As long as for-profit drug companies remain in existence, the intellectual properties of organized medicine (human and animal diseases) will never disappear.
– Dr. Reizer
The Homecoming Novel is Not My Attempt to Foretell Earth’s Future
For the visitors who have regularly frequented NoFakeNews during the past eight years, you are familiar with the fact that I write about many subjects that are rarely discussed in the mainstream media. More recently, my writings have focused primarily on the Covid-19 fakery being executed by the controlling policymakers of our planet.
My recent article that discussed other psyops that have been rolled out for the general population by the powers that be (AI being able to match wits with human intelligence, the fake moon landings, and the nuclear weapons hoax) has stirred up plenty of interest and commentary from readers.
Since the Covid-19 fairytale was unleashed on the world, the website traffic here has increased dramatically. It’s still a relatively low volume of visitors coming here as compared to many more prominent and well-known alternative media domains. Still, NoFakeNews continues to expand its readership every day. And for that fact, I am grateful. I want people to become more educated about the world.
I receive plenty of emails from readers that are generated through the website’s contact portal. I try my best to answer all of them. In many instances, visitors don’t want to leave a public message on the comment boards, and so they ask me a question via email. Not a problem, I understand people’s concern and their desire to maintain privacy. That’s why I created the contact portal in the first place.
As many of you know, I write sci-fi stories and shamelessly plug the novels on this website in an attempt to get visitors to purchase them. The royalties I earn from book sales are used to offset the maintenance fees associated with operating NoFakeNews.
I am thrilled that people are reading my novels and listening to the audiobook versions. I love to write fiction more than anything else. But I don’t want the fiction I write to bleed over into the real story content I cover on the website.
Quite a few visitors have asked me recently in emails if the Apophis meteor rumored to strike Earth in 2036 will be a real event. People are asking me if I have intentionally foretold the world about the catastrophic happening in my work of fiction, The Homecoming.
Let me make something blatantly clear; I am not a time traveler or a prophet. I have garnered no information about the future through the application of time travel.
The Homecoming is a fictional story and was written to entertain people while making them think about concepts that might affect or impact people in the real world. I encourage people to check out the novel, it’s a quick read and will make you scratch your head, but I am not referencing Apophis in the fictional plot of my story.
If you want to read more about the creation of my novel, The Homecoming, readers can access the interview I gave earlier this year at this link.
Thanks for reading my stories and, more importantly, thanks for visiting NoFakeNews and contributing to the different discussions concerning the published posts.
Armed officers with no insignias, badges or name tags “guarding” protest in Washington D.C.
This story is something that all Americans should take notice of and continue to monitor in the future. I find it hard to believe that American servicemen and women would be willing to plunge vaccines into the arms of US citizens. Still, private government contractors or foreign military personnel might be a different story—no need to panic or blow it out of proportion at this time.
The government likely wanted to distance itself from any altercations potentially taking place between demonstrators and US military people. The government undoubtedly contracted the work out to private companies for this reason.
by Peter Penn
Journalist Alejandro Alvarez of WTOP news in Washington D.C. has been covering the protests in our nation’s capitol. On June 3, he noticed that many of the security officers had no visible badges, insignias or name tags on their uniforms and posted photos of this on his Twitter account.
Alvarez later posted photos of a few insignias that were seen, that indicate some of these security officers were Federal Prison Officers from Texas. The insignias included Three Rivers, and FCC Beaumont.
The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), whose Director is Michael Carvajal, is an agency under the Department of Justice and is responsible for the care, custody, and control of incarcerated individuals. The National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 transferred responsibility for adult felons convicted of violating District of Columbia laws to the Bureau.
View original post 291 more words
On Demand Protesting
By Dr. John Reizer
I am passing on information that I received this morning from a NoFakeNews visitor about the staged protests occurring across the United States. This is precisely what I have been writing about.
On-demand protesters can be hired online and the website, http://www.demandprotest.com proves that this is really happening.
Straight from the Website!
“We have the proven expertise required to expertly shape political, corporate, or public health perceptions.” — Demand Protest
Special thanks to Shane for finding this and passing it along to me so I could share it with everyone.
An Open Letter to the Readers of NoFakeNews from Van Robison
Dear Readers,
A few months ago, I stumbled upon the NoFakeNews website. I have since read many articles posted by Dr. John Reizer. I am not meaning to embarrass Dr. Reizer, but I have to say that the time and energy he expends writing articles for NoFakeNews is quite amazing.
It is very obvious to me personally that Dr. Reizer is very intelligent and has great skill in writing and expressing real truth. He is a modern-day hero of truth. Others include Dr. Judy Mikovits, Dr. Rashid Buttar, and many other outspoken human beings against the powers of darkness.
In every age of human life on Earth, there are always individuals who speak out against evil. Dr. Reizer is one such individual.
Sincerely,
Van Robison
German Report Destroys Official Coronavirus Pandemic Narrative
A very telling government report that was leaked to the public by a whistleblower in early May has the German government and mainstream media backtracking and trying to minimize damage from the expose.
Major and shocking revelations from the report are:
— The dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated: probably at no point did the danger posed by the new virus go beyond the normal level.
— The people who die from Corona are essentially those who would statistically die this year, because they have reached the end of their lives and their weakened bodies can no longer cope with any random everyday stress (including the approximately 150 viruses currently in circulation).
— Worldwide, within a quarter of a year, there has been no more than 250,000 deaths from Covid-19, compared to 1.5 million deaths [25,100 in Germany] during the influenza wave 2017/18.
— The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.
— A reproach could go along these lines: During the Corona crisis the State has proved itself as one of the biggest producers of Fake News.
The information in the German report confirms the opinions I have been writing on NoFakeNews for many months. What is happening in Germany is no different than what is transpiring in the United States and the rest of the world.
The all-out attempt to create a new world order and turn the existing models of society into a third-world medical surveillance state has been losing some steam.
For the most part, the sheeple population has been compliant, wearing protective facemasks as instructed, committing economic suicide by staying at home and watching mind-control television programming that reinforces the pandemic fakery.
The believability of the false flag event is being tested with each passing day because of many factors associated with the illogical nature of the script. One genuine problem that has existed from the inception of this fraud has been centered around the world governing construct’s ability to manifest and maintain the fatality and Covid-19 case numbers, while keeping medical personnel awkwardly silent about the fact that hospital centers have been, for all intents and purposes, empty.
The other sleight of hand trickery that is beginning to become more visible to those really paying attention is the completely outrageous acts of tyranny being committed by governments worldwide. The masses are sensitive to what is taking place and have begun the gradual process of awakening. Right now, most of society is still sleepy, but they are awake and becoming more aware each day.
The few who control the many are finding it more difficult to maintain complete control concerning the outflow of information. Alternative media, although not widely embraced by the majority of society has been slowly making a dent in sharing the truth about the fictitious narrative.
The world’s population is beginning to figure out what is happening and that the coronavirus is a well-written and produced psychological operation that has been unleashed across the globe to usher in a new way of life that will minimally resemble the one we are being asked to leave behind.
Challenging the Constitutionality of Mandatory Vaccines: Where There’s A Risk There Must Be A Choice!
Regardless of the constitutionality of specific regulations and laws that have made it into existence, members of society must occasionally reexamine, and when necessary, retest those actions in a legal theatre. This is especially true when the morality and ethicality of such actions come into question and threaten the citizens the laws have allegedly been designed to protect.
Whether something being handed down by a governing body in America is constitutionally sound or not is decided by a group of justices (human beings) who don’t always agree with one another.
Regarding the question of whether or not mandatory vaccination laws are constitutionally protected (Jacobson v. Massachusetts), it’s important to remember the legal decision that answered this question was based in part on information that was available about vaccine products 115 years ago. The ruling justices had zero scientific information to examine that spoke of the public dangers vaccine products posed to society. If such information was available at the time, there undoubtedly would have been a different decision handed down.
Whenever there is a risk of harm to the public stemming from a medical procedure or product, patients must be offered the option of refusing the service. Patients must sign a form that serves as evidence they have consented to the medical products or services. This practice in medical care is referred to as informed consent and is the law.
Informed Consent Defined
The problem with mandatory vaccination laws is that they violate the basic laws of informed consent. When there is a health risk posed to the public from a medical product, the people must be offered a choice about whether or not they want to receive the product. This law is reasonable, ethical, and morally sound. Any rational-thinking person would agree with the legal process of informed consent.
It does not matter if you are a pro-vaxxer, anti-vaxxer, or something in between; common sense would dictate that where there’s a medical risk, there must be a choice and an option to refuse the medicinal product or service.
There is no doubt whatsoever, according to modern science, that a level of risk is associated with all vaccine products. This is undeniable because every vaccine product in existence is accompanied by a product insert that clearly informs doctors and patients of the risks associated with said products. I challenge anyone to find a medical vaccine that is currently in the marketplace that has zero risks associated with that product.
Because all vaccines come with some level of risk, patients must be given the right to refuse them. Anything less than a person being given the choice to refuse a dangerous medical product is unreasonable, unethical, and beneath the law, otherwise known as informed consent.
The question of whether or not mandatory vaccinations are constitutionally protected must be reexamined again by the SCOTUS. This time the justices must take into consideration the inherent public health risks associated with vaccine science.
Any doctor, healthcare professional, or agent of the government who administers a medical product or service to another human being without first gaining the patient’s written informed consent would be guilty of committing medical rape, which is a crime against humanity.
Are Mandatory Vaccine Laws Protected by the Constitution?
Many Americans have been recently asking the question: Are mandatory vaccine laws protected by the Constitution? If you type this question into a search engine on the Internet, you are going to be inundated with a plethora of legal opinions that thoroughly discuss the subject. The majority of the views will tell you that the federal government has a constitutional right to exercise mandatory vaccine laws.
The legal opinions referenced above are mostly made and influenced by a case that was decided by the SCOTUS on February 20, 1905, Jacobson v. Massachusetts. In that case, the Supreme Court decided that an individual’s liberty is not absolute and subject to police powers.
The decision handed down stated, “in every well-ordered society charged with the duty of conserving the safety of its members the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand” and that “[r]eal liberty for all could not exist under the operation of a principle which recognizes the right of each individual person to use his own, whether in respect of his person or his property, regardless of the injury that may be done to others.”
The court also ruled that mandatory vaccinations are not arbitrary or oppressive so long as they do not “go so far beyond what was reasonably required for the safety of the public.”
Now, I want to preface my remarks about this case by stating I am not a lawyer (although I do have an online Juris Doctorate that I worked really hard on many years ago), and I am not an expert on legal issues and have never pretended to be one. But strictly from a layperson’s perspective, I have to write that I agree with Robert F. Kennedy’s position that mandatory vaccine laws are unconstitutional.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts was heard and decided by the SCOTUS in 1905. That’s a long time ago, and there’s been a lot of new information uncovered about vaccines and the devastating effects they have on human physiology. A new argument could and should be laid out to retest and reverse this old and antiquated legal decision.
I believe that Jacobson v. Massachusetts could be successfully challenged and overturned in light of some of the new, damaging evidence that has been turned up about the vaccine industry. There are over 150 chronic diseases that the FDA has attributed to vaccinations, and there is a specialized National Vaccine Injury Compensation Court that was expressly set aside to hear vaccine injury cases and limit their awards to $250,000 to protect the big pharma industry. In addition to this, the soon to be released Covid-19 vaccine will have complete liability immunity from any injuries the product might potentially inflict on human lives.
In my opinion, Jacobson v. Massachusetts would yield a much different decision if heard in the year 2020. And I have spoken with a few lawyer friends who unequivocally agree with me. The minority dissenters in the case, Justices Brewer and Peckham, would likely have had more support from the majority ruling justices who heard the case if they had been made aware of the real dangers associated with the oxymoron known as vaccine science.
I think it is time to retest Jacobson v. Massachusetts in a modern-day legal setting, and one that takes into consideration the full extent of the safety issues associated with vaccines. These products have become overly oppressive in nature for all human beings because they pose serious health threats to the general public they have, in theory, been designed to protect. The current health risks stemming from vaccine products extend far beyond what the justices in 1905 considered safe for the general public.
In my opinion, the federal government will not try to mandate vaccines in the future because they would be afraid to place Jacobson v. Massachusetts in the line of fire of a real test. It has been tested in limited capacities in the past, but not with the argument that takes into consideration the case I have laid out in this post.
I think the powers that be would love to keep this precedent-setting decision right where it lies. To open it up to a brand new, real test scenario is opening a can of worms they can’t afford to open. If the decision was ever reversed, the controllers would lose their leverage and ability to populate search engines with articles that tell us that the federal government’s right to impose mandatory vaccines is protected by the US Constitution.
I, for one, would love to see this case revisited and put through a new legal test using the argument I have outlined. Any lawyers out there that have more expertise than me concerning this subject, please feel free to weigh in on the conversation.
My Second Open Letter to President Trump
June 6, 2020
Dear Mr. President,
I hope this letter finds you in good health. I am writing to you once again about the state of our country regarding the current coronavirus crisis. I continue to be worried about my family and all the citizens of our country. But I am not concerned because of Covid-19. I am afraid of the continuous overreaction to the pandemic by the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control, and the team of health science advisors that surround and significantly influence your opinions. Ultimately, the presidential edicts you create.
As I explained to you in my first letter dated March 26, 2020, I am a licensed chiropractic physician and have been practicing for over 33 years. Like my colleagues, I have extensive education in both health and chiropractic sciences. I believe I am profoundly qualified to comment on the crisis at hand.
I do not believe that Covid-19 is a severe threat to the citizens of our country. When looking at the virus exclusively from a statistical standpoint, it is minuscule compared to the reported annual case numbers of influenza and common cold infections. It’s hard for me to comprehend as a healthcare professional, why world and national health regulatory agencies and the team of health advisors surrounding you have overreacted to Covid-19.
Contrary to public belief, humans are not at war with bacterial and viral microbes. There are trillions of viruses in existence, and none threaten people with healthy functioning immune systems.
I publish a website (www.nofakenews.net) that discusses the coronavirus world pandemic at great length. Many Americans who visit my site are concerned about your intentions concerning the Covid-19 vaccine that is currently in production.
Many Americans are worried about the possibility you will create and sign an executive order that will mandate the Covid-19 vaccine to be administered to all American citizens. I would like to know what your intention is concerning the vaccine as well.
Are you going to make the Covid-19 vaccine program mandatory for all Americans? Do American citizens have a constitutional right to opt-out of compulsory vaccines should such a draconian law be passed by you during a national pandemic?
According to Mr. Alan Dershowitz, the answer is no! Mr. Dershowitz was recently quoted as saying, “Let me put it very clearly, you have no constitutional right to endanger the public and spread the disease, even if you disagree. You have no right not to be vaccinated, you have no right not to wear a mask, you have no right to open up your business.” Mr. Dershowitz also went on to say, “And if you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm.”
So, when I read Mr. Dershowitz’s comments, there is some reason for me to have concerns that mandatory vaccines might be something you are seriously considering. I would hope that my fears are unwarranted and that you would never consider signing such an executive order.
Mr. President, how many Americans and I vote in the upcoming election will be significantly influenced by your decision regarding this subject. Are you planning to authorize and instruct US servicemen and women to carry out what amounts to the medical rape of American citizens? A forcible vaccination program is unacceptable, whether it is deemed constitutional or unconstitutional by the SCOTUS.
The American voting public wants to support a president that is strong and able to withstand the enormous pressure coming from the American Medical Association, the Pharmaceutical – Industrial Complex, the World Health Organization, and the United Nations.
Mr. President, I want our country to become healthy again. Forcibly injecting an untested, unproven, and potentially dangerous vaccine into 330 million Americans is not the way to accomplish this goal.
I, along with millions of other concerned citizens, anxiously await your response.
Respectfully yours,
Dr. John Reizer
NoFakeNews 