And Now The End Of Brexit

By Dr. John Reizer

If something looks, smells or tastes like a conspiracy, chances are pretty damn good it is one.

A long time ago, powerful think-tanks got together and figured out a way to stop the masses from putting any credibility into ideas that governments might regularly conspire against their own citizenry. Their clever plan was to popularize a specific label that would, for all intents and purposes, inoculate the masses against believing the obvious. The label that was selected was “Conspiracy Theory.” According to a Freedom of Information request by the New York Times in 1976, the label “Conspiracy Theory” was made into a weaponized term to discredit minority groups of people from pushing conspiracy agendas that questioned the veracity of government reports.

The “Conspiracy Theory” label can very effectively defuse a specific problem before it ever has a chance to breathe. Whenever something big occurs that stinks of a massive conspiracy, the powers that be immediately inoculate the masses against such thought behavior by injecting the “Conspiracy Theory” label into the public domain. It goes something like this:

“Yesterday’s terror attack is already being dubbed as a false flag event by the lunatic fringe and other conspiracy theorists.”

When the hypnotized public read and hear such statements from the mainstream media companies, they automatically close their eyes and cover their ears with regards to anything that deviates from officialdom. In reality, the masses are routinely immunized against logic by coming into contact with this cleverly weaponized label. No matter how blatantly obvious the truth might be concerning a specific incident, the large majority of people worldwide will be unable to embrace anything other than what has been disseminated by the government’s script writers.

This brings me to the major theme of my latest post about Brexit; the European Union was never designed for the benefit of its member countries. And if you believe that it was, you have been hoodwinked and immunized by the powers that be into thinking so.

The EU has always been a tool of the Illuminati, specifically designed to manage, more effectively, the European countries after World War II. It’s much easier to manage a bunch of sovereign territories if they lose their sovereignty and can be controlled by one central location in Brussels. The same holds true when we are discussing monetary systems. By creating a single currency system, it is easier to make the member countries dependent on the EU model.

Britons continue to present a major problem for the EU. Originally presented to them as a free trade zone, the British people embraced the EU concept because they were allowed to keep their own currency system in place. London is a powerful financial center and the controlling powers do not want this to be the case in the immediate future.

And now the conspiracy: I believe the entire Brexit idea was created by the controlling powers as a giant psyop scheme. Regardless of the referendum’s result, the controlling powers had no intention of ever allowing Britain to exit the European Union. And any person, persons or groups that bring this information to light will be labeled as conspiracy theorists.

The goal from the onset was to create heated debate about a very important sovereignty issue that has been on the minds of many people, and then to have the heart cut out of the monster so it could die once and for all. If Brexit would have been defeated, controlling powers could have begun to introduce the convincing argument that a stronger EU makes for a stronger Europe and that London must give up its currency system in order for the EU to work.

But on June 23, 2016 the UK voted to leave the European Union 52% – 48% and David Cameron announced his intention to resign as British Prime Minister.

Throughout the many days leading up to the highly anticipated Brexit vote, Mr. Cameron maintained that he would immediately trigger Article 50 if the referendum returned a decision to leave the EU.

Article 50, for all intents and purposes, is the kill switch with regards to the UK’s membership in the EU. Once article 50 was invoked, there was supposedly no turning back. Until that transaction occurred, the Brexit result remained nothing more than a nonbinding referendum.

It’s interesting to note how David Cameron quickly changed his tune about triggering Article 50 right after the referendum results were revealed. He immediately announced his resignation and stated that the next Prime Minister would be the best person to activate Article 50. Really? Then he announced he would stay on as acting Prime Minister through the fall of 2016. The Illuminati needed time to figure out their next strategy.

The Illuminati masters are very clever. The real purpose of the Brexit vote was to kill “The Leave” movement forever. I honestly believe the controlling powers never envisioned the outcome of the vote would turn out the way it did. I think they genuinely believed the opposite result would come to fruition. But despite all the propaganda that was put in place by the elitists, the public still voted to leave. The British people delivered a very unfavorable result to their Illuminati masters. It is a result that would not be tolerated by them.

The powers really running things behind the scenes cleverly developed a contingency plan, one designed to look like it originated from  the heart of a population base that had second thoughts about the original referendum results.  That is what we are presently witnessing; a carefully crafted idea designed to convince the masses that Brexit was a horrible mistake and that the only logical way to correct such a mistake is to have a second referendum.

Enter Theresa May, the Prime Minister that was strategically selected and placed into office by the powers that be to deal with the problem of reversing and killing Brexit. May was an outright opponent of the leave movement prior to her becoming Prime Minister and although she has publicly pretended to see it through during her service as acting Prime Minister, she has secretly organized its death.

Theresa May invoked Article 50 on March 29, 2017 and this allegedly sealed the deal; Britain was officially leaving the European Union. But it doesn’t appear that this will ever become a reality. May has done everything in her power to delay and sabotage the country’s exit from the European Union and it’s very unlikely, in my opinion, that we will ever see Brexit actually take place.

It just goes to show everybody that the power brokers really in charge do not care about the voting results of the common people. They will do whatever it takes to keep their agenda alive and moving forward.

LAX Shooting: Many Unanswered Questions Remain

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

reizer3Let me begin this article by writing that it is always a sad day when a person is murdered, and others are injured, in a senseless crime like the one that took place at LAX airport on Friday, November 1, 2013. With no disrespect intended to any of the injured, or to the family members of the murdered TSA agent, Gerardo I. Hernandez, it is still necessary for professional journalists to sort out all of the facts regarding this shooting, ask officials in charge difficult and pointed questions, and clarify certain points that are being tossed around by the mainstream media companies. These are things that professional journalists are supposed to do.

As is usually the case in shootings/incidents of this nature, there are instantly theories launched from alternative news websites that portray a completely different explanation for a given chain of events than what is being postulated by the corporately owned news sources. As soon as I heard of this unfortunate incident, I immediately knew that there would be an official explanation that would gradually materialize and then be handed down for public consumption. I also realized that a plethora of conspiratorial theories would eventually manifest as well.

In my opinion, conspiracy theories are not necessarily bad things. It is healthy for people to question official explanations and not routinely swallow hook, line, and sinker every single word that is handed down by official sources. Taking into consideration the amount of disinformation that has been generated over the years by media giants, concerning terrorist events that have lead to gross changes in our nation’s laws, it’s more important than ever before to question everything.

This is what we know so far about the November 1, 2013 event at LAX:

  1. A single gunman, 23 year old Paul Ciancia, entered one of the most security laden airports in the world with an AR-15 automatic weapon.
  2. The gunman was an unemployed motorcycle mechanic.
  3. The gunman was outfitted in fatigues.
  4. The shooter was mentally disturbed and communicated with his brother by text messages, telling him he was contemplating suicide.
  5. The gunman methodically walked through the tarmac asking people if they were TSA members.
  6. One TSA agent was murdered and several others injured.
  7. The shooter was critically wounded by policemen.
  8. The shooter had a note in his possession that stated he wanted to kill TSA members and “Pigs”.
  9. The shooter also had materials in his possession that referenced the NWO (New World Order). The New World Order has to do with the popular theory that a conspiring group of elitists have been methodically working together, behind the scenes, to undermine the United States Government in order to introduce a world currency and world banking system among other machinations.
  10. The gunman had no prior military experience and was not professionally trained to handle a military assault weapon.
  11. Three weeks earlier, a drill was performed at the same airport location that simulated the identical situation that transpired on November 1, 2013.
  12. The shooter is presently in critical condition and unavailable for questioning.

Obviously, there are some very strange occurrences attached to this incident. It’s damn hard to imagine a 23 year old man, without military training, could make his way into one of the most secure airports in the world, carrying an AR-15 assault weapon, without being stopped by someone in security.

According to official sources, investigators initially believed that Ciancia acted alone and that this incident was a case of premeditated murder. Now, officials have made the statement that the gunman was given help getting to the airport. If this was the case, how did the driver not know he was planning this heinous crime? Wouldn’t the shooter’s driver have been suspicious of the way Ciancia was dressed and the equipment he was carrying on his person? If there was a driver that helped Ciancia get to LAX, wouldn’t that mean he was an accomplice in this crime?

One thing that bothers me about this story was the way officials, involved in the investigation, have withheld a lot of important facts from the public. We know very little about Ciancia. Many details have not been disclosed. Granted, this is an ongoing investigation and certain facts probably need to be kept quiet. But it is interesting to note how the same officials managed to leak to the media the fact that the shooter had materials in his possession that linked him to being a subscriber of the New World Order Conspiracy. This tidbit of information has been explained in great detail in almost every mainstream publication/broadcast that has been delivered. Why?

Is it possible that the NWO information was leaked, on a condition of anonymity, with the sole intent to negatively influence public perception regarding this specific conspiracy theory? Let’s be realistic and fair in our analysis of the NWO conspiracy theory. Contrary to the way it has been explained by the mainstream news companies as a growing theory promoted by radical types, it is actually the collective opinion of many scholars, business analysts, and other prominent people in various industries that this is not a conspiracy theory, but rather a real conspiracy that has been in operation for a very long time.

From this point forward, there will be a knee-jerk reaction of skepticism to any alternative news stories that happen to report on wealthy elitists, fiat currencies, fractional reserve lending, manipulation of precious metal prices, and other agendas currently in play. Was this LAX incident a golden opportunity to psychologically immunize U.S. citizens against an idea that is becoming too big and too dangerous in the eyes of certain powerful groups?

If I was a professional journalist, I would want to know a lot more about Mr. Ciancia. Who was he was living with in Los Angeles? Where did he procure a military assault rifle and enough ammunition to potentially take down an entire airport terminal? Who drove him to the airport? Who really made the texts to his sibling? Wouldn’t Ciancia have called his brother on the phone? Was the shooter on drugs? Did he ever visit a psychiatrist? Was anybody in his family in the military?

I am sorry, but an unemployed motorcycle mechanic does not usually fit the profile of a person that is interested in fiat currencies, fractional reserve lending, and global elitists that are currently running the world. And why was he so angry at the TSA agents, in particular?

What do you think about this story?

Is There A Giant Conspiracy Against Conspiracy Theorists?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

Did you ever notice anytime someone attempts to question a mainstream explanation about a controversial event, which has been handed down from official sources, the individual is immediately attacked by most members of society? It’s true! If you were to suggest there were other gunmen involved in the murder of President John F. Kennedy, the people listening to you would, undoubtedly, dismiss your claim as ridiculous and classify you as a conspiracy theorist. Your audience would almost instantly begin to roll their eyes towards the back of their heads. Offer a new angle on September 11, 2001, that is in opposition to the official government explanation, and the eye tremors will commence again. The same process would apply to many other suspect events that have taken place that were later explained by so called “trusted sources.”

Have the majority of us been systematically hypnotized to reject anything that strays away from officialdom? Have we been programmed, by official media sources, to automatically reject alternative and plausible explanations concerning certain subjects?

Once you become aware of this phenomenon, it’s quite disturbing to see it unfold in front of your eyes. Everyday acquaintances, family members, and close friends all seem to fall under the same spell. It’s as if the people rolling their eyes are trying to switch off their brains so they can go to sleep in order to avoid the truth. Think about it. When you go to sleep, your eyes roll back inside their sockets in a similar fashion. I honestly believe that people have been conditioned to fall asleep when they’re presented with something other than what “the powers that be” have authorized for public consumption.

Most of society’s members don’t seem to have a strong desire to challenge conventionality, even when there is hard evidence suggesting they should. And the vast majority of people regularly police and encourage others to swallow officialdom.

For every person that has the guts to stand alone, in an attempt to set the record straight about something that has been painted in a disingenuous manner, I’ll wager there are ten people looking to suppress the truth.

The suppression of truthful information, by powerful people worldwide, is routinely accomplished on a regular basis. Governments that have been entrusted by the public to honorably represent their countrymen seem to be letting us down big time. Unfortunately, these governing bodies are not completely transparent with their constituents and are more than willing to lie to the public they are supposed to represent. They lie in concert, with other countries, for maximum effect. They suppress the truth and label persons questioning their agendas as conspiracy theorists.

Why do so many people find it difficult to believe in conspiracy theories? By examining human nature and recorded history, one can easily observe that conspiracies do occur.

According to the Random House Dictionary, a conspiracy theory is: “the idea that many important political events or economic and social trends are the products of secret plots that are largely unknown to the general public.” (Dictionary.com Unabridged – Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc.)

After reading that definition, how could anyone deny this is happening worldwide? The truth be told; classifying someone’s position about a certain subject as a conspiracy theory is nothing more than a convenient way to dismiss the truth. People are so heavily vested in the practice of embracing conventional answers/solutions, that they automatically label anything outside the defined borders of conventional thinking as a conspiracy theory.

It’s time for people to wake up, to stop rolling their eyes, and to understand that not everything that challenges conventionality should be routinely dismissed. Sometimes the uncomfortable truth is not a conspiracy theory – it’s just a plain old fashioned conspiracy!