The Apollo Space Program: Astronauts or Astronots?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

On July 20, 1969, NASA’s Lunar Module (Eagle) touched down on the surface of our moon and astronaut, Neil Armstrong took one small step for man and one giant leap for mankind. Television anchor, Walter Cronkite kept Americans informed of the latest mission developments as human beings, for the first time ever, walked on the surface of a celestial body other than Earth.

But did it really happen the way we’ve been led to believe? Does the photographic record of NASA’s Apollo Program represent the truth? Did men visit the lunar surface, scoop up moon rocks, and return to Earth with those trophies?

Authors Mary Bennett and David S. Percy, in their book “Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers” convincingly explain the theory that NASA faked the moon landings throughout the Apollo program because they didn’t want the public to see what was really happening on the lunar surface. They also contend that NASA had serious challenges with escaping the earth’s radiation belts and, to this day, still do. This particular obstacle has precluded manned, deep space missions from taking place and was the real reason the space shuttle missions were designed. According to Bennett and Percy, NASA’s been trying to solve the radiation problems for years during shuttle missions.

Bennett and Percy believe that the United States did manage to successfully send two astronauts to the moon that unfortunately died from radiation poisoning before completing the journey back to earth. That mission was performed in private while the faked Apollo missions were filmed in studios and later broadcast as if they were live television feeds coming from the moon. The authors say that even the people working at mission control believed the Apollo transmissions were coming from the moon. Only a few people knew the truth.

Some of the alternative theories that challenge NASA’s historical record have been addressed by the space agency. NASA officials claim that when the astronauts visited the moon, they left reflective mirrors near the landing sites and that scientists on earth have been bouncing lasers off those mirrors for 43 years.

Bennett and Percy argue that the reflective mirrors only prove that someone went to the moon. They don’t prove Apollo delivered the astronauts to the lunar surface.

In July, 2009, NASA released photographs of the supposed landing sites for each of the Apollo missions that were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Critics, that have viewed the photos, claim the images could have been digitally edited. The photos, unfortunately, have poor resolution making it hard to view important details that would positively identify the remaining portions of the lunar module’s descent stage. Critics have also questioned why NASA, with its highly sophisticated cameras, hasn’t produced close-ups of the landing sites.

In 1994, NASA’s Clementine spacecraft photographed the entire surface of the moon and, in doing so, discovered what appeared to be large artificial buildings on the lunar surface. These photographs appeared to be obfuscated by sophisticated techniques but the artificial structures were still positively identified by Steve Skipper and published on his website, www.marsanomalyresearch.com.

After looking at the obfuscated lunar pictures from Clementine, it’s hard for some people to trust the integrity of the photos, offered by NASA, showing the Apollo landing sites.

It’s hard to imagine that a government agency might not have been completely transparent when discussing the Apollo program with its citizens. Of course many Americans don’t buy into any conspiracy theories whatsoever. To do so would be much too painful for them. Only NASA knows for sure what transpired 43 years ago. Was it, in fact, a giant leap for mankind or just a giant lie?

Just Thinking Out Loud: Would They Tell Us About an Earth Changing Event?

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

An earth changing event is about to take place. It’s not the first nor the last time this sort of thing has happened. According to ancient records being closely guarded and kept out of the public domain by certain world leaders, the coming event will not destroy earth, but many people will die. The passage of the event will cause massive planetary changes, affecting most forms of life. At first, these changes will be barely noticeable. Later, as the event draws nearer, the earth changes will grow in intensity and the people of the world will begin to notice that something is not quite right.

Members of the media will offer conventional explanations for the changing weather and environmental conditions. Government agencies will assure their citizens that everything taking place is perfectly normal and there’s nothing to worry about.

The leaders of the world, aware of impending doom, have long ago made a collective decision to remain silent and not alert citizens, living within their respective nations, about what is happening. It’s important to understand that there’s absolutely nothing that can be done to stop this event. To alert the people of the world is to risk worldwide panic. This sort of civil unrest could ultimately be very dangerous for people in positions of power. Riots, looting, and acts of aggression might be directly focused at world leaders.

The powers that be believe that if the general public knew massive earth changes were in motion and that life was going to be drastically changed, most people would not report to work or bother to pay their mortgages and taxes. The entire global infrastructure would likely collapse and create a hellish situation for any person in a position of authority.

The really important members of society, the elite families that have run the world for longer than most people realize, will attempt to ride out this nightmare situation in subterranean security bunkers. Their plan, very simply, is to exit such shelters after the event so they can reclaim their positions of power and wealth. They have instructed their puppets, the elected officials running various governments, to keep quiet and conduct business as usual.

By the way, are you going to watch major league baseball’s All-Star Game this week? And how much money do you think Tom Cruise had to cough up in his divorce settlement?  Who do you think will host American Idol next year?

Whistleblowers and Wrongful Termination Lawsuits: How the Laws Protect Employers

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

Any person that has ever had the unfortunate experience of taking on a company over a wrongful termination issue knows how frustrating the process can be. If a company has unfairly removed you from your job, the chances of seeing justice served through the U.S. legal system are slim to none.

Even when plaintiffs have an airtight case and a ‘smoking gun,’ so to speak, for evidence, it’s quite difficult to defeat companies over wrongful termination issues in a court of law. Legal expenses alone make it impractical for most individuals to fight for their rights or, in many cases, the rights of others. In addition, the costs involved with assembling a legal team, solely dedicated to fighting an individual’s private cause, are frightening. On the other side of the fence, big corporations usually have ample funds and can easily outlast individual plaintiffs that might be brave enough to launch lawsuits against them.

If, for example, Joe Blow is unfairly terminated from his place of employment because he blew the whistle on company administrators, after observing fellow employees being exposed to dangerous working conditions, he might find it virtually impossible to seek justice for his premature and unfair dismissal in a court of law.

In many states, employees are hired ‘at will’. This means that most employees can be terminated for virtually any reason and without recourse. In a lot of situations, the level of accountability for supervisors and administrators, of a particular company, is next to nothing.

The hardest concept for workers to comprehend is the fact that supervisors can fire them on the spot for any reason whatsoever. The supervisors are aware of how the labor laws protect them from employees during wrongful termination disputes and aren’t afraid to communicate this fact to employees.

The laws of the land, in many instances, are a direct product of earlier legal decisions. The legal decisions handed down, yesterday, through the courts are the legal precedents cited by present day attorneys. If a whistleblower is successful in proving his or her case through a court of law and is fortunate enough not to get the decision overturned in a court of appeals, the case could, potentially, set a legal precedent and be the key component cited in future cases. It is for this reason that the ‘little people’ sometime make the tough decision to go after big corporations that have harmed them. It’s not always about winning a monetary award. Sometimes affected persons believe it’s just the appropriate course of action to take. Thank goodness there are individuals that have the guts and stamina to standup for what’s right. It’s, perhaps, the only way the little guy can ever hope to change unfair and unethical laws.

Many corporations, unfortunately, have the financial resources to protect themselves from lawsuits brought about by former or current employees. In a nutshell, the laws have been designed to protect big corporations. In the past, many judges have ruled in favor of corporate America. Their legal decisions have definitely created precedents that practicing attorneys point to when defending big companies against plaintiffs like Joe Blow.

Even in situations where corporate abuse is blatant, it’s often difficult to get cases into the courts. Companies will go to great lengths in order to protect their public images as well as the images of CEO’s and other executive officers. Image is everything to big corporations and they’ll take extreme measures to protect themselves.

If a particular company cannot intimidate a plaintiff into submission; dismiss the case through a legal technicality, there’s always the old fashion option of settling with the little guy. ‘Hush money’ is an important option used to protect a corporation, as a last resort, from what executive officers view as the most damaging scenario – a court room.

A corporation that is, on the rare occasion, forced into a courtroom setting always loses regardless of the final verdict. In the courts, companies ultimately lose what they value even more than money – a good image. Once in the courts, everything becomes a matter of public record. The emperor, in a sense, is unclothed at this stage of the game, and all the dirty details are permanently released into the public domain.

Enter the settlement phase of a lawsuit, with its accompanying non-disclosure agreement, precluding Joe Blow from ever uttering a word about his case or said company again. You see, once Joe Blow is paid off by the corporation, to keep his lips permanently sealed, the corporation wins. Joe signs a contract in exchange for a monetary settlement that legally prohibits him from ever broaching the subject again. Once Joe signs on the dotted line, there’s no courtroom, no verdict, no legal precedent and most important, no change to the way the courts view corporations, in similar situations, under the law.

Are You Ready for A New Global Currency?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

If you have had an opportunity to read some of the chiropractic books, novels, and articles I’ve written, you already know I’ve been claiming for many years that a new global currency is on the horizon. It’s coming, and the campaign to bring it to fruition is, very much, on schedule and looking stronger than ever.

The great financial meltdown of 2008 was designed by the International Bankers (the real powers that be) to shift major pockets of wealth from the little guys (you and I) to some very wealthy corporations. The 2008 financial collapse was also important to the real powers that be because it allowed them to create and pass important banking laws that would assure the creation of a more important financial collapse a few years later. Get ready, it’s almost here!

Everything you read about in newspapers and view on television, regarding the current financial problems taking place worldwide, has been carefully orchestrated by powerful banking families that really run the world. Their ultimate goal is to create a one world currency that they can control and manage without interference from individual countries. This new world currency scheme was planned long ago. Although getting the different nations on the planet to embrace a new monetary system has been an arduous task, it has, nevertheless, been nearly accomplished by deceptive and extremely effective political techniques. In the United States, democrats and republicans alike have worked together, behind the scenes, to pass vital banking legislation that their masters have demanded. Similar strategies were planned and carried out by political organizations in other countries.

In order to convince the world’s population that they should abandon various sovereign currencies, in favor of a new global dollar, it was important for the banking families to create the largest financial catastrophe the modern world has ever witnessed. Without the mother of all financial meltdowns taking place, it would have been nearly impossible for the masters of banking to accomplish what’s about to unfold.

The coming collapse of the world’s monetary systems will ultimately create the necessary climate that will pave the way for a new global currency which will be marketed as an immunization against additional financial disharmony in the future. Just as they used completely engineered financial crises in the early 1900’s to create the Federal Reserve System in the United States, the International Banking families will use this financial disaster to introduce a one world currency.

What do you think about this subject?

“I’m Not One for Conspiracy Theories, but…”

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

It’s official! Conspiracies really do occur. I have proof that our national media companies have conspired to employ plenty of brainless morons. And on top of not having an adequate number of brain cells, many of these employees lack journalistic integrity.

This past week I must have listened to ten different sports talk radio show hosts state repeatedly for the record, “I’m not one for conspiracy theories, but…” It was as if these brain-dead talk show jockeys had to constantly remind their audiences that they lacked the capabilities to think for themselves.

“Not buying into conspiracy theories” was the major topic of discussion for various talk radio show hosts this past week due to the NBA draft lottery which, recently, handed out a first round pick to its New Orleans franchise.

If you’re not a follower of the game of hoops, you probably didn’t know that the New Orleans Hornets was one of the NBA’s worst teams (based on wins and losses) and was also previously owned by the league.

The NBA recently convinced Tom Benson, the owner of the NFL franchise, New Orleans Saints, to purchase one of basketball’s most troubled franchises. After Benson purchased the Hornets, the NBA held its annual lottery that awards draft picks to the basketball teams with the league’s worst winning percentages. After the lottery was held, the New Orleans team was awarded the first pick in the upcoming draft. Because Benson purchased the Hornets directly from the NBA, the appearance of an impropriety was placed on the table of public perception and certain fans, through the use of social media tools, cried conspiracy.

First of all let me write that there are plenty of real conspiracies taking place in this damn country. Why are people wasting their time worrying about hypothetical wrongdoings in the NBA? I have no idea if the NBA conspired to fix its annual lottery draft, and I couldn’t care less.

Second, let me write that the real conspiracies, which have occurred and deserve the complete attention of our entire nation, are routinely swept under the table and dismissed by the masses. It’s truly a pathetic situation when people are more concerned about a conspiracy theory attached to the NBA draft than some of the legitimate conspiracies committed by our national space agency. There is extensive evidence available that’s been provided by whistle-blowers and other credible sources proving NASA has lied to us about almost every program it has been involved with since its inception. This agency has obviously conspired to create cover-ups concerning many historic space happenings. Despite the existence of proof, no one seriously challenges NASA’s official photographic records or its claims that are currently in the public domain.

I cannot comprehend the collective stupidity of numerous sports announcers that made comments this week to national audiences about not believing in conspiracy theories? These individuals have completely ignored the facts that prove thousands of conspiracies occur around the world on a yearly basis. These producers of hot air refuse to even look at the evidence associated with a given conspiratorial claim. They’ve decided for everyone in society that it’s not possible for conspiracies to exist. According to these corporate mouthpieces, it’s beyond the realm of possibility for human beings to conspire against one another, and it’s beyond the realm of possibility that corporate and government officials would ever conspire against the public at large. Really? Are you that stupid that you actually believe the propaganda you are regularly delivering to the public?

It’s time for our national media spokespersons to get some real integrity. Stop conspiring to influence listeners into believing corporate lies!

Are You Addicted to Soda?

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

According to some knowledgeable sources, serious health consequences can arise from consuming soft drinks on a regular basis. If you’re like me, you probably have noticed most people that purchase carbonated soft drinks (soda) do so in large quantities. They often buy the stuff caseloads at a time.

Just a few days ago, I was sandwiched between two customers, in a grocery checkout aisle, that had several cases of soda products in their shopping carts. The persons buying the merchandise both looked extremely unhealthy. They were overweight; had visibly poor looking teeth and an unhealthy looking complexion. The entire scene, in the checkout aisle, motivated me to write this article.

In my opinion, the corporations producing and distributing the world’s soft drinks have created, over time, a never-ending supply of consumers that are addicted to drinking their patented concoctions. I think a lot of people are afraid to go out on a limb and state the obvious; soft drinks are extremely addictive in nature. Anyone that takes the time to research the consumption habits of soda drinkers will quickly come to the same conclusion I have. These so called refreshments are actually highly addictive chemicals and people, all over the world, are hopelessly addicted to them.

The ingredients in soda can be a risk to any person’s good health. For example, the acid in carbonated soft drinks causes demineralization of the body’s bones. This leads to a condition known as osteopenia. When viewed on a radiograph, osteopenia is referred to as the more commonly known term, osteoporosis. People that are addicted to drinking sodas are unnecessarily predisposing themselves to osteoporosis which can lead to stress fractures throughout the skeletal system.

In addition to eating your bones, sodas can screw up the body’s insulin levels which can stress out the pancreas. In a nutshell, this can lead to obesity, diabetes and a whole host of other physiological challenges.

The acid content within soda products can also dissolve the natural, enamel coverings protecting human teeth. Once the enamel is removed, it paves the way for dental caries and a general loss of dental integrity.

The question that naturally comes to mind is what can be done to solve such a serious health dilemma? The answer, unfortunately, is not very much. There is little that can be done because the soda industry is operated by very powerful companies that have the power and wealth to keep their toxic products within the public domain. Soft drinks are marketed around the world as harmless refreshments. Major sporting events and just about any significant entertainment venue are routinely sponsored by companies that produce soft drink beverages. The American people have grown up with these products. Soda and other toxic soft drinks are now a big part of our culture.

The only way to change a paradigm is to slowly educate the public over time. In this particular situation, the process of educating an addicted, consuming public will be challenging. In an ideal situation, our government would force the manufacturers of such products to place warning labels on soda cans that clearly state the contents are addictive and pose a significant risk to a person’s health and well-being. I don’t see that happening anytime soon. In the meantime, educating the public one article at a time will have to suffice. Help me spread the word by passing this post around to family and friends you think might benefit from reading such content.

Financial Armageddon: Is This A Golden Opportunity?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

Don’t you find it interesting that precious metals have dropped in value over the past several months? Keep in mind that we are still in the early stages of the world’s greatest financial depression ever. Let’s face facts, the U.S. and global economies aren’t going to turn around anytime soon and governments aren’t going to stop printing worthless fiat currencies. Precious metals should be climbing in value.

Why might precious metals be losing value at this point in time? With the prospects looking favorable for the demise of paper (electronic) fiat money (U.S. Dollar/Euro), one would logically think gold and silver would continue to climb in value.

Are we witnessing a blatant manipulation of the precious metal markets, by the powers that be, in order to instill a false sense of confidence in paper currencies and Wall Street?

Do people really believe the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies are a better safe haven than tangible, precious metals? Is this really the time to unload precious metals in order to stack up on fiat currencies, or is this actually a last chance opportunity to purchase precious metals before prices reach obscene levels?

In 2008, we watched a completely orchestrated, financial meltdown take place right in front of our eyes. Most people, who tuned into the mainstream media companies at the time, believed the reported propaganda that claimed the economic unrest of 2008 was a normal, cyclical event. Well, I’ve got some eye-opening news for you. The powers that be created financial unrest in 2008 so that strategic bailouts could be offered to major companies that have since profited tremendously. The “too big to fails” have profited and the public that was forced to bail them out have suffered and will continue to do so for the rest of their lives. Austerity measures are about to be implemented in the United States and around the world like never before.

What happened in 2008 is going to look like a blip on the radar screen compared to the financial tsunami that is about to be unleashed, globally, in the very near future. Oh, it’s going to happen. Europe’s financial meltdown is already being played up in the media. The upcoming financial collapse is a no-brainer. You cannot fix the world’s financial woes by continuing to bail out mountains of debt with more fiat money which, ultimately, causes even more debt.

The prices of precious metals are definitely being manipulated lower than they should. The reason this is happening is because the powers that be are currently buying metals like hot cakes. When the greatest financial collapse finally does occur, metal prices will go through the roof. In the meantime, the powers that be are hoping the average person will continue to sell their gold for more worthless fiat currency.

What do you think about this subject?

Health Advice: Everything We Have Been Taught Is Wrong!

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

During my lifetime, I have repeatedly come across misinformation campaigns, originating from respected sources, which offered horrible advice about health. The misinformation presented was so bad that it should have been considered a crime against humanity when it was published.

I have come to the conclusion that if I want to be healthy, I should do the complete opposite of what mainstream medicine advises. It’s truly a case of “Alice in Wonderland.” Everything we have learned from the traditional medical institutions of higher learning is wrong. We should listen carefully to that advice and then do the exact opposite in order to achieve the highest level of health possible.

Following my own advice, this is what I have decided:

  1. If I want to be the recipient of good nutrition, I should totally ignore the food pyramid that is published and endorsed by the U.S. government.
  2. If I want to lose weight, I should include healthy fats in my diet and avoid low and non fat products.
  3. If I want to be healthy, I should avoid artificial sugars like Aspartame, Splenda, Saccharin and similar products in the little, colored packets. I should consume Stevia or, in a worse case scenario, sugar. At least my body can recognize sugar as a food.
  4.  If I want to be healthy, I should understand that lowering my cholesterol with or without statin drugs can harm my immune system in many different ways.
  5. If I want to be healthy, I should cook my food in a conventional oven and not in a microwave contraption that changes the structure of proteins so my body cannot recognize the foods.
  6. If I want to be healthy, I should get plenty of sunlight (which stimulates the production of vitamin D in my body and prevents cancer) and not use sun block products which inhibit Vitamin D production and contain harmful ingredients that have been known to cause cancer.
  7. If I want to be healthy, I should avoid mammograms, (they cause breast cancer) eat a healthy diet and get plenty of vitamin D.
  8. If I want to be healthy, I should avoid toxic vaccines (they’re causing many allergies, autoimmune diseases, cancers and Autism) because they’re unnatural and will totally destroy my immune system for the remainder of my life.
  9. If I want to be healthy, I shouldn’t take drugs that alter my body’s metabolism; interfere with my nervous system, and suppress the natural abilities my body has to heal itself.
  10. If I want to be healthy, I should avoid soft drinks and consume plenty of fresh water that doesn’t contain fluoride and chlorine.
  11. If I want to be healthy, I should avoid using fluoridated toothpaste.
  12. If I want to be healthy, I should only visit a doctor for emergency situations.
  13. If I want to be healthy, I should tell my dentist not to put amalgam (mercury filled) fillings in my teeth, but instead ask him or her to use composite fillings, when necessary.
  14. If I want to be healthy, I should perform moderate exercise everyday.
  15. If I want to be healthy, I should keep my mind active, research topics of interest, and don’t become misinformed by corporate owned media companies that regularly disseminate misinformation that is dangerous to my physical, emotional and mental well being.
  16. If I want to be healthy, I should disconnect my television and read more books. If I want to watch a movie, I should rent a DVD. At least when I’m watching a DVD, I’m aware the story is fiction, unlike when I’m watching stories being reported through traditional news companies. I assume those stories are real, but in reality they are not.

You see, we live in a world that is like Alice in Wonderland. Everything is 180 degrees opposite of what we think it to be.

Disclaimer

The health information that has been written on this website is not intended to replace a professional relationship between a patient and a health care specialist nor is it intended as medical advice. Readers are encouraged to make health care decisions based upon their own independent research!

2009 Scientific Study Proves Traditional Chiropractic’s Major Premise!

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

For many years, traditional chiropractic’s major premise (an improperly functioning nervous system, due to a spinal subluxation (misalignment) will cause human beings to have a less than optimal expression of health) has been attacked by mainstream medicine. Regardless of the fact that numerous scientific studies have been conducted by medical researchers that clearly demonstrate the extreme importance of neurological and endocrine integrity in a living person; the chiropractic practice objective is still not taken seriously.

As a practitioner of chiropractic, I have dedicated a good portion of my professional career to the arduous task of attempting to educate my patients about the importance of getting their spines checked on a regular basis.

Although my career as a chiropractor has been very rewarding for me personally, it’s also been an exhausting experience in some ways. To have to continuously go against the conventional mindset of the average health care consumer is not always an enjoyable exercise. When just about every person perceives you as a circle and you’re a square, it can definitely get on your nerves after awhile.

Most people think of traditional chiropractic as something that is less than scientific; a drugless therapy for back pain; or a strange form of massage. Traditional chiropractic, of course, has nothing to do with any of those preconceived, public notions. To begin with, traditional chiropractic is based on very scientific principles, has nothing to do with back pain, and is a completely distinct and separate profession from massage therapy.

It’s not difficult to understand traditional chiropractic theory, it’s just damn inconvenient for everyone involved to change a societal paradigm that directly affects the health and well being of every person on the planet. And I’m not even getting into the financial considerations that are involved with changing such a paradigm.

How do you break the news to the average person that they’ve been continuously lied to throughout their lives? How do you explain to people that the best way to affect healthy changes in their bodies is by removing interferences that can and do impede their true expressions of physiology? And finally, how do you drive the point home that synthetically patented drugs, although they can alter the way you feel, can never provide a human being with a better expression of health?

In 2009, a scientific study was published by The Endocrine Society ® titled, “Endocrine –Disrupting Chemicals.” The premise and conclusion of the study demonstrated that certain chemicals we commonly encounter, in our environment and foods, have the abilities to interfere with the human endocrine system. The endocrine system is responsible for regulating and controlling the many hormones in our bodies. It is the chemical messaging system that ensures proper human physiology occurs.

A breakdown or interference in the endocrine system would cause all sorts of problems to occur in an otherwise healthy person. Whenever interference occurs in our body, physiology suffers. Things like cancer and autoimmune disorders begin to show up and healthy people become unhealthy.

The study that was conducted by The Endocrine Society ® speaks volumes about the importance of the nervous system and also traditional chiropractic. Our nervous system (the brain, spinal cord, spinal nerves) regulates and controls the functions of the endocrine system as well as every other system inside us.

The 2009 study proves, quite convincingly, what traditional chiropractic has been practicing and stating for well over a hundred years; an important factor leading to proper health can be easily achieved by simply removing a type of interference from the human nervous system that commonly occurs in the form of a spinal misalignment, also known as a vertebral subluxation.

Regularly visiting a chiropractor to have your spine’s alignment checked, not just because you have back pain, can improve your health drastically. Understand from this point forward that the integrity of your spine’s alignment is of paramount importance to your health. And if it wasn’t for the fact that this structural problem, which occurs in every human being from time to time, generates zero revenue for pharmaceutical companies, you’d see it advertised on the evening news. The sad truth is that because it doesn’t promote Big Pharma’s agenda, it’s disregarded by “science” and made to look “unscientific.”

Be sure you read the study, linked above, in order to gain a better understanding about how important our nervous system really is when it comes to maintaining a proper level of health.