censorship

Legislation Scheduled to End The Plandemic National Emergency

January 30, 2023January 30, 2023Dr. John Reizer8 Comments

The National Emergencies Act was passed in 1976 allowing presidents to declare national emergencies with just their own signature, bypassing Congress, giving them extraordinary powers they wouldn’t otherwise have.

Renewed by each successive president, 31 of these emergencies are in effect now, with the oldest dating back to 1979 with respect to Iran, signed by President Jimmy Carter.

The House Rules Committee met today to introduce four new bills that will end the “pandemic”-related national emergencies unecessarily maintained through the Biden administration — emergencies that have continued despite Biden himself claiming, a year ago, the “pandemic” is over.

One bill being presented is a resolution from Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., which states simply that the national emergency related to COVID is “hereby terminated.”

Gosar states: “There is no ongoing COVID-19 emergency to justify the continuation of the national emergency declaration . . .which is why I am calling on my colleagues and Mr. Biden to reverse course and move to give the People back their say in government.”

Another bill introduced today is the Pandemic is Over Act, from Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-Ky. That bill holds that the public health emergency declared by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on Jan. 31, 2020, is terminated.

Guthrie stated last week: “It is long overdue for President Biden to end the COVID-19 public health emergency and relinquish the emergency powers that he just renewed again,” adding “President Biden’s inaction and lack of transparency on this are unacceptable.”

Meanwhile, desiring to continue the tyranny, Dictator General of the WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, reports the WHO Emergency Committee met on Friday to consider whether Covid 19 remains a global healrh emergency stating, “The Committee has advised ne that, in its view, Covid 19 remains a global health emergency and I agree.”

Importantly, the WHO supplies suggestions. Their suggestions are not law (though they are — illegally — attempting to change that fact and make their suggestions binding international law).

Readers of NoFakeNews know there has never been a health emergency in the first place, but it is good to know legislators are finally seeing the light and taking action to stop the madness.

To follow bills being introduced in the House, visit https://docs.house.gov/floor/.

___________________

Ashley Hayes is a former business entrepreneur, patented inventor, researcher, and writer seeking to bring attention to the clearly-organized crimes of unlawful and corrupt law enforcement and fusion center personnel against innocent Americans and citizens worldwide, as well as crimes committed by military contractors via 21st century technology, and to the pandemic of child trafficking by those in power.

___________________

Coming Everywhere Soon!

An Andrew Arguello & MJ Palo Film

Watch the Target List Interview

Gareth Icke interviews John Reizer

Watch The Extended Cut

Please help us promote Target List by making a small donation on GoFundMe!

IMDb Page

www.thetargetlistmovie.com

Federal Judge Issues Preliminary Injunction Blocking California COVID ‘Misinformation’ Law

January 27, 2023January 28, 2023Dr. John Reizer3 Comments

California Assembly Bill 2098 took effect January 1, 2023. This Bill was to prevent physicians from spreading so-called “misinformation” about Covid and serve to keep them from offering any opinions, solutions or remedies to their patients that differed from the “scientific contemporary consensus.” Any doctor spreading “misinformation” would be disciplined by the state medical boards and potentially lose his or her medical license.

However, five physicians filed suit against California Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration for this new law, stating that it is in violation of their First Amendment rights and Constitutional right to due process. On Wednesday, Judge William B. Shubb agreed that the plaintiffs had standing to file the suit, stating the following in his ruling:

“For instance, who determines whether a consensus exists to begin with? If a consensus does exist, among whom must the consensus exist (for example, practicing physicians, or professional organizations, or medical researchers, or public health officials, or perhaps a combination)? In which geographic area must the consensus exist (California, or the United States, or the world)?

“What level of agreement constitutes a consensus (perhaps a plurality, or a majority, or a supermajority)? How recently in time must the consensus have been established to be considered “contemporary”? And what source or sources should physicians consult to determine what the consensus is at any given time (perhaps peer-reviewed scientific articles, or clinical guidelines from professional organizations, or public health recommendations)? The statute provides no means of understanding to what “scientific consensus” refers.”

As such, Judge Shubb issued a Preliminary Injunction against California which will, at least for now, keep them from being able to enforce such a ridiculous law.

See the full story here: https://healthimpactnews.com/2023/federal-judge-issues-preliminary-injunction-blocking-california-covid-misinformation-law/

___________________