Vaccines: where there is a potential risk, people must be afforded the freedom of choice

By Dr. John Reizer

Where there is a potential risk associated with medical products or procedures, human beings must be afforded the freedom to choose whether or not they want to receive the services. This is known as informed consent.

Any healthcare provider or government entity that forces a person or the general population to take or receive a therapeutic drug/procedure that carries a potential risk to said individuals’ health or wellbeing, without affording them the choice to opt-out would be guilty of medical rape. I believe that informed consent is enforceable at all times and without limitations or exceptions, such as when an epidemic or pandemic has been declared by health officials.

There is not one vaccine product in existence that does not present potential risks to human beings. One of the disclaimers always written in all drug inserts that have been used to legally protect the pharmaceutical industry is a statement that warns the consumer not to take the product if they are allergic to any of the ingredients. How would a person know if they are allergic to the ingredients if they have never taken the concoction?

The link below will take you to a website where you can read the product inserts for every vaccine on the market. Read the information (the fine print) that clearly explains the risks associated with taking these hazardous products. There are inherent risks associated with all the products or the risks are unknown according to the vaccine makers.

Many of the problems associated with vaccine injuries occur months and years after the poisons are administered to unknowing victims.

Keep in mind, the COVID-19 vaccines soon to be released have been granted full liability immunity by the federal government. Why do you think that might be? The answer: they’re anticipating massive problems.

Granting vaccine makers full immunity against health consumers’ injuries is not exactly a vote of confidence by the federal government concerning the vaccine product.





5 thoughts on “Vaccines: where there is a potential risk, people must be afforded the freedom of choice

  1. SeeBee September 12, 2020 / 10:22 am

    Thank you, Doc. The vaccine inserts are eye-opening and stomach churning. The same rigorous exposure should apply for all therapies, especially Chemo and radiation.

    • NoFakeNews September 12, 2020 / 11:03 am

      You are welcome! I agree with you concerning all the therapies.

      Dr. Reizer

  2. sandy edwards September 12, 2020 / 11:14 am

    Who is going to take the time to read these inserts? And if they do will they even understand most of it. It’s like my Dad used to say “you would need a Philadelphia Lawyer to get thru them.” I agree with Seebee about all other therapies. I know lots of friends and very close relatives that were murdered by Chemo. Chemo and radiation another huge money maker. I don’t understand how Doctors that prescribe this treatment can live with themselves.

    • NoFakeNews September 12, 2020 / 11:26 am

      Most doctors perform the services they have been trained to deliver. They believe that the treatment therapies available to them are the best ways to save patients.

      They might be very intelligent people when it comes to looking at and understanding formulas or tiny components of a situation. But looking at the same subject matter from a slightly different angle or vantage point makes them totally blind or even dumb to the things that are transpiring.

      The aptitude tests used to assess whether people are going to be a good fit for medical education are designed to evaluate how well candidates are suited to following already designed recipes. The medical establishment is not looking for people who question the illogicality of the procedures and therapies.

      Dr. Reizer

Comments are closed.