The Religious Cult of Medicine

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Although a small minority of us don’t think of them and their vocation in this way, medical doctors and the profession of medicine are perceived by the vast majority of people as priests working in a church. The entire structure of the medical profession has been intentionally designed to mirror a religious experience.

When you walk into a house of worship, you enter a domain that is considered sacred by the members of the congregation. Inside a church, temple, synagogue or any other religious chamber, there are specific rules that are generally understood and followed by its members. Out of respect for the belief system, any types of criticism, skepticism or questions concerning the veracity of the organization’s major premise are off limits. In other words, members of religious congregations can never publicly question the church about anything.

In medicine, the doctor (priest, minister, rabbi) customarily wears a white gown (robe) that absolutely identifies him as the high priest in the congregation (practice). Within that practice there are nurses (nuns) that assist the doctor in taking care of patients (members of the congregation) when they become ill (possessed by evil microbes). Patients do not usually question  a doctor’s (minister’s) advice.

There are a variety of techniques (rituals) the profession of medicine uses to rid the body of diseases (evil spirits). Some of these techniques include introducing synthetic drugs (holy water) in patients, mass produced by petrochemical companies. In other situations, doctors cut out diseases in the body by performing surgeries (exorcisms) in an effort to remove infected tissues and organs (possessed body parts).

Question the intentions or integrity of the medical man and his large support group of medical personnel, and you will be looked upon by the citizens of most communities as a nut job (the devil). Question the medical protocols (biblical passages) that have been written by the petrochemical corporations and firmly established within the base curricula of every medical school program in the world, and you will be labeled as a charlatan, a quack or a pseudo-scientist.

The petrochemical companies secretly overseeing prestigious medical journals, the publishers of supposed peer-reviewed research, make certain doctors opposing the allopathic paradigm (drugs are the only way to achieve and maintain health) are always viewed by the vast majority of people as being unscientific.

In the Catholic Church, they teach parishioners that a young soul, entering the world, is compromised by original sin (a weakened immune system). It predisposes that vessel (body) to a life of demonic possession (sickness). The baptismal holy waters of the church (vaccination programs) are the only sure way to wash away the sins (childhood diseases) and set the soul right (create immunity against germs) so that it can enjoy an existence on Earth that is free from Satan’s temptations (bacteria and viral microbes).

I understand there will be plenty of people incensed over what I have written in this article. A person that writes content questioning a particular religion’s philosophy or integrity will not win any popularity contests. And make no mistake; the medical profession is a powerful religion with many followers. That, in itself, is a sad fact, but also the major reason why so many people are walking around sick and don’t understand why.

The faith and trust we have collectively invested, as a society, in medicine is based upon blind faith and not the profession’s ability to get sick people well. There are some pretty screwed up concepts that medical dogma is based upon and when one takes a close look at these ideas, their flaws become very apparent. It is because of this fact that the profession has been cleverly structured and marketed, by its engineers, to appear as a religion.

As a religion, medicine remains off limits from would-be critics and avoids important questions. These questions have needed to be answered for years, and yet they continue to be ignored by medicine’s leaders. Instead, we continue to hear and read about, walkathons, parades and fundraisers that supposedly benefit research for future eradication of diseases that the medical profession and petrochemical corporations have no intention of ever eliminating!

It’s not a coincidence that so many hospitals in the United States and around the world have been named after religious organizations and saints. Let’s face facts, there aren’t any medical facilities named “The Charles Manson Center for Burned Victims’. Medical institutions have been designed and branded in such a way that they are presently perceived, by the masses, as places of worship. Even the doctor’s classic, white lab coat has been designed to instill, in the psyche of health care consumers, a sense of purity when they think of physicians.

Getting people to believe in the value of medicine has been the long-term goal of pharmaceutical companies. Their relentless commitment to this self-serving campaign has turned the public sector into a massive congregation of cheerleaders that ritualistically praise the medical industry. Communities throughout America and around the world regularly donate large amounts of money attempting to build and maintain hospital centers. These organizations are now the center points of all modern communities.

Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of good medical doctors and surgeons in the world and some medical practice objectives can be helpful in saving lives. But most of the successes that can be attributed to modern medicine usually come in the form of emergency based care and not from the area of managing diseases and restoring health to the human body.

If we ever hope to improve the health of human beings and raise the overall quality of healthcare that’s practiced in the United States and other locations throughout the world, we will need to break the stranglehold petrochemical corporations have on the medical profession. These giant companies have hijacked medicine and made it sick. We need to turn our attention away from figuring out ways to pay for medical care and start concentrating on ways to fix the profession so that it stops making people sicker than they already are.

In the future we must evaluate medicine as a profession and not blindly praise its false accomplishments that have, ultimately, been fabricated by drug companies and later promoted in peer-reviewed journals that are owned and operated by the same companies. It’s time for the members of the congregation (the general public) to get off their knees and begin holding traditional medicine (the church) accountable for its actions!

And Now The End Of Brexit

By Dr. John Reizer

If something looks, smells or tastes like a conspiracy, chances are pretty damn good it is one.

A long time ago, powerful think-tanks got together and figured out a way to stop the masses from putting any credibility into ideas that governments might regularly conspire against their own citizenry. Their clever plan was to popularize a specific label that would, for all intents and purposes, inoculate the masses against believing the obvious. The label that was selected was “Conspiracy Theory.” According to a Freedom of Information request by the New York Times in 1976, the label “Conspiracy Theory” was made into a weaponized term to discredit minority groups of people from pushing conspiracy agendas that questioned the veracity of government reports.

The “Conspiracy Theory” label can very effectively defuse a specific problem before it ever has a chance to breathe. Whenever something big occurs that stinks of a massive conspiracy, the powers that be immediately inoculate the masses against such thought behavior by injecting the “Conspiracy Theory” label into the public domain. It goes something like this:

“Yesterday’s terror attack is already being dubbed as a false flag event by the lunatic fringe and other conspiracy theorists.”

When the hypnotized public read and hear such statements from the mainstream media companies, they automatically close their eyes and cover their ears with regards to anything that deviates from officialdom. In reality, the masses are routinely immunized against logic by coming into contact with this cleverly weaponized label. No matter how blatantly obvious the truth might be concerning a specific incident, the large majority of people worldwide will be unable to embrace anything other than what has been disseminated by the government’s script writers.

This brings me to the major theme of my latest post about Brexit; the European Union was never designed for the benefit of its member countries. And if you believe that it was, you have been hoodwinked and immunized by the powers that be into thinking so.

The EU has always been a tool of the Illuminati, specifically designed to manage, more effectively, the European countries after World War II. It’s much easier to manage a bunch of sovereign territories if they lose their sovereignty and can be controlled by one central location in Brussels. The same holds true when we are discussing monetary systems. By creating a single currency system, it is easier to make the member countries dependent on the EU model.

Britons continue to present a major problem for the EU. Originally presented to them as a free trade zone, the British people embraced the EU concept because they were allowed to keep their own currency system in place. London is a powerful financial center and the controlling powers do not want this to be the case in the immediate future.

And now the conspiracy: I believe the entire Brexit idea was created by the controlling powers as a giant psyop scheme. Regardless of the referendum’s result, the controlling powers had no intention of ever allowing Britain to exit the European Union. And any person, persons or groups that bring this information to light will be labeled as conspiracy theorists.

The goal from the onset was to create heated debate about a very important sovereignty issue that has been on the minds of many people, and then to have the heart cut out of the monster so it could die once and for all. If Brexit would have been defeated, controlling powers could have begun to introduce the convincing argument that a stronger EU makes for a stronger Europe and that London must give up its currency system in order for the EU to work.

But on June 23, 2016 the UK voted to leave the European Union 52% – 48% and David Cameron announced his intention to resign as British Prime Minister.

Throughout the many days leading up to the highly anticipated Brexit vote, Mr. Cameron maintained that he would immediately trigger Article 50 if the referendum returned a decision to leave the EU.

Article 50, for all intents and purposes, is the kill switch with regards to the UK’s membership in the EU. Once article 50 was invoked, there was supposedly no turning back. Until that transaction occurred, the Brexit result remained nothing more than a nonbinding referendum.

It’s interesting to note how David Cameron quickly changed his tune about triggering Article 50 right after the referendum results were revealed. He immediately announced his resignation and stated that the next Prime Minister would be the best person to activate Article 50. Really? Then he announced he would stay on as acting Prime Minister through the fall of 2016. The Illuminati needed time to figure out their next strategy.

The Illuminati masters are very clever. The real purpose of the Brexit vote was to kill “The Leave” movement forever. I honestly believe the controlling powers never envisioned the outcome of the vote would turn out the way it did. I think they genuinely believed the opposite result would come to fruition. But despite all the propaganda that was put in place by the elitists, the public still voted to leave. The British people delivered a very unfavorable result to their Illuminati masters. It is a result that would not be tolerated by them.

The powers really running things behind the scenes cleverly developed a contingency plan, one designed to look like it originated from  the heart of a population base that had second thoughts about the original referendum results.  That is what we are presently witnessing; a carefully crafted idea designed to convince the masses that Brexit was a horrible mistake and that the only logical way to correct such a mistake is to have a second referendum.

Enter Theresa May, the Prime Minister that was strategically selected and placed into office by the powers that be to deal with the problem of reversing and killing Brexit. May was an outright opponent of the leave movement prior to her becoming Prime Minister and although she has publicly pretended to see it through during her service as acting Prime Minister, she has secretly organized its death.

Theresa May invoked Article 50 on March 29, 2017 and this allegedly sealed the deal; Britain was officially leaving the European Union. But it doesn’t appear that this will ever become a reality. May has done everything in her power to delay and sabotage the country’s exit from the European Union and it’s very unlikely, in my opinion, that we will ever see Brexit actually take place.

It just goes to show everybody that the power brokers really in charge do not care about the voting results of the common people. They will do whatever it takes to keep their agenda alive and moving forward.

The Medical Industrial Complex: Never A Cure to be Found

wp-image-879162634

By Dr. John Reizer

It’s vitally important to understand how the medical industrial complex operates in order to understand why there have never been any cures to any diseases.

Now I understand that some people like to point out that surgeons can cure tonsillitis, appendicitis, infected gallbladders, and a plethora of other conditions by removing diseased tissues. But that’s not technically a cure because the surgeon is cutting out the disease and not really curing anything. If done often enough, this practice would make the patient disappear.

In addition to those claims, others like to point out that Polio and Smallpox were cured through vaccination programs. This is also not accurate because both of these diseases declined through natural adaptations within human physiology, better sanitation, better public health practices, and some very clever statistical reporting by regulating agencies that reclassified Polio as viral meningitis after vaccines were administered. This is also the case with other diseases that were supposedly brought under control with vaccines. All of these claimed diseases declined in locations where vaccines were not administered, and often at a faster rate than the places where the medications were used. But we never hear about these facts.

In order to cure anything, a physician or the medicine he or she applies would have to cause the diseases involved to be replaced with new, healthy cells and tissues that are able to function normally from a physiological standpoint. This criteria is not even close to being satisfied in modern allopathic medicine. Only the body can cure specific diseases or more appropriately named, physiological expressions.

The medical industrial complex, for the most part, owns the named physiological expressions we commonly refer to as diseases. In reality, there are no diseases in existence. There are only physiological expressions that occur when the body is functioning in a state of ease (health) and also when the body is functioning in a state of dis-ease (loss of health).

Long ago, the medical industrial complex categorized various physiological expressions of dis-ease and named them as individual diseases. They own the rights to the named entities, and the surgical and chemical treatment protocols associated with them.

If you’re not in the medical club, you have no legal rights to claim that you can treat or cure these diseases. And if you attempt to do so, there are regulatory agencies like the FDA that will quickly remind you not to mess with their intellectual property. They don’t fool around with violators that infringe on their territories.

There will never be cures produced by the medical industrial complex because the enterprise was designed to expand the named entities not reduce them. They’re not in business to get rid of diseases, they’re in business to profit from their intellectual property, and that is exactly what they do. One of the easiest ways they create new intellectual property (diseases) is through the administration of vaccines to the human population.

Please understand I am not writing that medical doctors and surgeons can never help a person that has a medical emergency. In certain, limited scenarios they can be the difference between life and death for a patient. But the same practitioners can also kill a person while attempting to manage their disease process through a lengthy treatment protocol.

If we truly want to change physiological expressions in human beings from states of dis-ease to states of ease, we must understand that the body functions as an entire organism. The body is not a group of independent systems as depicted in medical textbooks that function separately from one another. Health cannot and will not be achieved through the application of drugs and surgeries that are targeting individual body systems.

Various physiological expressions of dis-ease that have been disingenuously categorized by medicine as cancers and autoimmune diseases can only be corrected by removing interferences from natural physiological pathways that are causing the body’s chemistry to react in an improper way. Pumping poisonous chemotherapeutic drugs into a compromised patient only makes the body weaker and the patient is not going to survive for more than a few years. The medical statistics show this to be the case. The same goes for radiation therapy, a known cause of cancer.

Not only does the medical industrial complex own the intellectual rights to the named entities, the associated treatment protocols, the pharmaceutical products, the insurance products that pay for the care and the hospital corporations where all the magic takes place, they also control the regulatory agencies, the medical researchers, medical schools, medical curricula and the media companies that constantly advertise their drugs as well as the newscasts that perform medical cheerleading on a daily basis.

Know the game you’re playing and know it well. This information could literally save the lives of you and your loved ones.

This is the real reason there are never any cures in organized medicine, only the long term management of individual diseases until the end of time.

I Caught the Flu And Survived

By Dr. John Reizer

I caught the dreaded flu virus several weeks ago. It had been about two and a half years since I last experienced any sickness whatsoever. And that episode had been limited to a simple cold that left me with a mild sore throat and some congestion for a few days.

A week prior to catching the flu, I had been bragging to one of my patients about how healthy I was and how I attributed my good health to eating properly, getting plenty of daily exercise and receiving regular chiropractic care. This recipe has always kept my nervous and immune systems working at a very efficient level.

Then out of nowhere, I had the damn flu.

I had been taking care of a lot of patients prior to catching the flu that had been experiencing flu like symptoms. A few of the patients I had seen even told me they had tested positive for the virus. And this was after they had taken the flu vaccine at a local drugstore down the street from my office.

This particular flu virus had me feeling pretty miserable within a few hours after the first symptoms appeared. It started quite innocently enough with me not being able to clear my throat. It then caused my throat to quickly become sore, and then the intense fever kicked in. The fever went to 104 degrees Fahrenheit and it lasted for 19 hours. I let it run its course like I always do. The fever dismantles the flu virus and actually prevents it from being able to replicate.

I drank plenty of water to prevent dehydration and secured a few blankets to keep me warm. I was shivering quite a bit. I propped myself up on a reclining chair and watched television and of course plenty of television commercials about how to fight off the flu with over-the-counter medicines.  The commercials told me I should take drugs to lower my fever, break up the congestion in my chest, dry up my runny nose, and stop my persistent coughing. WHAT A JOKE!

Shortly after my fever broke, I noticed that the other symptoms I experienced lessened. Within three days I was back to work and feeling much better. It’s amazing how fast the body can rid itself of bacterial and viral microbes if we get the hell out of its way. The human body really does know what it’s doing if we just give it a chance to function without taking a hundred different drugs that attempt to suppress every physiological response taking place.

Fever destroys many viruses like the flu. Most viral infections cannot survive in temperature ranges above 100 degrees Fahrenheit and so the body elevates its temperature for this very reason. It’s why the body causes the fever in the first place. The virus doesn’t cause the fever, the fever occurs in response to the viral infection under the guidance of the immune system.

Congestion is caused by the body in an effort to sequester the infection in areas where it cannot harm the lungs and other vital organs. If you take drugs to artificially breakup the congestion, it will cause the active infection to run rampant through your entire system. Instead, let the body do its job and kill the infection. Once the infection is neutralized, the congestion will disappear on its own and no harm can be done to the physiological system because the virus or bacterium involved has been dismantled or killed off.

A runny nose, persistent coughing and sneezing is how the body expels microbes from the system. Drugs that suppress this process are preventing the immune system from getting you better. The same thing goes for vomiting and diarrhea. These are the ways the body’s immune system gets rid of toxins and bugs inside of us. If you inhibit this process, you’re ultimately lengthening the amount of time you will have to deal with the viral or bacterial infection.

Contrary to popular belief, there’s no scientific evidence that flu vaccines are the best way to prevent catching the flu. In fact, evidence shows that people that receive a flu vaccine transmit the disease to others at a much higher rate than those not receiving the vaccines. It’s called viral shedding. The CDC has published misleading information about the safety and effectiveness of flu shots and also about the number of deaths that occur each year because of the flu.

Flu vaccines are known to cause serious side effects and the risks, in my opinion, far outweigh the benefits.

I caught the flu and survived just fine. I took no drugs whatsoever and because I let my immune system work out the problem of fighting this illness without any outside interference in the form of drugs, it will become stronger and keep me even healthier than before.

Vaccine Injuries: Where’s the Proof?

By Dr. John Reizer

Throughout my career as a primary healthcare provider, I have encountered a large number of people that refuse to believe vaccines are harmful to human physiology. These individuals don’t believe said medicines can cause the proliferation of diseases worldwide. They don’t believe the medical cartel, at the highest levels, is trying to weaken and harm humans. They want to see the definitive proof (research) that shows children and adults are being irreparably damaged from various vaccines.

When presented with real proof (thousands of parents relating horrific experiences about their damaged children) that demonstrates vaccines are dangerous products, most people refuse to believe the information. In summary, people want proof but don’t believe the proof when it’s placed in front of them.

It’s very hard to remove the forever skepticism of the general population when it comes to challenging conventional medical paradigms. People tend to believe what they have been taught to believe by the different regulatory agencies (trusted sources) and are not willing to modify their beliefs.

Unfortunately, the only way to convince many people about the dangers associated with certain things is to let them experience the damage firsthand.

Sometimes it’s better to let common sense prevail instead of relying on regulatory agencies for information concerning a particular vaccine. Virtually all vaccine and medical research being performed is being done for the benefit of multinational pharmaceutical companies and not for the benefit of healthcare consumers. If you’re waiting for published research to appear on the evening news that details the truth about vaccines and other drugs, you’re going to have a very long wait.

Aborted Babies Used in Vaccines

wp-image-282249783

By Dr. John Reizer

In addition to being extremely toxic, vaccines are also made from aborted human fetuses. Although this is probably shocking to most of us, it is not surprising to the people working in this industry. There are questionable bioethical practices performed in the field of medical research everyday.

Many scientists and the corporate structures they work for have very little regard for human life. To these people life is merely something that’s happened by chance and something that is eventually going to malfunction.

According to these individuals, we’re all the product of bad genetics and we will eventually express those bad genetics in the form of various diseases.

Mainstream science and medicine believe that the suppressive medical therapies practiced throughout the world are the only logical way to defeat physiological inadequacies in the human body.

Anyone who has ever had an opportunity to dissect a human cadaver should instantly realize that life on this planet has come to fruition from intelligent design. There’s an innate striving within all life that seeks to regulate itself and adapt to its ever changing environment. This is why human and animal medicine, through suppressive therapies, have over time made the people and animals on our planet weaker than they should be.

Vaccines are a bad idea for people and animals alike regardless of how many medical professionals jump up and down screaming otherwise. And these drugs contain toxins and human parts that should sicken all of us both physiologically and psychologically speaking.

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: Statement on Federal Vaccine Mandate

wp-image-879162634

To:  Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, House Energy and Commerce Committee

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions

Re: Statement federal vaccine mandates

Feb. 26, 2019

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) strongly opposes federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines. After being fully informed of the risks and benefits of a medical procedure, patients have the right to reject or accept that procedure. The regulation of medical practice is a state function, not a federal one. Governmental preemption of patients’ or parents’ decisions about accepting drugs or other medical interventions is a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy, and parental decisions about child-rearing.

A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks? Regulators may intervene to protect the public against a one-in-one million risk of a threat such as cancer from an involuntary exposure to a toxin, or-one-in 100,000 risk from a voluntary (e.g. occupational) exposure. What is the risk of death, cancer, or crippling complication from a vaccine? There are no rigorous safety studies of sufficient power to rule out a much higher risk of complications, even one in 10,000, for vaccines. Such studies would require an adequate number of subjects, a long duration (years, not days), an unvaccinated control group (“placebo” must be truly inactive such as saline, not the adjuvant or everything-but-the-intended-antigen), and consideration of all adverse health events (including neurodevelopment disorders).

Vaccines are necessarily risky, as recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court and by Congress. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid some $4 billion in damages, and high hurdles must be surmounted to collect compensation. The damage may be so devastating that most people would prefer restored function to a multimillion-dollar damage award.

The smallpox vaccine is so dangerous that you can’t get it now, despite the weaponization of smallpox. Rabies vaccine is given only after a suspected exposure or to high-risk persons such as veterinarians. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was withdrawn from the U.S. market, a decade later than from the Japanese market, because of reports of severe permanent brain damage. The acellular vaccine that replaced it is evidently safer, though somewhat less effective.

The risk: benefit ratio varies with the frequency and severity of disease, vaccine safety, and individual patient factors. These must be evaluated by patient and physician, not imposed by a government agency.

Measles is the much-publicized threat used to push for mandates, and is probably the worst threat among the vaccine-preventable illnesses because it is so highly contagious. There are occasional outbreaks, generally starting with an infected individual coming from somewhere outside the U.S. The majority, but by no means all the people who catch the measles have not been vaccinated. Almost all make a full recovery, with robust, life-long immunity. The last measles death in the U.S. occurred in 2015, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Are potential measles complications including death in persons who cannot be vaccinated due to immune deficiency a  justification for revoking the rights of all Americans and establishing a precedent for still greater restrictions on our right to give—or withhold—consent to medical interventions? Clearly not.

Many serious complications have followed MMR vaccination, and are listed in the manufacturers’ package insert, though a causal relationship may not have been proved. According to a 2012 report by the Cochrane Collaboration, “The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre- and post-marketing, are largely inadequate” (cited by the National Vaccine Information Center).

Mandate advocates often assert a need for a 95% immunization rate to achieve herd immunity. However, Mary Holland and Chase Zachary of NYU School of Law argue, in the Oregon Law Review, that because complete herd immunity and measles eradication are unachievable, the better goal is for herd effect and disease control. The best outcome would result, they argue, from informed consent, more open communication, and market-based approaches.

Even disregarding adverse vaccine effects, the results of near-universal vaccination have not been completely positive. Measles, when it does occur, is four to five times worse than in pre-vaccination times, according to Lancet Infectious Diseases, because of the changed age distribution: more adults, whose vaccine-based immunity waned, and more infants, who no longer receive passive immunity from their naturally immune mother to protect them during their most vulnerable period.

Measles is a vexing problem, and more complete, forced vaccination will likely not solve it. Better public health measures—earlier detection, contact tracing, and isolation; a more effective, safer vaccine; or an effective treatment are all needed. Meanwhile, those who choose not to vaccinate now might do so in an outbreak, or they can be isolated. Immunosuppressed patients might choose isolation in any event because vaccinated people can also possibly transmit measles even if not sick themselves.

Issues that Congress must consider:

Manufacturers are virtually immune from product liability, so the incentive to develop safer products is much diminished. Manufacturers may even refuse to make available a product believed to be safer, such as monovalent measles vaccine in preference to MMR (measles-mumps-rubella). Consumer refusal is the only incentive to do better.There are enormous conflicts of interest involving lucrative relationships with vaccine purveyors.Research into possible vaccine adverse effects is being quashed, as is dissent by professionals.There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children’s brains are developing rapidly—any interference with the complex developmental symphony could be ruinous.Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease.

AAPS believes that liberty rights are unalienable. Patients and parents have the right to refuse vaccination, although potentially contagious persons can be restricted in their movements (e.g. as with Ebola), as needed to protect others against a clear and present danger. Unvaccinated persons with no exposure to a disease and no evidence of a disease are not a clear or present danger.

AAPS represents thousands of physicians in all specialties nationwide. It was founded in 1943 to protect private medicine and the patient-physician relationship.

Respectfully yours,

Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

Orthodox Jews Stand With Omar

wp-image-282249783

By Gina Flores

To criticize the Zionist Israeli Government, AIPAC or the many other pro Israel lobby groups that promote Zionism and exert tremendous influence on the United States Government is not a form of anti Semitism. It is instead a form of anti Zionism which is a completely different thing altogether.

There are many people worldwide that absolutely oppose the atrocities the Israeli government have committed against the Palestinian people and the Jewish community that are also opposed to the Zionist movement.

The fact that a member of Congress has been publicly condemned by her colleagues for bringing to light the truth about this situation speaks volumes about just how much control AIPAC and other Zionist lobbying groups have over our US Government.

The control the Israeli Government has over Congress is a much more serious issue than the fabricated news about Russia’s supposed meddling in the last American election between Hillary Clinton and current President, Donald Trump.

Most of us can recognize the dangerous influence the pharmaceutical lobbyists have over Congress. Some of us can even comprehend the serious problems big telecom lobbyists have created through their powerful control over Congress. It puts all Americans in danger because it’s almost impossible to stay healthy with so many toxic drugs and electronic devices being shoved down our collective throat. The same problems are currently present with regards to Israel, their lobbyists and Congress.

It should not be the business of the United States Government to do what’s best for Zionism or the Zionist Israeli government. The United States should be focused on doing what’s best for America and its citizens. And please Mr. Trump, stop calling the people in your government anti Semitic just because they have the strength and courage to point out the obvious.

20190306_230413

Click Here!

Your Source for Alternative News