By Gina Flores
One of the many wonderful things I admire about our unique forum and its contributors is that we continue to write what we believe to be the truth no matter where the truth might happen to take us. Sometimes the facts of a situation are hard to swallow because they go against what society has been disingenuously led to believe. I feel that this is certainly the case with regards to the situation that took place in Syria on April 4, 2017.
This past week Americans were told by the fake media outlets and its government that the Syrian government poisoned its own people with a lethal nerve agent. This horrific act was quickly condemned by the Trump administration. President Trump followed his condemnation of the Syrian government’s act by launching 59 Tomahawk missiles at the Syrian military base where the lethal nerve gas was purported to have originated from.
This military action infuriated the Russian government and Russian president, Vladimir Putin. The Russian foreign ministry released the following statement:
“The United States conducted strikes against Syrian government troops in the early hours of April 7, using chemical weapons attacks in Idlib Province as a pretext.
“The US opted for a show of force, for military action against a country fighting international terrorism without taking the trouble to get the facts straight.
“It is not the first time that the US chooses an irresponsible approach that aggravates problems the world is facing, and threatens international security. The very presence of military personnel from the US and other countries in Syria without consent from the Syrian government or a UN Security Council mandate is an egregious and obvious violation of international law that cannot be justified. While previous initiatives of this kind were presented as efforts to combat terrorism, now they are clearly an act of aggression against a sovereign Syria. Actions undertaken by the US today inflict further damage to the Russia-US relations.
“Russia has expressed on numerous occasions that it was ready to cooperate on resolving the most urgent issues the world is facing today, and that fighting international terrorism was a top priority. However, we will never agree to unsanctioned action against the legitimate Syrian government that has been waging an uncompromising war on international terrorism for a long time.
“Seeking to justify military action Washington has totally distorted what had happened in Idlib. The US could not have failed to grasp the fact that the Syrian government troops did not use chemical weapons there. Damascus simply does not have them, as confirmed a number of times by qualified experts. This was the conclusion reached by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). Over the recent years this organisation inspected almost all the facilities linked or possibly linked to Syria’s chemical weapons programme. As for Idlib, the terrorists operating there used to produce toxic land mines intended for use in Syria and Iraq. These manufacturing facilities were put out of operation in a military operation carried out by the Syrian air force.
“The US pretends that it does not understand obvious things, turning a blind eye to the use of chemical weapons in Iraq, officially confirmed by Baghdad. The US refuses to believe the evidence provided by certified documents confirming the use of chemical weapons by terrorists in Aleppo. In doing so, the US is abetting international terrorism and making it stronger. New WMD attacks can be expected.
“There is no doubt that the military action by the US is an attempt to divert attention from the situation in Mosul, where the campaign carried out among others by US-led coalition has resulted in hundreds of civilian casualties and an escalating humanitarian disaster.
“It is obvious that the cruise missile attack was prepared in advance. Any expert understands that Washington’s decision on air strikes predates the Idlib events, which simply served as a pretext for a show of force.
“Russia suspends the Memorandum of Understanding on Prevention of Flight Safety Incidents in the course of operations in Syria signed with the US.
“We call on the UN Security Council to hold an emergency meeting to discuss the latest developments.”
According to the official story that’s been released and continuously parroted by the mainstream media, President Bashar al-Assad of Syria used Sarin gas, a lethal nerve agent, on his own people. Videos were then released by the mainstream media showing civilians and children choking and vomiting from the effects of the poison. An emotional President Trump reacted swiftly by ordering a military action against the Syrian government. Almost immediately the Trump administration received praise from the media whores that have routinely attacked him prior to this point in time. It’s pretty damn ironic that it took an outright act of war to get the mainstream media to offer their support for the new American president.
Just one week earlier, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson commented, “The longer-term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people.” In other words, the Trump administration was taking the new position that any regime change in Syria concerning the Assad government would not be decided by the United States. This was a drastic change in US foreign policy and one that the “Deep State” probably didn’t like very much.
It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever that President Assad would decide to gas his own people and focus such negative attention onto his own regime. This is especially true considering that he was extremely close to defeating ISIS and had finally gotten the US off his back.
Enter the false flag operation; a Problem – Reaction – Solution campaign designed by the Deep State to incite the wrath of the western world concerning Assad and Syria. This operation is just what the Deep State needed in order to get Trump and the United States back on track to carry out plans for a regime change in Syria.
A regime change in Syria has been the ultimate goal of the Deep State for many years and it really didn’t matter whether Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump was elected to the the US Presidency. The plan has never changed from its inception. It’s unbending and not up for debate. What the Illuminati wants, it gets. This has become even more apparent than ever before now that this latest false flag event has taken place and the US military responded by attacking Syria with 59 missiles.
Here are some important questions Americans should be asking: Was President Trump duped into committing a military action by the Deep State? Is President Trump part of the Deep State, disingenuously portraying himself as an outsider? Have we all been duped by the Deep State/Illuminati masters once again? Was Hillary Clinton a Tsunami storm and Donald Trump a mushroom cloud in the making? We will probably never know the answers to such questions. What I do know is that once again the American public is being played like a violin and there might be some very dire consequences in our immediate future.
Are these people in the Deep State completely insane? Do they actually want a global nuclear war between the United States and Russia? Unfortunately, I think this has been their plan for the longest time.
What do you think about this subject?