I signed the petition, and you should, too. Let’s show the controlling powers that we are not going to go down without a fight.
Please take the time to read and sign the petition at the link below to prevent a mandatory vaccine for Covid-19.
Thanks for your support!
Dr. Reizer
https://lifepetitions.com/petition/no-mandatory-vaccine-for-covid-19
Listen to some original music by Sandy Edwards and sign the petition.
Six Feet Apart – Words and Music © 2020 by Sandy Edwards — All Rights Reserved!
A reader sent me this very informative video about the soon to be released Covid-19 vaccine that billions of people on our planet will take with plenty of enthusiasm. If you have a few minutes to spare, this is an excellent presentation about what our owners are planning for the herd.
I believe there are defining moments in every person’s life. For me, those defining moments occurred in the year 1975.
There’s a synchronicity to a life where different ingredients are borne into existence and remain hidden from you until such time that they magically appear out of nowhere and drastically alter your life.
In 1966, my mother took me to a pediatric wellness checkup. The doctor gave me a vaccine, and I vividly recall it hurt and burned my left arm terribly. The pain was so bad, I remember crying the entire car ride home. I was only three at the time.
From that day forward, I remember developing many nervous tics in my shoulders, neck, and jaw. The spasms would remain with me for the remainder of my life.
I did not know so at the time, but I had been the victim of a childhood vaccine injury.
The tics would become more noticeable to my parents and friends as I progressed through childhood. I always knew that they were tied to that shot I received.
I was better than an average athlete, and the nervous twitches often precluded me from performing at my best when playing sports.
The problem became so bad, it became difficult for me to finish schoolwork and other activities on time.
I had developed Tourette Syndrome, and it made me self conscious and afraid when I became surrounded by large groups of people. I was also terrified of having to speak in public or play baseball in front of a crowd of spectators. I was cognizant of the nervous tics, and they distracted me while performing in school or on the ball field.
In 1975 I was a member of a little league baseball team that won a world championship in Williamsport, Pennsylvania. The summer of that year changed my life forever.
The game was nationally televised, and many millions of people watched the event. There were also many thousands of people who attended the game.
Here’s the funny thing about life, the little league baseball experience helped me to overcome the fear I had developed of speaking or playing sports in front of large crowds. After playing baseball in front of thousands of people, and the game being televised nationally on ABC television, every other game or event I participated in was a smaller venue.
In 1975, I came out of my shell. I also would go on to become a proficient speaker and writer because of that season of baseball. I authored a book at age 15 about the baseball experience.
As the years passed, I have been able to drastically reduce the nervous tics I once had. They minimally affect me in the present day. A lot of that has had to do with my understanding of health and being able to mentally restructure the way I think.
The other thing that makes me believe our lives are tied to a synchronous system is that one of the four teams playing in the championship tournament back in 1975 was from Davenport, Iowa. Davenport is the birthplace of chiropractic. That profession would later become a significant part of my life.
I knew early in my life that I was supposed to teach people about the dangers of organized medicine and that vaccines were a threat to human life.
Every step and stage of my life has helped me learn and understand the importance of the situation currently unfolding. I was born to teach people about fraudulent medical activities being unleashed on society. I am positive there are others out there, like me, doing the same.
If Covid-19 is a well-orchestrated global psyop, what are the vaccines really for, and who will be the first humans to receive them?
These are both fair questions to ponder at this point. The United States and other countries continue to witness a surge in coronavirus cases, along with heightened civil unrest in America due to a manufactured divide designed to incite racial tensions. The civil unrest I write about was obviously created by the same designers of the fake pandemic. Meanwhile, the bigger goal to vaccinate the world continues to progress at warp speed.
While people in America are concentrating on the color of human skin and removing statues of historic national characters that offend different races of people, the eugenicists running the world government are planning to cull the global population.
The psychopaths in charge don’t care about black lives matter, white lives matter, or any other skin tones that might be in play. To the controlling powers, no lives matter, and they’re quite serious about their plans to vaccinate every person who is stupid enough to let them do so.
What’s happening in the world is not about a virus or civil unrest. It’s an IQ test. If people don’t have the brains to understand that the pandemic is a hoax, they’re going to suffer some dire consequences when they accept the poisons that are currently being manufactured.
A New York Times article published on July 9, 2020, addressed who should be the first recipients of the new Covid-19 vaccine. Here are a few snippets from that publication:
Am I alone when I write that this policy strikes me as having a creepy feel to it? Is it possible that the controlling powers are looking to get rid of health professionals that might be helpful to society as well as the sick and elderly?
So, let me get this straight, the controlling powers want to offer the vaccines to the minority populations, first? That’s mighty nice of them. Could there be a more sinister and ulterior motive behind such generosity?
The more you read the New York Times article, the creepier it gets. One of the more ironic things taking place in the United States is that the racial divide and tensions being played up and financed by the psyop masters are apparently going to be used to get minorities jabbed with the toxic vaccines before anyone else. The powers that be are brilliant and have given a great deal of thought and consideration to the psyop.
Stay tuned for more interesting developments. As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome and appreciated.
Hey, United Nations, World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control, Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, United States Government, and any other persons or agencies representing the interests of the powers that be — I don’t need your stinking help to keep my body healthy!
I don’t need your help to protect me from a fake virus that you created in concert with others that I have neglected to list above.
I don’t need your help to track down the people who have tested false-positive for a fake virus that might have crossed my path.
I don’t need your help to boost my immunity through an untested, unproven, and unsafe experimental vaccine.
I don’t need your recommendations on how far away I should stand or sit from other human beings.
I don’t need your advice on how to cover my face in public with a mask that supposedly slows down the spread of a coronavirus that doesn’t exist.
I don’t need your advice on how to operate my business.
I don’t need to be updated daily on case numbers that are generated through test kits that are useless and unreliable in detecting Covid-19.
I don’t need to be told to self-isolate and quarantine myself from the outside world because of a nonexistent threat allegedly presented from a nonexistent disease.
What I do need from you is to leave me the hell alone and to get out of my personal business.
I don’t care if you have ruled that mandatory vaccines are constitutional or not. I am not taking them for my or anyone else’s greater good.
If you have a problem with my feelings or opinions concerning the fake viral pandemic you have been running for the entire year, it is too damn bad! I don’t care. I have had it with your lies and disinformation. Tell your propaganda to someone else who is not awake.
As long as for-profit drug companies remain in existence, the intellectual properties of organized medicine (human and animal diseases) will never disappear.
– Dr. Reizer
Regardless of the constitutionality of specific regulations and laws that have made it into existence, members of society must occasionally reexamine, and when necessary, retest those actions in a legal theatre. This is especially true when the morality and ethicality of such actions come into question and threaten the citizens the laws have allegedly been designed to protect.
Whether something being handed down by a governing body in America is constitutionally sound or not is decided by a group of justices (human beings) who don’t always agree with one another.
Regarding the question of whether or not mandatory vaccination laws are constitutionally protected (Jacobson v. Massachusetts), it’s important to remember the legal decision that answered this question was based in part on information that was available about vaccine products 115 years ago. The ruling justices had zero scientific information to examine that spoke of the public dangers vaccine products posed to society. If such information was available at the time, there undoubtedly would have been a different decision handed down.
Whenever there is a risk of harm to the public stemming from a medical procedure or product, patients must be offered the option of refusing the service. Patients must sign a form that serves as evidence they have consented to the medical products or services. This practice in medical care is referred to as informed consent and is the law.
Informed Consent Defined
The problem with mandatory vaccination laws is that they violate the basic laws of informed consent. When there is a health risk posed to the public from a medical product, the people must be offered a choice about whether or not they want to receive the product. This law is reasonable, ethical, and morally sound. Any rational-thinking person would agree with the legal process of informed consent.
It does not matter if you are a pro-vaxxer, anti-vaxxer, or something in between; common sense would dictate that where there’s a medical risk, there must be a choice and an option to refuse the medicinal product or service.
There is no doubt whatsoever, according to modern science, that a level of risk is associated with all vaccine products. This is undeniable because every vaccine product in existence is accompanied by a product insert that clearly informs doctors and patients of the risks associated with said products. I challenge anyone to find a medical vaccine that is currently in the marketplace that has zero risks associated with that product.
Because all vaccines come with some level of risk, patients must be given the right to refuse them. Anything less than a person being given the choice to refuse a dangerous medical product is unreasonable, unethical, and beneath the law, otherwise known as informed consent.
The question of whether or not mandatory vaccinations are constitutionally protected must be reexamined again by the SCOTUS. This time the justices must take into consideration the inherent public health risks associated with vaccine science.
Any doctor, healthcare professional, or agent of the government who administers a medical product or service to another human being without first gaining the patient’s written informed consent would be guilty of committing medical rape, which is a crime against humanity.
Many Americans have been recently asking the question: Are mandatory vaccine laws protected by the Constitution? If you type this question into a search engine on the Internet, you are going to be inundated with a plethora of legal opinions that thoroughly discuss the subject. The majority of the views will tell you that the federal government has a constitutional right to exercise mandatory vaccine laws.
The legal opinions referenced above are mostly made and influenced by a case that was decided by the SCOTUS on February 20, 1905, Jacobson v. Massachusetts. In that case, the Supreme Court decided that an individual’s liberty is not absolute and subject to police powers.
The decision handed down stated, “in every well-ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand” and that “[r]eal liberty for all could not exist under the operation of a principle which recognizes the right of each individual person to use his own, whether in respect of his person or his property, regardless of the injury that may be done to others.”
The court also ruled that mandatory vaccinations are not arbitrary or oppressive so long as they do not “go so far beyond what was reasonably required for the safety of the public.”
Now, I want to preface my remarks about this case by stating I am not a lawyer (although I do have an online Juris Doctorate that I worked really hard on many years ago), and I am not an expert on legal issues and have never pretended to be one. But strictly from a layperson’s perspective, I have to write that I agree with Robert F. Kennedy’s position that mandatory vaccine laws are unconstitutional.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts was heard and decided by the SCOTUS in 1905. That’s a long time ago, and there’s been a lot of new information uncovered about vaccines and the devastating effects they have on human physiology. A new argument could and should be laid out to retest and reverse this old and antiquated legal decision.
I believe that Jacobson v. Massachusetts could be successfully challenged and overturned in light of some of the new, damaging evidence that has been turned up about the vaccine industry. There are over 150 chronic diseases that the FDA has attributed to vaccinations, and there is a specialized National Vaccine Injury Compensation Court that was expressly set aside to hear vaccine injury cases and limit their awards to $250,000 to protect the big pharma industry. In addition to this, the soon to be released Covid-19 vaccine will have complete liability immunity from any injuries the product might potentially inflict on human lives.
In my opinion, Jacobson v. Massachusetts would yield a much different decision if heard in the year 2020. And I have spoken with a few lawyer friends who unequivocally agree with me. The minority dissenters in the case, Justices Brewer and Peckham, would likely have had more support from the majority ruling justices who heard the case if they had been made aware of the real dangers associated with the oxymoron known as vaccine science.
I think it is time to retest Jacobson v. Massachusetts in a modern-day legal setting, and one that takes into consideration the full extent of the safety issues associated with vaccines. These products have become overly oppressive in nature for all human beings because they pose serious health threats to the general public they have, in theory, been designed to protect. The current health risks stemming from vaccine products extend far beyond what the justices in 1905 considered safe for the general public.
In my opinion, the federal government will not try to mandate vaccines in the future because they would be afraid to place Jacobson v. Massachusetts in the line of fire of a real test. It has been tested in limited capacities in the past, but not with the argument that takes into consideration the case I have laid out in this post.
I think the powers that be would love to keep this precedent-setting decision right where it lies. To open it up to a brand new, real test scenario is opening a can of worms they can’t afford to open. If the decision was ever reversed, the controllers would lose their leverage and ability to populate search engines with articles that tell us that the federal government’s right to impose mandatory vaccines is protected by the US Constitution.
I, for one, would love to see this case revisited and put through a new legal test using the argument I have outlined. Any lawyers out there that have more expertise than me concerning this subject, please feel free to weigh in on the conversation.
June 6, 2020
Dear Mr. President,
I hope this letter finds you in good health. I am writing to you once again about the state of our country regarding the current coronavirus crisis. I continue to be worried about my family and all the citizens of our country. But I am not concerned because of Covid-19. I am afraid of the continuous overreaction to the pandemic by the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control, and the team of health science advisors that surround and significantly influence your opinions. Ultimately, the presidential edicts you create.
As I explained to you in my first letter dated March 26, 2020, I am a licensed chiropractic physician and have been practicing for over 33 years. Like my colleagues, I have extensive education in both health and chiropractic sciences. I believe I am profoundly qualified to comment on the crisis at hand.
I do not believe that Covid-19 is a severe threat to the citizens of our country. When looking at the virus exclusively from a statistical standpoint, it is minuscule compared to the reported annual case numbers of influenza and common cold infections. It’s hard for me to comprehend as a healthcare professional, why world and national health regulatory agencies and the team of health advisors surrounding you have overreacted to Covid-19.
Contrary to public belief, humans are not at war with bacterial and viral microbes. There are trillions of viruses in existence, and none threaten people with healthy functioning immune systems.
I publish a website (www.nofakenews.net) that discusses the coronavirus world pandemic at great length. Many Americans who visit my site are concerned about your intentions concerning the Covid-19 vaccine that is currently in production.
Many Americans are worried about the possibility you will create and sign an executive order that will mandate the Covid-19 vaccine to be administered to all American citizens. I would like to know what your intention is concerning the vaccine as well.
Are you going to make the Covid-19 vaccine program mandatory for all Americans? Do American citizens have a constitutional right to opt-out of compulsory vaccines should such a draconian law be passed by you during a national pandemic?
According to Mr. Alan Dershowitz, the answer is no! Mr. Dershowitz was recently quoted as saying, “Let me put it very clearly, you have no constitutional right to endanger the public and spread the disease, even if you disagree. You have no right not to be vaccinated, you have no right not to wear a mask, you have no right to open up your business.” Mr. Dershowitz also went on to say, “And if you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm.”
So, when I read Mr. Dershowitz’s comments, there is some reason for me to have concerns that mandatory vaccines might be something you are seriously considering. I would hope that my fears are unwarranted and that you would never consider signing such an executive order.
Mr. President, how many Americans and I vote in the upcoming election will be significantly influenced by your decision regarding this subject. Are you planning to authorize and instruct US servicemen and women to carry out what amounts to the medical rape of American citizens? A forcible vaccination program is unacceptable, whether it is deemed constitutional or unconstitutional by the SCOTUS.
The American voting public wants to support a president that is strong and able to withstand the enormous pressure coming from the American Medical Association, the Pharmaceutical – Industrial Complex, the World Health Organization, and the United Nations.
Mr. President, I want our country to become healthy again. Forcibly injecting an untested, unproven, and potentially dangerous vaccine into 330 million Americans is not the way to accomplish this goal.
I, along with millions of other concerned citizens, anxiously await your response.
Respectfully yours,
Dr. John Reizer
