Gina Flores
Evidence The Moon Landings Were Fake?
NATO’s ‘Secret’ War with Russia: What the MSM Won’t Tell You
Are You Familiar with The “Mandela Effect”?
By Gina Flores
Editor at NoFakeNews
A lot of people have been writing to me and asking about the “Mandela Effect”. They want to know if this has anything to do with time altering technology. I decided to confer with my colleague and business partner who has a better understanding about this particular subject than I do. This is what Dr. Reizer had to say:
“The ‘Mandela Effect’ is a phenomenon that supposedly affects the way many people perceive the past. In other words, a person or a large segment of the population might remember the name of a well known product as being different than it is today. Or people might remember that a celebrity died many years ago and yet the celebrity, in fact, is still alive. In some instances people remember the outcomes to certain sporting events being different than what they are in today’s record books.
“A lot of people have pointed to the cartoon and fictional books, ‘The Berenstain Bears’ as a good example of the ‘Mandela Effect’. Many people, evidently remember the ‘Berenstain Bears’ as being ‘The Berenstein Bears.’ This series of books and cartoons were authored by Stan and Jan Berenstain and yet many people remember the authors’ name and characters as being spelled Berenstein. I have included an interesting video below that discusses this controversy in greater detail.
“The ‘Mandela Effect’ received its name because a lot of people seem to remember that Nelson Mandela died in a prison in the early 1970’s instead of the date he really died in 2013.
“The ‘Mandela Effect’ could possibly be tied to the time altering technology we have been writing about on this website for several months. The powers that be have the technology to alter parallel timelines that influence the timeline we currently recognize and embrace as reality.
“This subject possibly has to do with the ‘Significant Event’ we are currently tracking and believe has a chance to occur on 11/11/17.” – John Reizer
So there you have it. The “Mandela Effect” might be a real phenomenon and it might be connected with time altering technology. I had never heard about this prior to people writing in about it. But this seems very similar to what our two sources explained to us earlier this fall.
What do you think?
Fake Apollo Moon Landings Directed by Stanley Kubrick?
By Gina Flores
Editor at NoFakeNews
I am including a few interesting videos that deal with the subject of the fake Apollo moon landings that allegedly took place during the years 1969-1971. Dr. Reizer has written several articles on NoFakeNews in the past that have done a very good job, in my opinion, of pointing out NASA’s sleight of hand operations regarding Apollo. One of his articles was published and featured in the electronic magazine, UFO DIGEST in 2012. There are a plethora of articles that have been written by various authors that discuss this same subject.
Take a look at the three videos below.
Readers should keep in mind that the subject of Apollo and the idea that the program was a gigantic hoax is a very protected concept. It has been proven through the years that government shills have been employed to write debunking commentary on websites featuring articles or video documentaries that give credence to the general theme of Apollo being a complete and utter hoax. In addition, there are often fake videos and other materials that are intentionally created by the powers that be and then inserted in the mainstream so that at a later time they can be identified as such. This technique is used by certain groups in an effort to confuse the public and make them throw their arms up into the air thinking that there is no merit to a particular storyline.
US Racing Recklessly Toward World War III?
The possibility of global war with nuclear weapons should focus all world leaders on preventing it at all costs

Mark Twain once said history doesn’t repeat. It rhymes – more dangerously today than ever.
US-instigated events ominously resemble things preceding both world wars – with super-weapons on hair triggers able to end life on earth, and bipartisan policymakers in Washington perhaps willing to use them recklessly.
Once in motion, things have a momentum of their own, heading toward what may be unstoppable. Washington’s grand strategy calls for replacing all independent governments with Western-controlled ones – mainly Russia and China, the main obstacles to achieving its hegemonic objectives.
Middle East tinderbox conditions rage, Washington determined to achieve regional control, waging one war of aggression after another, endless ones in multiple theaters , challenging Russia recklessly.
Will World War III follow? Will the unthinkable become reality? Will nuclear war erupt for the first time ever?
Nukes were used against Japan in August 1945 after Nazi Germany surrendered months earlier. and the war in the Pacific was won.
Tokyo’s high command was negotiating surrender when Hiroshima and Nagasaki were gratuitously attacked – so Pentagon commanders could test the destructive power of their new weapons in real time, while showing off for Soviet Russia what Stalin already knew, close to developing his own atomic capability.
Ongoing events should scare everyone. Washington bears full responsibility. NATO and other partners share it.
Ukraine remains the epicenter of a possible European war, Syria its Middle East flashpoint counterpart.
A US/Russian showdown may be building in plain sight. Putin is waging an effective war on ISIS and other terrorists in Syria – elements Washington supports, using them to achieve its imperial objectives, a policy heading recklessly toward a frightening showdown.
The possibility of global war with nuclear weapons should focus all world leaders on preventing it at all costs. The threat of ending life on earth should be countered with all-out peace efforts.
Everything comes down to a simple equation. Do we want to live in peace or perish in a mushroom-shaped cloud? There’s no in-between.
The risk of annihilation perhaps was never greater – given Washington’s rage for global dominance and its permanent war agenda. No nation ever threatened humanity’s survival more than now.
Its madness is supported by all duopoly presidential aspirants, some openly advocating use of nuclear weapons, unchallenged by the media.
Truman was the only world leader ever authorizing the use of nuclear weapons in combat. He later sacked Douglas MacArthur for wanting them used during Washington’s aggression on North Korea, along with urging a land war on China.
In 1961, US General Curtis Lemay believed nuclear war with Soviet Russia was inevitable. He wanted thousands of warheads launched preemptively.
He called retaliation against major US cities a small price to pay. At the same time, General Lyman Lemnitzer urged a surprise nuclear attack strategy.
Jack Kennedy stormed out of a National Security Council meeting discussing it. He wanted none of it. “And we call ourselves the human race,” he said.
Eisenhower warned against the military-industrial complex’s “acquisition of unwarranted influence. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist,” he stressed.
Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright once asked former Joint Chiefs chairman Colin Powell “(w)hat’s the point of having this superb military you’re always talking about if we (don’t) use it?”
Mass annihilation may follow this type thinking, virulent today in Washington with bipartisan lunatics in charge.
Obama intends accelerating war in Syria and Iraq on the phony pretext of battling ISIS. He’s recklessly challenging Russia’s effective intervention, Putin committed to combatting a scourge too dangerous to tolerate.
A US-instigated belligerent clash of civilizations may follow – Washington the ally of terrorism, using its elements to advance its imperium.
Russia is its sworn enemy, most concerned about defending its homeland, battling ISIS and other terrorists in Syria, perhaps Iraq to follow if Baghdad requests help, wanting its scourge prevented from spreading – an objective all world nations should support, not Washington, its NATO partners, Israel, and other rogue regional allies.
Things are escalating toward US policymakers initiating military confrontation with Russia. The unthinkable possibility of nuclear war may become reality – the vast majority of Americans mindless about the clear and present danger they face.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.
6 Negative Effects Of Too Much Screen Time For Kids
By Jeffrey Green
Have you considered sending your child to rehab to help them overcome their addiction to the electronic screens of video games, cell phones and the like? While that may sound far-fetched to some parents who are themselves ‘screen addicts’, it’s an idea whose time has come.
Some countries consider childhood screen addiction to be a clinical disorder and have rehab facilities in which to treat the afflicted children. Too much screen time is bad for your kids’ health on many different levels and must be treated like any other addiction so the damage can be stopped, and hopefully reversed.
1. Sleep Deprivation
Without question the electronic screens of many devices are causing a crisis of sleep deprivation for all age groups. However, the loss of sleep is most detrimental to children. Kids need more sleep than adults due to their developing body and mind. The average child needs 10-12 hours of sleep each night in order for them to grow and develop properly, but screen time is shaving off hours of that much-needed sleep time. The average child is constantly sleep deprived and trying to learn, grow and develop on 6-8 hours of sleep per night at the most.
Children who sleep with electronic devices in the their bedroom get less sleep than those who leave the devices in another room of the home at night. Not only are the children playing games and texting when they should be asleep, but the blue light emitted from the devices hinders sleep even after the device is shut off.
All electronics, including cell phones, tablets, iPads and TVs, emit a blue light from the screen. The body interprets that blue light as daylight and the brain sends out the signal to wake up. Instead of being sleepy at bedtime, the child is now wide awake even when the electronic screen is shut off.
A kid who is suffering from sleep deprivation will typically be cranky, have an increased risk of obesity, have a short attention span, lack decision-making skills, have increased health problems, be lethargic and do poorly in school. And all of this can be traced back to too much screen time.
2. Obesity
The use of any device with an electronic screen seems to require the need to sit down, or at least be still, while using. The sedentary nature, combined with ads for high-calorie junk food, often leads to childhood obesity. Children are naturally full of energy and have an inborn need to run, jump and otherwise be active. When that normal desire to be active is curtailed and they sit on their haunches for hours on end, they will become overweight.
Obesity leads to a variety of health problems, including diabetes, joint problems and heart disease. Childhood obesity is an epidemic in most countries, too much screen time is the biggest contributing factor to the epidemic.
3. Vision Problems
There used to be a 20/20/20 rule for those who had to spend long hours working in front of their computer screens – every 20 minutes look at something 20 feet away for 20 seconds. That 20/20/20 rule was implemented to help prevent eye strain and potential vision problems in the future.
Kids won’t take their eyes off the electronic screen for 20 seconds, even if they have heard of the 20/20/20 rule. Immediate eye strain and pain can occur from staring at the screen too long; and it’s too soon to know what type of vision problems the future may hold for those kids who have too much screen time now.
4. Aches and Pains
Phone neck, text thumb and several other new medical terms had to be coined in order to describe the various aches and pains which are developing from too much screen time. The head, neck and wrists are often held at odd angles, and thumbs are used in ways they were never meant to be used just to accommodate an electronic device. It all adds up to childhood aches and pains which will worsen as the child becomes an adult.
Back pain, arthritis, repetitive motion syndrome and migraines are just some of the chronic and often debilitating health problems a kid who has too much screen time today may develop in the future.
5. Loss of Social Skills
Kids who spend too much time with electronics lack in normal social skills that are needed to help them develop into a well-rounded adult. While kids know their way around keypads, they don’t know how to talk one-on-one to another person. Social skills, people skills and the ability to interact with others of all ages is lacking in kids who spend too much interacting with an electronic device and have limited face time with people.
By not developing the ability to interact with others face-to-face, future adult relationships for the child will be impeded. Employment, romance, friendships and simple social etiquette will be limited and awkward if a child never develops normal social skills.
6. Aggression
Ask any child what their favorite video game is and in all probability it will involve violence. Even very young kids are drawn to games that use weapons to kill. The more violent and bloody, the more popular the video game typically becomes.
That translates into aggression as the child becomes a teenager. Studies show that teens who spend a lot of time watching violent TV shows and/or playing violent video games are far more likely to be aggressive both in the home and at school. These aggressive teens fight with their siblings and peers, argue with teachers and parents and just always seems to be an outburst waiting to happen.
Jeffrey Green writes for NaturalBlaze.com where this article first appeared. This article is open-source and free to republish in full with attribution.
NoFakeNews: Looking Ahead at 2016
By Gina Flores
Editor at NoFakeNews
As we get ready to pull down the curtain on 2015 and begin the New Year, I wanted to take a few moments to share with our readers what’s new at NoFakeNews as well as my vision for this blog in the weeks and months to come.
As many of you have probably figured out by now, Dr. Reizer has decided to take a lesser role in the day to day operations of the website. He has convinced me that I can run this webpage, and I have agreed to jump in head first. He told me that the pay is horrible (there is no pay), the hours are long (very long), and he promised to help me (he’d better) when his schedule permits.
In all seriousness, I can assure you that Dr. Reizer still has tremendous input concerning everything taking place with regards to NoFakeNews. We talk daily about stories and potential articles that are featured on the website. John has several things he is currently focusing on and does not want the blog to suffer from his inability to devote the time and energy required to make everything appear the way it does.
In early November I assumed the role of chief editor. Because of my decision to permanently relocate back to the southeastern United States, I am able to devote the time and energy necessary to keep NoFakeNews up and running for the long haul. Both Dr. Reizer and I believe it is more important than ever before to have this blog available for people still searching for the truth concerning events transpiring throughout our world.
In 2016 I have several ideas that I would like to introduce that I believe will make for a better product for readers. In addition, I would like to really encourage visitors to consider contributing articles for publication.
In closing, I would like to take this opportunity to wish everybody a safe and happy holiday season. Thanks for reading and commenting on the stories that are published on NoFakeNews.
Stay tuned for more interesting content in the days ahead.
Gina
Three Tall White Men Were The Shooters at San Bernardino
By Gina Flores
Editor at NoFakeNews
According to an eyewitness that worked at the Inland Medical Center in San Bernardino, California, three tall white men were responsible for the shootings that killed 14 people and injured 21 others. Sally Abdelmageed and another eyewitness, Juan Hernandez told CBS news on the day of the shootings that the three shooters all had athletic builds and were wearing military fatigues. See interviews on video below:
Keep in mind that these interviews took place very soon after the shootings occurred. The massive media mind control blitz that instructed viewers around the world to inaccurately believe that a Muslim husband and wife were responsible for the attack had not yet begun.
In most instances, the closest the public will ever get to seeing the truth about a false flag operation is right after the incident takes place. After the initial interviews are conducted that often reveal the truth about what transpired, fake witnesses are often inserted and made available to reporters. The script gets rolling from there and the truth is permanently buried from that point forward.
We’re watching a movie here people. If you believe that the two dead suspects were responsible for the shootings in California, you have been hoodwinked by a massive psychological operations mission.
WAKE THE FLOCK UP, SHEEPLE!