This Is One of the Most Egregious Crimes Ever Committed Against Children

By Dr. John L Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

Every year there are children being irreparably harmed from vaccine injuries. The cases very rarely, if ever, make it into the mainstream news. Vaccine injuries reported to medical physicians are usually not recorded as such and get lost in an intentionally manufactured abyss, from a statistical perspective. Make no mistake about this subject matter, there is a concerted effort by medicine and Big Pharma to keep a lid on the biggest secret within the medical profession; vaccines are the lifeblood of medicine and the etiological cause of autoimmune disorders as well as many physiological expressions of cancer.

This is, without a doubt, one of the most egregious crimes ever committed against children. But that is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to examining this huge conspiracy. As painful as it might be for people to learn the truth, that the pharmaceutical industry has been and continues to be involved in the mother of all cover-ups that systematically harms children throughout the world, it is something that must be exposed and done so on a broad scale platform.

As the vaccine injury conspiracy is examined in more detail in the months and years to come, the public will learn that the cover-up goes far beyond the parameters of the pharmaceutical industry. There is much more involved here than greed and the quest for profits from huge corporations. Don’t get me wrong, there is money and profits driving this monster, but those elements are only the modalities being employed to help accomplish the agenda.

If this cover-up was only about drug companies and their pursuit of money, the CDC and other government agencies in the United States and other countries would have discovered the abuse and put an end to it long ago. But this is not the case. In fact, when the light of day has been allowed to shine on this issue, it’s been quite clear that the CDC and other agencies have helped the pharmaceutical companies in maintaining the conspiracy. In a nutshell, they’re all in bed together. The very same agencies that have been created to protect and serve the interests of the public are actively conspiring with drug companies against innocent healthcare consumers.

The newly released documentary, “VAXXED” shows just how deep the rabbit hole goes with regards to the CDC and its involvement in the cover-up to keep people uninformed about the link between vaccines and diseases like Autism, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, autoimmune problems and many forms of cancer.

Take a few minutes to watch an interview with the film’s producer that discuses why Big Pharma and others don’t want people watching “VAXXED” or anything else that takes a serious look at the truth about vaccines and the irreparable injuries they cause children and adults.

Robert De Niro Challenges Media to Research CDC Vaccine Whistleblower

cdc-cover-up-1024x569-1-1024x569By Derrick Broze

In an interview on the Today show, Robert De Niro, actor and co-founder of the Tribeca Film Festival, said he regrets pulling the documentary VAXXED from the festival.

Actor Robert De Niro has recently at the center of a storm regarding the decision to remove the documentary film VAXXED: From Controversy to Catastrophe from the Tribeca Film Festival in New York. Following the Tribeca cancellation, the film was also removed by officials with the Houston International Film Festival after being contacted by officials within the Mayor’s Office.

Robert De Niro had originally been very supportive of the film before ultimately deciding to pull it from the festival, stating, “after reviewing it over the past few days with the Tribeca Film Festival team and others from the scientific community, we do not believe it contributes to or furthers the discussion I had hoped for.” De Niro also stated that there were “concerns with certain things in this film” that prevented the film from being played at the festival.

The film follows the story of a Center for Disease Control and Prevention research scientist, Dr. William Thompson. In August 2014, Thompson claimed that researchers involved in a study on the MMR vaccine “fudged numbers” to lower the number of black children who were adversely affected. Thompson is a senior scientist at the CDC and has been with the agency since 1998. On August 27, 2014 Dr. Thompson released a statement acknowledging that he and co-authors from a 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics did in fact omit important information from a study on the link between vaccines and autism.

During the Today interview De Niro seemed to reverse his previous statements and spoke openly about his questions regarding the safety of vaccinations.“I think the movie is something people should see,” De Niro said. “There is a lot of information about things that are happening with the CDC, the pharmaceutical companies. There are a lot of things that are not said. As a parent of a child who has autism I want to know the truth.”


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ7iPn39i08

De Niro also discussed the media blackout regarding the CDC whistleblower. “Everybody doesn’t seem to want to hear much about it. And you guys are the ones who should do the investigation,” De Niro challenged. Regarding another film about autism that is showing at Tribeca, De Niro said “it’s not questioning how some people got autism, how the vaccines are dangerous for certain people who are more susceptible. Nobody seems to want to address that, or they say it’s a closed issue but it doesn’t seem to be. There is more to this than meets the eye, believe me.”

When asked if he believes that science has shown there is no link between vaccines and autism, De Niro replied, “I believe it’s much more complicated than that. There is a link and they are saying there isn’t. The obvious one is thimerosal, a mercury based preservative. Let’s just find out the truth.” De Niro also questioned statistics that claim that parents who do not vaccinate their children will lead to a higher incidence of measles and other illnesses.

Despite the often repeated claim that VAXXED is anti-vaccination, Philippe Diaz, head of Cinema Libre, the distributor of VAXXED, says the film is not anti-vaccine but rather pro-safe vaccines. “It is not an anti-vaccination movie, people are judging the movie without seeing it first. Even Robert De Niro said the film was not anti-vaccination,” Diaz said. Indeed, De Niro has stressed that he is also not anti-vaccine and only interested in the truth. “There is something there, there is something there that people are not addressing. All I want is for people to see the film and people can make up their own judgement.”

Another interesting facet of the Today interview was a claim by Tribeca co-founder Jane Rosenthal that the sponsors of the film festival did not complain, but rather the filmmakers were upset. Despite Rosenthal’s comments, Diaz told AP that the sponsors were responsible for pressuring Tribeca to remove VAXXED.

“That’s exactly what happened. The Directors of Tribeca confirmed it to us,” Diaz said. “They had problems with sponsors. I think it created a horrible precedent, if you do not like what is in a movie, no matter the quality of the film you can pull it from a festival.”

Although VAXXED has brought Dr. William Thompson’s story to the mainstream, he originally did not want to go public with his information until it was revealed that conversations he had with Dr. Brian Hooker had been recorded. Dr. Thompson handed over thousands of pages of documents to Congressman Bill Posey’s office for review. Posey serves on the Committee on Science, Space and Technology. There was very little chatter about the CDC whistleblower for quite some time until July 29th, 2015, when Congressman Bill Posey took to the floor of the House to discuss Dr. William Thompson and his documents. The debut of VAXXED has only increased the attention on Thompson’s claims.

Another controversial aspect of the Vaccine debate is the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which eliminated any liability for pharmaceutical manufacturers, stating, “the number of recommended childhood vaccines has more than tripled and we have seen a decline in the health and vitality of our children with among the worst infant mortality rate in the developed world.”

Although pharmaceutical manufactures cannot be held liable for problems associated with vaccinations, the U.S. government does have a fund for victims of vaccines known as the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Funds awarded through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program are first processed through a special vaccine court. In December 2014, Ben Swann examined a report by the Associated Press which revealed that thousands of families with claims with the vaccine court are left to wait for years, sometimes decades before receiving help.

The AP studied hundreds of court decisions, performed more than 100 interviews, and studied a database containing more than 14,500 cases. The database was last updated in January 2013 with the government refusing to release any new updates. Officially known as the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the so-called vaccine court is a little-known system that is intended to address claims of Americans who believe their children have been harmed by vaccinations. The court is an established part of the federal judiciary system however the authorities over the cases are not called judges but rather “special masters.”

The AP investigation found several issues with the court. These include tens of millions of taxpayer dollars that has been paid to private attorneys who often practice “churning,” a practice described as filing a large number of claims regardless of the quality of the claims. In the private court attorneys are paid out whether or not they succeed in convincing the court. That fact has led to questionable billing practices and an increase in court claims.

The AP report also found that “expert” witnesses for the families and the government often have a lack of credibility or conflicts of interest. The report says that some of the experts are also involved in setting up nonprofits that question vaccine safety. Meanwhile, doctors hired by the government to testify in defense of vaccines have ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

For more details on this court please watch Ben Swann’s report on the Vaccine Court and Autism.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfqpZqEP6gg

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for ActivistPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter.

Derrick is available for interviews.

This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

A Crime Against Humanity – Organ Harvesting in China

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

There are plenty of terrible things presently happening in the world. If you are a regular visitor to this website, you already know that very bad people rule the world from the top down and that they have control over the corporations that continuously disseminate information to the masses which is referred to as news.

Since creating NoFakeNews four years ago, I have written about some truly disgusting events that have taken place or are currently taking place throughout the world. Many of these happenings are concealed from the public or made to look far less horrific than they actually are. As I have written on more than one occasion, those who control people’s perception of reality, for all intents and purposes, control the world. The most dangerous weapons of mass destruction are not bombs, bullets, and guns. The most dangerous weapons in the world are televisions, radios, and other devices that can broadcast the propaganda that is created and delivered to us by the powers that be.

In many instances, the powers that be can also keep people uninformed by hiding important information that affects all of us. Whether it is disinformation, misinformation, or the suppression of important data, the mainstream news controls our understanding of the world and our place in it.

I just returned with my family from a trip to Washington, DC and had an opportunity to meet a remarkable woman from China. She told my wife and I about the awful practice of Organ Harvesting that is currently taking place in her country. According to this woman, Organ Harvesting in China targets many prisoners of conscience, who are law abiding citizens that have been imprisoned for their beliefs. The woman also told me that the Chinese government agencies, civilian and military hospitals form a value chain and are the primary culprits in this lucrative scheme. The woman we met, a former practicing nurse in China, had been unfairly imprisoned for a number of years because she had the guts to speak out against this practice.

Innocent people from America and other countries have become unknowing accomplices to this crime against humanity. Patients, who were promised fresh organs in a few days or weeks, have flown to China for transplants. Hospitals and medical schools train Chinese surgeons who go back to China and harvest organs. Pharmaceutical companies perform clinical trials that also support this insane and corrupt practice.

In 2006, an independent investigation was conducted by former Canadian Secretary of State, David Kilgour and human rights lawyer, David Matas. Their report released in July, 2006 and later published in a book titled, “Bloody Harvest” states: “We have come to the regrettable conclusion that the allegations are true. We believe that there has been and continues today to be large scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners.”

If you would like to help stop Organ Harvesting in China, visit the website www.StopOrganHarvesting.org and sign the petition to support H.Res.343. In addition, please share this post and the information in it on your social media page.

It’s time to call on the Chinese Communist Party to end Organ Harvesting from all prisoners of conscience and to allow independent investigations into organ procurement abuses to commence.

Thanks for your help and for your concern!

Dr. John

Easter: The Resurrection of Spring

By D.M. Murdock/Acharya S

Author and Religious Scholar

Although it is believed to represent the time of Jesus Christ’s resurrection, the festival of Easter existed in pre-Christian times and, according to the famous Christian saint Venerable Bede (672-735 AD/CE), was named for the Teutonic or German goddess Eôstre, who was the “goddess of dawn” and who symbolized the fertility found abundantly during the springtime of the year. (See CE, V, 224; Weekley, 491)  Regarding the ancient fertility goddess, in How the Easter Story Grew from Gospel to Gospel, Dr. Rolland E. Wolfe, a professor of Biblical Literature at Case Western Reserve University, relates:

“In the polytheistic pantheons of antiquity there usually was a king or chief of the gods, and also a female counterpart who was regarded as his wife. This mother goddess was one of the most important deities in the ancient Near East. She was called by the various names of Ishtar, Athtar [sic], Astarte, Ashtoreth, Antit, and Anat. This mother goddess always was associated with human fertility. In the course of time Mary was to become identified with this ancient mother goddess, or perhaps it should be said that Mary was about to supplant her in certain Christian circles.” (Wolfe, 234)

READ MORE HERE AND LISTEN TO D.M. MURDOCK/ ACHARYA  S  ON RADIO

If Your Doctor Insists Vaccines Are Safe, Have Them Sign This Form

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

For many years I have listened to the ongoing public debate about the pros and cons associated with vaccines. On one side of the argument, traditional medicine claims that in order for human beings to be healthy they must receive a large number of synthetically prepared medicinal concoctions and that said medicines pose absolutely no threat whatsoever to the proper expression of human physiology.

On the other side of the fence, anti-vaccine groups have been coming out of the woodwork for years claiming that not only are vaccines useless in protecting people against various diseases, they also destroy the human immune system and cause the proliferation of diseases in future generations by passing on vaccine damaged genes to our children and their children.

During my professional career as a health care provider, I have read my fair share of research about vaccines. I made up my mind long ago not to receive these drugs in my own body. Very often I come across patients in my private chiropractic office that ask me for my opinion with regards to the alleged dangers tied to vaccines. I tell my patients that I am not a medical doctor and cannot advise them, professionally speaking, about taking drugs. I point them in a direction where they can read unbiased research and let them make their own decisions after becoming more educated about the facts.

Many of my patients often decide against vaccinating themselves and their children after reading published research because they arrive at a similar conclusion that the risks associated with the prescribed shots are far more dangerous than any possible benefits that might be derived from the products being injected into their bodies.

In many situations, medical doctors will not treat patients that have not received their vaccines. This is especially true in the case of pediatricians. Many pediatric practices have a standard policy that precludes the treatment of any children that are unvaccinated. This attitude and professional mandate by many medical practitioners often leaves patients and the parents of young patients in an uncomfortable situation.

My advice to any persons being placed in this very precarious situation, where a doctor is demanding that they must be vaccinated  before being accepted into their medical practice, is to get the medical physician in question to sign, THE PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY. If you can find a doctor that is stupid enough to sign this document, then I guess you have to decide whether or not to proceed with the prescribed vaccine schedule. But I seriously doubt if any medical physician would ever sign such a document. To date, no medical doctor has ever signed such a waiver.

Please read the document below:

THE PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY (By Ken Anderson)

I (Physician’s name, degree)_______________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State/Province of _________. My State/Provincial license number is ___________ , and my DEA number is ____________. My medical specialty is _______________

I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name) ______________ , age _____ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________

I am aware that vaccines may contain many of the following chemicals, excipients, preservatives and fillers:

* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
* arginine hydrochloride
* dog kidney, monkey kidney,
* dibasic potassium phosphate
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* gentamicin sulfate
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrocortisone
* hydrolized gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* monobasic potassium phosphate
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* nonylphenol ethoxylate
* octylphenol ethoxylate
* octoxynol 10
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium chloride
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sodium deoxycholate
* sorbitol
* thimerosal
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood

and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosal causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses”).

In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

STEPS TAKEN: _________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________

I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)

The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”

The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety”

The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”

Hepatitis B

I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.

I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
____________________________________
____________________________________ _____________________________________

In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
_________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
______________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: _____________Date: ______________________

************************************************************************************************

(Please let me know if you are successful in finding any medical doctor that is willing to sign this form.)

Why You Can’t Trust Anything You See on the News

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

The mission statement of this website, from its inception, has been to provide a clearer picture of what is really happening in the world. Our premise remains unchanged. We maintain our unique position that the powers that be regularly misuse the mainstream media (MSM) to manipulate and mislead humanity away from the truth.

No matter how many posts are published here or on websites that have similar agendas to ours, there will be doubters out there that believe the content being disseminated via traditional media outlets is completely trustworthy.

I found an interesting video that exposes a technology that has probably been used for many years to alter the perceptions of many unsuspecting MSM viewers.

Take a look at the video below:

Donald Trump: A Credible Threat to the Power Elite

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

 

What Americans are currently witnessing here in the United States with regards to the presidential campaign of Donald Trump is nothing short of amazing. Mr. Trump’s tremendous surge in the polls as well as his large number of political wins in the GOP primaries and caucuses represent an unprecedented threat to the elite power structure that controls the United States and other countries throughout the world.

The fact that the Republican party’s front running candidate is being attacked by so many high level officials within his own party speaks volumes about the fear the illuminati has developed towards a possible Trump presidency. Mr. Trump appears, for all intents and purposes, to be a personality and political figure that cannot and will not be controlled by any special interest groups. He represents to American citizens a political breath of fresh air.

Unlike the remaining Republican and Democratic candidates in the 2016 race to the White House, Donald Trump appears to be a person that will truly represent the best interests of America. It will be interesting to see what will happen in the months to come and if Donald Trump will secure the Republican presidential nomination. Will the powers that be intervene and figure out a way to neutralize what clearly has become their biggest and most credible threat in quite some time?

What do you think about Donald Trump and the 2016 presidential election?

 

 

 

The Establishment Versus Donald Trump: What Can’t Be Controlled Will Be Discredited

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

Once again it’s presidential election time here in the United States. While the Democratic party appears poised and very eager to nominate Hillary Clinton as their candidate, the Republican party seems to be in panic mode, trying to decide what to do about anti-establishment personality and GOP frontrunner, Donald Trump.

On the surface, Hillary Clinton seems like a lock for the Democratic nomination. As crazy as that might seem to anyone with two functioning brain cells, many Americans seem to have little or no problem overlooking Mrs. Clinton’s recent legal scandal with regards to nationally classified materials that were exposed on her family’s private email server while she was acting in the capacity as The United States Secretary of State.

Meanwhile, the Republican frontrunner, Donald Trump is being attacked in the mainstream media (MSM) by GOP leaders on a daily basis. The way it’s being presented to the American people is that Mr. Trump, a self-made multibillionaire, is not qualified to be the next President of the United States.

There are claims coming from GOP leaders that Trump is dishonest, a racist, a phony, and a fraud. 2012 Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney went on record March 3, 2016 stating that Donald Trump will threaten the future of America. As of this writing, fellow Republican candidates, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio do not seem to be focused on their own presidential campaigns. Instead, they continue to focus on what they perceive are Mr. Trump’s shortcomings in nationally televised Republican debates.

There is a huge question that has to be answered in my mind. Is Donald Trump the real deal or is he just another puppet being disingenuously paraded around by the powers that be and made to look like an anti-establishment candidate that represents a theoretical change for many citizens that are mad as hell at current Washington politics? Is all this noise coming from the Republicans just another theatrical performance designed to fool a very gullible American public?

At face value, Donald Trump appears to be quite real. He has already made public remarks that probably scare the hell out of the establishment. For example, Trump has stated in a public forum that he wants to get behind the truth movement concerning September 11, 2001. He has also stated that he believes vaccines might be linked to autism. Many people might not think those two subjects are of great significance in the grand scheme of things, but in reality they are very important to the powers that be.

Another very disturbing scenario that seems to be taking place is the GOP leadership’s disrespect for the democratic process and more specifically, the American voters that have been screaming for the Donald. Despite widespread support for Mr. Trump that continues to become more and more evident with each Trump victory in state primaries, many GOP leaders are calling for Donald Trump to be disqualified or blocked from becoming the Republican nominee.

On the Democratic side of things, party members have to ask another important question. How can the American people trust a candidate like Hillary Clinton as a commander-in-chief when she has already failed in her current appointed position, as Secretary of State, to protect nationally classified information that was vital to the security and well being of the United States of America?

All of the current happenings have come to fruition because of two simple facts. Whatever and whoever the establishment can control, it promotes and whatever and whoever the establishment cannot control, it discredits.

Stay tuned for more in the days and weeks to follow.

Eight Drugs Doctors Won’t Take When Dealing With Their Own Health Problems:

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

One of the biggest impediments to the average health care consumer’s good health is the plethora of synthetic prescription and over the counter drugs people constantly take. It’s a serious problem and one that does not get enough attention in the corporately owned mainstream media. Nevertheless, the problem continues to make sick people sicker.  This is a national epidemic in the United States.

I found an interesting article earlier today with regards to this topic and thought I would share it with our readers, Please click this link to read: Eight Drugs Doctors Won’t Take When Dealing With Their Own Health Problems