The Wearing of Face Masks (Medical Devices) Require Informed Consent (a person’s permission to be administered or worn)

Dr. John Reizer

Staring at the prospect of having a national face mask mandate soon, American citizens must exercise their legal right to opt-out of this draconian requirement. I believe the appropriate way to do this is by exercising a medical patient’s right to informed consent.

Although the specific definition of informed consent may vary from state to state, it means that a physician (or another medical provider) must tell a patient all of the potential benefits, risks, and alternatives involved in any surgical procedure, medical procedure, or another course of treatment, and must obtain the patient’s written consent to proceed.

The concept is based on the principle that a physician must disclose information to the patient to make a reasonable decision regarding treatment.

“Face masks, when they are intended for a medical purpose such as source control (including uses related to COVID-19) and surgical masks, are medical devices.” –  FDA.gov

If a person is being instructed to wear a face mask to control a virus’s spread, that mask or protective device is considered a medical device.

A national face mask mandate would automatically require every citizen to wear a medical device, ignoring a person’s right to informed consent. Any medical decision, including requiring a person to use a medical device against their will and without their permission, is equivalent to medical rape.

Face masks, a type of medical device, can pose an imminent health threat to human beings and cannot be forced upon any persons without their informed consent. That consent can be withdrawn at any time whatsoever after it has been given.

The above argument would also be valid and applicable concerning a national vaccine mandate.

___________________________________

The Target List Movie is coming to Amazon Prime!

We’re About to Expose Big Pharma!

OVER $1,716.00 GIVEN SO FAR. (THANK YOU)!!!

DONATIONS OF ANY AMOUNT ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED — PLEASE CLICK HERE!

51010706_1601251839415494_r.jpeg

The Target List IMDb Official Movie Page 

Casting and Filming:
In-person auditions will be held on December 20, 2020 (check updates and cast announcements here), and filming is scheduled for March 2021.

Vaccines: where there is a potential risk, people must be afforded the freedom of choice

By Dr. John Reizer

Where there is a potential risk associated with medical products or procedures, human beings must be afforded the freedom to choose whether or not they want to receive the services. This is known as informed consent.

Any healthcare provider or government entity that forces a person or the general population to take or receive a therapeutic drug/procedure that carries a potential risk to said individuals’ health or wellbeing, without affording them the choice to opt-out would be guilty of medical rape. I believe that informed consent is enforceable at all times and without limitations or exceptions, such as when an epidemic or pandemic has been declared by health officials.

There is not one vaccine product in existence that does not present potential risks to human beings. One of the disclaimers always written in all drug inserts that have been used to legally protect the pharmaceutical industry is a statement that warns the consumer not to take the product if they are allergic to any of the ingredients. How would a person know if they are allergic to the ingredients if they have never taken the concoction?

The link below will take you to a website where you can read the product inserts for every vaccine on the market. Read the information (the fine print) that clearly explains the risks associated with taking these hazardous products. There are inherent risks associated with all the products or the risks are unknown according to the vaccine makers.

Many of the problems associated with vaccine injuries occur months and years after the poisons are administered to unknowing victims.

Keep in mind, the COVID-19 vaccines soon to be released have been granted full liability immunity by the federal government. Why do you think that might be? The answer: they’re anticipating massive problems.

Granting vaccine makers full immunity against health consumers’ injuries is not exactly a vote of confidence by the federal government concerning the vaccine product.

VACCINE PRODUCT INSERTS

_______________________________

STOP THE COVID-19  HOAX INSANITY: DOWNLOAD A COPY OF DR. REIZER’S PLANDEMIC NOVELLA ON AMAZON.COM. TELL OTHERS AND SHARE THE INFORMATION BROADLY!

GET BOOK HERE FOR $ 0.99