Should We Feel Confident Trusting the CDC?

By Dr. John Reizer

Author of The Target List Audiobook

The question that has been repeatedly asked of me through the years by readers of NoFakeNews is: Should We Feel Confident Trusting The CDC?

I have read numerous articles that have attempted to tackle this subject and of course, I have viewed the movie VAXXED that for all intents and purposes crushes any credibility this regulatory agency claims to have with regards to overseeing the safety and effectiveness of vaccine products that continue to be manufactured by pharmaceutical companies.

According to the CDC, they are a government regulatory agency that works to protect the American public.

The CDC claims it is completely free from the outside influences of corporations and it has no conflicts of interest that could possibly influence its policy-making decisions.

But can Americans really feel confident that this regulatory body is assessing information and writing policy recommendations that affect all healthcare consumers without biases and that the regulatory body is completely free from the outside influences of the pharmaceutical corporations and others that regularly donate monetary funds to them?

The links below give me some reasons to believe conflicts of interest regularly occur:

Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Safety Research – Gayle DeLong

Conflicts of Interest Report in Vaccine Policy Making by Congress

Ethical Violations of the CDC cited by The Office of Inspector General

The CDC Foundation (From Their Website)

“Established by Congress as an independent, nonprofit organization, the CDC Foundation is the sole entity authorized by Congress to mobilize philanthropic partners and private-sector resources to support CDC’s critical health protection mission.

“The CDC Foundation helps the CDC save and improve lives by unleashing the power of collaboration between CDC, philanthropies, corporations, organizations,, and individuals to protect the health, safety, and security of America and the world. Since 1995, the CDC Foundation has launched approximately 1,000 programs and raised over $740 million. The CDC Foundation managed over 300 CDC-led programs in the United States and in more than 130 countries last year.

“Because CDC is a federal agency, all scientific findings resulting from CDC research are available to the public and open to the broader scientific community for review. Funding for CDC’s work provided through the CDC Foundation is not contingent on the outcomes of research or other scientific activity being favorable to one or more partners. The CDC Foundation works with the CDC to ensure that programs will have a meaningful impact for CDC and public health, and complement CDC’s priorities and ongoing work.  The CDC and CDC Foundation each have review procedures in place to safeguard against possible conflicts of interest.”

In my considered opinion, the CDC Foundation seems to be a clever way for corporations, many of which are drug and vaccine makers to influence the regulatory agency with regards to specific products.

Take a few moments to read this article that discusses in great detail the conflicts of interest the CDC had concerning giving advice to healthcare consumers about the anti-viral, Tamiflu.

CDC’s Gift Review Process (From their Website)

“CDC ensures that when we engage with the private sector, we are good stewards of the funds entrusted to us. We maintain our scientific integrity by participating in a gift review process that is rigorous and transparent. CDC’s gift acceptance policy requires a comprehensive gift review prior to accepting a gift. This includes CDC Foundation (CDCF) gifts and gifts given directly to CDC, whether they are monetary or non-monetary. On May 1, 2014, CDC implemented a unified process for reviewing and documenting possible conflicts of interest (COI) related to gifts provided to CDC via CDCF. In April 2015, CDC extended the process to include the review of all monetary gifts directly provided to CDC. In 2016, this process was strengthened and institutionalized in the most recent revision of the CDC’s gift policy. From 2017 to today, CDC has focused on refining its gift review processes to ensure that the acceptance of gifts continues to be legally and ethically sound.”

Are you kidding me? Do people really believe that many of these donors are not influencing the CDC?

 

Funding Received in Fiscal Year 2019.Congressional Appropriations-$7,339,025,000. CDC Foundation-$13,221,109; Direct Gifts-$12,670,712;

 

The list below represents a history of CDC Foundation corporate donors and partners. Notice the incredible number of pharmaceutical companies included within the list. How can the CDC and our government write there are no conflicts of interest taking place?
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • 360 thinc, ltd.
  • 3M
  • 3M Pharmaceuticals
  • AB Biodisk
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • AbbVie Inc.
  • Academic Press
  • Accenture
  • ACE Construction Group
  • Acme Cargo Express Singapore
  • ActionSprout
  • Adis International
  • Adobe
  • Advanstar Communications, Inc.
  • Advantage Healthcare, Inc.
  • Aetna, Inc.
  • Affimedix, Inc.
  • AFLAC
  • AG Communications, LLC
  • Agilent Technologies
  • AGL Networks LLC
  • AGL Resources, Inc.
  • AirTran Airways
  • AkzoNobel N.V.
  • Alaska Center for Pediatrics
  • Alere North America, Inc.
  • Allergan, Plc
  • AlphaGraphics
  • Alston + Bird, LLP
  • The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
  • American Petroleum Institute
  • Amgen Inc.
  • The Analytica Group
  • Analytic Services Inc.
  • Annar Diagnostica
  • Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
  • Anthem, Inc.
  • Apatel.com, Inc.
  • Appalachian Power
  • Applied BioCode, Inc.
  • Applied Biosystems
  • Arch Chemicals, Inc.
  • Ark Sciences, Inc.
  • Arrowsmith Consulting, LLC
  • Ascend Media
  • ASI Holdings Inc.
  • Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
  • Astra Merck, Inc.
  • AstraZeneca PLC
  • AT&T Corp.
  • AT&T Georgia
  • Atkinson & Associates, LLC
  • Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Company
  • The Atlanta Journal Constitution
  • Atlanta Magazine
  • Autodesk, Inc.
  • Aventis Pasteur
  • Aventis Pasteur Limited
  • Aventis Pharmaceuticals

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL LIST OF DONORS

 

How are healthcare consumers supposed to have confidence in the advice the CDC publishes about vaccines and other pharmaceutical products when the regulatory agency receives funding, either directly or indirectly, from a large consortium of pharmaceutical companies that manufacture products the CDC are writing policies on?

 

If Your Doctor Insists Vaccines Are Safe, Have Them Sign This Form

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

For many years I have listened to the ongoing public debate about the pros and cons associated with vaccines. On one side of the argument, traditional medicine claims that in order for human beings to be healthy they must receive a large number of synthetically prepared medicinal concoctions and that said medicines pose absolutely no threat whatsoever to the proper expression of human physiology.

On the other side of the fence, anti-vaccine groups have been coming out of the woodwork for years claiming that not only are vaccines useless in protecting people against various diseases, they also destroy the human immune system and cause the proliferation of diseases in future generations by passing on vaccine damaged genes to our children and their children.

During my professional career as a health care provider, I have read my fair share of research about vaccines. I made up my mind long ago not to receive these drugs in my own body. Very often I come across patients in my private chiropractic office that ask me for my opinion with regards to the alleged dangers tied to vaccines. I tell my patients that I am not a medical doctor and cannot advise them, professionally speaking, about taking drugs. I point them in a direction where they can read unbiased research and let them make their own decisions after becoming more educated about the facts.

Many of my patients often decide against vaccinating themselves and their children after reading published research because they arrive at a similar conclusion that the risks associated with the prescribed shots are far more dangerous than any possible benefits that might be derived from the products being injected into their bodies.

In many situations, medical doctors will not treat patients that have not received their vaccines. This is especially true in the case of pediatricians. Many pediatric practices have a standard policy that precludes the treatment of any children that are unvaccinated. This attitude and professional mandate by many medical practitioners often leaves patients and the parents of young patients in an uncomfortable situation.

My advice to any persons being placed in this very precarious situation, where a doctor is demanding that they must be vaccinated  before being accepted into their medical practice, is to get the medical physician in question to sign, THE PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY. If you can find a doctor that is stupid enough to sign this document, then I guess you have to decide whether or not to proceed with the prescribed vaccine schedule. But I seriously doubt if any medical physician would ever sign such a document. To date, no medical doctor has ever signed such a waiver.

Please read the document below:

THE PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY (By Ken Anderson)

I (Physician’s name, degree)_______________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State/Province of _________. My State/Provincial license number is ___________ , and my DEA number is ____________. My medical specialty is _______________

I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name) ______________ , age _____ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________

I am aware that vaccines may contain many of the following chemicals, excipients, preservatives and fillers:

* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
* arginine hydrochloride
* dog kidney, monkey kidney,
* dibasic potassium phosphate
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* gentamicin sulfate
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrocortisone
* hydrolized gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* monobasic potassium phosphate
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* nonylphenol ethoxylate
* octylphenol ethoxylate
* octoxynol 10
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium chloride
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sodium deoxycholate
* sorbitol
* thimerosal
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood

and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosal causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses”).

In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

STEPS TAKEN: _________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________

I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)

The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”

The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety”

The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”

Hepatitis B

I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.

I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
____________________________________
____________________________________ _____________________________________

In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
_________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
______________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: _____________Date: ______________________

************************************************************************************************

(Please let me know if you are successful in finding any medical doctor that is willing to sign this form.)