Forget Hillary – The Establishment Switches Gears To Save The Media’s Reputation

On Friday, October 28, 2016 the FBI tossed a bombshell on the US Presidential election by announcing, out of left field, that it was officially reopening its criminal investigation of Democratic nominee for president, Hillary Clinton.

According to the Director of the FBI, James Comey, additional emails have surfaced and were brought to the attention of federal agents. Comey explained that a collective decision was then made by the bureau to reopen the investigation. All of this news was made available with only 11 days remaining before American voters will choose their next president.

In a letter from Comey that was addressed to Congress, the bureau’s director officially reopened the case on Friday afternoon leaving millions of Americans uncertain about what effects the investigation will have on the upcoming election on November 8. 

While most news media outlets were focused on the FBI’s criminal investigation of Clinton, Donald Trump took the opportunity on Friday to continue campaigning. Trump addressed cheering supporters in New Hampshire and discussed the reopening of the criminal investigation publicly.

Undoubtedly, most people probably see the FBI’s reopening of the case against Clinton as a chance to right a previous wrong, I believe there is something far more sinister in play. Some readers may think I am slightly misaligned from reality, but I am quite confident there is a much different reason the investigation was reopened with only 11 days to go in the presidential race.

Most Americans still rely on the mainstream news companies to make sense out of the world they live in. While it is true that overall trust in the corporate media by US citizens is presently declining nationwide, it has to be understood that the large majority of people in the country still, by reflexive habit, form their perception of reality by tuning into the corporately controlled press.

The powers that be (Establishment/Illuminati) also rely heavily upon the mainstream media to help influence and shape the perceptions of the masses with regards to a wide variety of subjects on any given day. The mind control campaigns carried out by media companies are not limited to the 2016 presidential election. The corporate owned media is a major tool and an important asset of those powerful groups that really control the US as well as other provinces worldwide. Having Hillary Clinton elected president is important to the Illuminati but not so important that they would ever want to risk losing the trust of Americans as it applies to the mainstream media. These companies ultimately help the Establishment create and maintain a false picture of reality for the sheople population.

Here’s the deal folks. We’re 11 days out from the only poll that matters and mainstream media companies have been publishing national polls for many months showing Donald Trump will lose the election in a landslide decision. My point of contention is that these polls are most likely not close to being accurate. Based on the size of crowds at Trump and Clinton rallies, and the apparent criminal background of the Democratic nominee, anyone with two functioning brain cells could figure out that Donald Trump is probably in front of Clinton at this stage of the game. If there is a landslide victory in the November 8 contest, it’s probably not going to be for Clinton. I think the powers that be realize there is a very little chance for Clinton to win the election. They ultimately want to save the credibility of their precious media companies, and they need to accomplish this goal fast (11 days).

The Establishment needed a very plausible reason for Clinton to take a nose dive in the fake polls and a very plausible reason for her to lose the election. By instructing the FBI to reopen the criminal investigation with only 11 days to go, they have created the ideal scenario, and a more than believable reason for Clinton’s fabricated lead in the mainstream media polls to suddenly tank.

This plan is ingenious because it saves the media propaganda machine from losing complete credibility in the eyes of average Americans. After Donald Trump wins the presidency, the Clinton investigation can be dropped once again. The Establishment can then marginalize a Trump presidency for the next four years in other ways. Think Congress!

Stay tuned for more updates!

Clinton’s Presidential Campaign is Dying

By Truth Teller

In 75 days American voters will select the next President of The United States and it’s beginning to look like that choice will be the Republican nominee, Donald Trump and not Hillary Clinton.

There are news developments flying around both traditional and alternative news outlets everyday concerning Mrs. Clinton’s health, her apparent lack of stamina to handle the rigors of the campaign trail, her lack of visibility to the American public, her private email scandal, and her ties to the Clinton Foundation.

What I and many other citizens believe is currently happening to the Democratic nominee is that her campaign is dying.

Hillary Clinton has too many negative hurdles in front of her to win the election. Many people are beginning to finally see the writing on the wall and now understand that she is going to be unelectable this November.

The news has been really bad for Clinton. Whether it’s her involvement with the email scandal, her apparent shady dealings and ties to the Clinton Foundation or the questions about her health, she has had no choice but to run and hide from the press. She’s not been able to give a press conference in over 260 days or so. People are starting to look on the sides of milk cartons in search of the invisible Mrs. Clinton.

Even with the help of the bias mainstream media, that has covered for Clinton’s  absence from the campaign circuit time and time again, it’s becoming increasingly obvious that this is a candidate that has for all intents and purposes lost a lot of credibility with a vast majority of Americans.

In all seriousness, whether we are talking about American citizens, foreigners, or foreign governments, many people associate the words dishonest and corrupt with Mrs. Clinton. This in part is due to all the information that has been uncovered by the FBI investigation and more recently the release of thousands of emails by WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange. And now Assange promises to release additional emails which many believe will be the final deathblow to the Democratic nominee.

Clinton’s image of being dishonest and corrupt was not born overnight. There is a long and suspicious trail of debris she  has left behind, politically speaking, that many people feel uncomfortable about.

Only time will tell, but things are beginning to look very good for Donald Trump because people in the United States are just tired of the same old corrupt politicians that the Establishment continues to promote.

 

Does Hillary Clinton Have Dementia?

By Gina Flores

Chief Editor at NoFakeNews

An interesting article recently published at Daily Mail.com exposes how Hillary Clinton may be suffering from some form of dementia related illness. An email released under a FOIA ruling to Judicial Watch is how the information came about. Click here to read the article!

There have been a few rumors in the past concerning Mrs. Clinton’s health and mental status. An interview that was conducted and captured on camera has many people claiming that the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States had a seizure and quickly tried to cover it up. See video below:

Do you think Hillary Clinton is fit to be the next President of The United States? Do you think she will defeat Donald Trump this coming November?

Cast your vote right now for the next President in our NoFakeNews presidential poll:

Were Dallas Shootings Used to Distract Attention Away From Hillary?

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

Right after James Comey made his stunning announcement that the FBI was not recommending criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton, I told a close friend that I would not be surprised to see a false flag event take place somewhere in America in order to draw attention away from the scandal. And then the Dallas shootings occurred and innocent people were murdered.

The thing about false flag events is that they are usually so horrific that most people never think to question the veracity of the reported information. There’s usually so much confusion taking place and data that comes in from the mainstream media does so in bits and pieces. In many instances the details of the event change over the first few hours until the final version of the story (officialdom) is firmly cemented in place. This was the case in Dallas as initial reports made mention of multiple shooters being present at the scene. That information was later changed to convey the idea that a lone shooter was to blame for all the mayhem.

The goal of any false flag event is to draw public attention toward or away from something. And in the case of Dallas, it’s not really much of a stretch for a conspiracy minded person to understand how a horrible murder scene could be used by very powerful control groups to distract public attention away from Hillary Clinton’s enormous email problems.

There are very powerful groups at work protecting Mrs. Clinton. Individuals that can be controlled by the powers that be are usually placed in the highest positions no matter how crooked they are. And those individuals that cannot be controlled will be discredited and made to look incompetent no matter how proficient they might be in handling a particular job.

A few things that immediately caught my attention about the Dallas shooter was that he was initially reported to be working with other shooters; he had a military background, and he was killed by the authorities so that the public would never be permitted to learn the truth about his real motives. All three of those facts point to an MK-ULTRA mind controlled robot. A real life Jason Bourne character that could be dialed up or placed at a particular crime scene might be responsible for the Dallas attack. I don’t know for certain, but perhaps professional shooters might have been used to do the dirty work and an innocent patsy, already murdered, might have been placed at the scene of the crime. Maybe this patsy was picked by the powers that be to be the perfect scapegoat because of his social media contacts and his strong public feelings about certain issues.  It’s hard to say for sure, but it looks damn suspicious to me.

Most people will never connect the dots with regards to this incident and Hillary Clinton’s email scandal. They trust the media, the government and everything else that is fed to them by our trusted sources. But regardless of whether Dallas was a false flag event or not, it certainly accomplished the job of flushing Hillary out of the news.

What do you think about this subject?

FBI: No Criminal Charges For Hillary

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

I learned earlier today that the FBI will not recommend criminal charges be filed against former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton for her involvement in releasing classified, government information through her private email servers.

Although the FBI’s investigation uncovered numerous classified emails (110 of them to be exact) that had their security status compromised by Mrs. Clinton, the agency decided not to recommend that the Department of Justice pursue criminal charges against the former Secretary of State.

FBI Director, James Comey prefaced his opening remarks by stating that the American people deserved to have complete transparency with regards to the investigative process that had been undertaken by his agency. The director then went on to state that his decision to speak to the American public on Tuesday morning was independent of political happenings taking place and that the entire investigative process had been conducted in a professional manner and politics never had anything to do with the agency’s final decision.

download

While Mr. Comey was speaking on national television, Mrs. Clinton and President Barack Obama were boarding Air Force One, on their way to Charlotte, NC for a set of campaign speeches scheduled later in the day. It’s very hard to imagine how uncomfortable that plane ride would have been if the FBI would have recommended criminal charges be filed against the presumptive democratic nominee.

I believe that Mr. Comey’s remarks and the timing of his announcement were purposely coordinated with the President and Mrs. Clinton’s travel itinerary to Charlotte. (This is such a sad day for America and its rigged justice system.)

Director Comey stated in the FBI’s report that Clinton was “extremely careless” in her handling of the emails. He went on to explain that the reason the FBI was not recommending filing charges against Senator Clinton was primarily because there was no precedent in charging a person in this kind of case. Basically speaking, the FBI had never come across a similar case that they could examine where a person had been charged for similar actions.

Comey further stated that, “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.” In addition, the Director stated, “This investigation was done honestly, competently and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear. Opinions are irrelevant. … We did our investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way.”

So there you have it, America. The decision that many of us had been waiting on for so long was delivered right in time to spare the President of the United States any embarrassment that might have existed from traveling and campaigning for Mrs. Clinton. The entire charade reeks of corruption and has the telltale signs of being totally scripted.

Although the FBI’s final report did not recommend criminal charges be filed against Mrs. Clinton, it surely suggested she was less than competent in her previous position and would have been fired by the president if she was still acting Secretary of State. This is the same president that is endorsing her for the highest position in the United States Government. (You just can’t make this stuff up!) 

What do you think about this story?