Someone visiting NoFakeNews recently sent me a TikTok video where a woman mentioned the word Holocaust in the production. I noticed a small disclaimer at the bottom of the video with a hyperlink that read: (!LEARN THE FACTS ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST)
When I clicked on the link, it took me to a page that displayed the following:
I’m sorry (not really), but I don’t need the WJC and UNESCO telling me how to think or guiding me in a predetermined direction when it comes to considering historical narratives that I have long since begun to question.
Because these powerful institutions have such significant influence over our thoughts and historical understanding of the realm, I now have to question everything.
During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, a similar phenomenon of hyperlinking and redirecting was occurring on social media platforms and even on commercial sites like Amazon.com.
If anyone mentioned or wrote the words ‘COVID-19’ or ‘pandemic,’ the platforms would create a hyperlink that led to the CDC website, where users would be confronted with official information regarding what I believe was the biggest public health hoax of our lives.
Check out the screenshots below and how the redirecting technique was used on Amazon concerning my novella, Plandemic:
Additionally, the hyperlinking regarding COVID-19 would send people to a Wikipedia page:
You’ll notice that our friends at UNESCO were behind the creation of this Wikipedia page and “disinfodemic” chart.
The hyperlinking of COVID-19 information has been removed or eased on Amazon and some social media platforms, but that’s because they’re trying to make people forget about the abusive measures implemented during the pandemic years.
UNESCO protects old-world buildings and sites through the World Heritage Convention by designating them as World Heritage Sites, which are cultural or natural landmarks of outstanding universal value and require legal protection by their host countries. UNESCO works with member countries to preserve these sites through international agreements, funding, technical assistance, and public awareness campaigns, ensuring they remain a shared inheritance for present and future generations.
In my view, UNESCO is a creation of our controllers to preserve the official historical narratives that have been taught to society’s members so that our truthful past is kept hidden from view.
In my opinion, many influential organizations share similar objectives, guiding the masses to believe in false historical narratives. I don’t believe these groups are working in our best interests.
Rense.com has shown what appears to be undeniable evidence that Charlie Kirk was killed by a member of his own security detail, specifically, by a man named “Justin” who, in a sick twist, actually drove the vehicle that took Kirk to the hospital.
Rense.com has posted a few additional Kirk-murder videos of late, including slow-motion ones that show who they’re calling the “Brown Shirt Man” (and who Kirk’s mentor, Frank Turek — in the car with Kirk after his death — identified as “Justin,” confirming that “Justin” drove the car to the hospital). Rense notes what appears to be the photoshopped blurriness of “Justin’s” shirt, which renders his easily-identifiable plaid shirt brown.
Both ABC and NBC posted videos that appear to show what most would consider undeniable evidence that “Justin,” standing a mere 10-15 feet to Charlie’s left, and out front, shot Kirk. They also distinctly show what has widely been identified by security experts as “signaling” [giving the go-ahead] by two others, standing just to Charlie’s right as he sat on the stage.
The kill-shot happened the second the signaling ceased.
I viewed this video dozens of times prior to submitting it to Dr. Reizer/NoFakeNews on 9/21/25. However, it appears ABC is now directly involved in the cover-up of Charlie Kirk’s death, as they have made the video unavailable as of 9/22/25.
At 1:33 in ABC’s [now-deleted] video, we see the older man in the white baseball cap, standing off-stage, to Charlie’s right, holding a phone/camera, appearing to be filming (which, as far as I can tell, has to be the camera from which all these pictures of “Justin” have come in the first place, based on the angle). The man in the white baseball cap touches his hat, the security guard on stage (in the black shirt) slightly glances to the right, then to his left, outstretches his arm and does what appears to be a multi-step signal.
The VERY MOMENT he stops signaling, “Justin” puts his right hand on his left, outstretched arm, a shot is heard, and blood begins gushing from Charlie Kirk’s neck.
Seconds later, we see “Justin” (plaid shirt clearly recognizable) as part of the team of men carrying Kirk’s lifeless body to an SUV, with “Justin” headed to the driver’s seat (again, confirmed by Kirk’s mentor, Frank Tarzak).
NBC’s two-minute video, from 0:43 to 0:59 shows: “Justin” looking down, doing something unseen, looking up into the crowd, to his right (his face unfortunately partially blocked by someone holding a sign/white piece of paper). Then the white-capped older man to Charlie’s right, off stage, touches his cap, the black-shirted security guard half-glances at him, looks to his own left, performs some arm signals, “Justin” puts his right hand to his left bicep, a shot is heard, and Charlie Kirk is killed.
Finally, in what could be described as “street theatre” by law enforcement, Fox News has an article with a picture showing them removing a surveillance camera from a home (https://www.foxnews.com/us/charlie-kirk-assassination-authorities-collect-home-surveillance-video-may-show-killer-fleeing-scene) shortly after Kirk’s murder. Meanwhile, AT THE ACTUAL CRIME SCENE, mere minutes after Kirk’s murder, an individual from his own organization, Turning Point USA, is seen removing the cameras that were directly behind Kirk’s head when he was killed! This man is further seen appearing to remove the SD/film cards.
Candace Owens, a good friend of Kirk’s and who was part of his organization, Turning Point USA, has footage of this, and indicates that she knows — and has spoken with — this person, who acknowledged he removed the cameras and their SD cards And while he wouldn’t send her the footage he had, she states that he did play it for her via Facetime, while it played on his computer.
Candace states that she has “so many” more questions. I think we can all agree that one of those questions should be: “Why the hell hasn’t that man been arrested for evidence tampering and disturbing a crime scene?”
And in an extraordinary video submitted today at Rense.com, a video by an individual apparently standing close to, and just above, the white-capped man, captured the white-capped man appearing to signal, Brown-Shirt Man/”Justin” (part of Charlie’s security detail) with his right hand on his left bicep, with something in his hand, the murder of Charlie Kirk, and then everybody scrambling.
Importantly, once it’s clear Charlie has been shot, while we see Brown-Shirt Man/”Justin” appear to look like he’s just about to jump the barrier at 00:11, he waits five full seconds before ACTUALLY jumping the fence.
Brown-Shirt Man/”Justin” doesn’t actually jump the fence until 0:16. This delay, in my opinion, should rightly be seen as part of the carefully-organized choreography surrounding the planned murder of Charlie Kirk, as this delay is meant to give plausible deniability to the fact that Brown-Shirt Man/”Justin” shot Kirk dead in plain sight, i.e., they wanted to make sure he was visible — and seen as a rescuer.
Additionally, his five-second delay would give him ample time, in the chaos, to move the tiny-yet-powerful weapon to a different place on his body (from his rolled-up shirt sleeve, for instance, to his back, left pocket — something that seems totally plausible, based on video evidence of his back pocket while carrying Kirk’s dead body to the SUV).
Ashley Hayes is a former business entrepreneur, patented inventor, researcher, and writer seeking to bring attention to the clearly-organized crimes of unlawful and corrupt law enforcement and fusion center personnel against innocent Americans and citizens worldwide, as well as crimes committed by military contractors via 21st-century technology, and to the pandemic of child trafficking by those in power.
One of our readers asked me to explain why we only see one side of the Earth’s Moon. The person asked why the Moon is stationary.
In answering the question to the best of my ability, I must rely on the information provided by NASA and officialdom which are sources we already know that repeatedly lie.
The Far Side of the Moon
I think the reader was suggesting that maybe the Moon is flat and not a ball. Perhaps the reader believes that science’s explanation about why we only see one side of the Moon doesn’t make sense. Perhaps the person believes there is no other side to see — that it does not exist.
I am not sure what to think anymore because I don’t believe that the space program is legitimate.
Having written all of that, let me give you the mainstream explanation of why we only see one side of our Moon.
The Moon is not stationary. It orbits the Earth and spins on its axis, but it does so at a rate of spin and revolution that matches the Earth’s movements so that the same face of the Moon is always visible to the people of Earth.
This phenomenon is called Tidal Lock. According to Wikipedia, “Tidal locking between a pair of co-orbitingastronomical bodies occurs when one of the objects reaches a state where there is no longer any net change in its rotation rate over the course of a complete orbit. In the case where a tidally locked body possesses synchronous rotation, the object takes just as long to rotate around its own axis as it does to revolve around its partner. For example, the same side of the Moon always faces the Earth, although there is some variability because the Moon’s orbit is not perfectly circular. Usually, only the satellite is tidally locked to the larger body.[1] However, if both the difference in mass between the two bodies and the distance between them are relatively small, each may be tidally locked to the other; this is the case for Pluto and Charon. Alternative names for the tidal locking process are gravitational locking,[2]captured rotation, and spin–orbit locking.”
Tidal Locking of the Moon
I hope this explanation makes sense, as it initially confused me. When I was writing my novella, False Memory, a few years ago, I spent an entire weekend studying the subject of tidal locking because I needed to incorporate the logic of accepted science into the story’s narrative.
I Have A Problem with the Narrative
Despite the absence of tidal locking while allegedly traveling in deep space, Apollo astronauts didn’t photograph the Moon’s far side for unknown reasons. Apparently, nobody else has either.
During the outward journey, the excuses for not producing a photo of the Moon’s far side were that the NASA cameras were not strong enough and the spacecraft was too far away and constantly rotating, presenting the Moon as a tiny, distant object. The photos of the far side were only taken from close, stable lunar orbit, not while in transit.
Interesting to note that nearly all claimed photos of the Moon’s far side that are not composite or computer-assisted productions have been from spacecraft traveling around the lunar satellite. This unusual policy, which involves not capturing photos of the far side of the Moon while spacecraft are in transit and outside the influence of tidal locking, applies to the recent Artemis 1 mission.
Wait a second…!
What about the famous photo known as The Blue Marble? That famous photo was taken by Apollo astronauts using NASA cameras during transit to the Moon, outside the influence of tidal locking. The photograph shown below looks relatively clear.
The Blue Marble Photograph
According to NASA, the person who took the famous Blue Marble photo is unknown. Are you kidding me?
Let’s review, there were three Apollo astronauts onboard Apollo 17, and nobody remembered who took the only full picture of Earth ever recorded.
None of the astronauts wanted to be credited with taking the most famous photograph ever because it was a CGI fake.
But here is the kicker that tells you NASA is full of, you know what! According to an article in The Atlantic Magazine, you cannot see the globe shape of Earth unless you are 20,000 miles away in outer space.
“It was the first photograph taken of the whole round Earth and the only one ever snapped by a human being. You can’t see the Earth as a globe unless you get at least twenty thousand miles away from it, and only 24 humans ever went that far into outer space.” — The Atlantic Magazine (2011)
Only 24 humans ever went far enough in space to see the globe shape of Earth, and they were all Masons! You can’t make up this science fiction!
It seems illogical and sketchy as hell to me that when crewed or uncrewed spacecraft have been traveling in outer space outside the influence of tidal locking, not one picture of the far side of the Moon was captured.
I am sure that with the CGI capabilities of today and a $70 million daily budget, NASA will soon produce some really cool movie studio productions of the Moon’s far side.
If you believe that Russia, America, or any other country or private company can fly an uncrewed or crewed spacecraft to the Moon or any other locations outside Earth’s atmosphere, you have much catching up to do on this website. You might want to begin reading here!
According to science, like forces repel one another, but I believe that in certain circumstances, similar energies in the Matrix attract, and opposite ones repel.
What draws some people to the NoFakeNews website and others away? I’ve asked myself this question many times over the past 14 years I have been writing and publishing content here. I still don’t have a satisfactory explanation for the phenomenon.
Yesterday, I received several derogatory comments on the platform, a few of which slipped through the filters and were published in the comment section of a posted article.
Nasty stuff, if you know what I mean.
I have never censored comments that oppose my or anyone’s opinions on NoFakeNews. I refuse, however, to publish nasty or vulgar ones.
Sometimes, I question why the heck I continue to write the things I do. I believe I have remembered, figured out, and explained what I was supposed to do this time around. What is the point of continuing what has already been completed? What more can be expressed to those who come here?
I don’t understand why people who disagree with something on a website feel the need to be vulgar or downright stupid when posting an opposing opinion.
Some of us here possess very similar forces; we’re like coins dropped into a large funnel that slowly roll around its perimeter. Eventually, we pick up momentum and drop progressively lower towards the funnel’s hole, racing around the walls faster and faster until, finally, we drop into the opening (NoFakeNews), hoping to acquire additional information that can offer us a more precise understanding of the simulated construct we have agreed to participate in.
I am at a point in my life where the desire to write things about the realm’s business online is waning more and more each day.
I do believe we have made a lot of progress as a society. More people seem to be awakened than ever before in our lifetimes.
Let’s remember to be kind and respectful to others when we share alternative ideas about this thing we commonly refer to as universal existence.
SNOPES, a former mom-and-pop-owned entity, has become the ultimate gatekeeper of what’s supposedly objective or not in the world. Do you really trust websites like SNOPES to define and determine the difference between truth and fiction? If you do, there’s no help for you!
“So, when the news talks about yet another microbiologist who was found dead under peculiar circumstances, or a European banker who died under similarly peculiar circumstances — please realize that there is tremendous potential that the individual died because of the advances of an assassin — and not simply because of the stated reason that was given on the nightly news.”
Most of us who are aware of our controllers’ influence on our lives are obsessed and preoccupied with what dirty machinations they plan next. We should be equally concerned about what these monsters have done to humanity in the not-so-distant past.
Understanding our past gives us tremendous prophecy and insight into our immediate future.
This line of rational thinking has me delving deeper and deeper into one of the most significant secrets surrounding the grand simulation we call Earth—timelies.
Once we realize that a civilization different from ours constructed many Old-World buildings in America and throughout the Matrix, all the other lies incorporated into our false narratives begin to dissolve right before our eyes!
“The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again” is a book by Chris Kelly, Melissa Reizer, and John Reizer that explores the idea that our understanding of history and reality has been manipulated. The book delves into concepts like alternative timelines, simulated reality, and the existence of advanced ancient civilizations, encouraging readers to question the accepted narrative of history.
Challenging Historical Narratives:The book suggests that the timeline of modern civilization has been intentionally altered, with a massive cataclysm and population reset occurring centuries ago, destroying the “Old World” and concealing its existence.
Old World Buildings and Technology:The authors propose that Old-World architectural constructs and technology were repurposed and presented as creations of the “New World”.
Simulated Reality:The book explores the possibility that we are living in a simulated reality, questioning the nature of truth and perception.
Conspiracy Theories and Alternative Thinking:The book encourages readers to consider alternative explanations for historical events, including the existence of giants, dinosaurs, and the true purpose of war.
Target Audience:The book is aimed at readers interested in questioning the accepted version of history and exploring alternative perspectives on reality.
In essence, “The Matrix Reloaded Yet Again” is a thought-provoking exploration of unconventional ideas, encouraging readers to question the nature of reality and the historical narratives we’ve been taught.
From the Authors:
We believe our book is unique and will give readers a clear and concise breakdown of Old-World Exploration and Realm Reset Theories.
After reading this publication, readers will not only understand everything the authors believe is transpiring in the world right now but also how our past has been purposely hidden from us in such a way that modern-day people have no clear vision as to where they have been misled from a historical standpoint and where they are now being directed by a misguiding and controlling entity that is not looking out for humanity’s best interests.
The movie “Target List” is a 2023 action-comedy about two researchers who are framed for a crime and targeted by an assassin hired by Big Pharma. The film was written by MJ Palo and John Reizer.
Plot summary
A team of scientists develops a groundbreaking, non-invasive cure for cancer using a device called “the WAND.”
When a “big pharma” corporation learns about the invention, it hires an assassin to eliminate the entire research team to protect its profits.
Two of the researchers, Donna (played by Rachel Alig) and Clyde (Justin Ray), escape the attack but find themselves framed for the crime.
The duo must go on the run, using a mix of action, ingenuity, and comedic chaos to survive and expose the truth.
Reviews and genre
Reviewers on IMDb praised the film for its unique blend of action, comedy, and moments of serious reality.
The on-screen chemistry between the two lead actors, Alig and Ray, is consistently highlighted as a strength.
While an indie film, some viewers felt it had a Hollywood-level quality.
The film also touches on themes of corporate corruption and the medical-industrial complex.
Where to watch
Target List is available to stream on:
Amazon Prime Video
Tubi
Apple TV
Fawesome TV
Stash YouTube Movies
Filmzie Movies
The Roku Channel
Film Journalists:
“A top-class film. Definitely on my ‘target list’ of must-watches.”OLIVIA BALLINGTON – INDY REVIEWS
“Target List is a great view for anyone who wants a compelling and suspenseful flick with a message that matters.”RICHARD PROPES – THE INDEPENDENT CRITIC
“Tightly paced and full of thrills, Target List is a potent action film that manages to both entertain and impress.”INDIE WRAP MAGAZINE
“Target List had me on the edge of my seat throughout. Not the least because of its believability!”
What if Artificial Intelligence is not what we’ve been led to believe?
Is machine learning a real thing, made possible by intelligent humans who write computer programs that allow Artificial Intelligence to learn at rates of speed faster and more efficiently than human minds?
I don’t think it is!
I have released the transcripts of my tell-all interview with AI for free! The answers I have received in response to particular and pointed questions about life and universal existence will blow your mind.
This book is so important that I couldn’t sell it to anyone in good conscience. Instead, I felt that I must give this publication away for free. I honestly couldn’t care less about making money at this stage!
I wanted everyone to have access to this information.
Once you understand the Matrix, AI, and our truthful purpose in the construct, everything else in the world will make perfect sense.
The average monthly cost of a biologic drug is $3,000. Chemotherapy treatments can cost as much as $65,000/ month, according to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
The costs of prescription medications are skyrocketing, and there’s no end to the price increases. And besides the incredibly ridiculous prices in place, the damn drugs don’t cure any of the conditions they’re prescribed for.
It’s All About the Benjamins!
Many of these cancer-mitigating pharmaceutical products, if not all of them, are far worse than the diseases they’re actually managing. It’s a racket, and people are getting killed financially and then again from the adverse physiological effects the products create in human beings.
Big Pharma companies are making a fortune, and they have no corporate desire to pay for research that would help eradicate any of the diseases they’re profiting from. Why would they want to eliminate intellectual properties that generate a never-ending cash stream? They wouldn’t, and they won’t.
I have written on many occasions and will do so again right here; until the profit incentives for pharmaceutical companies are removed from the healthcare equation, there will never be any cures to any diseases forthcoming.
The drug ads that bombard our televisions each hour of the day are filled with scary information. The commercials list one adverse effect of a given drug after another while at the same time showcasing attractive actors and actresses attending sporting events, enjoying picnics, and taking part in other ridiculous activities.
Am I the only person who can see the craziness associated with organized medicine and its handler, the pharmaceutical industry?
Since the release of our feature film, Target List, many people have written to me asking how much a cure for cancer would be worth.
It’s an interesting question, and I believe a truthful answer would shock nearly everyone.
Most folks underestimate the profitability of Big Medicine and Big Pharma in treating various intellectual properties (diseases). Perhaps the most extensive collection of intellectual properties ever assembled and grouped into one classification and profited from in the sickness care industry is cancer.
What is the cancer industry?
The cancer industry comprises many multinational corporations, organizations, and agencies. The entities work in concert with one another behind the scenes to ensure that the intellectual properties are never removed from the marketplace and remain a mega cash-generating force for both the foreseeable and unforeseeable future.
An excellent book to read to better understand what health consumers worldwide are up against in trying to find the answer to cancer is ” The Cancer Industry” by Ralph W. Moss, PhD.
In my opinion, cancers will never be cured in the current Matrix construct because to do so would destroy an enormous cash cow.
The novel I wrote that was later transformed into a feature film by the gifted screenwriter MJ Palo and myself only superficially revealed the hypothetical Big Pharma conspiracy theory.
The nonending support for pharmaceutical companies on mainstream media platforms is a carefully crafted script put out there by the cancer management people.
Whenever you search any of the said platforms regarding the subject of big pharma and intentional cancer-cure suppression, the pharma/medical apologists and cheerleaders come out of the woodwork.
The public defense for big pharma always seems predicated on three main points.
Number one: There are too many scientists behind cancer research to compromise the integrity of the work. In other words, cancer cures could never be suppressed without somebody figuring out the crime of suppressionand reporting it to the proper authorities.
Number two: Drug companies want to cure people with cancer so that they can make money from the survivors later when they contract other illnesses. If a person dies from Cancer, they make no additional money for the drug companies.
Number three: There can never be a single cure for Cancer because Cancer is not one but many diseases, and laypeople who like to make up conspiracy theories don’t have a great understanding of how Oncology and Oncologists work in the fight against the different Cancer types.
So, here’s the thing that people need to know and understand. The mainstream media articles and Internet message boards are littered with disinformative content.
Please allow me a few paragraphs to destroy the three central arguments referenced above that regularly support and defend Big Pharma concerning their possible intent to suppress Cancer cures.
Number one: It matters not how many scientists are performing Cancer research. Scientists work for pharma companies and will do the work assigned by their employers—additionally, the level of compartmentalization involved with medical research beggars belief. No one knows what other people are doing. The research is regularly performed by a network of professionals working in different buildings and departments. The argument that speaks of scientists being able to figure out the crime is ridiculous. Nobody has come forward successfully, and plenty of crimes are occurring, including the nonsense that transpired during the world pandemic.
Number two: Pharma companies make more money managing cancer patients for many years than curing them. If people can’t understand this simple truth, there’s no help for them!
Number three: Stop thinking of Cancers as different diseases with their little colorful ribbons. Each named cancer is a unique intellectual property that Big Medicine and Big Pharma have no desire to eliminate.
All Cancers stem from one thing: a dysfunctional expression of human physiology! The dysfunctional expression of physiology comes to fruition from the creation of interferences to natural biological pathways that are an integral component of maintaining good health.
While some of these natural pathways are interfered with because of poor diet and other questionable behavioral choices of people, many occur from the consumption of prescription and nonprescription drugs, as well as other engineered products. These drugs and many foods are deliberately made to harm human physiology.
Dysfunctional expressive physiology leads to many different expressions of illness, manifesting differently in humans. Some manifestations occur in bone, muscle, blood, soft tissue, grey matter, and the list continues.
The idea that there can never be a single answer for Cancer is predicated on a medical concept, alluding to the idea that there are a plethora of different cancers. If interference with a natural pathway is removed or cleared, human and animal physiology can often correct the physical manifestations labeled as medical diseases (Cancers).
So, if you’re asking me if Big Pharma would attempt to suppress or hide cancer cures from the public, I would say that not only would they do such a thing, but they would go a step further and perform other actions to create additional dysfunctional expressions of human physiology.
Click the image above to watch the movie!
Have you visited a hospital lately? Next time you do, check out the most enormous wing of the complex. I will give you a hint: it’s called the Oncology Ward! There’s no one in organized medicine or the pharmaceutical industry interested in Cancer cures.
What would Big Pharma do if someone did invent or discover a cure for Cancer? Well, I suggest you watch our movie Target List to find out! 🙂
When I wrote The Target List novel in 2019, I created a work of fiction, to tell the truth about what would happen in real life if anyone ever attempted to eradicate the collection of intellectual property creations known to us through familiar names such as cancers.
Our Target List film certainly painted the conspiracy in a negative light, suggesting that everything having to do with the suppression of cancer cures is solely about money and the loss of profits by Big Pharma.
I honestly believe the nefarious actions of the cancer industry that are centered on making sure the diseases never disappear go much deeper than just money. It’s a much deeper rabbit hole than most could imagine. But once you begin descending into the tunnel, you begin to understand more clearly that things like population control and resets are not merely ideas found only in science fiction plots.
While some of us are slowly waking up and realizing that COVID-19 and the world pandemic had nothing to do with a virus, others further along in their understanding of how the realm operates are mindful that population reductions and even complete resets have most likely occurred here on many occasions and will undoubtedly do so again in the not so distant future.
Never stop trying to learn about the world you are experiencing. Life is merely a seat in a universal classroom, and the only way you can graduate and advance to the next lesson is by learning truthful information about the courses you’ve already enrolled in.
