well-informed citizens, and includes more than 2500 pages of documents detailing the harm inherent in poisoning the pubic with fluoride.

In detail, the complaint is an attempt to demonstrate how this practice violates the Toxic Substances Control Act.

“The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), along with a coalition of environmental and public health groups has filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to their denial of our petition under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) seeking a ban on water fluoridation.

We believe this lawsuit is an unprecedented opportunity to end the practice once and for all in the U.S., and potentially throughout the world, based on the well-documented neurotoxicity of fluoride. You may read the official complaint here.” [Source]

Read: 18 SCIENTIFICALLY VALIDATED REASONS TO END PUBLIC WATER FLUORIDATION

Final Thoughts

The negative effects of consuming fluoridated water are well-documented, and the body of evidence continues to grow. In 2012 a major Harvard study presented a study demonstrating water fluoridation lowers IQ. In 2016 a study demonstrated a link between increased diabetes and water fluoridation. In 2015 the EPA had to issue new guidelines for safe levels of fluoride, reducing the amount, citing the potential for fluoridated water damages teeth, which ironically, is the very condition which we are told is the reason we need fluoride in the first place.

Public water fluoridation is slowly being defeated, and this lawsuit may play a major role in this fight.

 

About the Author

Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.

This article (Lawsuit Could End Water Fluoridation Once and For All by Demonstrating its Neurotoxicity) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

Excellent Presentation About Water Fluoridation: Watch this Video!

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

In honor of Fluoride Awareness Week, I am featuring this excellent presentation that addresses the pros and cons associated with the practice of water fluoridation.

Please watch the following video:

For those people that are new to NoFakeNews.net, let me explain a few house rules about this electronic magazine:

1. This is a private website and you are cordially invited to peruse the various posts that have been written for the benefit of people looking for a different perspective on many subjects that are impacting and affecting human beings on a daily basis.

2. Feel free to leave a comment regarding a specific article or subject. If I like what you have to say I will publish your words of wisdom. If I think your comment is not suitable to publish for whatever reason I deem it inappropriate, it will not appear on the website.

3. Regarding health topics: Please do not attempt to clog up my comment boards with “officialdom” such as “peer-reviewed” research that demonstrates vaccines, Mercury, and Fluoride are safe for human beings. If you want to state an opinion such as this, make your post one time and please move on so others can be read.

4. Please do not attack or be rude to other posters because I promise you your comments will be removed from the site and you will lose the privilege of posting on NoFakeNews in the future.

5. If you do not like the house rules listed above, please feel free to unsubscribe from the website. I assure you that there are plenty of other interesting addresses to visit on the Internet.

 

Thanks!

Dr. John L. Reizer

 

 

Can We Really Trust Medical “Peer-Reviewed” Research?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

 reizer3In a recent article that I published here on NoFakeNews.net, I discussed at length the possible dangers associated with human beings ingesting Fluoride. I believe that because of the common practice of water fluoridation in the United States and other locations throughout the world, many people suffer poor health due to Fluoride poisoning.

Predictably, a number of Internet trolls immediately jumped on my comment board and inundated the website with copy and paste posts that allegedly originated from “peer-reviewed” studies. The research plastered all over my website, of course, defended the mainstream public health mindset that Fluoride is a safe substance in appropriate concentrations, etc.

Every once in awhile, I purposely author and post one of these controversial articles on my website in an effort to measure the response by various trolls that are working for the establishment that wants to desperately remove credibility from websites like mine that might influence readers to see a different perspective about a subject than what the powers that be have authorized.

In almost every situation where I have released articles about the harmful effects associated with Fluoride, amalgam fillings, and especially vaccinations, the copy and pasted materials used to defend conventional paradigms appear scripted in nature. The written words used by the posters to attack my position are almost always the same.

For example, a few years ago I published a very similar article to the one I released here on June 14, 2015 about water Fluoridation. In the article that I published in 2012, a dentist wrote the following commentary:

“The great 16th Century alchemist, Paracelsus said, ‘Every substance is a poison and only the proper dose determines a poison from a cure.’

The poster in the 2012 article was trying to make the point that Fluoride is only a poison if it is administered to humans in inappropriate concentrations. If you believe that piece of advice I have some swamp land in the Everglades to sell you.

Then I received a comment regarding my article from June 14, 2015 from another dentist and he wrote practically the same thing:

“16th Century European doctor and alchemist, Paracelsus, stated it well: ‘All substances are poisons: there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison and a remedy.’”

I began thinking earlier today that these posters are working off the same damn script. The materials were pre-written along with the “peer-reviewed” research so that any dentist, doctor, or pretender could easily copy and paste them to a given website in order to defend the position in question being attacked. It is a brilliant strategy and demonstrates just how prepared the mainstream paradigm managers are in their efforts to keep members of society locked inside the box when it comes to certain subjects.

Regardless of the number of “peer-reviewed” research pieces being copy and pasted on this website or any other alternative news productions, it is important for readers to realize that a lot of scientific research is flawed and does not accurately represent the truth about the questions being examined.

There are tremendous amounts of bias in medical research due to the heavy influence that pharmaceutical companies have on institutions of higher learning and the federal government of the United States. This situation is fast becoming a serious problem for the scientific community as was reported in 2012 in an article published in the Washington Post.

According to another article written and published in The Atlantic magazine, “Much of what medical researchers conclude in their studies is misleading, exaggerated, or flat-out wrong.”

A publication put out by the University of California at Berkeley reported, “Almost 75% of U.S. clinical trials in medicine are paid for by private companies.” With statistics like these how can there ever be “peer-reviewed” research that is truly unbiased and representative of the truth regarding medicines and their effectiveness or ineffectiveness with regards to human subjects?

In the cases of Fluoride, Mercury, and vaccines, I have always found that it is probably better to rely on a little bit of common sense versus “peer-reviewed” research that often seems to defy the parameters of logic.

What do you think about this subject?

 

DISCLAIMER!

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

The IABDM: Fluoride and Mercury Free Dentistry

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

I am including a link for readers that want access to professional dental services without the risks of being exposed to the toxic substances, Fluoride and Mercury.

Biological dentistry is concerned with the whole body effects of all dental materials, techniques and procedures.
It is fluoride-free, mercury-free and mercury-safe.

Please visit the IABDM (International Academy of Biological Dentistry & Medicine’s) website by clicking this link and become educated by the dental professionals that truly understand the serious dangers associated with Fluoride and Mercury.