nofakenews
Clinton’s Presidential Campaign is Dying
By Truth Teller
In 75 days American voters will select the next President of The United States and it’s beginning to look like that choice will be the Republican nominee, Donald Trump and not Hillary Clinton.
There are news developments flying around both traditional and alternative news outlets everyday concerning Mrs. Clinton’s health, her apparent lack of stamina to handle the rigors of the campaign trail, her lack of visibility to the American public, her private email scandal, and her ties to the Clinton Foundation.
What I and many other citizens believe is currently happening to the Democratic nominee is that her campaign is dying.
Hillary Clinton has too many negative hurdles in front of her to win the election. Many people are beginning to finally see the writing on the wall and now understand that she is going to be unelectable this November.
The news has been really bad for Clinton. Whether it’s her involvement with the email scandal, her apparent shady dealings and ties to the Clinton Foundation or the questions about her health, she has had no choice but to run and hide from the press. She’s not been able to give a press conference in over 260 days or so. People are starting to look on the sides of milk cartons in search of the invisible Mrs. Clinton.
Even with the help of the bias mainstream media, that has covered for Clinton’s absence from the campaign circuit time and time again, it’s becoming increasingly obvious that this is a candidate that has for all intents and purposes lost a lot of credibility with a vast majority of Americans.
In all seriousness, whether we are talking about American citizens, foreigners, or foreign governments, many people associate the words dishonest and corrupt with Mrs. Clinton. This in part is due to all the information that has been uncovered by the FBI investigation and more recently the release of thousands of emails by WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange. And now Assange promises to release additional emails which many believe will be the final deathblow to the Democratic nominee.
Clinton’s image of being dishonest and corrupt was not born overnight. There is a long and suspicious trail of debris she has left behind, politically speaking, that many people feel uncomfortable about.
Only time will tell, but things are beginning to look very good for Donald Trump because people in the United States are just tired of the same old corrupt politicians that the Establishment continues to promote.
Media Bias Against Donald Trump Has Forever Destroyed its Credibility
By Dr. John L. Reizer
Founder of NoFakeNews
Regardless of who wins the 2016 presidential election, there has been irreparable damage to what remains of the U.S. mainstream media’s credibility. Media bias against Donald Trump has risen to a fever pitch and for the first time in the history of America, citizens have had an opportunity to see a total lack of impartiality with regards to the media’s handling of the presidential race.
The elite owned media, in the past, has always made an attempt to paint themselves as being fair and balanced when covering political campaigns. But the corporate media’s previous image of being fair and balanced, in the eyes of its viewers, has forever been replaced with another one; unscrupulous and dishonest.
The presence of Donald Trump in the current presidential race has caused the powers that be to resort to incredibly drastic measures. Whatever the elitists can’t control they are always forced to discredit (Donald Trump). And whatever they can control, they must promote (Hillary Clinton). In past major elections, the powers that be have always controlled all the candidates running for office in both major political parties. That is certainly not the case this time around.
A recent article in the mainstream publication, New York Post discusses the damage that has been done to America’s traditional media giants. Click here to read more!
Donald Trump Leads Hillary Clinton in Latest L.A. Times Presidential Poll
Gina Flores
Editor at NoFakeNews
Republican Nominee for President of the United States, Donald Trump has edged ahead of Democratic Nominee, Hillary Clinton according to the latest USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times Daybreak poll that was conducted for Saturday, August 20, 2016. Saturday’s poll results have Trump at 44.2% and Clinton at 43.6%.
The L.A. based poll gets its data from 3,000 eligible voters. Read more here.
Is Clinton Ahead in the Real Polls?
By Truth Teller
Ladies and gentlemen of the United States, is it possible we are being lied to by the mainstream media? If you believe the various national polls that suggest Hillary Clinton is 10 points ahead of Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential race, I have some swamp land to sell you in the Florida Everglades.
Let me tell you a little secret about the current presidential polls being conducted by national media companies; they’re all being purposely manipulated to fraudulently show Hillary Clinton is leading Donald Trump. Many of the current polls showing Clinton in front of Trump have been conducted using a voter sample size consisting of a thousand people or less. That in itself demonstrates the poll results are pretty unreliable. Add into the equation that the thousand or less being polled are strategically weighted with pro Hillary supporters and you can begin to understand how the fix is in against the Republican candidate, Donald Trump.
If you think the presidential polls are on the up and up, just take a look at how unfairly the media has conducted its business when covering the Democratic and Republican candidates. There is a very obvious bias in favor of Hillary Clinton. The media’s treatment of Trump often appears mind-boggling, to say the least, to the average American viewer. He has and continues to be the focus of coordinated media attacks that have little or nothing to do with the real important issues facing America.
Are you still not convinced the polls are rigged? All you have to do is look at the popularity of the two candidates based on social media. These studies have been compiled using a much broader sample size of American voters and their results tell a drastically different story than the polls being showcased on the evening news programs.
Trusting the veracity of the presidential polls being produced by the mainstream media is tantamount to trusting the same media to ask fair and tough questions of Hillary Clinton. It’s just not going to happen. Clinton’s shady record as Secretary of State along with her involvement with the Clinton Foundation scandal continue to be left untouched by professional journalists throughout the country. There certainly appears to be no journalistic integrity whatsoever coming from mainstream media writers, editors, or broadcasters.
Still not convinced? Let’s examine for just a moment the situation as it stands right now. Donald Trump is without a doubt a very polarizing public figure. Many people love and hate this candidate and many in the Establishment are terrified of what he might bring to the table as commander in chief.
The Establishment’s biggest fear is not predicated on the belief that Trump will be unable to manage America’s business properly. Their fear is that Trump will manage the country’s business properly and in a way that would eliminate much of the corruption that has been taking place by Democrats and Republicans alike for so many years.
The Establishment Democrats and Republicans hate Donald Trump. President Obama hates Donald Trump, the mainstream media hates Donald Trump, Radical Islam hates Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton hates Donald Trump, Illegal aliens hate Donald Trump, Mexico hates Donald Trump, China hates Donald Trump, the United Nations hates Donald Trump, and the elite owned banking cartel hates Donald Trump. There are many others I could place on the list but I think you get the idea. Who do you think has tremendous influence over the national presidential polls we constantly see on mainstream news productions each day? The answer is the Establishment that owns and operates the mainstream media companies worldwide.
If the polls were truly an accurate depiction of how the November election will turnout, the constant barrage of mainstream media attacks against Trump currently taking place would not be occurring. It is quite a risky proposition for the mainstream press to continue to carry out their assault on Trump because it ultimately undermines their overall credibility as a fair and balanced platform that Americans can use to make assessments concerning political candidates. Americans are not blind and they can see what’s happening with regards to the media’s unfair handling of Trump as a presidential candidate. Something is going to have to change in the near future when it comes to how the media handles Trump because the Republican candidate, contrary to what’s currently being reported, is going to be elected POTUS in November.
It’s going to be a very interesting election in November and I think a lot of people are going to be genuinely surprised when the final results are tabulated.
Are Americans Ever Going To Wake Up?
Is Hillary Clinton Healthy Enough To Be President?
Vladimir Putin: If It’s Hillary Clinton It’s War!
EU’s Smallest Nation Is Its First To Completely Ban Monsanto’s Toxic Glyphosate
Alex Pietrowski, Staff Writer
Waking Times
The European Union’s smallest member country, Malta, has officially begun the process of completely banning Monsanto’s toxic glyphosate from the 122 square mile island nation in the Mediterranean Sea. Labeled a ‘probable carcinogenic’ by the World Health Organization, controversy over the use of glyphosate, a primary ingredient in the popular gardening product RoundUp, is a globally contentious issue, yet very few nation states have sided with precautionary reasoning when considering the continued use of this toxic herbicide and crop desiccant.
Usage of glyphosate is soaring worldwide, even in the face of vast expert and personal testimony that confers upon the risks to public health of its usage in industrial agriculture and in small-scale farms and gardens. In addition to being suspected of causing cancer under certain conditions, glyphosate has been linked to many other serious and chronic health problems, such as autoimmune disorders, liver poisoning, autism, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, inflammatory bowel disease and other chronic illnesses.
Furthermore glyphosate is severely disruptive to the gut microbiome of the human body, which is now being understood as a ‘second brain,’ responsible in major ways for regulating mood, the emotional body, our immune system, and influencing mental health conditions like depression.
“Glyphosate is such an effective killer because it gets into plants and prevents them from taking up their normal nutrients – thus starving them to death. Glyphosate depletes micronutrients(such as calcium, zinc, magnesium, sulfur and cobalt, just to name a few) which are essential for health in plant and animal organisms. Specifically, glyphosate interferes with the shikimate pathway, a metabolic function in plants which allows them to create essential amino acids or proteins. Without this pathway functioning properly, the plant cannot survive.
Although animals and humans don’t have a shikimate pathway, here comes the glyphosate problem: the bacteria in our gut (microbiome or microbiota) do have this pathway, and we are reliant upon this microbiome in our gut for our health, immunity and our “second brain”. When we allow glyphosate to infiltrate our system, it destroys our gut and subsequently our immune system.” [Source]
Additionally, it is widely known that misuse, abuse and overuse of agrichemicals such as glyphosate is a common international problem, as is highlighted in the case of Argentina, where agrochemicals are causing widespread and terrifying health problems for citizens, especially those living close to farms and agricultural facilities in rural areas.
With such an overwhelming body of evidence linking so many health issues to this chemical, it would stand to reason that governments around the world should err on the side of caution, which is a point also made by Malta’s environment minister.
“Environment Minister José Herrera has said that Malta’s opposition to glyphosate is based on the precautionary principle, which states that potentially hazardous protects should not be used unless they can be proven safe.” [Source]
READ: The Complete History of Monsanto, The World’s Most Evil Corporation
France may be next in considering an outright national ban on glyphosate, indicating that we may be on the brink of triggering a global domino effect, hopefully allowing consumer and public concern to be recognized above the interests of multi-national corporations. If the political will to ban the risky chemical can be mustered by one nation, it can be mustered by any nation.
“The decision shows courage from government’s side as it chose to listen to the concerns of experts and individuals who have demanded that our fields, streets and gardens would be free from this risky weed killer.” [Source]
For a comprehensive look at the risks involved with the use of glyphosate, please visit our database on this critical public health issue, here. Watch this telling interview with a Monsanto lobbyist who makes the claim that glyphosate is safe to drink, but refuses to do so when offered the chance, saying, “I am not an idiot.”
Read more articles by Alex Pietrowski.
About the Author
Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.
This article (EU’s Smallest Nation is it’s First to Completely Ban Monsanto’s Toxic Glyphosate) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.
