The Real Matrix: Society’s Addiction to the Blue Pill

By Dr. John Reizer

CONGRATULATIONS! You made a wise choice when you selected the CONTINUE option. Now let’s get down to business. A good place to begin is with a discussion about the Matrix.

One of the greatest films ever released, in my opinion, was the original Matrix movie starring Keanu Reeves. The film very cleverly demonstrated the lack of understanding most people have regarding real-world events. Truth be told, many of us are like the character in the Matrix movie, unable to crack specific security codes that would allow us to understand what is happening in our realm.

In the Matrix movie, the main character (Neo) is gradually awakened to the fact that nothing in the world is the way it appears. As the film evolves, Neo’s understanding of life is eventually replaced with a truer representation of reality. The Neo character learns that the images of the world he has always embraced as being genuine have been disingenuously implanted in his mind by a computer-operated world.

Throughout most of the movie, Neo tries to view the Matrix and make sense of it. Even when he learns of its existence, he lacks the skills to fully understand the different levels within the Matrix. To Neo, the Matrix initially appears as a never-ending list of numbers and letters that have been encrypted into an unbreakable code. At the end of the movie, Reeves is finally able to unlock the code and see the world for what it is.

The Matrix Movie is a metaphor for real life. It illustrates, quite well, the fact that total reality and a human being’s perception of reality are very different things. The true nature of our world is not anything close to what we have been led to believe it is.

The basic goals of NoFakeNews are to raise awareness in readers about the machinations taking place by the powers that be and also to shed light on how those powers greatly influence mainstream media companies and ultimately keep members of society inside the confines of another Matrix. That’s right! We live in a real Matrix. Its existence lies outside the fictional plot that was a blockbuster movie.

Many people have enjoyed watching the Matrix movie. They fully understood the cinematic plot and yet they are unable to see The Real Matrix all of us live in every single day that we are alive. Many of us lack the skillset to be able to crack the necessary codes that would allow us to view our world as it exists.

Every time we tune into the mainstream news, we are, in a sense, taking the blue pill. In the Matrix movie, the blue pill represented amnesia, a prescription for keeping people blissfully ignorant about everything in life that made up the very fabric of their perceived reality. When presented with the opportunity, Neo decides not to swallow the blue pill. He chooses, instead, the red pill which allows him to explore another side of reality, an opportunity that few people in his fictional world have a chance to experience.

Mainstream media companies represent the blue pill in our world and there are more people than ever before addicted to this longstanding habit. As long as people continue to tune in to the mainstream media products that litter our society, people will be unable to see the world as it is.

Welcome to NoFakeNews! A free subscription to this website is what many people might be lacking in their lives.

Please click the archive box on this website to access older articles or the NoFakeNews title at the very top of the page to access the most recent articles published.

ENJOY!

Excellent Presentation About Water Fluoridation: Watch this Video!

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

In honor of Fluoride Awareness Week, I am featuring this excellent presentation that addresses the pros and cons associated with the practice of water fluoridation.

Please watch the following video:

For those people that are new to NoFakeNews.net, let me explain a few house rules about this electronic magazine:

1. This is a private website and you are cordially invited to peruse the various posts that have been written for the benefit of people looking for a different perspective on many subjects that are impacting and affecting human beings on a daily basis.

2. Feel free to leave a comment regarding a specific article or subject. If I like what you have to say I will publish your words of wisdom. If I think your comment is not suitable to publish for whatever reason I deem it inappropriate, it will not appear on the website.

3. Regarding health topics: Please do not attempt to clog up my comment boards with “officialdom” such as “peer-reviewed” research that demonstrates vaccines, Mercury, and Fluoride are safe for human beings. If you want to state an opinion such as this, make your post one time and please move on so others can be read.

4. Please do not attack or be rude to other posters because I promise you your comments will be removed from the site and you will lose the privilege of posting on NoFakeNews in the future.

5. If you do not like the house rules listed above, please feel free to unsubscribe from the website. I assure you that there are plenty of other interesting addresses to visit on the Internet.

 

Thanks!

Dr. John L. Reizer

 

 

The IABDM: Fluoride and Mercury Free Dentistry

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

I am including a link for readers that want access to professional dental services without the risks of being exposed to the toxic substances, Fluoride and Mercury.

Biological dentistry is concerned with the whole body effects of all dental materials, techniques and procedures.
It is fluoride-free, mercury-free and mercury-safe.

Please visit the IABDM (International Academy of Biological Dentistry & Medicine’s) website by clicking this link and become educated by the dental professionals that truly understand the serious dangers associated with Fluoride and Mercury.

AMA Endorses the Elimination of Religious Exemptions Regarding Vaccinations

By Dr. John L Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

reizer3

According to an article in the publication, Newsweek, the AMA (American Medical Association) has recently endorsed a new policy that has the goal of eliminating religious exemptions regarding vaccinations for healthcare consumers in the United States. Although the AMA is not a government agency that can write actual laws, it has tremendous influence and lobbying power over state and other legislative bodies that ultimately determine healthcare laws in America.

This is a very aggressive policy change by the AMA that could spell the end of healthcare consumers’ rights to choose if and when they submit to a particular vaccine at a given time during their lives.

Currently, many states have laws that allow citizens to choose whether or not they receive medical vaccines. Religious and philosophical exemptions are regularly used by anti-vaccine groups in order to opt out of the regularly published vaccine guidelines that are followed by the large majority of people throughout the country.

Most recently, a measles outbreak originating in California in the Disneyland Park has been promoted ad nauseum by the corporately owned mainstream media. It has reached the point of becoming a witch hunt on many news programs as people have been featured on television calling out parents that have chosen not to vaccinate their children for fear of what these potentially harmful drugs might do to their children. All of this rubbish came about because less than 200 people in the entire United States were infected by measles in 2014. The Measles outbreak in Disneyland has been cited by the AMA as one of the reasons they have revised their policy and want to bring an end to religious exemptions regarding vaccinations.

Some health care experts believe that vaccines are very dangerous drugs and make people weaker, sicker, and more vulnerable to diseases they would otherwise not have to contend with. Some doctors also believe that these medicines do not create immunity and that the vaccine ingredients are toxic beyond belief and bad for all human beings.

In 1998, the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, published a controversial paper that linked MMR vaccinations to Autism. The MMR vaccine is a preventive, medicinal concoction against Measles, Mumps, and Rubella.

According to mainstream health sources, The Lancet article caused a major panic in the minds of parents in both Britain and the United States. Because of the study, many parents chose not to vaccinate their children and opted for safer measures to maintain the health and well being of younger family members. (1)

An independent investigative journalist, Brian Deer, determined that the author of the famous article, Andrew Wakefield, M.D., had manipulated evidence in his study and had also broken several ethical standards within the field of research. As a result of Deer’s investigation, Wakefield’s study was retracted by The Lancet in 2010. Dr. Wakefield was later reprimanded by the medical profession and stripped of his license to practice medicine. (2)

The news about the Wakefield Study being retracted was given worldwide exposure by the corporately, owned mainstream media. In fact, anytime a person attempts to type anything relating to vaccines and Autism into an Internet search engine, the results are littered with references about the now famous retraction of the Wakefield study.

Since the retraction of the study, many health care professionals have indicated that the Wakefield article was singled out and crushed by representatives of Big Pharma in order to protect the vaccine industry. Obviously, a lot of money was at stake in the way of potential lawsuits against vaccine makers, as well as the British and United States governments. Enough said!

Regardless of a person’s feelings about the benefits or dangers associated with vaccinations, it is the opinion of this writer that every human being should have the right to choose if he or she wants to be exposed to a particular medicine.

What do you think about this subject?

 

What Is Cervical Arthrosis and What Can I Do About It?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

The other day one of my patients wanted to know what the condition, Cervical Arthrosis was. I smiled and told the woman that it was another fancy word for osteoarthritis in the neck. I told the woman that by being under chiropractic care, the condition would probably not get any worse and not to worry too much.

“But what if a person had this disease and lived in a country where there were no chiropractors?” she asked me with a frown on her face.

“Do you know someone with Cervical Arthrosis?” I asked my patient.

“My sister,” she replied. “She has the early stages of this condition. Her hands are always numb and have pain at the same time. She gets headaches, too.”

I felt sorry for my patient and I tried to give her the best advice that I could think of. The conversation inspired me to write this article that might be helpful to others and especially readers of this blog that live in areas of the world that do not have practicing chiropractors.

Let me preface this post by writing that Arthrosis/Osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition of a joint in the body. In the case of Cervical Arthrosis the degenerative changes are between the spinal vertebrae in the neck.

Whenever there exists a situation where the body’s joints become slightly misaligned from one another, the climate will become conducive for the genesis of Osteoarthritis. The body realizes that misaligned boney joints in the human body could impede the function of nerves and blood vessels. Because of this situation the body’s natural intelligence will cause a physiological process to occur that begins to cement the bones in place so that they will not go any further out of alignment. This cementing process is what we commonly refer to as Arthrosis or Osteoarthritis. It is a degenerative change in the joint.

As a chiropractor, I check the integrity of spinal alignment in my patients on a regular basis. When I locate a spinal misalignment that is impeding the function of the nervous system (Vertebral Subluxation), I make a chiropractic adjustment to the segment involved in order to correct the alignment. Once the alignment is corrected, further degenerative changes in the spine usually will not occur.

If a person cannot get access to a chiropractor, they should have a massage therapist gently traction their neck by pulling very gently on the head which will decompress the cervical spinal segments. In many instances, gentle forces of traction in the cervical spine can help unlock or reposition cervical spinal bones back into a normal position without an adjustment being administered. The natural anatomy of the spinal muscles that surround the spine are usually already engaged and attempting to pull the segments back into proper alignment. The traction forces will unlock the segments in some situations and the muscles will guide the bones back into their proper positions which can help retard further degenerative changes. Under no circumstances should any person attempt to manipulate their neck or someone else’s neck or make a spinal adjustment unless they are a licensed chiropractor.

In addition to this advice, gentle flexion and extension exercises of the neck (moving your neck forward and backward) can help to naturally unlock stubborn misalignments. The same exercises can be performed very gently from side to side (lateral flexion).

The key to spinal health is proper alignment of the vertebrae. Adequate motion of spinal joints also helps the joints become healthier for many reasons that I will not have the time to cover in this short article.

People with Cervical Arthrosis should limit the amount of time they spend on a computer or watching television. In other words, you don’t want to keep the neck in a constant and fixed position throughout the entire day. Also try to find a very comfortable cervical pillow that can assure a good night’s rest without placing undue stress on the neck bones.

I hope this information will be helpful to someone.

Disclaimer!

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

Introducing Michael Morris Book Released on Amazon.com

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

In an earlier post this year, I promised I would inform readers when my latest book, “Introducing Michael Morris: The Beginning of the End Game”  was officially released for distribution. That publication has now been released and can be purchased on Amazon.com.

product_thumbnail (1)In my writing career to date, I have authored and published 20 books. While it is true that all of my writings, whether designed for entertainment or personal and professional instruction, attempt to educate the members of society about what I believe are very important subjects, I  am convinced this latest book is the most important text I have ever written.

Enjoy!

 

A recent Amazon Reviewer from Chattanooga, TN wrote about the following:

Click Review below for original source:

CLICK HERE TO PURCHASE BOOK FROM AMAZON.COM

 

The Recent Measles Scare: More Vaccination Propaganda in Play

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net 

Long before the development and introduction of a measles vaccine, children worldwide would contract this childhood disease and recover in a relatively short period of time without complications and with true lifelong immunity. The same could be also said in regards to cases of Mumps and Rubella. (1)

The childhood diseases are believed by some health care specialists to be a natural primer to the human immune system. In other words, children that contract these diseases prior to puberty can benefit from a stronger and more efficient immune system response against other and more potentially devastating health challenges later in life.

At the center of the vaccination controversy is the well documented anger of many families that have had to endure pain and suffering because their children were permanently harmed or killed from adverse vaccine reactions. A family asking for compensation for damages stemming from vaccine injuries to their child is not a new concept. Pharmaceutical companies, in the past, have had to pay out large monetary awards in an effort to settle lawsuits generated from vaccination injuries to small children.

Recently, new legislation has been passed that limits the monetary awards parents can recover when seeking damages caused from vaccine injuries. Such cases are now heard in a special vaccine injury court. This venue limits all monetary awards at $250,000. In addition to that, it is quite cumbersome to enter specialized vaccine courts and many cases are thrown out before they get started. Unlike other courtroom scenarios, the vaccine cases are heard by a special vaccine judge and you can pretty much imagine how biased and unfair, in the direction of the pharmaceutical manufacturers, this process has become.

Despite the tremendous risks associated with vaccinating children and the relatively benign nature of most childhood diseases as well as other maladies being protected against, the pharmaceutical industry has managed to brainwash most parents and health care consumers into believing that the human body is completely defenseless against a never ending assortment of deadly microbes.

Most recently, a measles outbreak originating in California in the Disneyland Park has been promoted ad nauseum by the corporately owned mainstream media. It has reached the point of becoming a witch hunt on many news programs as people have been featured on television calling out parents that have chosen not to vaccinate their children for fear of what these very harmful drugs can potentially do to their children. All of this rubbish came about because 84 people in the entire United States have been infected by measles in 2015 as of this writing. This is craziness and a lot of propaganda being promoted by Big Pharma.

My point of contention remains quite simple and logical to understand. If the people getting vaccinated feel unsafe due to the fact that others around them are unvaccinated, how effective can the vaccines really be? The truth be told, the vaccines are not very effective at all. And the medical profession over the years has alluded to this fact in their professional journals.

An article written in JAMA, May, 1990 stated, “In an era when physicians are relatively unfamiliar with the disease, failure to detect measles in some vaccinated people will lead to calculation of artificially low attack rates for the vaccinated population.” (2)

It appears when one reviews the large number of claims being made today that a lot of children might be getting needlessly harmed from vaccines. This is not something that can be hidden, any longer, as the complaints continue to pile up in the vaccine courts and the accusatory finger has been pointed in the face of the Medical Establishment for their involvement in possibly causing more harm than good when it comes to the vaccine issue.

Some health care experts believe that vaccines are very dangerous drugs and make people weaker, sicker, and more vulnerable to diseases they would otherwise not have to contend with. Some doctors also believe that these medicines do not create immunity and that the vaccine ingredients are toxic beyond belief and bad for all human beings.

In 1998, the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, published a controversial paper that linked MMR vaccinations to Autism. The MMR vaccine is a preventive, medicinal concoction against Measles, Mumps, and Rubella.

According to mainstream health sources, The Lancet article caused a major panic in the minds of parents in both Britain and the United States. Because of the study, many parents chose not to vaccinate their children and opted for safer measures to maintain the health and well being of younger family members. (3)

An independent investigative journalist, Brian Deer, determined that the author of the famous article, Andrew Wakefield, M.D., had manipulated evidence in his study and had also broken several ethical standards within the field of research. As a result of Deer’s investigation, Wakefield’s study was retracted by The Lancet in 2010. Dr. Wakefield was later reprimanded by the medical profession and stripped of his license to practice medicine. (4)

The news about the Wakefield Study being retracted was given worldwide exposure by the corporately, owned mainstream media. In fact, anytime a person attempts to type anything relating to vaccines and Autism into an Internet search engine, the results are littered with references about the now famous retraction of the Wakefield study. How convenient and considerate it was for the news services to have provided this information for all health care consumers in the world.

Since the retraction of the study, many health care professionals have indicated that the Wakefield article was singled out and crushed by representatives of Big Pharma in order to protect the vaccine industry. Obviously, a lot of money was at stake in the way of potential lawsuits against vaccine makers, as well as the British and United States governments. Enough said!

One impressive article that was featured in the online publication, Natural News.com, implied that several of the key players responsible for having the Wakefield study retracted were tied to major pharmaceutical companies that had deep financial interests in the vaccine industry. (5)

As has been reported for a very longtime by many independent researchers, Big Pharma seems to have very rigid ties to medical research as well as the journals that publish medical studies. (6) These corporations have the ultimate power to greatly influence research so that the studies being released each year routinely support the petrochemical industry’s products. They also appear to have the power to erase important studies that slip through the cracks and speak out against the dangers of various medicines.

To this day, Dr. Wakefield maintains his innocence and credibility regarding the famous 1998 paper. (7) As is the case with many things in this world, if you want to know the truth about a particular situation, you simply follow the money trail.

Very simply written, the immunization industry remains the holy grail of modern medicine and is carefully protected by followers and financiers within the church of medicine. Any health care practitioner that attempts to shed light on the dangers associated with vaccinating our children can expect to be ridiculed, attacked, or ostracized from their profession. And for those individuals that doubt the authenticity of such claims, they only have to look at the unfair treatment of Dr. Andrew Wakefield.

What do you think about this subject?

Sources:

(1) What About Immunizations? Exposing The Vaccine Philosophy: A Parent’s Guide to the Vaccination Decision – Cynthia Cournoyer – © 1991 Fifth Edition Nelson’s Books

(2) E. Markowitz, S.R. Preblud, W.A. Orenstein, et al. “Patterns of Transmissions in measles outbreaks in the United States, 1985-1986.” New England Journal of Medicine 1989; 320:75-81, as cited by Randall Neustaedter, The Immunization Decision: A Guide For Parents.

(3) Online Link

(4) Online Link

(5) Online Link

(6) Online Link

(7) Online Link