Why You Can’t Trust Anything You See on the News

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

The mission statement of this website, from its inception, has been to provide a clearer picture of what is really happening in the world. Our premise remains unchanged. We maintain our unique position that the powers that be regularly misuse the mainstream media (MSM) to manipulate and mislead humanity away from the truth.

No matter how many posts are published here or on websites that have similar agendas to ours, there will be doubters out there that believe the content being disseminated via traditional media outlets is completely trustworthy.

I found an interesting video that exposes a technology that has probably been used for many years to alter the perceptions of many unsuspecting MSM viewers.

Take a look at the video below:

San Bernardino Shooting Story: The Facts Just Don’t Add Up

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

Does 1+1= 6? Of course not! I’m not a mathematician, but even a 36 year old seminar coordinator from Barcelona, Spain can figure out that 1+1=2.

If you told a first grade student that 1+1=6, she would look at you like you were crazy and then laugh out loud. A young child has the ability to understand when a simple math equation just doesn’t add up.

If an international adult audience watching CNN or some other mainstream media (MSM) news service were constantly told that 1+1=6, they might believe the equation and answer are correct. Really think about this concept for a few seconds. People keep watching the same video loops repeatedly throughout the day and in-between those loops you have various so-called experts repetitively explaining to them how it’s possible the equation and answer are actually correct. After awhile, the adult audience becomes hypnotized and actually begins to believe the equation 1+1=6 is logical.

As I continued to watch the MSM’s coverage of the San Bernardino shooting, there were a lot of things in my opinion, which did not add up.

I find it fascinating to watch how the corporately controlled news companies get people to think a certain way. The MSM no longer reports the facts about any major happening. Instead, they focus their efforts on shaping the way the audience thinks. The MSM is delivering to its targeted audience pure unadulterated mind control.

I find myself constantly wondering why some very important questions are not being asked, addressed, or are simply being glossed over by professional journalists. What’s going on here?

In the case of the California shootings, it’s not easy to simultaneously dupe the police and entire world unless you have access to the best black ops forces in the world. The Illuminati masters have such tools at their immediate disposal and are unafraid to use them in order to achieve their ultimate goal of ushering in a New World Order. Because they also control the MSM, the Illuminati can make an entire population base believe that 1+1=6.

I would like to call your attention to some of the details of this tragedy that are bothering me. I will also insert my conspiratorial opinions herein that will explain to readers why I believe something is not quite right with regards to the San Bernardino scenario.

I understand that some readers will dismiss my writings as those coming from a conspiracy nut. I realize that anyone attempting to question the veracity of the MSM and the officialdom coming from the authorities in charge will be cast in a negative light, labeled a “truther”, or something along those lines. It’s okay. I am a big girl and can handle the criticism.

At the time of the shooting incident, a shooting drill depicting the same scenario just happened to be taking place nearby. SWAT police forces were in full gear, participating in the drill and “ready to roll” according to official police sources. Where have we observed this scenario before? There were simultaneous police drills taking place at the times of the Paris shootings on 11/13/15; New York City on September 11, 2001; the Sandy Hook massacre; the Boston Marathon bombing; Oklahoma City, etc. It goes on and on folks.

The three gunmen shooting up the holiday party were in full military gear and wearing masks to conceal their identities. They successfully escaped the premises in a black SUV despite the fact that SWAT forces were at the crime scene in a very short period of time. Is it possible a special ops team executed the shooting and then quickly exited the crime scene? Why drive up in a black SUV? Why would the shooters pick such a conspicuous looking vehicle?

The three shooters mysteriously became two shooters according to the reports coming from the MSM and police officials discussing the crime scene. What happened to the third masked shooter? Who was this individual? Was this person a handler or someone else coordinating the attack?

According to the public accounts of this tragedy, 3-4 hours lapsed before the “two shooters” made another appearance a couple of miles away as the police figured out where the alleged terrorists lived. They were then pursued by the police in a black SUV and a shootout began that ultimately lead to the deaths of both suspects. What happened in those 3-4 hours of lapsed time? Was it used to equip the suspects’ residence with ammunition and a bomb laboratory?

According to the suspects’ family’s attorney, Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik were not violent or aggressive people. The suspects’ family members were caught completely off guard by the news of their involvement in the shootings. The attorney was interviewed on CNN on Friday, December 4, 2015 and said on live television that Malik weighed around 90 pounds and was probably not even strong enough to carry the types of weapons used in the crimes.

Malik was the mother of a six-month old baby!  I find it difficult to believe that a mother would abandon her six-month old baby?

According to the family’s attorney, the two dead suspects were handcuffed and riddled with bullets inside the black SUV. Is it normal police protocol to handcuff the suspects after they’ve been killed? I don’t honestly know about this but it seems damn strange to me.

Police found lots of bombs and ammunition inside the suspects’ house. The police stated that a small weapons and bomb laboratory existed inside the couple’s garage. It was apparent from the contents inside the house that the suspects were planning to do a lot more damage to the same crime scene or perhaps an additional location. Or perhaps a black ops team set up the weapons laboratory in the garage over a 3-4 hour period of time because they wanted to make it seem like the suspects were preparing for a lot more terrorist activities later the same day? Maybe they set up the suspects’ residence to look like it did before the police and other authorities arrived on the scene?

According to undisclosed sources, police found two destroyed cell phones and a computer that was missing its hard drive. It appears as if the suspects did not want anybody to have access to their computer documents or communications that would link them to the incident? Or perhaps the powers that be didn’t want police investigators to find out that the two suspects were not involved with the crime scene or any other terrorist activities?

According to another source speaking on a condition of anonymity, Malik made a social media post on Facebook at 11:00 am, just prior to the shooting rampage, which praised some radical Islamic leader. Malik and Farook destroyed computer and cell phone devices, but Malik still found time to make a post on Facebook to praise a radical Islamic leader?

The couple end their day and lives four hours later in a shootout with police a short distance away from the original crime scene. This stinks of MK-Ultra mind control programming. Were the two suspects mind controlled to be patsies?

I don’t have enough information and details from the shooting incident in San Bernardino to know for sure what really happened. I know that a terrible tragedy occurred and lots of people lost their lives. I know that lots of people were seriously injured. I know that lots of brave law enforcement people risked their lives to protect civilians. I know that a lot of things in the story do not add up and that the public will never be told the complete truth with regards to whom or what was really behind the attack.

I think the police and people investigating this incident honestly believe the suspects killed were responsible for the death and carnage that took place in California. The sleight of hand tactics that can be performed in most terror events are sophisticated. They can fool the authorities, reporters, and everybody else watching in the world.

Many people know about the Illuminati’s ultimate goal of creating a New World Order. Don’t be confused or fooled by the sleight of hand machinations being used to reach that end point. Remember that 1+1 should always equal 2.

Keeping us Inside the Box

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

Did you ever happen to notice how major news networks treat subjects and story lines that tug and pull us away from our carefully manufactured understanding of the way things are supposed to work in the world? For example, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of UFO sightings every year. Despite all the reports of paranormal activities, the traditional media companies, writers and news people turn a blind eye or a deaf ear, in a lot of situations, to very credible witnesses. Can so many people in the world be wrong about aliens, UFOs and other strange happenings?

When the occasional story, challenging conventional mindset, makes its way on the evening news, it often seems as if the anchor person, delivering the day’s propaganda, feels obligated to apologize to viewers for broaching such subject matter. Or, even worse, some news people feel inclined to joke about the witnesses attached to a particular story, making them seem as if they’re all lunatics on leave from a local mental asylum.

On almost every television documentary I’ve ever watched, that attempted to seriously examine paranormal activities, there’s always some authority figure (skeptic) afforded an opportunity to get the last words on the topic. This individual, without exception, is the proverbial bull that’s about to enter a china shop. The china shop, of course, being the carefully constructed theories of reputable scientists and the commentary of selected eyewitnesses offering their understanding of said paranormal activities being scrutinized.

There’s a common pattern that can be easily identified in many of these documentaries. In the first 45 minutes of the program, viewers are encouraged to believe that the paranormal subject under consideration is plausible.  As the show progresses, pieces of evidence are reviewed and experts interviewed. One by one, scientists promote the idea that the paranormal event is under serious review. It’s all a cleverly plotted script. It’s also a psychological roller coaster, designed to build up the hype before the bull enters the china shop.

It’s the final 15 minutes of the presentation that is really important. In those 15 minutes, the skeptic methodically crushes everything that was presented in the beginning of the film. The skeptic, the paid shill, neatly pulls the entire viewing audience back to terra firma. At last, conventionality is restored and the documentary’s real objective is achieved. That objective, of course, is to maintain conventional thinking standards in the minds of all members of the viewing audience.

The purpose of the History Channel is not to teach history. Its agenda is to teach members of society the false history the powers that be have authorized. The tremendous influence of media products is often underestimated by individual citizens. When we watch television or read magazines, people are often unaware of the hypnotic effects these products can induce in our minds. We assume, incorrectly, that everything being broadcast on television is truthful information. You know the saying, “If it’s on television, it’s got to be true.” In reality, it’s most likely not true. Television programs are paid for by corporate sponsors and those companies have agendas. Some of them have dangerous agendas that affect our understanding of many important issues.

The producers of the mainstream media circus want us to believe that everything happening in the world does so in a conventional manner. They want to keep us inside the box. According to the corporate controlled media, everything is portrayed as being black and white with no shades of paranormal activity. Unfortunately, our poor understanding of what’s occurring in the world is a far cry from what is actually taking place on a daily basis.

What do you think about this subject?

The Mainstream Media’s Bait and Switch Techniques are Designed to Keep Us in the Box

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakenews.net

reizer3It never ceases to amaze me how incredibly predictable the mainstream news companies have become when reporting on their fluff filled stories that attempt to misinform and deceive the public they are supposed to be serving.

On August 22, 2013, Space.com released an off world story that was picked up by Yahoo News. This particular piece was featured with the sensational title, “Astronaut Sees ‘UFO’ Near Space Station.” Really? Do you honestly believe the “lamestream” news companies would be allowed to release a story like that to the American public?

The title, in this situation, is the bait and when the reader (sucker) clicks on the link to view the article, they soon figure out that the “UFO” the astronaut supposedly saw was a piece of space garbage that happened to be floating by the International Space Station. And so the sensational title (the bait) is followed by a nonsense article (the switch) that has no real news content in it whatsoever. Why is this even being packaged and discussed as news? The answer is because it helps to keep people firmly planted within the parameters of conventional thinking. This type of garbage story assures readers that there is nothing of importance going on off world. Think again!

I am pretty sure there are plenty of real UFO’s passing by the astronauts and the International Space Station everyday. It is pretty obvious that the mainstream news companies and NASA are not going to report on the existence of these encounters. They would rather report on how an astronaut observed the passing by of space junk and related debris.

I challenge space.com and NASA to seriously discuss the structures and buildings that exist on our moon and Mars. I challenge them to seriously discuss many of the photos that depict artificial structures on these foreign worlds. And I challenge our space agency to seriously discuss, in a public forum, the photographs that show evidence of intelligent life on other worlds that are currently on file on NASA’s own websites. These photos exist and the funny thing about them is that they are all in the public domain. They are available for public viewing, yet no one even pays attention to the evidence.

We are such a complacent and apathetic society that it is scary. Even when the evidence exists, we couldn’t care less about looking at it.

What do you think about this subject?