If Your Doctor Insists Vaccines Are Safe, Have Them Sign This Form

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

For many years I have listened to the ongoing public debate about the pros and cons associated with vaccines. On one side of the argument, traditional medicine claims that in order for human beings to be healthy they must receive a large number of synthetically prepared medicinal concoctions and that said medicines pose absolutely no threat whatsoever to the proper expression of human physiology.

On the other side of the fence, anti-vaccine groups have been coming out of the woodwork for years claiming that not only are vaccines useless in protecting people against various diseases, they also destroy the human immune system and cause the proliferation of diseases in future generations by passing on vaccine damaged genes to our children and their children.

During my professional career as a health care provider, I have read my fair share of research about vaccines. I made up my mind long ago not to receive these drugs in my own body. Very often I come across patients in my private chiropractic office that ask me for my opinion with regards to the alleged dangers tied to vaccines. I tell my patients that I am not a medical doctor and cannot advise them, professionally speaking, about taking drugs. I point them in a direction where they can read unbiased research and let them make their own decisions after becoming more educated about the facts.

Many of my patients often decide against vaccinating themselves and their children after reading published research because they arrive at a similar conclusion that the risks associated with the prescribed shots are far more dangerous than any possible benefits that might be derived from the products being injected into their bodies.

In many situations, medical doctors will not treat patients that have not received their vaccines. This is especially true in the case of pediatricians. Many pediatric practices have a standard policy that precludes the treatment of any children that are unvaccinated. This attitude and professional mandate by many medical practitioners often leaves patients and the parents of young patients in an uncomfortable situation.

My advice to any persons being placed in this very precarious situation, where a doctor is demanding that they must be vaccinated  before being accepted into their medical practice, is to get the medical physician in question to sign, THE PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY. If you can find a doctor that is stupid enough to sign this document, then I guess you have to decide whether or not to proceed with the prescribed vaccine schedule. But I seriously doubt if any medical physician would ever sign such a document. To date, no medical doctor has ever signed such a waiver.

Please read the document below:

THE PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY (By Ken Anderson)

I (Physician’s name, degree)_______________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State/Province of _________. My State/Provincial license number is ___________ , and my DEA number is ____________. My medical specialty is _______________

I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name) ______________ , age _____ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________

I am aware that vaccines may contain many of the following chemicals, excipients, preservatives and fillers:

* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
* arginine hydrochloride
* dog kidney, monkey kidney,
* dibasic potassium phosphate
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* gentamicin sulfate
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrocortisone
* hydrolized gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* monobasic potassium phosphate
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* nonylphenol ethoxylate
* octylphenol ethoxylate
* octoxynol 10
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium chloride
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sodium deoxycholate
* sorbitol
* thimerosal
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood

and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosal causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses”).

In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

STEPS TAKEN: _________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________

I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)

The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”

The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety”

The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”

Hepatitis B

I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.

I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
____________________________________
____________________________________ _____________________________________

In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
_________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
______________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: _____________Date: ______________________

************************************************************************************************

(Please let me know if you are successful in finding any medical doctor that is willing to sign this form.)

The Highly Profitable Vaccine Industry

By Melissa Reizer

Staff Writer at NoFakeNews
w-Melissa52_bwSome of the biggest profits earning corporations in the world are pharmaceutical companies. Add vaccines to the list of products a particular company offers to potential healthcare consumers, and those financial rewards are that much larger.

Regardless of your position on the controversial subject of vaccines, it’s easy to see that these medicinal concoctions continue to generate large sums of money for Big Pharma. There are enormous financial incentives for pharmaceutical companies to enter the vaccine arena.

According to an article that was published in Silent Crow News, the lucrative vaccine market is about to skyrocket to even higher levels and surpass the impressive financial rewards it’s previously provided for these monster petrochemical corporations.

Read more about this subject by clicking here!

E. Coli In Two Meningococcal Vaccines!

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

Each and everyday there continues to be more information that comes out exposing the corruption and crimes that Big Pharma is perpetrating on citizens all over the world. The process of vaccinating human beings is an ingenious way to plant the seeds of deadly diseases inside all of us. Be smart and do your own research. If you are content with being complacent or apathetic, you will be another victim of organized healthcare.

Read more by clicking here!

 

The Vaccines Keep Coming

By Gina Flores

Staff Writer at NoFakeNews.net

Year after year the vaccines seem to keep coming. Big Pharma has hundreds of new medicinal concoctions in the works that are eventually slated to be injected in human beings. What does this mean in the grand scheme of things? It means that millions of unsuspecting people will have their immune systems assaulted to an even larger extent than is currently taking place.

Vaccines are the ultimate guarantee that big drug companies will never run out of customers. They are the seeds of today that have been planted by sinister corporations and they will grow into the new diseases of tomorrow. Those new diseases will then be managed indefinitely by a never ending catalog of patented pharmaceutical products that will yield monetary profits in the billions of dollars.

Read the article below for more on this subject:

271 New Vaccines in Big Pharma’s Pipeline

AMA Endorses the Elimination of Religious Exemptions Regarding Vaccinations

By Dr. John L Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

reizer3

According to an article in the publication, Newsweek, the AMA (American Medical Association) has recently endorsed a new policy that has the goal of eliminating religious exemptions regarding vaccinations for healthcare consumers in the United States. Although the AMA is not a government agency that can write actual laws, it has tremendous influence and lobbying power over state and other legislative bodies that ultimately determine healthcare laws in America.

This is a very aggressive policy change by the AMA that could spell the end of healthcare consumers’ rights to choose if and when they submit to a particular vaccine at a given time during their lives.

Currently, many states have laws that allow citizens to choose whether or not they receive medical vaccines. Religious and philosophical exemptions are regularly used by anti-vaccine groups in order to opt out of the regularly published vaccine guidelines that are followed by the large majority of people throughout the country.

Most recently, a measles outbreak originating in California in the Disneyland Park has been promoted ad nauseum by the corporately owned mainstream media. It has reached the point of becoming a witch hunt on many news programs as people have been featured on television calling out parents that have chosen not to vaccinate their children for fear of what these potentially harmful drugs might do to their children. All of this rubbish came about because less than 200 people in the entire United States were infected by measles in 2014. The Measles outbreak in Disneyland has been cited by the AMA as one of the reasons they have revised their policy and want to bring an end to religious exemptions regarding vaccinations.

Some health care experts believe that vaccines are very dangerous drugs and make people weaker, sicker, and more vulnerable to diseases they would otherwise not have to contend with. Some doctors also believe that these medicines do not create immunity and that the vaccine ingredients are toxic beyond belief and bad for all human beings.

In 1998, the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, published a controversial paper that linked MMR vaccinations to Autism. The MMR vaccine is a preventive, medicinal concoction against Measles, Mumps, and Rubella.

According to mainstream health sources, The Lancet article caused a major panic in the minds of parents in both Britain and the United States. Because of the study, many parents chose not to vaccinate their children and opted for safer measures to maintain the health and well being of younger family members. (1)

An independent investigative journalist, Brian Deer, determined that the author of the famous article, Andrew Wakefield, M.D., had manipulated evidence in his study and had also broken several ethical standards within the field of research. As a result of Deer’s investigation, Wakefield’s study was retracted by The Lancet in 2010. Dr. Wakefield was later reprimanded by the medical profession and stripped of his license to practice medicine. (2)

The news about the Wakefield Study being retracted was given worldwide exposure by the corporately, owned mainstream media. In fact, anytime a person attempts to type anything relating to vaccines and Autism into an Internet search engine, the results are littered with references about the now famous retraction of the Wakefield study.

Since the retraction of the study, many health care professionals have indicated that the Wakefield article was singled out and crushed by representatives of Big Pharma in order to protect the vaccine industry. Obviously, a lot of money was at stake in the way of potential lawsuits against vaccine makers, as well as the British and United States governments. Enough said!

Regardless of a person’s feelings about the benefits or dangers associated with vaccinations, it is the opinion of this writer that every human being should have the right to choose if he or she wants to be exposed to a particular medicine.

What do you think about this subject?

 

The Recent Measles Scare: More Vaccination Propaganda in Play

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net 

Long before the development and introduction of a measles vaccine, children worldwide would contract this childhood disease and recover in a relatively short period of time without complications and with true lifelong immunity. The same could be also said in regards to cases of Mumps and Rubella. (1)

The childhood diseases are believed by some health care specialists to be a natural primer to the human immune system. In other words, children that contract these diseases prior to puberty can benefit from a stronger and more efficient immune system response against other and more potentially devastating health challenges later in life.

At the center of the vaccination controversy is the well documented anger of many families that have had to endure pain and suffering because their children were permanently harmed or killed from adverse vaccine reactions. A family asking for compensation for damages stemming from vaccine injuries to their child is not a new concept. Pharmaceutical companies, in the past, have had to pay out large monetary awards in an effort to settle lawsuits generated from vaccination injuries to small children.

Recently, new legislation has been passed that limits the monetary awards parents can recover when seeking damages caused from vaccine injuries. Such cases are now heard in a special vaccine injury court. This venue limits all monetary awards at $250,000. In addition to that, it is quite cumbersome to enter specialized vaccine courts and many cases are thrown out before they get started. Unlike other courtroom scenarios, the vaccine cases are heard by a special vaccine judge and you can pretty much imagine how biased and unfair, in the direction of the pharmaceutical manufacturers, this process has become.

Despite the tremendous risks associated with vaccinating children and the relatively benign nature of most childhood diseases as well as other maladies being protected against, the pharmaceutical industry has managed to brainwash most parents and health care consumers into believing that the human body is completely defenseless against a never ending assortment of deadly microbes.

Most recently, a measles outbreak originating in California in the Disneyland Park has been promoted ad nauseum by the corporately owned mainstream media. It has reached the point of becoming a witch hunt on many news programs as people have been featured on television calling out parents that have chosen not to vaccinate their children for fear of what these very harmful drugs can potentially do to their children. All of this rubbish came about because 84 people in the entire United States have been infected by measles in 2015 as of this writing. This is craziness and a lot of propaganda being promoted by Big Pharma.

My point of contention remains quite simple and logical to understand. If the people getting vaccinated feel unsafe due to the fact that others around them are unvaccinated, how effective can the vaccines really be? The truth be told, the vaccines are not very effective at all. And the medical profession over the years has alluded to this fact in their professional journals.

An article written in JAMA, May, 1990 stated, “In an era when physicians are relatively unfamiliar with the disease, failure to detect measles in some vaccinated people will lead to calculation of artificially low attack rates for the vaccinated population.” (2)

It appears when one reviews the large number of claims being made today that a lot of children might be getting needlessly harmed from vaccines. This is not something that can be hidden, any longer, as the complaints continue to pile up in the vaccine courts and the accusatory finger has been pointed in the face of the Medical Establishment for their involvement in possibly causing more harm than good when it comes to the vaccine issue.

Some health care experts believe that vaccines are very dangerous drugs and make people weaker, sicker, and more vulnerable to diseases they would otherwise not have to contend with. Some doctors also believe that these medicines do not create immunity and that the vaccine ingredients are toxic beyond belief and bad for all human beings.

In 1998, the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, published a controversial paper that linked MMR vaccinations to Autism. The MMR vaccine is a preventive, medicinal concoction against Measles, Mumps, and Rubella.

According to mainstream health sources, The Lancet article caused a major panic in the minds of parents in both Britain and the United States. Because of the study, many parents chose not to vaccinate their children and opted for safer measures to maintain the health and well being of younger family members. (3)

An independent investigative journalist, Brian Deer, determined that the author of the famous article, Andrew Wakefield, M.D., had manipulated evidence in his study and had also broken several ethical standards within the field of research. As a result of Deer’s investigation, Wakefield’s study was retracted by The Lancet in 2010. Dr. Wakefield was later reprimanded by the medical profession and stripped of his license to practice medicine. (4)

The news about the Wakefield Study being retracted was given worldwide exposure by the corporately, owned mainstream media. In fact, anytime a person attempts to type anything relating to vaccines and Autism into an Internet search engine, the results are littered with references about the now famous retraction of the Wakefield study. How convenient and considerate it was for the news services to have provided this information for all health care consumers in the world.

Since the retraction of the study, many health care professionals have indicated that the Wakefield article was singled out and crushed by representatives of Big Pharma in order to protect the vaccine industry. Obviously, a lot of money was at stake in the way of potential lawsuits against vaccine makers, as well as the British and United States governments. Enough said!

One impressive article that was featured in the online publication, Natural News.com, implied that several of the key players responsible for having the Wakefield study retracted were tied to major pharmaceutical companies that had deep financial interests in the vaccine industry. (5)

As has been reported for a very longtime by many independent researchers, Big Pharma seems to have very rigid ties to medical research as well as the journals that publish medical studies. (6) These corporations have the ultimate power to greatly influence research so that the studies being released each year routinely support the petrochemical industry’s products. They also appear to have the power to erase important studies that slip through the cracks and speak out against the dangers of various medicines.

To this day, Dr. Wakefield maintains his innocence and credibility regarding the famous 1998 paper. (7) As is the case with many things in this world, if you want to know the truth about a particular situation, you simply follow the money trail.

Very simply written, the immunization industry remains the holy grail of modern medicine and is carefully protected by followers and financiers within the church of medicine. Any health care practitioner that attempts to shed light on the dangers associated with vaccinating our children can expect to be ridiculed, attacked, or ostracized from their profession. And for those individuals that doubt the authenticity of such claims, they only have to look at the unfair treatment of Dr. Andrew Wakefield.

What do you think about this subject?

Sources:

(1) What About Immunizations? Exposing The Vaccine Philosophy: A Parent’s Guide to the Vaccination Decision – Cynthia Cournoyer – © 1991 Fifth Edition Nelson’s Books

(2) E. Markowitz, S.R. Preblud, W.A. Orenstein, et al. “Patterns of Transmissions in measles outbreaks in the United States, 1985-1986.” New England Journal of Medicine 1989; 320:75-81, as cited by Randall Neustaedter, The Immunization Decision: A Guide For Parents.

(3) Online Link

(4) Online Link

(5) Online Link

(6) Online Link

(7) Online Link

Are Vaccines Being Used As A Tool In A Mass Sterilization Program?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary”.

– Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER

 

Recently, the Catholic Church accused the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF with sterilizing millions of women through the administration of a tetanus vaccine in the country of Kenya.

Although there were no reported cases of tetanus in the region, a massive vaccination campaign was launched by the WHO and UNICEF under the guise of a potential tetanus outbreak due to recent flooding and severe weather conditions.

Conspiracy theorists have pointed an accusatory finger at vaccine campaigns for the longest time. Many authors have attempted to make a connection between vaccine programs targeting young girls and an increase in infertility problems in certain countries.

One large concern voiced by laypersons and anti vaccine groups is the presence of a mercury laden vaccine ingredient called Thimerosal. Thimerosal is an anti-fungal agent and is often placed in many vaccines. Some independent researchers have written about Thimerosal as a causal factor with regards to infertility problems.

In the current situation playing out in Kenya, the presence of HCG, a pregnancy hormone, was discovered in the tetanus vaccines being administered to young women. The HCG, intentionally placed within the vaccine preparations, causes women to have miscarriages once they become pregnant.

Two obvious questions on the table that need to be answered by the powers that be are whether the WHO and UNICEF are complicit in a mass sterilization campaign in Kenya and other countries?

Both the WHO and UNICEF are United Nations organizations and this opens an entirely new can of worms. Is it possible the United Nations is writing and actively implementing depopulation agendas for certain countries?

What do you think about this subject?

The Cult of Vaccinism is Being Attacked Again

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

reizer3Once again we are witnessing an attack on the medical profession’s practice of Vaccinism. Attacks against the controversial theory are nothing new. People from all walks of life have questioned the safety of vaccinating children and adult human beings for as long as the medical profession has been administering such drugs. The recent criticism, however, has come from a person within the medical profession. Statements by medical doctors against vaccinations add a high degree of credibility to the longstanding argument that vaccines are more detrimental to the human body than they are helpful. That is why this most recent attack, by a medical doctor, is so important.

Vaccinism (a new word introduced by yours truly to denote the cult like following of this medical practice) is a protected science within the field of medicine. In other words, if any person writes negative content online about the vaccine theory, he or she is immediately attacked by a host of paid shills that are employed by pharmaceutical companies to police the Internet comment boards. In addition, any medical professional that speaks or writes negatively about vaccination theory will be ostracized from the medical profession.

For the longest time, medicine has vehemently defended any accusations that vaccines might be the cause of widespread diseases that have made their way through society. The most recent controversy connected to this subject is the ongoing public debate by mainstream medicine and health care consumers about whether or not there is a connection between vaccinations and Autism.

In 1998, Dr. Andrew Wakefield published a study in the prestigious Lancet Magazine that linked Autism to the MMR Vaccine. In 2010 the published study was retracted due to a claim, by the pharmaceutical industry, that Wakefield’s research was flawed. To this day, Wakefield stands by his research and conclusion that Autism and MMR are connected. And a lot of parents that have had children harmed by these shots believe Wakefield is correct as well.

Recently, a famous neurosurgeon, Russell Blaylock, M.D. has come out with a video that describes how vaccines harm a child’s brain development. The presentation is lengthy, but certainly worthy of our time considering the importance of the subject matter.

As always, readers are asked to perform their own independent research about health care issues and then make health decisions based on what they discover. Remember that an educated health care consumer is usually a healthier health care consumer.

What do you think about this subject?