For many years, Hollywood movie productions have been gifted billions of dollars by governments and other powerful entities. Most movies are funded to create perceptions in people’s minds about a plethora of subjects. Those perceptions are far removed from reality.
Does Somebody Have an Agenda?
In 2019, I began the arduous task of writing a novel titled The Target List. Nearly four years later, the story has been transformed into a feature film that entertains and delivers a powerful message to an audience desperately in need of hearing one.
Many talented artists and creative people have worked hard to make this movie a reality. The film is finally complete and has been released!
We have a unique opportunity to promote and support a cinematic production on major platforms that can awaken humanity.
Will people support our product? I certainly hope so because it was a monumental task to make the movie. I nearly lost my life in the middle of the process because some people were not happy about the fact that I write on certain subjects with precision accuracy.
Please take the time to watch, rate, and honestly review Target List. I will include a link below to the movie’s IMDb page where people can rate the film, leave a review, or do both.
A couple of years ago, I watched the disturbing movie, “The Push,” directed and conceived by covert hypnotist Derren Brown.
Brown wanted to see how far individuals — good, kind people, believed to have integrity — would go to protect themselves, and whether or not they would succumb to peer pressure and actually murder someone in order to protect themselves.
At several events, targets were chosen, not knowing their fellow party-goers were actors who were “in” on the set-up. In one scenario, the target is having a conversation with a gentleman (an actor) who suddenly has a (fake) heart attack and ends up at the bottom of a stairwell. Unbeknownst to him, the body is a complete fake, but the prosthetics are so extraordinary, you literally cannot tell the difference between the live actor the body was modeled after and the fake body.
There used to be an excellent close-up photo online where the actor who played the victim was leaning over a table on which his fake doppelganger was lying, but I can no longer locate it. Plus, I had a physical copy I had printed out, but it appears to have been removed from the folder in which I had kept it. In the picture, there is NO discernable difference between the actual, living, breathing man and the prosthetic one. Every piece of stubble, every ingrown hair, every eyelash, every hair of his eyebrows, every vein, any skin discolorations. . . they were all there. Trust me when I say, no one would believe the fake body was not real.
The extraordinary prosthetics, materials and techniques, coupled with the no-detail-shall-be-missed skills of the makeup artists, made the dead body so convincing — to sight, and to feel, apparently — that the targets of the prank believed they (while accidental) had actually killed a man.
Later, when a few partygoers (again, all actors) were gathered on the rooftop having drinks, we see the man we thought had died sitting on the edge of the building (catching his breath?). The target is then barraged with breathless warnings by the partygoers that he will surely be going to prison for attempted murder, having “thrown” a man down the stairs. And even though the target knows he did no such thing, and that the man accidentally fell when the target wasn’t looking, he is, bit-by-bit convinced by these individuals that, not only is he responsible and will be put in prison, but that “this is [his] chance;” and he should seize the moment and push his accuser (and only witness) to his death.
After much prodding, incredibly, this innocent, seemingly kind young man does just that. He quickly walks over to the “victim” sitting on the rooftop’s edge, pushes him off and walks away.
Source: Netflix, “The Push” film by Darren Brown
We later discover, when the prank is revealed to the target, that the actor was fully wired to a safety harness and was fine. But many viewers felt Brown, and the target(s) (there were several similar set-ups) who pushed the man should be charged with attempted murder because they genuinely believed they were murdering someone.
While this anecdote is about the [potentially deadly] effects of peer pressure and gang bullying, it also serves as an excellent example of how we can now be so easily fooled by what we see. We are literally at a previously never-anticipated point in time where saying, ” I know [such and such] happened. I saw it with my own eyes!” won’t necessarily make it so. Now, with Artificial Intelligence (AI) aggressively entering the picture — and no shortage of individuals willing to manipulate it — that statement is now truer than ever.
In previous articles, I have discussed invisible technologies like foglets, nanobots and smart dust and their effects on our health, our privacy, and our civil rights. I have also highlighted technologies that enable remote-controllers/digerati/nanomafia to alter the thoughts of individuals, as well as their words, in real time — literally putting words in people’s mouths.
Deepfake video (including porn) and deepfake voice are big business, with the quality improving so much, fakes can easily be made that are indistinguishable from the real source. And like so many technologies, the majority of the courts are still decades behind, unaware of just how sophisticated these tools are.
In 2017, the Taser company (who changed their name to Axon) began manufacturing body cameras and they offered them, free-of-charge, to every law enforcement officer in the country. Officers take that footage and upload it to a site called evidence.com, owned by Axon.
The trademark for Axon Evidence states: “Computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software allowing a user to remotely upload, access, view, edit, and manage data, video, and audio; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software allowing a user to manage weapons, video surveillance systems worn on the head and the body, and video surveillance systems used in automobiles; computer services, namely, creating and maintaining websites, for others, that allow streaming of selected video, audio, and photographic data for others; computer services, namely, providing an interactive web site featuring technology that allows users to collect, store, manage, deliver, and showcase electronic and paper-based content; computer services, namely, development and maintenance of an internet software platform for the management of digital documentation; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for data storage management of data obtained from electronic devices in the field of public safety and law enforcement.”
There is absolutely nothing that can prevent that footage from being manipulated. So if a corrupt officer wants to frame someone, or slander someone, and wants to show video “proof,” nothing can prevent him or her from providing deepfake evidence. Additionally,companies like Cambrian Genomics, who is known as a “Kinko’s for DNA,” can laser print copies of any DNA sent to them, from any source. (FBI futurist Marc Goodman says, for this reason, solving crimes solely through DNA matches will no longer be possible.) Then there is Genscript who offers cloning and subcloning services and allows customers to “acquire exact gene sequences in the vector of your choice.”
So, it is now completely possible to clone a body (or create one from prosthetics), clone the DNA from that body, create indiscernibly-fake video (and audio) of that individual, remotely put words into someone’s mouth, and more. So if someone with access to this technology wanted to create a a false reality about someone — with “proof” — nothing could stop them.
AI can, of course, be used in fun ways, too. Here are some entertaining and informative links to show some of what’s possible:
Gal Gadot face swapped for Elizabeth Taylor in Cleopatra:
Gal Gadot faceswap in Cleopatra (Credit: Faceswap)
Ashley Hayes is a former business entrepreneur, patented inventor, researcher, and writer seeking to bring attention to the clearly-organized crimes of unlawful and corrupt law enforcement and fusion center personnel against innocent Americans and citizens worldwide, as well as crimes committed by military contractors via 21st-century technology, and to the pandemic of child trafficking by those in power.
Dr. James Giordano is a professor in the Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. He also currently serves as Chair of the Neuroethics Program of the IEEE Brain Project, and as an appointed member of the Neuroethics, Legal and Social Issues (NELSI) Advisory Panel of the Defense Advanced Research Projects’ Agency (DARPA). He has previously served as Research Fellow and Task Leader of the EU Human Brain Project Sub-Project on Dual-Use Brain Science; an appointed member of United States Department of Health and Human Services Secretary’s Advisory Council on Human Research Protections (SACHRP); and as Senior Science Advisory Fellow of the Strategic Multilayer Assessment Branch of the Joint Staff of the Pentagon.
Dr. James Giordano
I have mentioned Dr. Giordano in several previous articles, with good reason: He is THE expert on the brain and, as an advisor to the Pentagon and DARPA, has intimate knowledge about the technologies being used today that enable remote access to our brains.
While Giordano points out that these technologies can be used for benevolent purposes, he acknowledges that they can also be used to intentionally harm, conceding that this intent to harm is useful for military purposes, but (obviously) not so when directed at innocent civilians.
My recent article The Nanomafia: The Most Dangerous Criminal Syndicate The World Has Ever Known discusses the dangerous, criminal affiliate network that has long had access to these technologies, has been using them for decades, and with the nanoparticle-infused mass injections that occurred in 2020 and 2021 (and are continuing) will have a previously incomprehensible ability to remotely control, and alter the behavior of, the public.
In 2021, Dr. Giordano participated in “Technology Day” at the Stockholm Security Conference. Here is some of what he had to say with regard to the current implications of what science and technology can now do:
“This technology allows us to assess the brain, access the brain, and affect the brain.”
He acknowledges that new technologies can create (and are creating) “inequities and inequalities, used by a few who benefit, and kept secret from the majority.”
Importantly, he stresses, “Nothing I am about to tell you is science fictional; it is science fact.”
Psychological Operations (PsyOps) are now referred to as “Neuro-Cognitive Operations” or NCOs, and participants have access to technologies that provide them with the ability to “modify the thoughts, actions, and, therefore, overall stature of others — the operational definition of a weapon.”
(Photo credit: nanobrainimplant.com)
He continues: “Taken from the Oxford dictionary: a weapon is simply a means of contending against others. . . to injure, impair or, perhaps, kill others. But in its strictest definition, a weapon is some means of influence, deterrant. And the question then becomes, “Can the brain sciences become weaponized in those ways that may be less lethal, or non-lethal, yet their influence be overwhelmingly more powerful in that their effects are getting at the essence of what it means to be: the relatively inviolable space of self, of mind; being able to assess and . . . control thoughts, emotions, and behaviors remotely, and in so doing, influence postures of individuals, groups and collectives and perhaps populations.”
Giordano asks, “Is there some line that’s being crossed there whereby this “cognitive liberty” is being intruded upon? I think if we understand “weapon” in that context, we can then frame the brain sciences into those domains, and those tools, . . . that could be weaponized in such a way. Generally, we can parse these into two non-mutually- exclusive and active domains: 1) the assessment neurotechnologies which include various forms of neuro-imagong, neuro-physiological recording, (17:32) . . . and 2) the use of ‘Neuro Big Data’ which, when coupled with decision technologies, machine learning and AI, creates . . . a juggernaut of capability to not only acquire data, and utilize data, but also to manipulate the data itself whereby assessment immediately can turn into effect. (In simpler terms: We can access your brain and immediately alter your thoughts and/or behavior.)
He continues, “This then brings us into the realm of the interventional neurotechnologies. And perhaps first and foremost, if not easiest, is the ability to use extant systems of computational technology and engineering, together with decision technologies, Big Data acquisition and use, and various forms of soft to hard AI to manipulate the data themselves, and by manipulating the data on large scales, it may be possible to literally paint a new reality of what an individual is; to implant information into large-scale databanks, make individuals appear to have certain neurological and psychiatric conditions, to affect their capability to do their job by virtue of their profile, their data profile, by affecting aspects of their metadata so that they’re regarded as limited, and treated in different ways economically, socially, militarily, politically.” (18:54)
Graphics credit: nanobrainimplant.com
With regard to customized targeting of bodies and brains of specific individuals, Giordano says: “The more we know, the further we can go. One of the concerns is the ubiquity of biodata, particularly neuro-biodata, creates certain vulnerabilities, and targetabilities to be able to create precision pathogens. Now those pathogens need not be the tradiional drugs, bugs, or toxins. They can also be certain devices that can be tuned to individual parameters of . . . physiology, to differentially affect individuals in a variety of ways: to direct or compromise their capability for thought, emotion, and action.”
“Putting all of these together, we see a new toolkit that, essentially, engages those domains that have been addressed by current language of the Biological Toxins Conventions, Chemical Weapons Conventions, and various declarations and signatory treaties, but, in some ways, sidesteps that as I hope to show you, which may . . . (20:06) necessitate a revisioning [or] revisiting of the language, scope and tenor of these existing conventions and treaties: new drugs, for example, that are able to penetrate the brain space far more capably, at much lower doses, linking pharmaceuticals to nano-engineered scaffolds, micelles (water-soluble particles that can carry other substances inside them. In medicine, micelles are made in the laboratory and are used to carry drugs to body tissues and cells.), chaperones, that allow facile penetrants into the brain space, sometimes through means that can be rather clandestine or covert: inhalation, transdermally — and doing so with higher specificity; in fact, in some cases targeting these pharmaceuticals to be able to work in key individuals (20:44), or groups of individuals, based on an understanding of their pharmacogenomics and dynamics. Here, too, we see the ability to generate novel biologicals whether that be bacteria, fungi, viruses and, increasingly, there is a worry about the potential weaponization of prions that, based upon individual, collective, and populational information, can be developed so as to high selectivity, affecting key individuals: either individually targets of high value or more globally, more universally, creating, if you will, bellicose value and affecting relatively benign . . . targets, like the general population.”
(21:23) “[W]e can also use various methods of gene editing and synthetic biology to develop organic neurotoxins that are far more stable, less labile, more effective, and can be used with more precision, particularly if delivered to unmanned vehicles: aerial, ground, or sea-based. And a variety of technological devices that can be used to augment, or change, cognitive capacity.”
Finally, VoterVoice.net has posted a plea to everyone, to write to your senators and members of Congress, urging them to declassify and ban neuroweapons. They have provided a letter, which you can copy and paste, or, of course, you can create your own. Here is their version:
As a public representative, your job is to take seriously any potential threat to the common good. The development of neuro-weapons by members of the intelligence community is one such threat.
Prof. James Giordano, a senior science advisory fellow of the Joint Staff at the Pentagon, is currently playing a key role in the development of brain-controlling technologies that will “assess and modify the thoughts, actions and therefore overall stature of others,” he freely admits.
Such control of thoughts and behavior would be a step too far for most Americans, if they were aware of what is being developed by the intelligence community.
We have learned the hard way that government and its agencies are often compromised by bad actors and even worse ideas, and this one ranks even higher than what we have seen in the last three years of restrictions on our liberties.
We urge you to ban the use of neuroweapons and demand that US intelligence agencies declassify the nature any human experimentation involved in their development.
Thank you.
Should you care to reach out to Dr. Giordano personally (which he welcomes), his email address is James.Giordano@Georgetown.edu.
Knowledge is vital. Please share this article widely. . . .
Ashley Hayes is a former business entrepreneur, patented inventor, researcher, and writer seeking to bring attention to the clearly-organized crimes of unlawful and corrupt law enforcement and fusion center personnel against innocent Americans and citizens worldwide, as well as crimes committed by military contractors via 21st-century technology, and to the pandemic of child trafficking by those in power.
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five research team members are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. Two researchers soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list when they escape the attack.
“Contrary to seemingly prevalent beliefs in the inherent goodness of scalar, scalar fields aren’t good or bad. Their healing and constructive effect, or destructive effects, depends on how they are produced, exactly what information is being carried by the scalar component, and the coherent or incoherent field that can be used for either harmonizing or destructive purposes.” – Blushield
I found the following interesting article about scalar waves that I wanted to share. Because although scalar waves can be used against us for mind control or worse, they can also be used for healing. And a unique way that the scalar waves can be created is with the use of crystals and gemstones.
Scalar Waves and Crystals
Quantum Resonance Energetic Systems:
“Since man has been able to dig up rocks, he has marveled at the beauty and clarity of certain types of rocks like gemstones. These shiny rocks have captivated man’s desires while he busily digs deeper or artificially creates the penultimate gemstone. There is, however, another side to gemstones which goes unseen by most, and that is the multidimensional nature of crystals and gemstones.
Crystals have a special ability to hold, transmute, and absorb energy. Not only can they work with energy in these unique ways, but they can develop scalar energy or be used for precise measurement of time. In this article, we will be focusing on the scalar energy side of crystals.”
I have always treasured crystals and gemstones. So much so that I named my daughter Krystal. And I have a collection of crystals that keeps growing.
And I have slept on an infrared amethyst mat for nearly ten years. Also, I have a blanket containing fiber-filled tourmaline.
In addition, I have a lot of jewelry made from crystals. Not to mention copper-coiled orgone pyramids filled with crystals, geodes, and more.
And I delight in my singing bowls made from quartz crystal. I find their vibrations to be soothing and uplifting!
But my favorite gemstones are the ever-popular quartz and amethyst. Also, tourmaline is known for its protective properties. Although I love most all of these beautiful gems!
It has also been suggested that crystals and gemstones can protect you from EMF (electromagnetic frequencies.) And I am inclined to believe it. When my husband was hit with Directed Energy Weapons that led to him being in the hospital on a ventilator a couple of years ago, any mild symptoms I endured dissipated after a good night’s sleep on my mat.
However, the information provided in this scalar wave article takes the power of crystals to another level. Crystals can produce scalar waves. And your intentions can be transmitted into energy through them. This knowledge helps me to understand how the controlling powers might be able to use scalar waves as a form of mind control.
“They (scalar waves) propagate longitudinally; therefore, they could reach a target’s neurological system, from a satellite (via a supercomputer). Activation of an organism’s neurological system requires transmission of both data and energy. Electromagnetic waves can only carry data, not energy, therefore are unlikely to cause the action potential of neurons.”— Source
And again, scalar waves are neither good nor bad. It is what is programmed into them that manifests what happens.
And all this information makes me wonder now, can crystals also be used to protect against EMF or the destructive type of scalar waves? Fight fire with fire! I can only speculate. I really have no idea if this is possible or actually true.
But crystals and gemstones are a part of the earth. And some scientists argue that walking barefoot and being grounded with the earth has mental and physical health benefits. And just being in nature in general. So why not these natural pretty gems? Why might they not be more powerful than what we imagined? And if Atlantis was real, it is theorized that crystals were their power source and the earth’s energy and sun.
And in the present day, quartz crystals can operate our watches!
“Quartz watches get their name from the tiny quartz crystal in their timekeeping mechanism. A battery acts as the power source for Quartz watches, as it sends an electrical current through the quartz crystal, which causes it to vibrate at an extremely high frequency. To be precise, the quartz vibrates at exactly 32,768 times per second. The vibrations are then processed by a circuit board, which regulates them at one electric pulse per second. These pulses are then used to drive a small motor, which turns the gears in the mechanism to rotate the hands of the watch face.
Although this process sounds complicated, it uses very little electricity, so the battery can last anywhere from three years to a decade before it needs replacing.
Mechanical watches represent a much higher level of craftsmanship, containing a complex mechanism of gears and springs, all working in harmony to turn the hands of the face. This mechanical movement is driven by a small spring that’s tightly wound by either manual or automatic winding.” — Source
To conclude, I believe the overall magic of crystals to be fascinating! I recently attended a Rock, Mineral, Gem & Earth Science Show in my area, which enticed me to bring home a few more magnificent gems. One quartz crystal weighs about 5 pounds. And costing a pretty penny!
Although the weight of carrying those precious rocks around for a significant period in my bag had later caused some strained, sore muscles! 😂
However, my muscles have been improving daily, and I think I’ll fully recover! So, to me, it was worth it! 🙂
___________________
Lisa Hakes is the author of Subtle Sabotage — a candid portrait of alcoholism and autism for readers who appreciate down-to-earth authors who aren’t afraid to tell the whole story.
The Global Medical Genocide of 2020 was a world government-funded and constructed program that specifically targeted all members of society. Tools were built and utilized to isolate, censor, poison, and sterilize the human race.
The deaths of hundreds of millions were not a result of a viral pathogen propagandized by national mainstream media companies but rather the direct result of an ideology that preplanned the creation and distribution of deadly poisons disguised as life-saving medicines.
Until the members of society recognize the facts that they were and continue to be victims of a global medical genocide and that the vaccines they continue to voluntarily take to mitigate a fake disease are bioweapons designed to harm human beings, the perpetrators of the crimes will never be held accountable!
As long as for-profit big pharma corporations are trusted and allowed to manufacture healthcare products that are broadly administered to society, there will continue to be a world filled with sick people.
I believe that it is important for people to understand that no sars-cov-2 virus was leaked from a lab at any point. Likewise, no gain of function research weaponized an already existing virus. There never was any virus in the atmosphere during the world pandemic. People were made sick by other nefarious technologies and the large number of cases were created by a rigged PCR test.
In my recent article, Targeted Injustice (Part 1): How Law Enforcement Stalks and Harasses Women Then Calls Them Mentally Ill To Get Away With it, I discussed a deeply cruel, malicious game corrupt members of law enforcement (at all levels) are playing with innocent citizens’ lives – particularly women – who have been blacklisted and targeted for life sabotage by someone in their law enforcement/military/DOD-contractor network.: Spreading false rumors that a perfectly sane, successful, healthy, loving parent, and productive member of society, is mentally ill.
They do this so that their daily abuse, theft, interception of mail, stalking (including stalking-by-proxy, something Neighborhood Watch and similar groups have taken part in for years), property damage, holes cut into new clothing (or in crotches of underwear), animal cruelty, falsification of records, illegal entry into targets’ homes and cars will be ignored when their target begins reporting it.
Per my previous article, they use (and incentivize) individuals trusted by the friends and family of the target (whether it’s an actual law enforcement employee, an Infragard member, a hired non-law-enforcement proxy, etc.) to slyly spread this horrible rumor meant to destroy the target’s reputation and, as I said, make her appear “crazy” when she begins reporting their hard-to-believe, immature antics. (This happens to men, as well. But for simplicity purposes, I am focusing on women for this article.)
When the highly-coordinated antics (the massive groups of individuals suddenly stopping in front of her house to take pictures, the groups of cars that follow her to the store, the items moved around in her house when she’s away, etc.) begin, a concurrent gaslighting campaign begins, as well. (The slander campaign, spread out to any possible distant friend, childhood friend, distant relative, relative, etc., is happening at this time, as well.)
When the target – having no idea she is, in fact, a target of coordinated group bullying and life interference – decides to call law enforcement to report some of the events, the officers who respond are game players and gas lighters. They take the report and libelously put in the report that the woman may be “possible 315” (or whatever the code is for the mentally ill). Then they put that code in the system so that any officer in the future who comes into contact with the [perfectly sane, gang-bullied] woman will see that code in the system and behave accordingly. Everything she says at that point is colored by that planted, false implication. Most officers would never doubt that their system would give them false information. But it’s happening all over America. And it has happened to me. (And after 9/11, thanks to fusion centers, this false information is shared with every law enforcement agency in the nation.)
From 2015 to 2018, the aggressive law enforcement stalking, daily harassment (by land and by air), interruption of life and business, etc., that happened was off the charts. The public would be horrified to know that members of law enforcement not only participate in these sick games with people’s lives (single women, as I said in my previous article, are a favorite target – particularly when they have no family nearby who can see them every day and know the entire slander campaign is B.S.).
One memorable occurrence was in March 2015. Multiple terrifying events happened that month, on top of the intense cyberstalking I was enduring (culminating in the theft of my 15-year-old business): I had reported two separate times to one officer who had come to my house. I found multiple discrepancies and wanted to get them corrected. But rather than go to the precinct, I called and asked for the officer to come to my home, as I had a small child, etc.
A different officer came and met with me on our front porch. Due to all the recent bizarre activity, I asked to see his ID. He showed it to me and made a comment about his military haircut in the picture. His name was Steve. Steve discussed the reports with me for 10 or 15 minutes, then said he would take them to his car to call his supervisor for directions. (While he was gone, a flower delivery came, in an unmarked, plain truck, for my child from my mom. Pink roses had specifically been requested, but no pink roses were included. This kind of thing happens over and over and over when you are a [fusion center] target. Every target reports this.) Officer Steve returned, gave me the reports back, and left. (He did not take a report of his own.)
The next day, as I sat looking at the reports, I noticed Officer Steve had done something to them; they had been altered. While I have had many records (of all kinds) altered during the course of the years of this crime, as complicit officers (directly or through proxies) attempt to cover up evidence of their brothers’ crimes against me, I don’t know why Steve altered those reports.
Two weeks later, I called the local cops again (having endured multiple instances of coming home to have had someone in our home while we were out, where evidence of their intrusion was always left behind). This time, I was reporting tax fraud (an ongoing issue). I had just opened my mail and discovered the two strangers I had found online (a married couple) had committed multiple instances of fraud against me (costing me over $3000 in money I was due, among other things).
As I sat on our front porch swing with a friend and my child, an officer arrived. His name was William, and I had never seen or met him before. As we spoke, he started pretending like we had met, pretending that it had been him who had stood on my front porch (rather than Steve). I said, “I don’t know what you’re talking about; we’ve never met.” He then condescendingly says, “Ashley, I was here a couple of weeks ago.” I said, “No, you were not. We have never met.” (My young child, who, like so many young children, missed nothing, blurted out: “No, you weren’t.” She had met and spoken with Steve and knew this guy was lying.)
In addition to the gaslighting he was doing on me, he was also slandering me in front of my friend, a friend (like most of the public) who was unaware that law enforcement participates in psyops games like this. The Officer’s words were meant to make me question myself (which I didn’t) and to also make my friend question me. (Most folks are under the impression that cops don’t lie, and they certainly could never fathom that they would – and do – participate in coordinated mind games meant to hurt women.)
Prior to this disturbing visit, I went to the precinct to meet with “Sergeant Mike,” whom I had met before. He was the “COPS” (Community Oriented Policing Services) coordinator and had fake-cried in front of me on one occasion, demonstrated a taser for my child, and sent me to an empty field on another, pretending he was giving me the address of one of my cybercriminals. I was addressing the altered reports given back to me by Steve: Sergeant Mike looked at his computer than at me, and said with a straight face, “Ashley, we don’t have a Steve in our precinct.” I said, “Well, that was his name; that was what his ID said.” Sergeant Mike continues with the mind game, “We don’t have a Steve anywhere in our precinct or at the main precinct.” He was, literally, attempting to try to make me believe I had dreamed I had met with Steve! It was ridiculous!
Then, that meeting was followed by the visit from officer William, who attempted to try to convince me it was he, and not, Steve I had met with for a good 15 minutes just a couple of weeks prior. Not only did they look nothing alike. But, again, Steve had actually stated his name and shown me his ID – which did say “Steve.” (It actually showed his full name, but I am just using first names for this article.) Yet, here were two separate officers, clearly colluding in this sick game, lying to my face, attempting to make me question myself.
Finally, I had mentioned to Officer William that there had been what appeared to be an undercover FedEx truck in front of my house a couple of weeks prior. It was there the day after Steve had been to my house. The driver of the truck had left the side door wide open, so I could see the equipment – which anyone who has watched any one of the syndicated crime shows would recognize as surveillance equipment. Prior to this, I had never thought about the fact that undercover surveillance is done via trucks with known brands on them. “Bob’s Plumbing,” sure, but not FedEx. Yet there it was.
When I mentioned this to Officer William, he smirked and mocked my statement; again implying I was “seeing things,” pretending that undercover FedEx trucks didn’t exist, and if they did, then there was no way I had seen one in front of my house. (While I did have, for years, strange vans and cars outside my house, with blackened windows – like they would do with criminals! – the FedEx surveillance truck did not stay parked there. The driver did, in fact, deliver something to my neighbor and left the door open, and since I had a perfect view of it from my living room window, I could clearly see it wasn’t a typical delivery truck. Yet my mentioning it gave Officer William another opportunity to mock me, as he pretended those converted trucks didn’t exist.)
Not only do they exist, but, as it turns out (something I discovered much later), the very man who was part of the tax-preparer team that had defrauded me was the vice president of a company who customized FedEx trucks, Mobile Command Units, SWAT trucks, etc. for law enforcement.
Truth is, indeed, stranger than fiction at times.
Innocent women (and men) are enduring these crimes by those in power every day. Exposure is key. Please share this article wherever you can.
Ashley Hayes is a former business entrepreneur, patented inventor, researcher, and writer seeking to bring attention to the clearly-organized crimes of unlawful and corrupt law enforcement and fusion center personnel against innocent Americans and citizens worldwide, as well as crimes committed by military contractors via 21st-century technology, and to the pandemic of child trafficking by those in power.
NoFakeNews 