Watch The Target List movie trailer on
Saturday, July 24th — 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time
Watch The Target List movie trailer on
Saturday, July 24th — 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time
By Dr. John Reizer
Editor at NoFakeNews
I have previously written about my feelings concerning the dangers associated with consuming Fluoride through drinking water. Many municipalities and bottled water companies in the United States routinely add Fluoride to drinking water under the false pretext that it prevents dental caries in human beings. While water fluoridation is not as common of a practice throughout portions of Europe, many provinces around the world also continue to add Fluoride to public water supplies.
There is no evidence that adding Fluoride to drinking water benefits human physiology in any way whatsoever. There is, however extensive evidence that humans consuming this neurotoxin are doing damage to their overall health.
Many proponents of this dangerous practice use the argument that in small doses, Fluoride added to drinking water has no adverse effects on human neurophysiology. This claim is not true because the neurotoxin, Fluoride accumulates in human bones and teeth. Fluoride is a toxic poison that also can accumulate in brain and nervous tissues over time (Pineal Gland).
“A meta-analysis of 27 cross-sectional studies of children exposed to fluoride in drinking water, mainly from China, suggests an average IQ decrement of about seven points in children exposed to raised fluoride concentrations.44 Confounding from other substances seemed unlikely in most of these studies. Further characterisation of the dose–response association would be desirable.” – The Lancet – 2/14/14
Fluoride is an industrial chemical known to cause developmental neurotoxicity in human beings. – (Source: The Lancet).
Most toothpaste products contain the poison, Fluoride and thus a poison warning disclaimer is always printed on the product’s packaging. Remember, Fluoride accumulates in the human body so the argument that it is safe in small doses is illogical and untruthful.
What do you think about this subject?
The practice of water fluoridation in the United States has been under growing scrutiny for years by a public that has become conscious of the fact that adding toxic chemicals which are proven to be harmful to human health and children’s development to public water is medication without consent.
Never-the-less, the effort to stop fluoridation of municipal water supplies has been an uphill battle against entrenched financial interests and against dated ideas about health. While each year we hear news of cities heeding the concerns of their citizens and stopping fluoridation, without a major victory at the national level, people will be fighting this for years to come, all the while consuming toxic chemicals in the one thing we cannot live without, water.
The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is reporting on a major development to cut the head off of this snake, and an unprecedented lawsuit is now holding promise for a national reversal of municipal water fluoridation.
Based on neurotoxicity studies, the “EPA has been served with a petition that includes more than 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing the risks of water fluoridation to human health.”
As noted by FAN in a recent press release:
“This case will present the first time a court will consider the neurotoxicity of fluoride and the question of whether fluoridation presents an unreasonable risk under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
And, in contrast to most other legal challenges of Agency actions, TSCA gives us the right to get the federal court to consider our evidence ‘de novo’ — meaning federal courts are to conduct their own independent review of the evidence without deference to the EPA’s judgment.”
The lawsuit has been served along with a petition containing thousands of signatures of concerned and well-informed citizens, and includes more than 2500 pages of documents detailing the harm inherent in poisoning the pubic with fluoride.
In detail, the complaint is an attempt to demonstrate how this practice violates the Toxic Substances Control Act.
“The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), along with a coalition of environmental and public health groups has filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to their denial of our petition under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) seeking a ban on water fluoridation.
We believe this lawsuit is an unprecedented opportunity to end the practice once and for all in the U.S., and potentially throughout the world, based on the well-documented neurotoxicity of fluoride. You may read the official complaint here.” [Source]
The negative effects of consuming fluoridated water are well-documented, and the body of evidence continues to grow. In 2012 a major Harvard study presented a study demonstrating water fluoridation lowers IQ. In 2016 a study demonstrated a link between increased diabetes and water fluoridation. In 2015 the EPA had to issue new guidelines for safe levels of fluoride, reducing the amount, citing the potential for fluoridated water damages teeth, which ironically, is the very condition which we are told is the reason we need fluoride in the first place.
Public water fluoridation is slowly being defeated, and this lawsuit may play a major role in this fight.
Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.
This article (Lawsuit Could End Water Fluoridation Once and For All by Demonstrating its Neurotoxicity) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.
The streets of Bedford, England were the scene of an anti-fluoride campaign on Saturday, October 17. Throughout the streets, teams of activists with Fluoride Free Bedford signs were carrying clipboards and information packets to educate and encourage shoppers and passersby as to the dangers of forced water-fluoridation and their petition to stop it.
Fluoride Free Bedford has been calling for an end to water fluoridation since 2002 yet their new impetus for action comes as a newly elected group of councilors have taken office.
Cynthia Bagchi, Fluoride Free Bedford coordinator, stated:
We want to stimulate discussion throughout Bedford and to stun councilors, to show them the huge amount of support there is from people who don’t want fluoride in their water supply.
She also stated:
It’s about educating ourselves and each other. The government isn’t doing it and nor is the counsel, they are just covering up the truth.
The water in Bedford borough had been fluoridated for about 40 years but in 2009 the process was temporarily suspended in order so that improvement and repairs could be made on the area’s water treatment plant. Fluoride Free Bedford is attempting to ensure that fluoride does not return.
The activists are frustrated because in 2011 the Bedford Borough Council voted unanimously to cease water-fluoridation – a proposal that was submitted by major Dave Hodgson. Still, no action was actually taken.
Fluoride Free Bedford is working in coordination with the West Midlands Against Fluoridation group; a similar organization designed to serve the West Midlands area.
Joy Warren, coordinator of WMAF, stated:
The only reason fluoride is added to our water supply is for it to have a physiological effect on the enamel of the milk teeth of very young children by exerting an effect from the inside of the tooth to the outside. This means that fluoride is a medicine and fluoridated water is, according to a judgement in the European Court of Justice, classified as a “functional food.” A “functional food” is first and foremost a medicine and thus, medicinal law takes precedence over food law. The difference is that pills are legalized medicine whereas fluoridated water is illegal medicine.
To sign Fluoride Free Bedford ‘s petition to end water fluoridation in Bedford Borough, go HERE.
This article (English Town Takes to Streets Against Fluoride in Water) can be republished with original links. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Brandon Turbeville, Heather Callaghan, the original article and Natural Blaze.com.
Brandon Turbeville – article archive here – is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books,Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, and The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Turbeville has published over 600 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.
By Dr. John L. Reizer
Editor at NoFakeNews.net
In honor of Fluoride Awareness Week, I am featuring this excellent presentation that addresses the pros and cons associated with the practice of water fluoridation.
Please watch the following video:
For those people that are new to NoFakeNews.net, let me explain a few house rules about this electronic magazine:
1. This is a private website and you are cordially invited to peruse the various posts that have been written for the benefit of people looking for a different perspective on many subjects that are impacting and affecting human beings on a daily basis.
2. Feel free to leave a comment regarding a specific article or subject. If I like what you have to say I will publish your words of wisdom. If I think your comment is not suitable to publish for whatever reason I deem it inappropriate, it will not appear on the website.
3. Regarding health topics: Please do not attempt to clog up my comment boards with “officialdom” such as “peer-reviewed” research that demonstrates vaccines, Mercury, and Fluoride are safe for human beings. If you want to state an opinion such as this, make your post one time and please move on so others can be read.
4. Please do not attack or be rude to other posters because I promise you your comments will be removed from the site and you will lose the privilege of posting on NoFakeNews in the future.
5. If you do not like the house rules listed above, please feel free to unsubscribe from the website. I assure you that there are plenty of other interesting addresses to visit on the Internet.
Dr. John L. Reizer