Are Anti-Vaxxers Crazy?

By Dr. John Reizer

Anti-vaxxer terminology – a creation of the pharmaceutical industry that has been used to identify and discredit any persons or groups that are in opposition to the current vaccine paradigm.

Anti-vaxxer – a person who refuses to vaccinate their child because they believe the medication is more dangerous than the benefits they allegedly offer.

Are anti-vaxxers crazy, paranoid conspiracy theorists? More important, are anti-vaxxers causing the members of society to become more at risk from dangerous and contagious diseases than they should be? These are both fair questions to explore because a lot of medical experts have been bringing up these questions on national television programs as well as other mainstream media forums.

According to some mainstream medical sources, many diseases are currently returning or making a comeback due to anti-vaxxers who refuse to vaccinate their children.

First of all let me preface my little article by writing that if vaccines truly conferred immunity to the people receiving them, there would be absolutely no need for the vaccinated patients to fear outbreaks of certain diseases coming from the unvaccinated folks. The only people at risk, theoretically speaking, should be those individuals not vaccinated.

Truth be told, a minority of American healthcare consumers have become a lot more educated in the past 5-10 years and have intelligently concluded that the risks associated with these medicines far out-way the published benefits. This in itself is a scary concept for the drug manufacturers (vaccine makers) who have a financial obligation to their shareholders to make profits. And that is exactly what they have been doing each year. These multinational corporations are making billions of dollars annually while putting out products that are supposedly designed to prevent the spread of diseases. In actuality, the vaccine programs of today have most likely caused the proliferation of many diseases at breakneck speed.

In response to an increasingly educated healthcare consumer, big pharma and its far reaching tentacles (the mainstream media, the government regulating agencies it controls through an endless bankroll of dollars and too many political lobbyists to count) have launched an all out war against anti-vaxxers. Anti-vaxxers have been made to look like crazy people. Because a small segment of society has decided to question the advice of a large consortium of pharmaceutical corporations, they have been targeted for ridicule and eventual elimination.

Make no mistakes regarding the facts. According to many professionals and doctors that are labeled as vaccine critics, these medicines are dangerous and contain ingredients that can make human beings extremely sick. In many instances the physiological reactions to vaccine ingredients are quite irreversible and capable of causing autoimmune dysfunction that leads to a lifelong struggle for many people.

The ingredient thimerosol is still to this day commonly found in many vaccines. It is reported as being safe by drug makers in small quantities. It has been linked to autism by some researchers and remains a concern for many parents. But by no means whatsoever is thimerosol the only harmful ingredient in these drugs.

If you are physically harmed by a vaccine product, you cannot sue the vaccine maker or the doctor that administered the poison in a regular court of law. Gee, that sure doesn’t seem very fair. But that’s the way the law reads. You can only try to recover damages in a special vaccine court where the awards are limited to $250,000. Good luck trying to collect anything in this venue.

Vaccine proponents like to jump up and down screaming that national vaccine programs were the reason childhood diseases like measles, mumps, polio and others declined over the years. This is not true by any stretch of the imagination because these diseases were already declining before the various vaccines were ever introduced.

In many countries where there were not vaccines offered, the same diseases also declined in the general population. The reason this occurred can be attributed to natural adaptive tendencies of human physiology to disease processes and better nutrition and hygiene practices that were employed over time.

When vaccines are administered to patients, they bypass the normal portal of entry that the body is used to and this can stress out or even harm the immune system and cause autoimmune problems. Diseases like Lupus, Rheumatoid arthritis, Diabetes, Psoriasis, and many cancers have likely connections to vaccines.

Once you decide to get a vaccine you cannot decide at a later date to reverse your decision. So you better make damn sure you have done your research before you roll up your sleeve and voluntarily agree to get jabbed. And when you do your research be warned that most of said research you will find populating the top portions of most search engines has been rigged to appear in those positions by the powers that be. Most of the top tier results will yield the research data pharmaceutical companies have paid for.

It’s not easy to find the truth about vaccines because the regulating agencies have been bought off and can no longer be trusted as evidenced in the movie Vaxxed.

Disclaimer

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

A Safe Vaccine is One That is Never Used

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

The vaccine theory is well protected within the field of medicine. In other words, if anyone speaks or writes negatively about vaccines, he or she is immediately attacked by the pharmaceutical industrial complex. This is especially true with regards to anti vaccine articles authored online.

There are a plethora of paid shills employed by pharmaceutical companies and other agencies that police the Internet comment boards. Collectively speaking, their job is to squash/ridicule any commentary that might suggest or prove that vaccines are not safe for healthcare consumers. In addition, any medical professional that speaks or writes negatively about vaccination theory will assuredly be ostracized from the medical profession.

The research that proves there are serious risks associated with administering vaccines to human beings and other living animals exists, but it is intentionally made difficult to access. Such research has clearly demonstrated that all vaccines are direct transporters of dangerous products into the human body. This in turn permanently damages the human immune system by causing targeted suppression of normal physiology that is necessary to have a healthy population free of disease.

Vaccines are designed to create antibodies in living systems that ultimately suppress biology. The suppression systems realized by these designer medicines vary, but can be used to achieve whatever effect the engineers that make them desire. This includes the planned proliferation of specific diseases as well as infertility challenges within specifically selected segments of the human population.

Within the past few years many campaigns have been launched by the powers that be inviting everybody and their uncle to send off their DNA to independent companies in order to uncover secrets about their ancestral tree. This might not be such a great idea because specific individuals as well as larger segments of the population could potentially be targeted for sterilization or harm from designer diseases.

If the wrong people get their hands on your DNA samples, you could be in trouble. People should protect their DNA as if it were their personal financial information. You don’t want a data breach taking place with regards to your personal DNA information. That kind of stolen data loaded into a vaccine could be a serious problem for all of us.

Take the time to watch the video below:

Understanding The Real Dangers Associated With Vaccines

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

Contrary to popular belief, vaccines are not safe and do not make us healthier, and there is an enormous body of research that backs up my premise. (1)

We have all been told this incredible lie by the powers that be that vaccines have eradicated diseases on this planet and that without these medicinal concoctions the world would be a very sickly place and human life would have succumbed long ago to a wide variety of plagues. For those health practitioners that are aware of the truth, it’s frustrating to see and hear this type of nonsense.

Whenever I write or speak openly about the truth about vaccines, I get lots of people that tell me that without vaccines, polio and other diseases would still be around today. What these individuals fail to realize is that they are the recipients of inaccurate information. They are parroting and re-parroting the same disinformation to others and have no idea what the heck they are talking about.

Most people do not realize that virtually all the major diseases that have vaccines tied to them had already diminished in their intensity or, for all intents and purposes, disappeared prior to the vaccines being introduced. (2)

In the case of polio, the disease, prior to the introduction of the vaccines (Sabin and Salk), had been reported and recorded in concert with aseptic meningitis and the Coxsackie virus. After the introduction of the vaccines, polio cases were recorded exclusively as aseptic meningitis and other convenient diagnoses. The cases of these other diseases suddenly skyrocketed while polio seemingly disappeared. At least that is the way it appeared to be in the eyes of an unsuspecting group of healthcare consumers. (3)

Many of us have an extremely difficult time questioning officialdom. This also rings true when we examine the decision making tendencies of healthcare consumers worldwide. A lot of people do not want to go against the advice of public health agencies that have been established by governments to protect the welfare and safety of its citizens. People generally have a problem with going against health advice that has been released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). As a result of this agency and others like it that are on record stating vaccines are safe for public consumption and pose no serious health risks to children and adults, more people than ever before are voluntarily receiving vaccinations. And people are receiving these manufactured drugs for an increasing number of conditions.

The beliefs most of us have, to a large extent, have been etched into our psyches by the corporately owned mainstream media (MSM) companies that continue to have plenty of biases with regards to the subjects they report on. But why does the MSM promote the petrochemical agenda to its viewership? Besides the most obvious reason, that advertising revenue generated by pharmaceutical advertising campaigns is extremely profitable to said companies, there are far more nefarious reasons that these powerful companies continue to promote the vaccine and drug industry. You have to do your own research to uncover these other reasons and a good place to begin is by looking up information about media ownership in the United States and throughout the world. They don’t make it easy to connect the dots so to speak, but if you put in your due diligence, the other reasons become very clear to researchers.

In the case of the pro vaccine agenda, the MSM has had a big role in convincing healthcare consumers about the supposed value of many vaccines as well as the risks associated with not receiving said drugs. Currently, in the United States, it’s virtually impossible to watch a television program without being bombarded with advertising that promotes prescription drugs and specific vaccines that are supposedly designed to protect human beings from pneumonia, shingles, hepatitis, influenza, and the list goes on and on. In addition to commercials, the content of most news programs includes regular daily segments that discuss vaccines and the great benefits they are affording humanity. Let’s understand what the heck is going on here; people are relentlessly being bombarded with vaccine propaganda that is disguised to look like science. It’s not science. It’s a carefully written marketing campaign that appears regularly, like a soap opera, in both commercial and news programming formats. It’s marketing that has been backed by the best scientific research money can buy. (4)

The vaccine industry, like the petrochemical industrial complex, is a protected science. It’s a taboo subject that most healthcare professionals wouldn’t even think of questioning in a public forum. But there are some brave medical doctors and other professionals that have put their licenses and lives on the line to bring out the truth to people. They are tired of seeing innocent children and other healthcare consumers being unnecessarily harmed. They have embraced the challenge of speaking out against a protected domain while trying to maintain credibility in their respective professions. Good luck with that! I write with experience when I tell readers that this is quite a daunting task.

What do you think about this subject?

Disclaimer

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

 

Robert De Niro Challenges Media to Research CDC Vaccine Whistleblower

cdc-cover-up-1024x569-1-1024x569By Derrick Broze

In an interview on the Today show, Robert De Niro, actor and co-founder of the Tribeca Film Festival, said he regrets pulling the documentary VAXXED from the festival.

Actor Robert De Niro has recently at the center of a storm regarding the decision to remove the documentary film VAXXED: From Controversy to Catastrophe from the Tribeca Film Festival in New York. Following the Tribeca cancellation, the film was also removed by officials with the Houston International Film Festival after being contacted by officials within the Mayor’s Office.

Robert De Niro had originally been very supportive of the film before ultimately deciding to pull it from the festival, stating, “after reviewing it over the past few days with the Tribeca Film Festival team and others from the scientific community, we do not believe it contributes to or furthers the discussion I had hoped for.” De Niro also stated that there were “concerns with certain things in this film” that prevented the film from being played at the festival.

The film follows the story of a Center for Disease Control and Prevention research scientist, Dr. William Thompson. In August 2014, Thompson claimed that researchers involved in a study on the MMR vaccine “fudged numbers” to lower the number of black children who were adversely affected. Thompson is a senior scientist at the CDC and has been with the agency since 1998. On August 27, 2014 Dr. Thompson released a statement acknowledging that he and co-authors from a 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics did in fact omit important information from a study on the link between vaccines and autism.

During the Today interview De Niro seemed to reverse his previous statements and spoke openly about his questions regarding the safety of vaccinations.“I think the movie is something people should see,” De Niro said. “There is a lot of information about things that are happening with the CDC, the pharmaceutical companies. There are a lot of things that are not said. As a parent of a child who has autism I want to know the truth.”


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ7iPn39i08

De Niro also discussed the media blackout regarding the CDC whistleblower. “Everybody doesn’t seem to want to hear much about it. And you guys are the ones who should do the investigation,” De Niro challenged. Regarding another film about autism that is showing at Tribeca, De Niro said “it’s not questioning how some people got autism, how the vaccines are dangerous for certain people who are more susceptible. Nobody seems to want to address that, or they say it’s a closed issue but it doesn’t seem to be. There is more to this than meets the eye, believe me.”

When asked if he believes that science has shown there is no link between vaccines and autism, De Niro replied, “I believe it’s much more complicated than that. There is a link and they are saying there isn’t. The obvious one is thimerosal, a mercury based preservative. Let’s just find out the truth.” De Niro also questioned statistics that claim that parents who do not vaccinate their children will lead to a higher incidence of measles and other illnesses.

Despite the often repeated claim that VAXXED is anti-vaccination, Philippe Diaz, head of Cinema Libre, the distributor of VAXXED, says the film is not anti-vaccine but rather pro-safe vaccines. “It is not an anti-vaccination movie, people are judging the movie without seeing it first. Even Robert De Niro said the film was not anti-vaccination,” Diaz said. Indeed, De Niro has stressed that he is also not anti-vaccine and only interested in the truth. “There is something there, there is something there that people are not addressing. All I want is for people to see the film and people can make up their own judgement.”

Another interesting facet of the Today interview was a claim by Tribeca co-founder Jane Rosenthal that the sponsors of the film festival did not complain, but rather the filmmakers were upset. Despite Rosenthal’s comments, Diaz told AP that the sponsors were responsible for pressuring Tribeca to remove VAXXED.

“That’s exactly what happened. The Directors of Tribeca confirmed it to us,” Diaz said. “They had problems with sponsors. I think it created a horrible precedent, if you do not like what is in a movie, no matter the quality of the film you can pull it from a festival.”

Although VAXXED has brought Dr. William Thompson’s story to the mainstream, he originally did not want to go public with his information until it was revealed that conversations he had with Dr. Brian Hooker had been recorded. Dr. Thompson handed over thousands of pages of documents to Congressman Bill Posey’s office for review. Posey serves on the Committee on Science, Space and Technology. There was very little chatter about the CDC whistleblower for quite some time until July 29th, 2015, when Congressman Bill Posey took to the floor of the House to discuss Dr. William Thompson and his documents. The debut of VAXXED has only increased the attention on Thompson’s claims.

Another controversial aspect of the Vaccine debate is the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which eliminated any liability for pharmaceutical manufacturers, stating, “the number of recommended childhood vaccines has more than tripled and we have seen a decline in the health and vitality of our children with among the worst infant mortality rate in the developed world.”

Although pharmaceutical manufactures cannot be held liable for problems associated with vaccinations, the U.S. government does have a fund for victims of vaccines known as the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Funds awarded through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program are first processed through a special vaccine court. In December 2014, Ben Swann examined a report by the Associated Press which revealed that thousands of families with claims with the vaccine court are left to wait for years, sometimes decades before receiving help.

The AP studied hundreds of court decisions, performed more than 100 interviews, and studied a database containing more than 14,500 cases. The database was last updated in January 2013 with the government refusing to release any new updates. Officially known as the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the so-called vaccine court is a little-known system that is intended to address claims of Americans who believe their children have been harmed by vaccinations. The court is an established part of the federal judiciary system however the authorities over the cases are not called judges but rather “special masters.”

The AP investigation found several issues with the court. These include tens of millions of taxpayer dollars that has been paid to private attorneys who often practice “churning,” a practice described as filing a large number of claims regardless of the quality of the claims. In the private court attorneys are paid out whether or not they succeed in convincing the court. That fact has led to questionable billing practices and an increase in court claims.

The AP report also found that “expert” witnesses for the families and the government often have a lack of credibility or conflicts of interest. The report says that some of the experts are also involved in setting up nonprofits that question vaccine safety. Meanwhile, doctors hired by the government to testify in defense of vaccines have ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

For more details on this court please watch Ben Swann’s report on the Vaccine Court and Autism.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfqpZqEP6gg

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for ActivistPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter.

Derrick is available for interviews.

This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

If Your Doctor Insists Vaccines Are Safe, Have Them Sign This Form

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

For many years I have listened to the ongoing public debate about the pros and cons associated with vaccines. On one side of the argument, traditional medicine claims that in order for human beings to be healthy they must receive a large number of synthetically prepared medicinal concoctions and that said medicines pose absolutely no threat whatsoever to the proper expression of human physiology.

On the other side of the fence, anti-vaccine groups have been coming out of the woodwork for years claiming that not only are vaccines useless in protecting people against various diseases, they also destroy the human immune system and cause the proliferation of diseases in future generations by passing on vaccine damaged genes to our children and their children.

During my professional career as a health care provider, I have read my fair share of research about vaccines. I made up my mind long ago not to receive these drugs in my own body. Very often I come across patients in my private chiropractic office that ask me for my opinion with regards to the alleged dangers tied to vaccines. I tell my patients that I am not a medical doctor and cannot advise them, professionally speaking, about taking drugs. I point them in a direction where they can read unbiased research and let them make their own decisions after becoming more educated about the facts.

Many of my patients often decide against vaccinating themselves and their children after reading published research because they arrive at a similar conclusion that the risks associated with the prescribed shots are far more dangerous than any possible benefits that might be derived from the products being injected into their bodies.

In many situations, medical doctors will not treat patients that have not received their vaccines. This is especially true in the case of pediatricians. Many pediatric practices have a standard policy that precludes the treatment of any children that are unvaccinated. This attitude and professional mandate by many medical practitioners often leaves patients and the parents of young patients in an uncomfortable situation.

My advice to any persons being placed in this very precarious situation, where a doctor is demanding that they must be vaccinated  before being accepted into their medical practice, is to get the medical physician in question to sign, THE PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY. If you can find a doctor that is stupid enough to sign this document, then I guess you have to decide whether or not to proceed with the prescribed vaccine schedule. But I seriously doubt if any medical physician would ever sign such a document. To date, no medical doctor has ever signed such a waiver.

Please read the document below:

THE PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY (By Ken Anderson)

I (Physician’s name, degree)_______________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State/Province of _________. My State/Provincial license number is ___________ , and my DEA number is ____________. My medical specialty is _______________

I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name) ______________ , age _____ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________

I am aware that vaccines may contain many of the following chemicals, excipients, preservatives and fillers:

* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
* arginine hydrochloride
* dog kidney, monkey kidney,
* dibasic potassium phosphate
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* gentamicin sulfate
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrocortisone
* hydrolized gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* monobasic potassium phosphate
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* nonylphenol ethoxylate
* octylphenol ethoxylate
* octoxynol 10
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium chloride
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sodium deoxycholate
* sorbitol
* thimerosal
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood

and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosal causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses”).

In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

STEPS TAKEN: _________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________

I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)

The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”

The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety”

The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”

Hepatitis B

I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.

I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
____________________________________
____________________________________ _____________________________________

In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
_________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
______________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: _____________Date: ______________________

************************************************************************************************

(Please let me know if you are successful in finding any medical doctor that is willing to sign this form.)