We just received a set of interesting photographs from a site visitor showing a black spot in the center of the sun. The photographs were captured from several web cams in Mexico and have been making their way around the Internet for a number of years.
A brief review of this subject reveals a wide variety of opinions about what is causing the strange presentation on these public domain cams. The theories about what is causing the black spots range from a massive object (Planet X) that is positioned in front of the sun to more technical explanations that claim the digital sensors on the web cameras are over powered from the brightness of the sun and therefore cause a blackened area to form in the digital picture presentation.
The peculiar part of this story is that there are many dates throughout the year that the black spots do not appear on the web cams in Mexico. One would think that if the presentations were due to digital sensors being overpowered by intense light from the sun that the same cameras would be consistent in displaying the black spots on every encounter the cameras had with the sun. But this has not been the case.
I am including some of the web cam photos below as well as the link to the web cams. Remember never to look directly at the sun as this can cause permanent damage to your eyes.
Contrary to popular belief, vaccines are not safe and do not make us healthier, and there is an enormous body of research that backs up my premise. (1)
We have all been told this incredible lie by the powers that be that vaccines have eradicated diseases on this planet and that without these medicinal concoctions the world would be a very sickly place and human life would have succumbed long ago to a wide variety of plagues. For those health practitioners that are aware of the truth, it’s frustrating to see and hear this type of nonsense.
Whenever I write or speak openly about the truth about vaccines, I get lots of people that tell me that without vaccines, polio and other diseases would still be around today. What these individuals fail to realize is that they are the recipients of inaccurate information. They are parroting and re-parroting the same disinformation to others and have no idea what the heck they are talking about.
Most people do not realize that virtually all the major diseases that have vaccines tied to them had already diminished in their intensity or, for all intents and purposes, disappeared prior to the vaccines being introduced. (2)
In the case of polio, the disease, prior to the introduction of the vaccines (Sabin and Salk), had been reported and recorded in concert with aseptic meningitis and the Coxsackie virus. After the introduction of the vaccines, polio cases were recorded exclusively as aseptic meningitis and other convenient diagnoses. The cases of these other diseases suddenly skyrocketed while polio seemingly disappeared. At least that is the way it appeared to be in the eyes of an unsuspecting group of healthcare consumers. (3)
Many of us have an extremely difficult time questioning officialdom. This also rings true when we examine the decision making tendencies of healthcare consumers worldwide. A lot of people do not want to go against the advice of public health agencies that have been established by governments to protect the welfare and safety of its citizens. People generally have a problem with going against health advice that has been released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). As a result of this agency and others like it that are on record stating vaccines are safe for public consumption and pose no serious health risks to children and adults, more people than ever before are voluntarily receiving vaccinations. And people are receiving these manufactured drugs for an increasing number of conditions.
The beliefs most of us have, to a large extent, have been etched into our psyches by the corporately owned mainstream media (MSM) companies that continue to have plenty of biases with regards to the subjects they report on. But why does the MSM promote the petrochemical agenda to its viewership? Besides the most obvious reason, that advertising revenue generated by pharmaceutical advertising campaigns is extremely profitable to said companies, there are far more nefarious reasons that these powerful companies continue to promote the vaccine and drug industry. You have to do your own research to uncover these other reasons and a good place to begin is by looking up information about media ownership in the United States and throughout the world. They don’t make it easy to connect the dots so to speak, but if you put in your due diligence, the other reasons become very clear to researchers.
In the case of the pro vaccine agenda, the MSM has had a big role in convincing healthcare consumers about the supposed value of many vaccines as well as the risks associated with not receiving said drugs. Currently, in the United States, it’s virtually impossible to watch a television program without being bombarded with advertising that promotes prescription drugs and specific vaccines that are supposedly designed to protect human beings from pneumonia, shingles, hepatitis, influenza, and the list goes on and on. In addition to commercials, the content of most news programs includes regular daily segments that discuss vaccines and the great benefits they are affording humanity. Let’s understand what the heck is going on here; people are relentlessly being bombarded with vaccine propaganda that is disguised to look like science. It’s not science. It’s a carefully written marketing campaign that appears regularly, like a soap opera, in both commercial and news programming formats. It’s marketing that has been backed by the best scientific research money can buy. (4)
The vaccine industry, like the petrochemical industrial complex, is a protected science. It’s a taboo subject that most healthcare professionals wouldn’t even think of questioning in a public forum. But there are some brave medical doctors and other professionals that have put their licenses and lives on the line to bring out the truth to people. They are tired of seeing innocent children and other healthcare consumers being unnecessarily harmed. They have embraced the challenge of speaking out against a protected domain while trying to maintain credibility in their respective professions. Good luck with that! I write with experience when I tell readers that this is quite a daunting task.
What do you think about this subject?
Disclaimer
The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!
How often do scientists smugly quote the latest research on a topic only later to be made the fool by insider revelations that published research in peer-reviewed journals is abjectly false? This happens so frequently now, that it has become clear: Science is broken, and most scientific research is fraudulent.
It isn’t broken like a bike needing a new tire, or even an outdated paradigm that has reached its tipping point, as in the time of the renaissance. Modern science is broken for reasons that might shock you.
First, there’s a replication crisis. More and more studies simply cannot be replicated, so any false theories are not thrown out, but left floating as acceptable ‘fact’ in the hallowed scientific ethers, when they are nothing more than studies paid for and promoted by the companies who have a marked interest in proving their personal hypothesis.
Take for example a recent review of 67 blockbuster drug discovery research findings published in prestigious journals. A review of the studies found that three-fourths of them weren’t right. Bayer simply couldn’t replicate findings that were published in more than 75 percent of their drug trials. Another study of cancer research found that only 11 percent of preclinical cancer research could be reproduced – but the problem isn’t just in the pharmaceutical industry.
Even in physics, supposedly the most complex and most reliable of all sciences, two of the most flaunted physics results of the past few years — the announced discovery of both cosmic inflation and gravitational waves at the BICEP2 experiment in Antarctica, as well as the supposed discovery of superluminal neutrinos at the Swiss-Italian border — have now been retracted.
Why the gross negligence in a field that has been heralded as sacrosanct? The errors in science have been due to simple arithmetic miscalculations or excel spreadsheet mistakes, but they are also due to industry greed and outright fraud.
Science has even discredited itself – in one study meant to hoodwink the very prestigious British Medical Journal, a paper with eight major errors was submitted. Not a single one of the 221 scientists who reviewed the paper caught all the errors in it, and only 30 percent of reviewers recommended that the paper be rejected.
Second, scientists can manipulate data almost any way they deem fit. Data can be excluded, included and re-arranged to support the presupposition of any scientist.
Third, the scientific community doesn’t listen to women, young people, or those whose ideas go against the current scientific dogma. The greatest scientific pioneers were once weirdoes with wiry glasses and grandiose ideas that they set out to prove with the scientific method. Now, we have an aged scientific population, that is mostly white and male, worried about getting tenure at their institutions or that have been lobbied directly by pharmaceutical and biotech industries to promote a certain plan that affects our entire sociological structure.
Next, its all about the fame and money. These two things alone kill objectivity. Industry-funded studies completely ignore conflict of interest and skew any possible hope for real scientific results. This is why institutions like the FDA, supposedly founded on scientific study, are a complete fraud.
Finally, its about the social pandering to guys in white lab coats. We’ve made scientists Gods while ignoring that they are people with greed, lust for power, and other very human traits.
There aren’t just cracks in the current scientific community, there are gapping gulches that need to be addressed. William A Wilson writes:
Even if self-correction does occur and theories move strictly along a lifecycle from less to more accurate, what if the unremitting flood of new, mostly false, results pours in faster? Too fast for the sclerotic, compromised truth-discerning mechanisms of science to operate? The result could be a growing body of true theories completely overwhelmed by an ever-larger thicket of baseless theories, such that the proportion of true scientific beliefs shrinks even while the absolute number of them continues to rise. Borges’ Library of Babel contained every true book that could ever be written, but it was useless because it also contained every false book, and both true and false were lost within an ocean of nonsense. [First Things]
Skeptic of science, Michael Shermer, says that science is “a set of methods designed to describe and interpret observed or inferred phenomena, past or present, aimed at building a testable body of knowledge open to rejection or confirmation.”
Science is modifiable and falsifiable, just like religion. So why have we made it the modern day, untouchable dogma? We can’t treat beliefs as facts, but when science is broken we do. How do we trust science again when it is so shattered? Perhaps its time to trust our guts again, and not every testimony given in the latest scientific journal.
About the Author
Christina Sarich is a writer, musician, yogi, and humanitarian with an expansive repertoire. Her thousands of articles can be found all over the Internet, and her insights also appear in magazines as diverse as Weston A. Price, Nexus, Atlantis Rising, and the Cuyamungue Institute, among others. She was recently a featured author in the Journal, “Wise Traditions in Food, Farming, and Healing Arts,” and her commentary on healing, ascension, and human potential inform a large body of the alternative news lexicon. She has been invited to appear on numerous radio shows, including Health Conspiracy Radio, Dr. Gregory Smith’s Show, and dozens more. The second edition of her book, Pharma Sutra, will be released soon.
This article (6 Reasons Why Most Scientific Research is Fake, False or Fraudulent) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commonslicense with attribution to Christina Sarich and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.
Every year there are children being irreparably harmed from vaccine injuries. The cases very rarely, if ever, make it into the mainstream news. Vaccine injuries reported to medical physicians are usually not recorded as such and get lost in an intentionally manufactured abyss, from a statistical perspective. Make no mistake about this subject matter, there is a concerted effort by medicine and Big Pharma to keep a lid on the biggest secret within the medical profession; vaccines are the lifeblood of medicine and the etiological cause of autoimmune disorders as well as many physiological expressions of cancer.
This is, without a doubt, one of the most egregious crimes ever committed against children. But that is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to examining this huge conspiracy. As painful as it might be for people to learn the truth, that the pharmaceutical industry has been and continues to be involved in the mother of all cover-ups that systematically harms children throughout the world, it is something that must be exposed and done so on a broad scale platform.
As the vaccine injury conspiracy is examined in more detail in the months and years to come, the public will learn that the cover-up goes far beyond the parameters of the pharmaceutical industry. There is much more involved here than greed and the quest for profits from huge corporations. Don’t get me wrong, there is money and profits driving this monster, but those elements are only the modalities being employed to help accomplish the agenda.
If this cover-up was only about drug companies and their pursuit of money, the CDC and other government agencies in the United States and other countries would have discovered the abuse and put an end to it long ago. But this is not the case. In fact, when the light of day has been allowed to shine on this issue, it’s been quite clear that the CDC and other agencies have helped the pharmaceutical companies in maintaining the conspiracy. In a nutshell, they’re all in bed together. The very same agencies that have been created to protect and serve the interests of the public are actively conspiring with drug companies against innocent healthcare consumers.
The newly released documentary, “VAXXED” shows just how deep the rabbit hole goes with regards to the CDC and its involvement in the cover-up to keep people uninformed about the link between vaccines and diseases like Autism, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, autoimmune problems and many forms of cancer.
Take a few minutes to watch an interview with the film’s producer that discuses why Big Pharma and others don’t want people watching “VAXXED” or anything else that takes a serious look at the truth about vaccines and the irreparable injuries they cause children and adults.
In an interview on the Today show, Robert De Niro, actor and co-founder of the Tribeca Film Festival, said he regrets pulling the documentary VAXXED from the festival.
Actor Robert De Niro has recently at the center of a storm regarding the decision to remove the documentary film VAXXED: From Controversy to Catastrophe from the Tribeca Film Festival in New York. Following the Tribeca cancellation, the film was also removed by officials with the Houston International Film Festival after being contacted by officials within the Mayor’s Office.
Robert De Niro had originally been very supportive of the film before ultimately deciding to pull it from the festival, stating, “after reviewing it over the past few days with the Tribeca Film Festival team and others from the scientific community, we do not believe it contributes to or furthers the discussion I had hoped for.” De Niro also stated that there were “concerns with certain things in this film” that prevented the film from being played at the festival.
The film follows the story of a Center for Disease Control and Prevention research scientist, Dr. William Thompson. In August 2014, Thompson claimed that researchers involved in a study on the MMR vaccine “fudged numbers” to lower the number of black children who were adversely affected. Thompson is a senior scientist at the CDC and has been with the agency since 1998. On August 27, 2014 Dr. Thompson released a statement acknowledging that he and co-authors from a 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics did in fact omit important information from a study on the link between vaccines and autism.
During the Today interview De Niro seemed to reverse his previous statements and spoke openly about his questions regarding the safety of vaccinations.“I think the movie is something people should see,” De Niro said. “There is a lot of information about things that are happening with the CDC, the pharmaceutical companies. There are a lot of things that are not said. As a parent of a child who has autism I want to know the truth.”
De Niro also discussed the media blackout regarding the CDC whistleblower. “Everybody doesn’t seem to want to hear much about it. And you guys are the ones who should do the investigation,” De Niro challenged. Regarding another film about autism that is showing at Tribeca, De Niro said “it’s not questioning how some people got autism, how the vaccines are dangerous for certain people who are more susceptible. Nobody seems to want to address that, or they say it’s a closed issue but it doesn’t seem to be. There is more to this than meets the eye, believe me.”
When asked if he believes that science has shown there is no link between vaccines and autism, De Niro replied, “I believe it’s much more complicated than that. There is a link and they are saying there isn’t. The obvious one is thimerosal, a mercury based preservative. Let’s just find out the truth.” De Niro also questioned statistics that claim that parents who do not vaccinate their children will lead to a higher incidence of measles and other illnesses.
Despite the often repeated claim that VAXXED is anti-vaccination, Philippe Diaz, head of Cinema Libre, the distributor of VAXXED, says the film is not anti-vaccine but rather pro-safe vaccines. “It is not an anti-vaccination movie, people are judging the movie without seeing it first. Even Robert De Niro said the film was not anti-vaccination,” Diaz said. Indeed, De Niro has stressed that he is also not anti-vaccine and only interested in the truth. “There is something there, there is something there that people are not addressing. All I want is for people to see the film and people can make up their own judgement.”
Another interesting facet of the Today interview was a claim by Tribeca co-founder Jane Rosenthal that the sponsors of the film festival did not complain, but rather the filmmakers were upset. Despite Rosenthal’s comments, Diaz told AP that the sponsors were responsible for pressuring Tribeca to remove VAXXED.
“That’s exactly what happened. The Directors of Tribeca confirmed it to us,” Diaz said. “They had problems with sponsors. I think it created a horrible precedent, if you do not like what is in a movie, no matter the quality of the film you can pull it from a festival.”
Although VAXXED has brought Dr. William Thompson’s story to the mainstream, he originally did not want to go public with his information until it was revealed that conversations he had with Dr. Brian Hooker had been recorded. Dr. Thompson handed over thousands of pages of documents to Congressman Bill Posey’s office for review. Posey serves on the Committee on Science, Space and Technology. There was very little chatter about the CDC whistleblower for quite some time until July 29th, 2015, when Congressman Bill Posey took to the floor of the House to discuss Dr. William Thompson and his documents. The debut of VAXXED has only increased the attention on Thompson’s claims.
Another controversial aspect of the Vaccine debate is the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which eliminated any liability for pharmaceutical manufacturers, stating, “the number of recommended childhood vaccines has more than tripled and we have seen a decline in the health and vitality of our children with among the worst infant mortality rate in the developed world.”
Although pharmaceutical manufactures cannot be held liable for problems associated with vaccinations, the U.S. government does have a fund for victims of vaccines known as the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Funds awarded through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program are first processed through a special vaccine court. In December 2014, Ben Swann examined a report by the Associated Press which revealed that thousands of families with claims with the vaccine court are left to wait for years, sometimes decades before receiving help.
The AP studied hundreds of court decisions, performed more than 100 interviews, and studied a database containing more than 14,500 cases. The database was last updated in January 2013 with the government refusing to release any new updates. Officially known as the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the so-called vaccine court is a little-known system that is intended to address claims of Americans who believe their children have been harmed by vaccinations. The court is an established part of the federal judiciary system however the authorities over the cases are not called judges but rather “special masters.”
The AP investigation found several issues with the court. These include tens of millions of taxpayer dollars that has been paid to private attorneys who often practice “churning,” a practice described as filing a large number of claims regardless of the quality of the claims. In the private court attorneys are paid out whether or not they succeed in convincing the court. That fact has led to questionable billing practices and an increase in court claims.
The AP report also found that “expert” witnesses for the families and the government often have a lack of credibility or conflicts of interest. The report says that some of the experts are also involved in setting up nonprofits that question vaccine safety. Meanwhile, doctors hired by the government to testify in defense of vaccines have ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
For more details on this court please watch Ben Swann’s report on the Vaccine Court and Autism.
Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for ActivistPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter.
Derrick is available for interviews.
This article may be freely reposted in part or in full with author attribution and source link.
There are plenty of terrible things presently happening in the world. If you are a regular visitor to this website, you already know that very bad people rule the world from the top down and that they have control over the corporations that continuously disseminate information to the masses which is referred to as news.
Since creating NoFakeNews four years ago, I have written about some truly disgusting events that have taken place or are currently taking place throughout the world. Many of these happenings are concealed from the public or made to look far less horrific than they actually are. As I have written on more than one occasion, those who control people’s perception of reality, for all intents and purposes, control the world. The most dangerous weapons of mass destruction are not bombs, bullets, and guns. The most dangerous weapons in the world are televisions, radios, and other devices that can broadcast the propaganda that is created and delivered to us by the powers that be.
In many instances, the powers that be can also keep people uninformed by hiding important information that affects all of us. Whether it is disinformation, misinformation, or the suppression of important data, the mainstream news controls our understanding of the world and our place in it.
I just returned with my family from a trip to Washington, DC and had an opportunity to meet a remarkable woman from China. She told my wife and I about the awful practice of Organ Harvesting that is currently taking place in her country. According to this woman, Organ Harvesting in China targets many prisoners of conscience, who are law abiding citizens that have been imprisoned for their beliefs. The woman also told me that the Chinese government agencies, civilian and military hospitals form a value chain and are the primary culprits in this lucrative scheme. The woman we met, a former practicing nurse in China, had been unfairly imprisoned for a number of years because she had the guts to speak out against this practice.
Innocent people from America and other countries have become unknowing accomplices to this crime against humanity. Patients, who were promised fresh organs in a few days or weeks, have flown to China for transplants. Hospitals and medical schools train Chinese surgeons who go back to China and harvest organs. Pharmaceutical companies perform clinical trials that also support this insane and corrupt practice.
In 2006, an independent investigation was conducted by former Canadian Secretary of State, David Kilgour and human rights lawyer, David Matas. Their report released in July, 2006 and later published in a book titled, “Bloody Harvest” states: “We have come to the regrettable conclusion that the allegations are true. We believe that there has been and continues today to be large scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners.”
If you would like to help stop Organ Harvesting in China, visit the website www.StopOrganHarvesting.org and sign the petition to support H.Res.343. In addition, please share this post and the information in it on your social media page.
It’s time to call on the Chinese Communist Party to end Organ Harvesting from all prisoners of conscience and to allow independent investigations into organ procurement abuses to commence.
![Screenshot_2016-05-15-18-58-58_resized[1]](https://nofakenews.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/screenshot_2016-05-15-18-58-58_resized1.png?w=169&h=300)
![Screenshot_2016-05-15-18-58-21_resized[1]](https://nofakenews.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/screenshot_2016-05-15-18-58-21_resized1.png?w=169&h=300)
NoFakeNews 