Two Hollywood Movies are Keeping Two Big Psyops in Our Lives Up and Running 

DVDs Are Back In Stock!

Dr. John Reizer

It’s summertime, and that means Hollywood blockbusters are in movie theaters across America and other countries throughout the realm. It’s a time for entertainment and a time to reinforce official narratives that make little to no sense whatsoever but are believed and thoroughly embraced by more people than not!

# 1 — Oppenheimer (2023)

The story of American scientist J. Robert Oppenheimer and his role in the development of the atomic bomb.

Genre(s): Biography Drama History

MPAA Rating: R

Production: Universal Pictures

Runtime: 180 minutes

Note: I wrote and attempted to publish this review on IMDb but that platform refused to publish my review because my views conflict with the official narrative being peddled by the controlling powers!

John’s Movie Review

Oppenheimer – 2023 is a long, drawn-out film well-suited for IMAX theaters. Here we have the latest propaganda sponsored by the controlling powers to convince the public that atomic bombs are a credible threat to the world.

According to officialdom, the United States government built the first two atomic bombs and dropped them on Japan at the end of WW2. This science fiction narrative is quite laughable at best!

If you want to believe in an eight-decade-old psyop/hoax that claims A-bombs are real and Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, were not carpet-bombed with napalm to make it appear as if they were nuked — Oppenheimer 2023 is for you!

The fake nuclear weapons psyop is so old and unbelievable, yet many Americans still believe the fairytale. And Hollywood refuses to let the sci-fi narrative die.

The younger generation of Americans was never exposed to fake A-bomb photography and the constant news propaganda about the imaginary weapon of mass destruction. So, this is why movies like Oppenheimer 2023 are created. The goal is to keep the lie fresh in the public’s minds.

The public’s perception that nukes are real is a profitable business for the elites, and it also provides several chosen governments worldwide leverage over other territories.

Most people would not question the authenticity of the nukes. I don’t believe it is even listed as a conspiracy theory. But it is as fake as the Apollo Moon landings and the nonsense we all just experienced for the last several years, the imaginary virus brought to fruition by nothing more than a mass-produced, rigged lab diagnostic tool. Yes, Covid is a hoax, too!

By the way, the movie is boring, as it can be!

So, if you like psyops and overpriced movie snacks, have a ball with this flick. Otherwise, recognize the agenda being driven by Hollywood and save your money!

#2 — Fly Me to the Moon (2024)

The story of how America authorized the creation of a fake studio version of the Apollo 11 Moon Landing in case the authentic mission was unsuccessful.

Genre(s): Drama and History

MPAA Rating: PG -13

Production: Columbia Pictures, Sony Pictures

Runtime: 131 minutes

My prediction for the plot of this movie is that NASA and the American government had to film a fake studio version of the first Moon landing to ensure, for national security reasons, that America was perceived publicly as beating the Soviets in the ridiculous race to the lunar surface. The government’s rationale for making the phony studio production would be in case NASA and Apollo failed in their lunar ambitions.

‘Fly Me To The Moon,’ like ‘Oppenheimer’ last year with its nauseating promotion of the nuclear weapons lie, will attempt to reinforce in most people’s minds the idea that space travel psyops are genuine accomplishments.

In my opinion, both the space and nuclear weapons programs are psyops, and the technologies are completely fake!

I guarantee that in the movie’s world, NASA and its geniuses pull off the impressive feat and make a successful journey to the Moon. The movie’s writers will claim the faked studio version shot on a Hollywood movie set was never broadcast to Americans or anyone else, which will be what moviegoers believe after viewing the cinematic experience.

Lights, Camera, Fiction!

We must understand that many forensic photography experts, over the years, have conclusively proven that the Apollo photos were shot in a studio on Earth.

People who question the integrity of the space program or Apollo, moving forward, will be presented with a new false narrative that claims the backup plan (an on-set studio production of the lunar landing) was leaked and that those studio images are in circulation today and have been identified by the photo experts as studio fakes.

Under this new narrative, the presence of fake moon pictures does not discredit the notion that Apollo was a genuine collection of space travel accomplishments.

– Dr. Reizer

The Summer of 2024’s Oppenheimer Movie


Welcome to NoFakeNews:

One of the most censored websites on the net

THE TRUTH TOLD THROUGH FICTION

Are you ready for the truth?

Choose Your Pill Wisely!

Click on the blue pill to remain asleep!

Click on the red pill to wake up!


Coming in the future to explain our hidden past

The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again

Yes, we did!


Target List – A Feature Film

Over One Million Movie Views

Curing cancer was their first mistake!

IMDb Page


NOW AVAILABLE ON DVD!

Get Target List on DVD (Trepstar)

New Filmhub Edition:

Get DVD at Amazon.com

Get DVD at MovieMars.com

Get DVD at Walmart.com


Watch the movie trailer on YouTube

Watch the full movie on YouTube



Download the free app to watch!


CLICK HERE  FOR  ALL MOVIE WATCH OPTIONS


©Target List LLC

The overseers carefully control anything that carries great influence over society

Dr. John Reizer

I don’t care what genre we examine; it is blatantly apparent that anything that carries great influence over society is carefully controlled by the powers that be, and absolutely nothing is left to chance.

I have been aware of the overseer’s careful control of public perception since my earlier years. I observed how newspaper articles were crafted, television programs were edited, and radio programming was delivered.

Sports and entertainment have always been tools used by the controllers to modulate the emotions of people.

We couldn’t have had a world vaccine genocide disguised as an infectious disease emergency without decades of Hollywood programming that pumped up the fear of germs and the greatness of medicine in the minds of the masses.

Since my introduction to the movie business in 2020, I have become even more conscious of how specific film productions are financed and promoted by the government and other industries.

There is a reason why Oppenheimer was the number one movie in America, with a very high IMDb rating for most of the summer. The government and other intelligence agencies wanted people exposed to a heavy dose of the nuclear weapons technology lies. The nuke narrative is predicated on a government psyop that has been ongoing since the end of WWII.

Oppenheimer is a brutally boring movie that portrays the storyline of making the atomic bomb. It is pure bullshit, and besides the fact that nuclear weapons technology is fake, the film is the only real bomb in the theater.

I have witnessed firsthand with our movie Target List how movie ratings are fixed to keep the production from gaining serious public attention.

When the movie launched in April 2023, we were getting truthful public feedback about the film. Even the movie journalists who reviewed Target List gave it glowing remarks. Then, the movie began to pick up steam and gained access to the TUBI, Apple, and Roku platforms. The film got serious attention on TikTok, and all of a sudden, after virtually very few negative ratings or reviews for six months, the negative ratings campaign was launched on IMDb.

Most of the negative ratings came from a few players creating fake accounts. It was and continues to be a coordinated attack; make no mistake about what is in play.

An influx of one and two-star ratings ensued. Then, the perpetrators would downvote positive reviews and upvote the negative comments to ensure the negative reviews appeared at the top of the page.

This is the type of nonsense you have to deal with when you write a movie that suggests big pharma is not interested in people’s health and would go to extraordinary measures to eliminate technologies that might help humanity.

Who would hate a movie that showcased the truth about big medicine? Would the public, who has been the victim of a vaccine genocide for over three years, hate our film?

I think not!

_____________________

Fake IMDB Ratings Continue

Our movie Target List is being attacked on the IMDb platform with a fake ratings campaign.

People or bots leave one-star ratings without watching the film to lower the production’s overall IMDb rating. This is intentionally done to make Target List appear less appealing to moviegoers.

Someone doesn’t want our film to gain more popularity because it delivers a truthful message to the public about the pharmaceutical industry’s practices. Gee, I wonder who that might be.

There appears to be an ongoing effort to try and paint the movie as a poor-quality production. While I realize that the perception of art is a subjective practice and that everyone has different tastes and likes concerning movies, it is evident that many of the low ratings Target List has recorded on IMDb are fake results. 

A recent review on IMDb claims our film is the worst the reviewer has ever seen. The reviewer has been an IMDb member for four years and has left one review, an eight-paragraph commentary on our film, which he hated and watched for 15 minutes. Who bothers to do such a thing without having an agenda? Maybe he should try sitting through Asteroid City and Oppenheimer; then, he might change his mind.

Additionally, the Target List movie continues to stack up eight, nine, and 10-star ratings on the IMDb platform. Regardless of how many of these high ratings are recorded, the film’s IMDb rating never moves up from where it is. Once a one-star rating is registered, the movie rating average immediately drops lower. Target List’s statistical rating average is 8.7, but IMDb currently has the movie rating set at 6.1. This platform is one of the most rigged and crooked ones in existence!

TARGET LIST IMDb RATING: 6.1

TARGET LIST’S POPULARITY IS SURGING!

Target List’s popularity, however, is surging, and more people are watching the film than ever before. 🙂

Rate Target List Now!

If you have watched our movie, please rate it honestly on the IMDb platform. Without your help, the perpetrators get away with censoring our film.

Read the article below for further information:

Dr. Reizer

Read more here!

What would happen if someone discovered how to cure all cancers?

The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie

“Curing cancer was their first mistake!”

An Andrew Arguello & MJ Palo Film

____________________

Watch For Free Right now!

Click an Arrow to Watch!

Click An Image Below To Buy From Your Favorite US Platform

______________________

_____________________

____________________

____________________

____________________

Watch Now In:

🇦🇺  Australia 🇧🇪  Belgium 🇧🇬 Bulgaria

🇨🇦 Canada 🇨🇿 Czech Republic 🇩🇰 Denmark

🇪🇪 Estonia 🇫🇮 Finland 🇩🇪 Germany

  🇬🇷 Greece 🇭🇺 Hungary 🇮🇪 Ireland 🇮🇱 Israel

🇱🇹  Lithuania 🇲🇺 Mauritius 🇲🇽 Mexico

🇲🇿 Mozambique  🇳🇬 Nigeria 🇳🇴  Norway

🇵🇭  Philippines 🇵🇱  Poland 🇵🇹 Portugal

🇸🇮 Slovenia 🇸🇪 Sweden 🇨🇭 Switzerland

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

___________________

IMDb Page

TheTargetListMovie.com

©Target List LLC

The Pros and Cons of “Barbie” — Is she an Icon or a Sex Toy?

By Lisa Hakes

The inventor of Barbie was an American businesswoman named Ruth Handler. She invented the controversial doll in 1959. She was also the co-founder of the toy manufacturer Mattel along with her husband, Eliot.

Ruth got the idea to create the doll from watching her daughter Barbara play with grown-up paper dolls. A form of play and imagination other than the typical play at the time of a mother figure with her baby dolls. But the idea of an actual beautiful grown-up doll for young girls to play with was an intriguing new idea. And Ruth came across a doll named Lilli while vacationing in Europe that she used as a model to emulate.

Once home, she reworked the doll’s design and named her Barbie after the Handler’s daughter, Barbara. Barbie debuted at the New York toy fair on March 9, 1959, but was unsuccessful. (Barbie debuted wearing a black and white striped one-piece bathing suit.) 

When Disney introduced The Mickey Mouse Club children’s television show, Mattel invested heavily in television advertising. The TV commercials for the Barbie doll paid off, and Barbie rocketed Mattel and the Handlers to fame and fortune.

“Subsequently, they would add a boyfriend for Barbie named Ken, after the Handlers’ son, and many other “friends and family” to Barbie’s world.” – Matthew Tukaki 

Meet Lilli, the High-end German Call Girl Who Became Barbie” by MessyNessy.

“So, it turns out Barbies’ original design was based on a German adult gag-gift escort doll named Lilli. That’s right, she wasn’t a dentist or a surgeon, an Olympian gymnast, a pet stylist or an ambassador for world peace.  She certainly wasn’t a toy for little girls.

SEE ARTICLE HERE

And it is interesting to me that Barbie’s successful beginning had ties to Disney. The sex trafficking station for young children. 

Also, some of the later toy products and accessories that came from Mattel’s Barbie world had sensitive questionable motives. It appeared that some of it was intended for sex education. You be the judge!

There was Barbie’s best friend Midge.

“Turns out, Midge was so controversial at one point in the early 2000s that she was actually discontinued. But who is Midge and what’s up with all the drama surrounding her pregnant belly. The doll was launched in 1963 as Barbie’s bestie. The first version of Midge was discontinued in 1967. The original version of the doll was “not” pregnant.

By the late 1980s, Midge was back on shelves as part of the California Dream Barbie set. Then she was re-released in the 1990s wearing a wedding dress, and again in 2002 with a detachable magnetic pregnant stomach, which allowed her to “deliver” a small plastic baby curled up inside, per CBS News. And that’s where the chaos began.” – Woman’s Health/ Korin Miller

“Growing up Skipper- growing breasts 1975-1979. Barbie’s younger sister, Skipper was created by Mattel in 1964. By the mid-70’s the company decided it was time for her to grow up a bit. When girls rotated Growing Up skipper’s left arm forward, she grew an inch and developed breasts, Rotate the same arm backward, and she went back to pre-pubescence. Creeeepy! Mattel was criticized for sexualizing a teenage girl, which – unlike Growing Up Skipper – isn’t making mountains out of molehills. The doll was a big bust. Let’s hope that Mattel learned its lesson: dolls simply shouldn’t grow up.” – Mox Museum of Failure

“Don’t Eat! Controversial 1965 Slumber Party Barbie came with scales permanently set to just 110 lbs. and a diet book telling her not eat.” – Daily Mail/Martha De Lacey

Barbie perpetuated negative self-image in girls because many do not have the tiny waist and large bust that she has. 

Then there was the (Suntan) Malibu Barbie collection. I had that collection. And I still love to get my summer tan every year. 

“The Palm Beach Sugar Daddy Ken was reportedly a part of the adult Barbie Collector line. However, the name had a different meaning that one could think. His post puppy is where Sugar Daddy Ken actually gets his name from. Ken’s West Highland Terrier is named Sugar. He’s Sugar’s Daddy!” –  Pop Culture/Culture News/ Hannah Malach

“Mattel’s latest Ken doll, (Cock Ring Ken) part of the Earring Magic line of Barbie toys, was openly modeled on gay fashion. And Mattel had unwittingly put a sex toy around his neck.” Pollygon/Tasha Robinson

However, despite these controversies I do have to attest to loving my Barbie dolls as a child. It is true that they helped little girls imagine and dream to be anything that they wanted to be. Ruth Handler was smart in foreseeing this. However, I have to wonder if there was not more to it. In sexualizing Barbie they were also sexualizing young girls. What was their interest in this agenda?

Also, in recreating the role of a woman from mother to worker, the controlling powers could receive more income taxes. And despite the incredible success of many women today as they accomplish both raising a family and having a career, they may not now always have the time to reflect on themselves. And I believe detachment from ourselves is the controlling powers ultimate goal, so that they may be better able to control and brainwash us. Women are naturally intuitive. The powers that be might be attempting to dim their light.

Also, in addition to these debatable Mattel products, Ruth Handler seemed to be a controversial woman herself when it came to business. She had some disreputable charges against her.

 “In February 1978 Handler, three other former Mattel officers, and supervisor were indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of conspiracy, mail fraud, and making false financial statements to the Securities and Exchange commission. Handler and Rosenberg were ordered to pay $57,000 in “reparations” and sentenced to 2,500 hours of community service during their five-year probation period.” – Insider/Grace Dean

“The crimes each of you committed in the opinion of this court are explosive parasitic and I think disgraceful to anything decent in this society,” US District Judge Robert Takasugi said, per The Los Angeles Times. 

And all this information is now surfacing because of the movie “Barbie.” I did go see the movie a few days ago. And it was mostly fun! And I don’t want to be too much of a spoiler, but it did appear to be a battle of the sexes between the Barbies and Kens. If you can call it that with dolls?  A battle between men and women and their place in society. And although I always love seeing empowerment in women, I actually felt a bit sorry for the Kens. They were made out to be such dim-wits, in my opinion. And at one point, they brainwashed the Barbies into being submissive. Although it was just temporary. And the Kens did happily come around and develop some self-esteem in the end. But division seems to be the theme as it is in much of our world.

And I was expecting to learn more of the discovery of their universe. But it would seem that would be Ruth Handler in the Mattel building as the God figure. 

All in all it was a colorful and entertaining movie. But that made it a good manipulative maneuver to put it aside the darkness of Oppenheimer. Because Barbie sells! And now Oppenheimer sells. But it sells lies!

And apparently people are switching from pink to black for the double feature. But I stayed in pink for my single movie feature of Barbie.

___________________

Lisa Hakes is the author of Subtle Sabotage — a candid portrait of alcoholism and autism for readers who appreciate down-to-earth authors who aren’t afraid to tell the whole story.

_____________________

What would happen if someone discovered how to cure all cancers?

The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie

“Curing cancer was their first mistake!”

An Andrew Arguello & MJ Palo Film

Reno, Nevada – Target List Billboard!

____________________

Film Journalists:

“A top-class film. Definitely on my ‘target list’ of must-watches.”

OLIVIA BALLINGTON – INDY REVIEWS

“Target List is a great view for anyone who wants a compelling and suspenseful flick with a message that matters

RICHARD PROPES – THE INDEPENDENT CRITIC

“Tightly paced and full of thrills, Target List is a potent action film that manages to both entertain and impress.”

INDIE WRAP MAGAZINE

____________________

Click An Image Below To Buy From Your Favorite US Platform

____________________

______________________

_____________________

____________________

____________________

Watch Now In:

🇦🇺  Australia 🇧🇪  Belgium 🇧🇬 Bulgaria

🇨🇦 Canada 🇨🇿 Czech Republic 🇩🇰 Denmark

🇪🇪 Estonia 🇫🇮 Finland 🇬🇷 Greece

🇭🇺 Hungary 🇮🇪 Ireland 🇮🇱 Israel

🇱🇹  Lithuania 🇲🇺 Mauritius 🇲🇽 Mexico

🇲🇿 Mozambique 🇳🇴  Norway

🇵🇭  Philippines 🇵🇱  Poland 🇵🇹 Portugal

🇸🇮 Slovenia 🇸🇪 Sweden 🇨🇭 Switzerland

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

___________________

TheTargetListMovie.com

Please rate our movie on IMDb!

©Target List LLC

Oppenheimer Movie: More Propaganda to Convince the Public that Fake Nuclear Bombs Are Real

A 78-Year-Old Psyop is Still in Play!

Remember to be Afraid!

_____________________

The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie

“Curing cancer was their first mistake!”

An Andrew Arguello & MJ Palo Film

____________________

Film Journalists:

“A top-class film. Definitely on my ‘target list’ of must-watches.”

Olivia Ballington – Indy Reviews

“Target List is a great view for anyone who wants a compelling and suspenseful flick with a message that matters.”

Richard Propes – The Independent Critic

“Tightly paced and full of thrills, Target List is a potent action film that manages to both entertain and impress.”

Indie wrap magazine

____________________

Click An Image Below To Buy From Your Favorite US Platform

____________________

______________________

_____________________

____________________

____________________

Watch Now In:

🇦🇺  Australia 🇧🇪  Belgium 🇧🇬 Bulgaria

🇨🇦 Canada 🇨🇿 Czech Republic 🇩🇰 Denmark

🇪🇪 Estonia 🇫🇮 Finland 🇬🇷 Greece

🇭🇺 Hungary 🇮🇪 Ireland 🇮🇱 Israel

🇱🇹  Lithuania 🇲🇺 Mauritius 🇲🇽 Mexico

🇲🇿 Mozambique 🇳🇴  Norway

🇵🇭  Philippines 🇵🇱  Poland 🇵🇹 Portugal

🇸🇮 Slovenia 🇸🇪 Sweden 🇨🇭 Switzerland

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

___________________

TheTargetListMovie.com

Please rate our movie on IMDb!

©Target List LLC

When you want to reinforce in the minds of the public one of the biggest lies about technology ever spread, you use Hollywood!

___________________

Watch it Now!

The Independent Film Event of 2023!

IMDb Page

Rent and watch the movie now!

When you rent our movie, you help us market the Target List film to more people. This allows for our powerful message to be spread more broadly to moviegoers. Thanks for your support!