Celebrating 50 Years of Apollo “Astro-nots” Walking on the Moon

By NoFakeNews

This July, NASA will roll out more propaganda and fanfare regarding its alleged accomplishments of safely landing astronauts on the moon between 1969-1971. There are numerous articles, television documentaries, and even a major motion picture that have been released for public consumption by the powers that be in order to reinforce the false paradigm that was brilliantly created and forced down the throats of American citizens for five decades.

If Americans, or any other humans, have visited the moon, they didn’t hitch a ride there with Apollo. Let’s explore the facts that back up that last sentence:

The Thermosphere

According to the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) “Temperatures climb sharply in the lower thermosphere (below 200 to 300 km altitude), then level off and hold fairly steady with increasing altitude above that height. Solar activity strongly influences temperature in the thermosphere. The thermosphere is typically about 200° C (360° F) hotter in the daytime than at night, and roughly 500° C (900° F) hotter when the Sun is very active than at other times. Temperatures in the upper thermosphere can range from about 500° C (932° F) to 2,000° C (3,632° F) or higher.” The NCAR and UCAR also claim, “The space shuttle and the International Space Station both orbit Earth within the thermosphere.” 

Let me point out that just about any metal found in existence has a melting point below the temperatures found in the thermosphere. Lead: 327 degrees C; Magnesium 650 degrees C; Aluminum 660 degrees C; Aluminum Alloys 463-671 degrees C; Gold 1063 degrees C; Copper 1084 degrees C; Steel 1425 – 1540 degrees C; Titanium 1670 degrees C. What kind of materials did NASA make the Apollo and other space ships out of?

United States Military Strategic Positions

Let’s face facts. The United States government and its military strength have never retreated from a strategic military target it has conquered. The moon is, without a doubt, the most strategic military target in the universe to conquer when it comes to keeping an eye on our planet. If NASA and Apollo had really made it through the Van Allen Belts and thermosphere in 1969-1971, they would have continued to visit the moon. Other manned missions to deep space locations would have also been planned and carried out.

Are we supposed to believe that NASA perfected space travel through the radiation belts and thermosphere surrounding the earth in 1969 and have never duplicated the accomplishment again?

The Space Shuttle

The telltale evidence NASA never defeated the Van Allen Belts and thermosphere is written within the history of its missions. All of them have taken place in Low Earth Orbits (LEO’s). This is, ultimately, why the Space Shuttle program was planned and developed. It was designed to study and solve the radiation issues and extremely hot temperatures preventing astronauts from taking a real giant step for man and a real giant leap for mankind.

It’s become blatantly obvious to those paying close attention that the moon landing deceptions of the late 60’s and early 70’s eventually became too difficult to continue. The likely possibility that too many people would uncover the truth about the hoax increased dramatically with the passing of time which brought with it advanced computer technology that the public had easy access to. This is the same technology that has allowed for careful examination of the photographic records of Apollo. It is the same technology that has proven the photos were not taken on the moon or in the vacuum of space.

Where Are the Cameras ?

Interesting to note, none of the Apollo cameras used to capture the alleged moon photographs were brought back to earth. I believe the real reason for that fact is because analysis of said cameras would have confirmed that they would have been useless and incapable of taking photographs in the vacuum of space. It was best for NASA to pretend to leave those cameras on the moon where they were out of harm’s way or away from the eyes of researchers.

Examine the Lost Technology Closely

Take a look at any piece of technology that is 50 years old. Look at the modern versions of those technological models and you will observe marked improvements in all of them. Phones, cameras, computers, refrigerators, televisions, automobiles and others; they’ve all been improved drastically with regards to their designs and technological sophistication. Not the case with NASA’s space ships and their abilities to visit the moon and other celestial bodies.

According to NASA, they lost the Apollo space technology that was used 50 years ago and are years away from getting it back. How’s that even possible? Are we seriously supposed to believe such nonsense?

You don’t see General Electric losing the designs for the toaster oven or electric range. You don’t see General Motors losing the technology to manufacture cars. Can you imagine the Ford Motor Company announcing next month that they can no longer manufacture pickup trucks because they misplaced the plans?

The Apollo Space Program: Astronauts or Astronots?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

On July 20, 1969, NASA’s Lunar Module (Eagle) touched down on the surface of our moon and astronaut, Neil Armstrong took one small step for man and one giant leap for mankind. Television anchor, Walter Cronkite kept Americans informed of the latest mission developments as human beings, for the first time ever, walked on the surface of a celestial body other than Earth.

But did it really happen the way we’ve been led to believe? Does the photographic record of NASA’s Apollo Program represent the truth? Did men visit the lunar surface, scoop up moon rocks, and return to Earth with those trophies?

Authors Mary Bennett and David S. Percy, in their book “Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers” convincingly explain the theory that NASA faked the moon landings throughout the Apollo program because they didn’t want the public to see what was really happening on the lunar surface. They also contend that NASA had serious challenges with escaping the earth’s radiation belts and, to this day, still do. This particular obstacle has precluded manned, deep space missions from taking place and was the real reason the space shuttle missions were designed. According to Bennett and Percy, NASA’s been trying to solve the radiation problems for years during shuttle missions.

Bennett and Percy believe that the United States did manage to successfully send two astronauts to the moon that unfortunately died from radiation poisoning before completing the journey back to earth. That mission was performed in private while the faked Apollo missions were filmed in studios and later broadcast as if they were live television feeds coming from the moon. The authors say that even the people working at mission control believed the Apollo transmissions were coming from the moon. Only a few people knew the truth.

Some of the alternative theories that challenge NASA’s historical record have been addressed by the space agency. NASA officials claim that when the astronauts visited the moon, they left reflective mirrors near the landing sites and that scientists on earth have been bouncing lasers off those mirrors for 43 years.

Bennett and Percy argue that the reflective mirrors only prove that someone went to the moon. They don’t prove Apollo delivered the astronauts to the lunar surface.

In July, 2009, NASA released photographs of the supposed landing sites for each of the Apollo missions that were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Critics, that have viewed the photos, claim the images could have been digitally edited. The photos, unfortunately, have poor resolution making it hard to view important details that would positively identify the remaining portions of the lunar module’s descent stage. Critics have also questioned why NASA, with its highly sophisticated cameras, hasn’t produced close-ups of the landing sites.

In 1994, NASA’s Clementine spacecraft photographed the entire surface of the moon and, in doing so, discovered what appeared to be large artificial buildings on the lunar surface. These photographs appeared to be obfuscated by sophisticated techniques but the artificial structures were still positively identified by Steve Skipper and published on his website, www.marsanomalyresearch.com.

After looking at the obfuscated lunar pictures from Clementine, it’s hard for some people to trust the integrity of the photos, offered by NASA, showing the Apollo landing sites.

It’s hard to imagine that a government agency might not have been completely transparent when discussing the Apollo program with its citizens. Of course many Americans don’t buy into any conspiracy theories whatsoever. To do so would be much too painful for them. Only NASA knows for sure what transpired 43 years ago. Was it, in fact, a giant leap for mankind or just a giant lie?