Are Anti-Vaxxers Crazy?

By Dr. John Reizer

Anti-vaxxer terminology – a creation of the pharmaceutical industry that has been used to identify and discredit any persons or groups that are in opposition to the current vaccine paradigm.

Anti-vaxxer – a person who refuses to vaccinate their child because they believe the medication is more dangerous than the benefits they allegedly offer.

Are anti-vaxxers crazy, paranoid conspiracy theorists? More important, are anti-vaxxers causing the members of society to become more at risk from dangerous and contagious diseases than they should be? These are both fair questions to explore because a lot of medical experts have been bringing up these questions on national television programs as well as other mainstream media forums.

According to some mainstream medical sources, many diseases are currently returning or making a comeback due to anti-vaxxers who refuse to vaccinate their children.

First of all let me preface my little article by writing that if vaccines truly conferred immunity to the people receiving them, there would be absolutely no need for the vaccinated patients to fear outbreaks of certain diseases coming from the unvaccinated folks. The only people at risk, theoretically speaking, should be those individuals not vaccinated.

Truth be told, a minority of American healthcare consumers have become a lot more educated in the past 5-10 years and have intelligently concluded that the risks associated with these medicines far out-way the published benefits. This in itself is a scary concept for the drug manufacturers (vaccine makers) who have a financial obligation to their shareholders to make profits. And that is exactly what they have been doing each year. These multinational corporations are making billions of dollars annually while putting out products that are supposedly designed to prevent the spread of diseases. In actuality, the vaccine programs of today have most likely caused the proliferation of many diseases at breakneck speed.

In response to an increasingly educated healthcare consumer, big pharma and its far reaching tentacles (the mainstream media, the government regulating agencies it controls through an endless bankroll of dollars and too many political lobbyists to count) have launched an all out war against anti-vaxxers. Anti-vaxxers have been made to look like crazy people. Because a small segment of society has decided to question the advice of a large consortium of pharmaceutical corporations, they have been targeted for ridicule and eventual elimination.

Make no mistakes regarding the facts. According to many professionals and doctors that are labeled as vaccine critics, these medicines are dangerous and contain ingredients that can make human beings extremely sick. In many instances the physiological reactions to vaccine ingredients are quite irreversible and capable of causing autoimmune dysfunction that leads to a lifelong struggle for many people.

The ingredient thimerosol is still to this day commonly found in many vaccines. It is reported as being safe by drug makers in small quantities. It has been linked to autism by some researchers and remains a concern for many parents. But by no means whatsoever is thimerosol the only harmful ingredient in these drugs.

If you are physically harmed by a vaccine product, you cannot sue the vaccine maker or the doctor that administered the poison in a regular court of law. Gee, that sure doesn’t seem very fair. But that’s the way the law reads. You can only try to recover damages in a special vaccine court where the awards are limited to $250,000. Good luck trying to collect anything in this venue.

Vaccine proponents like to jump up and down screaming that national vaccine programs were the reason childhood diseases like measles, mumps, polio and others declined over the years. This is not true by any stretch of the imagination because these diseases were already declining before the various vaccines were ever introduced.

In many countries where there were not vaccines offered, the same diseases also declined in the general population. The reason this occurred can be attributed to natural adaptive tendencies of human physiology to disease processes and better nutrition and hygiene practices that were employed over time.

When vaccines are administered to patients, they bypass the normal portal of entry that the body is used to and this can stress out or even harm the immune system and cause autoimmune problems. Diseases like Lupus, Rheumatoid arthritis, Diabetes, Psoriasis, and many cancers have likely connections to vaccines.

Once you decide to get a vaccine you cannot decide at a later date to reverse your decision. So you better make damn sure you have done your research before you roll up your sleeve and voluntarily agree to get jabbed. And when you do your research be warned that most of said research you will find populating the top portions of most search engines has been rigged to appear in those positions by the powers that be. Most of the top tier results will yield the research data pharmaceutical companies have paid for.

It’s not easy to find the truth about vaccines because the regulating agencies have been bought off and can no longer be trusted as evidenced in the movie Vaxxed.

Disclaimer

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

Understanding The Real Dangers Associated With Vaccines

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

Contrary to popular belief, vaccines are not safe and do not make us healthier, and there is an enormous body of research that backs up my premise. (1)

We have all been told this incredible lie by the powers that be that vaccines have eradicated diseases on this planet and that without these medicinal concoctions the world would be a very sickly place and human life would have succumbed long ago to a wide variety of plagues. For those health practitioners that are aware of the truth, it’s frustrating to see and hear this type of nonsense.

Whenever I write or speak openly about the truth about vaccines, I get lots of people that tell me that without vaccines, polio and other diseases would still be around today. What these individuals fail to realize is that they are the recipients of inaccurate information. They are parroting and re-parroting the same disinformation to others and have no idea what the heck they are talking about.

Most people do not realize that virtually all the major diseases that have vaccines tied to them had already diminished in their intensity or, for all intents and purposes, disappeared prior to the vaccines being introduced. (2)

In the case of polio, the disease, prior to the introduction of the vaccines (Sabin and Salk), had been reported and recorded in concert with aseptic meningitis and the Coxsackie virus. After the introduction of the vaccines, polio cases were recorded exclusively as aseptic meningitis and other convenient diagnoses. The cases of these other diseases suddenly skyrocketed while polio seemingly disappeared. At least that is the way it appeared to be in the eyes of an unsuspecting group of healthcare consumers. (3)

Many of us have an extremely difficult time questioning officialdom. This also rings true when we examine the decision making tendencies of healthcare consumers worldwide. A lot of people do not want to go against the advice of public health agencies that have been established by governments to protect the welfare and safety of its citizens. People generally have a problem with going against health advice that has been released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). As a result of this agency and others like it that are on record stating vaccines are safe for public consumption and pose no serious health risks to children and adults, more people than ever before are voluntarily receiving vaccinations. And people are receiving these manufactured drugs for an increasing number of conditions.

The beliefs most of us have, to a large extent, have been etched into our psyches by the corporately owned mainstream media (MSM) companies that continue to have plenty of biases with regards to the subjects they report on. But why does the MSM promote the petrochemical agenda to its viewership? Besides the most obvious reason, that advertising revenue generated by pharmaceutical advertising campaigns is extremely profitable to said companies, there are far more nefarious reasons that these powerful companies continue to promote the vaccine and drug industry. You have to do your own research to uncover these other reasons and a good place to begin is by looking up information about media ownership in the United States and throughout the world. They don’t make it easy to connect the dots so to speak, but if you put in your due diligence, the other reasons become very clear to researchers.

In the case of the pro vaccine agenda, the MSM has had a big role in convincing healthcare consumers about the supposed value of many vaccines as well as the risks associated with not receiving said drugs. Currently, in the United States, it’s virtually impossible to watch a television program without being bombarded with advertising that promotes prescription drugs and specific vaccines that are supposedly designed to protect human beings from pneumonia, shingles, hepatitis, influenza, and the list goes on and on. In addition to commercials, the content of most news programs includes regular daily segments that discuss vaccines and the great benefits they are affording humanity. Let’s understand what the heck is going on here; people are relentlessly being bombarded with vaccine propaganda that is disguised to look like science. It’s not science. It’s a carefully written marketing campaign that appears regularly, like a soap opera, in both commercial and news programming formats. It’s marketing that has been backed by the best scientific research money can buy. (4)

The vaccine industry, like the petrochemical industrial complex, is a protected science. It’s a taboo subject that most healthcare professionals wouldn’t even think of questioning in a public forum. But there are some brave medical doctors and other professionals that have put their licenses and lives on the line to bring out the truth to people. They are tired of seeing innocent children and other healthcare consumers being unnecessarily harmed. They have embraced the challenge of speaking out against a protected domain while trying to maintain credibility in their respective professions. Good luck with that! I write with experience when I tell readers that this is quite a daunting task.

What do you think about this subject?

Disclaimer

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

 

Robert De Niro Challenges Media to Research CDC Vaccine Whistleblower

cdc-cover-up-1024x569-1-1024x569By Derrick Broze

In an interview on the Today show, Robert De Niro, actor and co-founder of the Tribeca Film Festival, said he regrets pulling the documentary VAXXED from the festival.

Actor Robert De Niro has recently at the center of a storm regarding the decision to remove the documentary film VAXXED: From Controversy to Catastrophe from the Tribeca Film Festival in New York. Following the Tribeca cancellation, the film was also removed by officials with the Houston International Film Festival after being contacted by officials within the Mayor’s Office.

Robert De Niro had originally been very supportive of the film before ultimately deciding to pull it from the festival, stating, “after reviewing it over the past few days with the Tribeca Film Festival team and others from the scientific community, we do not believe it contributes to or furthers the discussion I had hoped for.” De Niro also stated that there were “concerns with certain things in this film” that prevented the film from being played at the festival.

The film follows the story of a Center for Disease Control and Prevention research scientist, Dr. William Thompson. In August 2014, Thompson claimed that researchers involved in a study on the MMR vaccine “fudged numbers” to lower the number of black children who were adversely affected. Thompson is a senior scientist at the CDC and has been with the agency since 1998. On August 27, 2014 Dr. Thompson released a statement acknowledging that he and co-authors from a 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics did in fact omit important information from a study on the link between vaccines and autism.

During the Today interview De Niro seemed to reverse his previous statements and spoke openly about his questions regarding the safety of vaccinations.“I think the movie is something people should see,” De Niro said. “There is a lot of information about things that are happening with the CDC, the pharmaceutical companies. There are a lot of things that are not said. As a parent of a child who has autism I want to know the truth.”


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ7iPn39i08

De Niro also discussed the media blackout regarding the CDC whistleblower. “Everybody doesn’t seem to want to hear much about it. And you guys are the ones who should do the investigation,” De Niro challenged. Regarding another film about autism that is showing at Tribeca, De Niro said “it’s not questioning how some people got autism, how the vaccines are dangerous for certain people who are more susceptible. Nobody seems to want to address that, or they say it’s a closed issue but it doesn’t seem to be. There is more to this than meets the eye, believe me.”

When asked if he believes that science has shown there is no link between vaccines and autism, De Niro replied, “I believe it’s much more complicated than that. There is a link and they are saying there isn’t. The obvious one is thimerosal, a mercury based preservative. Let’s just find out the truth.” De Niro also questioned statistics that claim that parents who do not vaccinate their children will lead to a higher incidence of measles and other illnesses.

Despite the often repeated claim that VAXXED is anti-vaccination, Philippe Diaz, head of Cinema Libre, the distributor of VAXXED, says the film is not anti-vaccine but rather pro-safe vaccines. “It is not an anti-vaccination movie, people are judging the movie without seeing it first. Even Robert De Niro said the film was not anti-vaccination,” Diaz said. Indeed, De Niro has stressed that he is also not anti-vaccine and only interested in the truth. “There is something there, there is something there that people are not addressing. All I want is for people to see the film and people can make up their own judgement.”

Another interesting facet of the Today interview was a claim by Tribeca co-founder Jane Rosenthal that the sponsors of the film festival did not complain, but rather the filmmakers were upset. Despite Rosenthal’s comments, Diaz told AP that the sponsors were responsible for pressuring Tribeca to remove VAXXED.

“That’s exactly what happened. The Directors of Tribeca confirmed it to us,” Diaz said. “They had problems with sponsors. I think it created a horrible precedent, if you do not like what is in a movie, no matter the quality of the film you can pull it from a festival.”

Although VAXXED has brought Dr. William Thompson’s story to the mainstream, he originally did not want to go public with his information until it was revealed that conversations he had with Dr. Brian Hooker had been recorded. Dr. Thompson handed over thousands of pages of documents to Congressman Bill Posey’s office for review. Posey serves on the Committee on Science, Space and Technology. There was very little chatter about the CDC whistleblower for quite some time until July 29th, 2015, when Congressman Bill Posey took to the floor of the House to discuss Dr. William Thompson and his documents. The debut of VAXXED has only increased the attention on Thompson’s claims.

Another controversial aspect of the Vaccine debate is the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which eliminated any liability for pharmaceutical manufacturers, stating, “the number of recommended childhood vaccines has more than tripled and we have seen a decline in the health and vitality of our children with among the worst infant mortality rate in the developed world.”

Although pharmaceutical manufactures cannot be held liable for problems associated with vaccinations, the U.S. government does have a fund for victims of vaccines known as the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Funds awarded through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program are first processed through a special vaccine court. In December 2014, Ben Swann examined a report by the Associated Press which revealed that thousands of families with claims with the vaccine court are left to wait for years, sometimes decades before receiving help.

The AP studied hundreds of court decisions, performed more than 100 interviews, and studied a database containing more than 14,500 cases. The database was last updated in January 2013 with the government refusing to release any new updates. Officially known as the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the so-called vaccine court is a little-known system that is intended to address claims of Americans who believe their children have been harmed by vaccinations. The court is an established part of the federal judiciary system however the authorities over the cases are not called judges but rather “special masters.”

The AP investigation found several issues with the court. These include tens of millions of taxpayer dollars that has been paid to private attorneys who often practice “churning,” a practice described as filing a large number of claims regardless of the quality of the claims. In the private court attorneys are paid out whether or not they succeed in convincing the court. That fact has led to questionable billing practices and an increase in court claims.

The AP report also found that “expert” witnesses for the families and the government often have a lack of credibility or conflicts of interest. The report says that some of the experts are also involved in setting up nonprofits that question vaccine safety. Meanwhile, doctors hired by the government to testify in defense of vaccines have ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

For more details on this court please watch Ben Swann’s report on the Vaccine Court and Autism.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfqpZqEP6gg

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for ActivistPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter.

Derrick is available for interviews.

This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

The Vaccines Keep Coming

By Gina Flores

Staff Writer at NoFakeNews.net

Year after year the vaccines seem to keep coming. Big Pharma has hundreds of new medicinal concoctions in the works that are eventually slated to be injected in human beings. What does this mean in the grand scheme of things? It means that millions of unsuspecting people will have their immune systems assaulted to an even larger extent than is currently taking place.

Vaccines are the ultimate guarantee that big drug companies will never run out of customers. They are the seeds of today that have been planted by sinister corporations and they will grow into the new diseases of tomorrow. Those new diseases will then be managed indefinitely by a never ending catalog of patented pharmaceutical products that will yield monetary profits in the billions of dollars.

Read the article below for more on this subject:

271 New Vaccines in Big Pharma’s Pipeline

AMA Endorses the Elimination of Religious Exemptions Regarding Vaccinations

By Dr. John L Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

reizer3

According to an article in the publication, Newsweek, the AMA (American Medical Association) has recently endorsed a new policy that has the goal of eliminating religious exemptions regarding vaccinations for healthcare consumers in the United States. Although the AMA is not a government agency that can write actual laws, it has tremendous influence and lobbying power over state and other legislative bodies that ultimately determine healthcare laws in America.

This is a very aggressive policy change by the AMA that could spell the end of healthcare consumers’ rights to choose if and when they submit to a particular vaccine at a given time during their lives.

Currently, many states have laws that allow citizens to choose whether or not they receive medical vaccines. Religious and philosophical exemptions are regularly used by anti-vaccine groups in order to opt out of the regularly published vaccine guidelines that are followed by the large majority of people throughout the country.

Most recently, a measles outbreak originating in California in the Disneyland Park has been promoted ad nauseum by the corporately owned mainstream media. It has reached the point of becoming a witch hunt on many news programs as people have been featured on television calling out parents that have chosen not to vaccinate their children for fear of what these potentially harmful drugs might do to their children. All of this rubbish came about because less than 200 people in the entire United States were infected by measles in 2014. The Measles outbreak in Disneyland has been cited by the AMA as one of the reasons they have revised their policy and want to bring an end to religious exemptions regarding vaccinations.

Some health care experts believe that vaccines are very dangerous drugs and make people weaker, sicker, and more vulnerable to diseases they would otherwise not have to contend with. Some doctors also believe that these medicines do not create immunity and that the vaccine ingredients are toxic beyond belief and bad for all human beings.

In 1998, the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, published a controversial paper that linked MMR vaccinations to Autism. The MMR vaccine is a preventive, medicinal concoction against Measles, Mumps, and Rubella.

According to mainstream health sources, The Lancet article caused a major panic in the minds of parents in both Britain and the United States. Because of the study, many parents chose not to vaccinate their children and opted for safer measures to maintain the health and well being of younger family members. (1)

An independent investigative journalist, Brian Deer, determined that the author of the famous article, Andrew Wakefield, M.D., had manipulated evidence in his study and had also broken several ethical standards within the field of research. As a result of Deer’s investigation, Wakefield’s study was retracted by The Lancet in 2010. Dr. Wakefield was later reprimanded by the medical profession and stripped of his license to practice medicine. (2)

The news about the Wakefield Study being retracted was given worldwide exposure by the corporately, owned mainstream media. In fact, anytime a person attempts to type anything relating to vaccines and Autism into an Internet search engine, the results are littered with references about the now famous retraction of the Wakefield study.

Since the retraction of the study, many health care professionals have indicated that the Wakefield article was singled out and crushed by representatives of Big Pharma in order to protect the vaccine industry. Obviously, a lot of money was at stake in the way of potential lawsuits against vaccine makers, as well as the British and United States governments. Enough said!

Regardless of a person’s feelings about the benefits or dangers associated with vaccinations, it is the opinion of this writer that every human being should have the right to choose if he or she wants to be exposed to a particular medicine.

What do you think about this subject?

 

The Cult of Vaccinism is Being Attacked Again

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

reizer3Once again we are witnessing an attack on the medical profession’s practice of Vaccinism. Attacks against the controversial theory are nothing new. People from all walks of life have questioned the safety of vaccinating children and adult human beings for as long as the medical profession has been administering such drugs. The recent criticism, however, has come from a person within the medical profession. Statements by medical doctors against vaccinations add a high degree of credibility to the longstanding argument that vaccines are more detrimental to the human body than they are helpful. That is why this most recent attack, by a medical doctor, is so important.

Vaccinism (a new word introduced by yours truly to denote the cult like following of this medical practice) is a protected science within the field of medicine. In other words, if any person writes negative content online about the vaccine theory, he or she is immediately attacked by a host of paid shills that are employed by pharmaceutical companies to police the Internet comment boards. In addition, any medical professional that speaks or writes negatively about vaccination theory will be ostracized from the medical profession.

For the longest time, medicine has vehemently defended any accusations that vaccines might be the cause of widespread diseases that have made their way through society. The most recent controversy connected to this subject is the ongoing public debate by mainstream medicine and health care consumers about whether or not there is a connection between vaccinations and Autism.

In 1998, Dr. Andrew Wakefield published a study in the prestigious Lancet Magazine that linked Autism to the MMR Vaccine. In 2010 the published study was retracted due to a claim, by the pharmaceutical industry, that Wakefield’s research was flawed. To this day, Wakefield stands by his research and conclusion that Autism and MMR are connected. And a lot of parents that have had children harmed by these shots believe Wakefield is correct as well.

Recently, a famous neurosurgeon, Russell Blaylock, M.D. has come out with a video that describes how vaccines harm a child’s brain development. The presentation is lengthy, but certainly worthy of our time considering the importance of the subject matter.

As always, readers are asked to perform their own independent research about health care issues and then make health decisions based on what they discover. Remember that an educated health care consumer is usually a healthier health care consumer.

What do you think about this subject?

Traditional Chiropractic vs. Traditional Medicine

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

reizer3Traditional chiropractic and medicine have different professional objectives. The profession of chiropractic has the ultimate goal of maintaining a person’s health by removing a type of interference to the nervous system which inhibits the true expression of health in all human beings (vertebral subluxations).

The profession of medicine attempts to cure various diseases that are affecting the body by prescribing certain medications that reverse or oppose physiological processes occurring in the body and also through the application of surgical procedures which attempt to remove or repair compromised human tissues.

Traditional chiropractic has a vitalistic philosophy which adheres to the premise that health comes from within the body or from the inside out. This philosophy acknowledges the fact that all human beings have inherent abilities to maintain their own healthy existence and that a disruption of health is caused internally. Traditional chiropractic states that if health is lost from within the body it must logically be restored from the inside out.

Medicine has a different philosophy that claims that the human body is weak and must constantly have its health maintained from the outside in. According to modern medicine, a human being must have an assortment of vaccines and other preventive medicinal compounds in order to build up the immune system.

In summary, traditional chiropractic works with the controlling laws of nature and physiology while organized medicine (allopathy) attempts to go against the controlling laws of nature and physiology.