Sandy Hook, San Bernardino & Boston Bombing – False Flags?

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

The video below features an interesting interview with Jim Fetzer, who maintains nobody died at Sandy Hook. According to Fetzer, the entire event was nothing more than a very cleverly orchestrated false flag operation. Fetzer also claims San Bernardino and the Boston Bombings were staged events.

Mr. Fetzer is a magna cum laude graduate of Princeton University where he majored in philosophy and earned a Ph.D. in the history and philosophy of science.

 

Three Tall White Men Were The Shooters at San Bernardino

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

According to an eyewitness that worked at the Inland Medical Center in San Bernardino, California, three tall white men were responsible for the shootings that killed 14 people and injured 21 others. Sally Abdelmageed and another eyewitness, Juan Hernandez told CBS news on the day of the shootings that the three shooters all had athletic builds and were wearing military fatigues. See interviews on video below:

Keep in mind that these interviews took place very soon after the shootings occurred. The massive media mind control blitz that instructed viewers around the world to inaccurately believe that a Muslim husband and wife were responsible for the attack had not yet begun.

In most instances, the closest the public will ever get to seeing the truth about a false flag operation is right after the incident takes place. After the initial interviews are conducted that often reveal the truth about what transpired, fake witnesses are often inserted and made available to reporters. The script gets rolling from there and the truth is permanently buried from that point forward.

We’re watching a movie here people. If you believe that the two dead suspects were responsible for the shootings in California, you have been hoodwinked by a massive psychological operations mission.

WAKE THE FLOCK UP, SHEEPLE!

San Bernardino Shooting Story: The Facts Just Don’t Add Up

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

Does 1+1= 6? Of course not! I’m not a mathematician, but even a 36 year old seminar coordinator from Barcelona, Spain can figure out that 1+1=2.

If you told a first grade student that 1+1=6, she would look at you like you were crazy and then laugh out loud. A young child has the ability to understand when a simple math equation just doesn’t add up.

If an international adult audience watching CNN or some other mainstream media (MSM) news service were constantly told that 1+1=6, they might believe the equation and answer are correct. Really think about this concept for a few seconds. People keep watching the same video loops repeatedly throughout the day and in-between those loops you have various so-called experts repetitively explaining to them how it’s possible the equation and answer are actually correct. After awhile, the adult audience becomes hypnotized and actually begins to believe the equation 1+1=6 is logical.

As I continued to watch the MSM’s coverage of the San Bernardino shooting, there were a lot of things in my opinion, which did not add up.

I find it fascinating to watch how the corporately controlled news companies get people to think a certain way. The MSM no longer reports the facts about any major happening. Instead, they focus their efforts on shaping the way the audience thinks. The MSM is delivering to its targeted audience pure unadulterated mind control.

I find myself constantly wondering why some very important questions are not being asked, addressed, or are simply being glossed over by professional journalists. What’s going on here?

In the case of the California shootings, it’s not easy to simultaneously dupe the police and entire world unless you have access to the best black ops forces in the world. The Illuminati masters have such tools at their immediate disposal and are unafraid to use them in order to achieve their ultimate goal of ushering in a New World Order. Because they also control the MSM, the Illuminati can make an entire population base believe that 1+1=6.

I would like to call your attention to some of the details of this tragedy that are bothering me. I will also insert my conspiratorial opinions herein that will explain to readers why I believe something is not quite right with regards to the San Bernardino scenario.

I understand that some readers will dismiss my writings as those coming from a conspiracy nut. I realize that anyone attempting to question the veracity of the MSM and the officialdom coming from the authorities in charge will be cast in a negative light, labeled a “truther”, or something along those lines. It’s okay. I am a big girl and can handle the criticism.

At the time of the shooting incident, a shooting drill depicting the same scenario just happened to be taking place nearby. SWAT police forces were in full gear, participating in the drill and “ready to roll” according to official police sources. Where have we observed this scenario before? There were simultaneous police drills taking place at the times of the Paris shootings on 11/13/15; New York City on September 11, 2001; the Sandy Hook massacre; the Boston Marathon bombing; Oklahoma City, etc. It goes on and on folks.

The three gunmen shooting up the holiday party were in full military gear and wearing masks to conceal their identities. They successfully escaped the premises in a black SUV despite the fact that SWAT forces were at the crime scene in a very short period of time. Is it possible a special ops team executed the shooting and then quickly exited the crime scene? Why drive up in a black SUV? Why would the shooters pick such a conspicuous looking vehicle?

The three shooters mysteriously became two shooters according to the reports coming from the MSM and police officials discussing the crime scene. What happened to the third masked shooter? Who was this individual? Was this person a handler or someone else coordinating the attack?

According to the public accounts of this tragedy, 3-4 hours lapsed before the “two shooters” made another appearance a couple of miles away as the police figured out where the alleged terrorists lived. They were then pursued by the police in a black SUV and a shootout began that ultimately lead to the deaths of both suspects. What happened in those 3-4 hours of lapsed time? Was it used to equip the suspects’ residence with ammunition and a bomb laboratory?

According to the suspects’ family’s attorney, Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik were not violent or aggressive people. The suspects’ family members were caught completely off guard by the news of their involvement in the shootings. The attorney was interviewed on CNN on Friday, December 4, 2015 and said on live television that Malik weighed around 90 pounds and was probably not even strong enough to carry the types of weapons used in the crimes.

Malik was the mother of a six-month old baby!  I find it difficult to believe that a mother would abandon her six-month old baby?

According to the family’s attorney, the two dead suspects were handcuffed and riddled with bullets inside the black SUV. Is it normal police protocol to handcuff the suspects after they’ve been killed? I don’t honestly know about this but it seems damn strange to me.

Police found lots of bombs and ammunition inside the suspects’ house. The police stated that a small weapons and bomb laboratory existed inside the couple’s garage. It was apparent from the contents inside the house that the suspects were planning to do a lot more damage to the same crime scene or perhaps an additional location. Or perhaps a black ops team set up the weapons laboratory in the garage over a 3-4 hour period of time because they wanted to make it seem like the suspects were preparing for a lot more terrorist activities later the same day? Maybe they set up the suspects’ residence to look like it did before the police and other authorities arrived on the scene?

According to undisclosed sources, police found two destroyed cell phones and a computer that was missing its hard drive. It appears as if the suspects did not want anybody to have access to their computer documents or communications that would link them to the incident? Or perhaps the powers that be didn’t want police investigators to find out that the two suspects were not involved with the crime scene or any other terrorist activities?

According to another source speaking on a condition of anonymity, Malik made a social media post on Facebook at 11:00 am, just prior to the shooting rampage, which praised some radical Islamic leader. Malik and Farook destroyed computer and cell phone devices, but Malik still found time to make a post on Facebook to praise a radical Islamic leader?

The couple end their day and lives four hours later in a shootout with police a short distance away from the original crime scene. This stinks of MK-Ultra mind control programming. Were the two suspects mind controlled to be patsies?

I don’t have enough information and details from the shooting incident in San Bernardino to know for sure what really happened. I know that a terrible tragedy occurred and lots of people lost their lives. I know that lots of people were seriously injured. I know that lots of brave law enforcement people risked their lives to protect civilians. I know that a lot of things in the story do not add up and that the public will never be told the complete truth with regards to whom or what was really behind the attack.

I think the police and people investigating this incident honestly believe the suspects killed were responsible for the death and carnage that took place in California. The sleight of hand tactics that can be performed in most terror events are sophisticated. They can fool the authorities, reporters, and everybody else watching in the world.

Many people know about the Illuminati’s ultimate goal of creating a New World Order. Don’t be confused or fooled by the sleight of hand machinations being used to reach that end point. Remember that 1+1 should always equal 2.

REPORTERS ALLOWED TO STORM SAN BERNARDINO SHOOTERS’ APARTMENT, REVEAL POTENTIAL EVIDENCE ON LIVE TV

Editor’s Note: Yet another reason people think this event was staged. When have you ever seen a crime scene of an open investigation in a terrorist mass shooting treated this way?

2015-12-04_17-15-46

Earlier today, we brought you the latest from the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California that left 14 dead and 21 injured after husband and wife Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik stormed a holiday party with assault rifles.

On Thursday, the FBI indicated that Farook may have had ties to “tangential” terrorists and the media was rife with speculation that the Chicago-born, county health inspector may have been radicalized by Malik, who he married in 2013 in Saudi Arabia.

We predicted that it wouldn’t be long before the mass media “discovered” the San Bernardino equivalent of the Syrian passport found in Paris and sure enough, earlier today, CNN reported that authorities believe Malik pledged allegiance to ISIS leader Bakr-al Baghdadi in a Facebook post as the attacks were unfolding.

Shortly thereafter, Reuters reported that Islamic State media have confirmed that the group’s followers were responsible for the attack. 

Then, just when you thought the media circus might die down for the day, the landlord of the home where Farook and Malik resided pried open the “door” (which is actually a piece of plywood after the FBI stormed the home) and allowed the media to enter and rummage through everything from photos, to passports, to driver’s licenses, to the crib of the couple’s six month-old baby.

Here’s more from The LA Times:

On Friday morning, reporters were allowed by a landlord to enter the apartment of Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik.

A man was seen using a crowbar to open the plywood-covered front door, allowing a rush of reporters, photographers and videographers to spill into the home.

The chaotic scene of reporters and TV cameras going through the apartment was broadcast live on news channels.

Reporters were shown on networks rifling through what appeared to be personal information, including driver’s licenses. Some were shown going through photos and entering closets.

The scene had been closed off since the shooting. It was not immediately clear if law enforcement officials had allowed the apartment to be accessed.

Los Angeles Times reporter Kate Mather was among the reporters allowed in.

In the apartment, there were small black tables in the middle of the main room. On one table was a copy of the Koran.

Another table had a lengthy list of dozens of items that the FBI had seized as part of their investigation.

The list included Christmas lights, an iPhone, several boxes and bags of various types of ammunition, letters, a passport and gun accessories.

An FBI spokerperson said the bureau had “finished its investigation,” but they were kind enough to leave a “receipt” documenting the items confiscated.

Here’s a clip which is largely representative of the melee:

And here are some screenshots and a few particularly egregious highlights which some social media users have described as “journalistic malpractice.”

And here’s a clip that will likely live in media infamy:

*  *  *  Obviously, this is an attempt to create a giant media spectacle out of the incident, which is broadly consistent with how the mainstream outlets cover all tragedies only this time around, they’re exposing potential evidence. Not only that, it doesn’t seem to have occurred to anyone that now every reporter whose face was shown in the various videos inside the home will henceforth be known in the Islamic world as someone who’s willing to exploit images of a child’s crib for the sake of entertaining America’s mindless masses. You can bet ISIS will use this very same footage to make a point in future propaganda videos.  Oh, and in case you were wondering what hangs above the couple’s upstairs bathroom, the LA Times’ Kate Mather has you covered:

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).


Contributed by of Zero Hedge.