Gina Flores
NFL Players: Respectfully Kneeling To Take A Stand
By Gina Flores
Writer for NoFakeNews
London, England – American professional footballers have been getting plenty of boos from their fans and other US citizens lately over their collective decision to publicly protest President Donald Trump’s recent comments about not standing for the country’s national anthem.
Mr. Trump used his Twitter platform this past weekend to deliver some very negative remarks against NFL players that had previously and repetitively taken a knee over the past year during national anthem ceremonies. The players have been protesting what they believe are major social/racial inequality issues that the American government refuses to address.
After the president delivered his recent remarks, players, coaches, and team owners, in a display of unity, demonstrated their full support for the other players called out by the president by also sitting, kneeling and interlocking their arms together during every contest’s national anthem ceremony this past weekend. The protests even touched UK soil as the same public display was observed at Wembley Stadium Sunday during the contest between the Ravens and Jaguars.
President Trump publicly called on all team owners and the league’s commissioner, Roger Goodell to fire players that refused to stand in the presence of the American flag during the playing of the national anthem. He later tweeted that American citizens should boycott games until the owners and commissioner fix their product so that players respected the American flag.
While many Americans believe that not standing for the anthem and flag is a sign of disrespect towards the country they love, others believe that sitting or kneeling during the national anthem is an American privilege and right. They believe all American citizens have been afforded the ability to protest anything within reason, in a peaceful manner, because of the American flag.
In my opinion, I think America is a great country and its citizens are really fortunate that they can openly protest when they believe something is unfair and justice is not being upheld for all citizens. In some other countries you would be thrown in jail or executed for doing what NFL players are doing. But that’s the unique and great thing about America, you can protest things that you disagree with. Protesting is what allows conversations to begin rolling and conversations that are rolling can potentially bring about change that would otherwise never materialize.
I believe that forcing people to stand during the American national anthem goes against everything that America represents. If you cannot protest something that you believe is fundamentally wrong and affecting so many people, then that becomes a bigger problem than what you were originally protesting, and that would also go against everything America is supposed to represent.
I can’t tell people how to think, nor should I, but I know how I feel about the current situation. Yes, people will have different points of view regarding these public displays of protest, but it’s really a beautiful thing to watch so many people talking and discussing important issues. None of these conversations would have ever materialized in the first place if a few people didn’t have the strength to kneel or sit down to ultimately take a stand.
What is your position regarding this story?
You Won’t See Them Covering This In The Mainstream Media
Gina Flores
NoFakeNews
Barcelona, Spain – This is a very interesting story that doesn’t seem to be getting much coverage from the mainstream media companies. It has to do with the discovery of an unusual mummified body in Peru. According to the information being reported by www.gaia.com, this find could be one of the biggest archaeological discoveries in the history of the world. It seems to be a credible story. Check out the video below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=934IE62Wd44
Why no coverage by the mainstream media? The problem with this kind of information seeing the light of day is that it absolutely changes the game for the powers that be who want to continue to keep the masses believing that human beings living on this planet are not connected to extraterrestrial bloodlines.
US Solar Eclipse (Greenville, SC) – August 21, 2017
By Gina Flores
Greenville, SC – Millions of people have made plans to travel to the United States in anticipation of a total eclipse of the sun (when the moon passes in front of the sun and causes a state of total darkness in the middle of the day). This event will occur on August 21, 2017.
It’s such a rare event, astronomically speaking, that people from all over the world have decided to come to the United States, and more specifically South Carolina, in order that they will be able to observe something that has not happened here since 1979. The 2017 event marks the first total solar eclipse in the continental US in 38 years.
Check out the path of totality (complete darkness) below:
Picture Credit: NASA
They’re Screwing With The Weather
By Gina Flores
Rome, Italy – They’re screwing with the weather and they’ve been doing so for decades. The geoengineering of droughts, floods, extreme heat and anything else we’ve been experiencing in the way of strange and unpredictable weather patterns all over the world is being manufactured/manipulated by the powers that be.
I am seeing the same aerosol spraying programs here in Europe this summer that I regularly observe in the continental US on a daily basis. There seems to be a consortium of governments and shadow groups that are overseeing weather modification operations worldwide and I seriously doubt any of their goals are for the benefit of humanity.
I felt inclined to share the following website with our readers: Click Here
LAWSUIT COULD END WATER FLUORIDATION ONCE AND FOR ALL BY DEMONSTRATING ITS NEUROTOXICITY
Alex Pietrowski, Staff Writer
Waking Times
The practice of water fluoridation in the United States has been under growing scrutiny for years by a public that has become conscious of the fact that adding toxic chemicals which are proven to be harmful to human health and children’s development to public water is medication without consent.
Never-the-less, the effort to stop fluoridation of municipal water supplies has been an uphill battle against entrenched financial interests and against dated ideas about health. While each year we hear news of cities heeding the concerns of their citizens and stopping fluoridation, without a major victory at the national level, people will be fighting this for years to come, all the while consuming toxic chemicals in the one thing we cannot live without, water.
The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is reporting on a major development to cut the head off of this snake, and an unprecedented lawsuit is now holding promise for a national reversal of municipal water fluoridation.
Based on neurotoxicity studies, the “EPA has been served with a petition that includes more than 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing the risks of water fluoridation to human health.”
As noted by FAN in a recent press release:
“This case will present the first time a court will consider the neurotoxicity of fluoride and the question of whether fluoridation presents an unreasonable risk under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
And, in contrast to most other legal challenges of Agency actions, TSCA gives us the right to get the federal court to consider our evidence ‘de novo’ — meaning federal courts are to conduct their own independent review of the evidence without deference to the EPA’s judgment.”
The lawsuit has been served along with a petition containing thousands of signatures of concerned and well-informed citizens, and includes more than 2500 pages of documents detailing the harm inherent in poisoning the pubic with fluoride.
In detail, the complaint is an attempt to demonstrate how this practice violates the Toxic Substances Control Act.
“The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), along with a coalition of environmental and public health groups has filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in response to their denial of our petition under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) seeking a ban on water fluoridation.
We believe this lawsuit is an unprecedented opportunity to end the practice once and for all in the U.S., and potentially throughout the world, based on the well-documented neurotoxicity of fluoride. You may read the official complaint here.” [Source]
Read: 18 SCIENTIFICALLY VALIDATED REASONS TO END PUBLIC WATER FLUORIDATION
Final Thoughts
The negative effects of consuming fluoridated water are well-documented, and the body of evidence continues to grow. In 2012 a major Harvard study presented a study demonstrating water fluoridation lowers IQ. In 2016 a study demonstrated a link between increased diabetes and water fluoridation. In 2015 the EPA had to issue new guidelines for safe levels of fluoride, reducing the amount, citing the potential for fluoridated water damages teeth, which ironically, is the very condition which we are told is the reason we need fluoride in the first place.
Public water fluoridation is slowly being defeated, and this lawsuit may play a major role in this fight.
About the Author
Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.
This article (Lawsuit Could End Water Fluoridation Once and For All by Demonstrating its Neurotoxicity) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.
America Wake Up! We’re On The Precipice Of WWIII
Gina Flores
While most Americans continue to remain in a trance-like state, preoccupied with watching reality television and other forms of mass produced entertainment, it appears to anyone with his or her eyes wide open that the world is inching dangerously closer, each day, towards World War III.
The problem with most citizens living in the United States is that they secretly like to glorify war and have no real understanding about the horrors associated with armed conflicts. Americans watch too many war movies and television shows that intentionally glamorize war, violence and killing. It’s a form of sick and twisted entertainment that many people have become hopelessly addicted to.
Most American civilians have obviously not had to endure the terrible atrocities of war. They have not had to run for cover because of bombs being dropped in their communities. America is not a place where we have had to deal with bombs being dropped on us by jets or missiles (excluding Pearl Harbor). When Americans think of bombs exploding in a war scenario, they envision those explosions being detonated in the Middle East or on some foreign territory.
As each day passes, the leaders of various governments continue to make foolish decisions that are needlessly placing the lives of billions of people in harm’s way. Although any armed conflicts of war in our future will most likely begin with conventional weapons and troops being deployed, it’s also very likely that before these battles conclude, they will feature the launching of many nuclear warheads that will definitely destroy the lives and properties of millions of people around the entire planet.
In a nuclear war no country will be able to claim victory. The direct damage to our planet, its food chain, and life in general will be unbelievable. And for those people that foolishly believe American soil will be off limits to these deadly attacks, like they have been in the past, they should definitely think again.
It’s time that we all wake up and recognize that the leaders of various countries are completely out of touch with reality. These people are warmongers, and the media whores that praise war and the military industrial complex are pushing a dangerous agenda that will end badly for all of us.
What do you think about this subject?
Airline Companies Have A License To Rob Passengers
Gina Flores
There’s no doubt about it; airline companies have a license to rob passengers blind. In case any of you have not had a chance to see the new video that went viral of a passenger being forcibly removed by police/security from a United Airlines domestic flight in the United States earlier this week, you can take a look at it below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faV4j2oKkhk
According to numerous sources, the passenger was forcibly removed by security because the airline company had overbooked the flight and needed additional seats for company employees. After asking for volunteers to give up seats with compensation included, and not receiving any takers, United officials randomly selected passengers already seated on the plane and asked them to exit the aircraft. One of the passengers refused to leave and the company called in a security officer to remove the man by force.
My question to United Airlines and the airline industry as a whole is the following: why are you overbooking flights that are, for all intents and purposes, nonrefundable? You routinely sell passengers very expensive seats on your aircraft that cannot be refunded. If the passenger doesn’t show up, the seat is already paid for. Why in the hell are you permitted to resell the same seat a second, third, or fourth time? The answer is GREED!
Not only do you sell a passenger a nonrefundable ticket, you routinely charge passengers additional fees for luggage storage, food, and to sit together with loved ones and friends.
If I want to attend a music concert to see my favorite performer, I have to purchase a ticket for a seat. If I decide not to show up for the event, they don’t resell my seat. It remains empty because I have the ticket for that show. The airlines are getting away with robbery by overbooking nonrefundable seats and then asking passengers to disrupt their itineraries.
Granted, there are times when people have some flexibility within their itineraries and they can give up a seat in exchange for compensation. That’s okay in my book. But the air carrier should not be able to forcibly remove a ticketed passenger, for purposes of greed and incompetence, that has already been seated on the plane.
What do you think about this subject?
Was the Syrian Gas Attack A False Flag Event Conducted by the Deep State?
By Gina Flores
One of the many wonderful things I admire about our unique forum and its contributors is that we continue to write what we believe to be the truth no matter where the truth might happen to take us. Sometimes the facts of a situation are hard to swallow because they go against what society has been disingenuously led to believe. I feel that this is certainly the case with regards to the situation that took place in Syria on April 4, 2017.
This past week Americans were told by the fake media outlets and its government that the Syrian government poisoned its own people with a lethal nerve agent. This horrific act was quickly condemned by the Trump administration. President Trump followed his condemnation of the Syrian government’s act by launching 59 Tomahawk missiles at the Syrian military base where the lethal nerve gas was purported to have originated from.
This military action infuriated the Russian government and Russian president, Vladimir Putin. The Russian foreign ministry released the following statement:
“The US opted for a show of force, for military action against a country fighting international terrorism without taking the trouble to get the facts straight.
“It is not the first time that the US chooses an irresponsible approach that aggravates problems the world is facing, and threatens international security. The very presence of military personnel from the US and other countries in Syria without consent from the Syrian government or a UN Security Council mandate is an egregious and obvious violation of international law that cannot be justified. While previous initiatives of this kind were presented as efforts to combat terrorism, now they are clearly an act of aggression against a sovereign Syria. Actions undertaken by the US today inflict further damage to the Russia-US relations.
“Russia has expressed on numerous occasions that it was ready to cooperate on resolving the most urgent issues the world is facing today, and that fighting international terrorism was a top priority. However, we will never agree to unsanctioned action against the legitimate Syrian government that has been waging an uncompromising war on international terrorism for a long time.
“Seeking to justify military action Washington has totally distorted what had happened in Idlib. The US could not have failed to grasp the fact that the Syrian government troops did not use chemical weapons there. Damascus simply does not have them, as confirmed a number of times by qualified experts. This was the conclusion reached by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). Over the recent years this organisation inspected almost all the facilities linked or possibly linked to Syria’s chemical weapons programme. As for Idlib, the terrorists operating there used to produce toxic land mines intended for use in Syria and Iraq. These manufacturing facilities were put out of operation in a military operation carried out by the Syrian air force.
“The US pretends that it does not understand obvious things, turning a blind eye to the use of chemical weapons in Iraq, officially confirmed by Baghdad. The US refuses to believe the evidence provided by certified documents confirming the use of chemical weapons by terrorists in Aleppo. In doing so, the US is abetting international terrorism and making it stronger. New WMD attacks can be expected.
“There is no doubt that the military action by the US is an attempt to divert attention from the situation in Mosul, where the campaign carried out among others by US-led coalition has resulted in hundreds of civilian casualties and an escalating humanitarian disaster.
“It is obvious that the cruise missile attack was prepared in advance. Any expert understands that Washington’s decision on air strikes predates the Idlib events, which simply served as a pretext for a show of force.
“Russia suspends the Memorandum of Understanding on Prevention of Flight Safety Incidents in the course of operations in Syria signed with the US.
“We call on the UN Security Council to hold an emergency meeting to discuss the latest developments.”
According to the official story that’s been released and continuously parroted by the mainstream media, President Bashar al-Assad of Syria used Sarin gas, a lethal nerve agent, on his own people. Videos were then released by the mainstream media showing civilians and children choking and vomiting from the effects of the poison. An emotional President Trump reacted swiftly by ordering a military action against the Syrian government. Almost immediately the Trump administration received praise from the media whores that have routinely attacked him prior to this point in time. It’s pretty damn ironic that it took an outright act of war to get the mainstream media to offer their support for the new American president.
Just one week earlier, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson commented, “The longer-term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people.” In other words, the Trump administration was taking the new position that any regime change in Syria concerning the Assad government would not be decided by the United States. This was a drastic change in US foreign policy and one that the “Deep State” probably didn’t like very much.
It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever that President Assad would decide to gas his own people and focus such negative attention onto his own regime. This is especially true considering that he was extremely close to defeating ISIS and had finally gotten the US off his back.
Enter the false flag operation; a Problem – Reaction – Solution campaign designed by the Deep State to incite the wrath of the western world concerning Assad and Syria. This operation is just what the Deep State needed in order to get Trump and the United States back on track to carry out plans for a regime change in Syria.
A regime change in Syria has been the ultimate goal of the Deep State for many years and it really didn’t matter whether Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump was elected to the the US Presidency. The plan has never changed from its inception. It’s unbending and not up for debate. What the Illuminati wants, it gets. This has become even more apparent than ever before now that this latest false flag event has taken place and the US military responded by attacking Syria with 59 missiles.
Here are some important questions Americans should be asking: Was President Trump duped into committing a military action by the Deep State? Is President Trump part of the Deep State, disingenuously portraying himself as an outsider? Have we all been duped by the Deep State/Illuminati masters once again? Was Hillary Clinton a Tsunami storm and Donald Trump a mushroom cloud in the making? We will probably never know the answers to such questions. What I do know is that once again the American public is being played like a violin and there might be some very dire consequences in our immediate future.
Are these people in the Deep State completely insane? Do they actually want a global nuclear war between the United States and Russia? Unfortunately, I think this has been their plan for the longest time.
What do you think about this subject?
NoFakeNews 