For many years, Hollywood movie productions have been gifted billions of dollars by governments and other powerful entities. Most movies are funded to create perceptions in people’s minds about a plethora of subjects. Those perceptions are far removed from reality.
Does Somebody Have an Agenda?
In 2019, I began the arduous task of writing a novel titled The Target List. Nearly four years later, the story has been transformed into a feature film that entertains and delivers a powerful message to an audience desperately in need of hearing one.
Many talented artists and creative people have worked hard to make this movie a reality. The film is finally complete and has been released!
We have a unique opportunity to promote and support a cinematic production on major platforms that can awaken humanity.
Will people support our product? I certainly hope so because it was a monumental task to make the movie. I nearly lost my life in the middle of the process because some people were not happy about the fact that I write on certain subjects with precision accuracy.
Please take the time to watch, rate, and honestly review Target List. I will include a link below to the movie’s IMDb page where people can rate the film, leave a review, or do both.
A couple of years ago, I watched the disturbing movie, “The Push,” directed and conceived by covert hypnotist Derren Brown.
Brown wanted to see how far individuals — good, kind people, believed to have integrity — would go to protect themselves, and whether or not they would succumb to peer pressure and actually murder someone in order to protect themselves.
At several events, targets were chosen, not knowing their fellow party-goers were actors who were “in” on the set-up. In one scenario, the target is having a conversation with a gentleman (an actor) who suddenly has a (fake) heart attack and ends up at the bottom of a stairwell. Unbeknownst to him, the body is a complete fake, but the prosthetics are so extraordinary, you literally cannot tell the difference between the live actor the body was modeled after and the fake body.
There used to be an excellent close-up photo online where the actor who played the victim was leaning over a table on which his fake doppelganger was lying, but I can no longer locate it. Plus, I had a physical copy I had printed out, but it appears to have been removed from the folder in which I had kept it. In the picture, there is NO discernable difference between the actual, living, breathing man and the prosthetic one. Every piece of stubble, every ingrown hair, every eyelash, every hair of his eyebrows, every vein, any skin discolorations. . . they were all there. Trust me when I say, no one would believe the fake body was not real.
The extraordinary prosthetics, materials and techniques, coupled with the no-detail-shall-be-missed skills of the makeup artists, made the dead body so convincing — to sight, and to feel, apparently — that the targets of the prank believed they (while accidental) had actually killed a man.
Later, when a few partygoers (again, all actors) were gathered on the rooftop having drinks, we see the man we thought had died sitting on the edge of the building (catching his breath?). The target is then barraged with breathless warnings by the partygoers that he will surely be going to prison for attempted murder, having “thrown” a man down the stairs. And even though the target knows he did no such thing, and that the man accidentally fell when the target wasn’t looking, he is, bit-by-bit convinced by these individuals that, not only is he responsible and will be put in prison, but that “this is [his] chance;” and he should seize the moment and push his accuser (and only witness) to his death.
After much prodding, incredibly, this innocent, seemingly kind young man does just that. He quickly walks over to the “victim” sitting on the rooftop’s edge, pushes him off and walks away.
Source: Netflix, “The Push” film by Darren Brown
We later discover, when the prank is revealed to the target, that the actor was fully wired to a safety harness and was fine. But many viewers felt Brown, and the target(s) (there were several similar set-ups) who pushed the man should be charged with attempted murder because they genuinely believed they were murdering someone.
While this anecdote is about the [potentially deadly] effects of peer pressure and gang bullying, it also serves as an excellent example of how we can now be so easily fooled by what we see. We are literally at a previously never-anticipated point in time where saying, ” I know [such and such] happened. I saw it with my own eyes!” won’t necessarily make it so. Now, with Artificial Intelligence (AI) aggressively entering the picture — and no shortage of individuals willing to manipulate it — that statement is now truer than ever.
In previous articles, I have discussed invisible technologies like foglets, nanobots and smart dust and their effects on our health, our privacy, and our civil rights. I have also highlighted technologies that enable remote-controllers/digerati/nanomafia to alter the thoughts of individuals, as well as their words, in real time — literally putting words in people’s mouths.
Deepfake video (including porn) and deepfake voice are big business, with the quality improving so much, fakes can easily be made that are indistinguishable from the real source. And like so many technologies, the majority of the courts are still decades behind, unaware of just how sophisticated these tools are.
In 2017, the Taser company (who changed their name to Axon) began manufacturing body cameras and they offered them, free-of-charge, to every law enforcement officer in the country. Officers take that footage and upload it to a site called evidence.com, owned by Axon.
The trademark for Axon Evidence states: “Computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software allowing a user to remotely upload, access, view, edit, and manage data, video, and audio; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software allowing a user to manage weapons, video surveillance systems worn on the head and the body, and video surveillance systems used in automobiles; computer services, namely, creating and maintaining websites, for others, that allow streaming of selected video, audio, and photographic data for others; computer services, namely, providing an interactive web site featuring technology that allows users to collect, store, manage, deliver, and showcase electronic and paper-based content; computer services, namely, development and maintenance of an internet software platform for the management of digital documentation; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for data storage management of data obtained from electronic devices in the field of public safety and law enforcement.”
There is absolutely nothing that can prevent that footage from being manipulated. So if a corrupt officer wants to frame someone, or slander someone, and wants to show video “proof,” nothing can prevent him or her from providing deepfake evidence. Additionally,companies like Cambrian Genomics, who is known as a “Kinko’s for DNA,” can laser print copies of any DNA sent to them, from any source. (FBI futurist Marc Goodman says, for this reason, solving crimes solely through DNA matches will no longer be possible.) Then there is Genscript who offers cloning and subcloning services and allows customers to “acquire exact gene sequences in the vector of your choice.”
So, it is now completely possible to clone a body (or create one from prosthetics), clone the DNA from that body, create indiscernibly-fake video (and audio) of that individual, remotely put words into someone’s mouth, and more. So if someone with access to this technology wanted to create a a false reality about someone — with “proof” — nothing could stop them.
AI can, of course, be used in fun ways, too. Here are some entertaining and informative links to show some of what’s possible:
Gal Gadot face swapped for Elizabeth Taylor in Cleopatra:
Gal Gadot faceswap in Cleopatra (Credit: Faceswap)
Ashley Hayes is a former business entrepreneur, patented inventor, researcher, and writer seeking to bring attention to the clearly-organized crimes of unlawful and corrupt law enforcement and fusion center personnel against innocent Americans and citizens worldwide, as well as crimes committed by military contractors via 21st-century technology, and to the pandemic of child trafficking by those in power.
Dr. James Giordano is a professor in the Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. He also currently serves as Chair of the Neuroethics Program of the IEEE Brain Project, and as an appointed member of the Neuroethics, Legal and Social Issues (NELSI) Advisory Panel of the Defense Advanced Research Projects’ Agency (DARPA). He has previously served as Research Fellow and Task Leader of the EU Human Brain Project Sub-Project on Dual-Use Brain Science; an appointed member of United States Department of Health and Human Services Secretary’s Advisory Council on Human Research Protections (SACHRP); and as Senior Science Advisory Fellow of the Strategic Multilayer Assessment Branch of the Joint Staff of the Pentagon.
Dr. James Giordano
I have mentioned Dr. Giordano in several previous articles, with good reason: He is THE expert on the brain and, as an advisor to the Pentagon and DARPA, has intimate knowledge about the technologies being used today that enable remote access to our brains.
While Giordano points out that these technologies can be used for benevolent purposes, he acknowledges that they can also be used to intentionally harm, conceding that this intent to harm is useful for military purposes, but (obviously) not so when directed at innocent civilians.
My recent article The Nanomafia: The Most Dangerous Criminal Syndicate The World Has Ever Known discusses the dangerous, criminal affiliate network that has long had access to these technologies, has been using them for decades, and with the nanoparticle-infused mass injections that occurred in 2020 and 2021 (and are continuing) will have a previously incomprehensible ability to remotely control, and alter the behavior of, the public.
In 2021, Dr. Giordano participated in “Technology Day” at the Stockholm Security Conference. Here is some of what he had to say with regard to the current implications of what science and technology can now do:
“This technology allows us to assess the brain, access the brain, and affect the brain.”
He acknowledges that new technologies can create (and are creating) “inequities and inequalities, used by a few who benefit, and kept secret from the majority.”
Importantly, he stresses, “Nothing I am about to tell you is science fictional; it is science fact.”
Psychological Operations (PsyOps) are now referred to as “Neuro-Cognitive Operations” or NCOs, and participants have access to technologies that provide them with the ability to “modify the thoughts, actions, and, therefore, overall stature of others — the operational definition of a weapon.”
(Photo credit: nanobrainimplant.com)
He continues: “Taken from the Oxford dictionary: a weapon is simply a means of contending against others. . . to injure, impair or, perhaps, kill others. But in its strictest definition, a weapon is some means of influence, deterrant. And the question then becomes, “Can the brain sciences become weaponized in those ways that may be less lethal, or non-lethal, yet their influence be overwhelmingly more powerful in that their effects are getting at the essence of what it means to be: the relatively inviolable space of self, of mind; being able to assess and . . . control thoughts, emotions, and behaviors remotely, and in so doing, influence postures of individuals, groups and collectives and perhaps populations.”
Giordano asks, “Is there some line that’s being crossed there whereby this “cognitive liberty” is being intruded upon? I think if we understand “weapon” in that context, we can then frame the brain sciences into those domains, and those tools, . . . that could be weaponized in such a way. Generally, we can parse these into two non-mutually- exclusive and active domains: 1) the assessment neurotechnologies which include various forms of neuro-imagong, neuro-physiological recording, (17:32) . . . and 2) the use of ‘Neuro Big Data’ which, when coupled with decision technologies, machine learning and AI, creates . . . a juggernaut of capability to not only acquire data, and utilize data, but also to manipulate the data itself whereby assessment immediately can turn into effect. (In simpler terms: We can access your brain and immediately alter your thoughts and/or behavior.)
He continues, “This then brings us into the realm of the interventional neurotechnologies. And perhaps first and foremost, if not easiest, is the ability to use extant systems of computational technology and engineering, together with decision technologies, Big Data acquisition and use, and various forms of soft to hard AI to manipulate the data themselves, and by manipulating the data on large scales, it may be possible to literally paint a new reality of what an individual is; to implant information into large-scale databanks, make individuals appear to have certain neurological and psychiatric conditions, to affect their capability to do their job by virtue of their profile, their data profile, by affecting aspects of their metadata so that they’re regarded as limited, and treated in different ways economically, socially, militarily, politically.” (18:54)
Graphics credit: nanobrainimplant.com
With regard to customized targeting of bodies and brains of specific individuals, Giordano says: “The more we know, the further we can go. One of the concerns is the ubiquity of biodata, particularly neuro-biodata, creates certain vulnerabilities, and targetabilities to be able to create precision pathogens. Now those pathogens need not be the tradiional drugs, bugs, or toxins. They can also be certain devices that can be tuned to individual parameters of . . . physiology, to differentially affect individuals in a variety of ways: to direct or compromise their capability for thought, emotion, and action.”
“Putting all of these together, we see a new toolkit that, essentially, engages those domains that have been addressed by current language of the Biological Toxins Conventions, Chemical Weapons Conventions, and various declarations and signatory treaties, but, in some ways, sidesteps that as I hope to show you, which may . . . (20:06) necessitate a revisioning [or] revisiting of the language, scope and tenor of these existing conventions and treaties: new drugs, for example, that are able to penetrate the brain space far more capably, at much lower doses, linking pharmaceuticals to nano-engineered scaffolds, micelles (water-soluble particles that can carry other substances inside them. In medicine, micelles are made in the laboratory and are used to carry drugs to body tissues and cells.), chaperones, that allow facile penetrants into the brain space, sometimes through means that can be rather clandestine or covert: inhalation, transdermally — and doing so with higher specificity; in fact, in some cases targeting these pharmaceuticals to be able to work in key individuals (20:44), or groups of individuals, based on an understanding of their pharmacogenomics and dynamics. Here, too, we see the ability to generate novel biologicals whether that be bacteria, fungi, viruses and, increasingly, there is a worry about the potential weaponization of prions that, based upon individual, collective, and populational information, can be developed so as to high selectivity, affecting key individuals: either individually targets of high value or more globally, more universally, creating, if you will, bellicose value and affecting relatively benign . . . targets, like the general population.”
(21:23) “[W]e can also use various methods of gene editing and synthetic biology to develop organic neurotoxins that are far more stable, less labile, more effective, and can be used with more precision, particularly if delivered to unmanned vehicles: aerial, ground, or sea-based. And a variety of technological devices that can be used to augment, or change, cognitive capacity.”
Finally, VoterVoice.net has posted a plea to everyone, to write to your senators and members of Congress, urging them to declassify and ban neuroweapons. They have provided a letter, which you can copy and paste, or, of course, you can create your own. Here is their version:
As a public representative, your job is to take seriously any potential threat to the common good. The development of neuro-weapons by members of the intelligence community is one such threat.
Prof. James Giordano, a senior science advisory fellow of the Joint Staff at the Pentagon, is currently playing a key role in the development of brain-controlling technologies that will “assess and modify the thoughts, actions and therefore overall stature of others,” he freely admits.
Such control of thoughts and behavior would be a step too far for most Americans, if they were aware of what is being developed by the intelligence community.
We have learned the hard way that government and its agencies are often compromised by bad actors and even worse ideas, and this one ranks even higher than what we have seen in the last three years of restrictions on our liberties.
We urge you to ban the use of neuroweapons and demand that US intelligence agencies declassify the nature any human experimentation involved in their development.
Thank you.
Should you care to reach out to Dr. Giordano personally (which he welcomes), his email address is James.Giordano@Georgetown.edu.
Knowledge is vital. Please share this article widely. . . .
Ashley Hayes is a former business entrepreneur, patented inventor, researcher, and writer seeking to bring attention to the clearly-organized crimes of unlawful and corrupt law enforcement and fusion center personnel against innocent Americans and citizens worldwide, as well as crimes committed by military contractors via 21st-century technology, and to the pandemic of child trafficking by those in power.
The first week of April, the Federal Reserve will be implementing the new FedNow instant-payments program in an effort to begin “encouraging” individuals and institutions to do away with cash payments for “better efficiency,” “convenience,” and “security” (which NoFakeNews readers will recognize as code for trackability, control, and surveillance).
With FedNow, all the data for each financial transaction between two “end users” will flow through the Federal Reserve banks. And while these transactions are digital, they are not CBDCs, yet they will, most assuredly, be the gateway to them.
See the full story at HealthImpactNews and be sure to watch the excellent 20-minute video at the bottom of the article, hosted by Terry Coontz.
Ashley Hayes is a former business entrepreneur, patented inventor, researcher, and writer seeking to bring attention to the clearly-organized crimes of unlawful and corrupt law enforcement and fusion center personnel against innocent Americans and citizens worldwide, as well as crimes committed by military contractors via 21st-century technology, and to the pandemic of child trafficking by those in power.
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five research team members are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. Two researchers soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list when they escape the attack.
According to Dr. April Fulayha of Edward Timmons University in Watts, South Dakota, the word history will soon be removed from the English dictionary and replaced with a new one — itstory.
Dr. Fullayha, a member of the Webster’s Society for Lexiconic Studies chaired an academic think tank in March 2021 that came up with the idea of removing the gender component from the word history.
Due to the Covid pandemic, the Webster’s Society Committee voted to modify the spelling of the word history with fifteen of its 21- panel members absent. The motion was approved by the attending members 4-2 on April 1, 2022.
Webster’s Dictionary has already begun the arduous task of publishing the word itstory in place of history in all its publications.
On January 1, 2024, the word itstory will replace the word history. Historical societies nationwide have already been instructed by the White House that all federal institutions will comply with the Webster’s Society’s decision. Federal institutions are already getting a headstart on changing textbooks, signage, and a plethora of other materials.
Many independent institutions of higher education are protesting the word change and have publicly stated that they will not comply with the committee’s decision.
The White House has stated that any schools, colleges, or universities that do not comply with the word change ruling will lose federal financial assistance.
The Webster’s Society and Dr. Fullayha have recently proposed changing the word fishermen to fisher-them. A vote on that potential word modification is scheduled for later this year.
I will provide additional information about this story as it becomes available.
___________________
Dr. John Reizer is a retired chiropractor and author. Born in Lakewood, New Jersey, in 1963, he now resides in Inman, South Carolina, with his wife and daughter.
John has written several April Fools articles on NoFakeNews in the past and decided to continue the tradition this year. 🤣
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five research team members are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. Two researchers soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list when they escape the attack.
“If you control the [computer software] code, you control the world.” – Marc Goodman, Founder, Future Crimes Institute, Former FBI Futurist-in-Residence, and Consultant to Interpol.
PhotoCredit: The Economist
While I have written many articles about technology, specifically invisible nanotechnology and the “digerati” who control — and abuse — it, its message bears repeating as it is THIS technology that is rapidly changing our world to something truly inhumane. And it is happening without the knowledge of most everyone.
My recent article, How The Digerati Have Used Surveillance Capitalism to Destroy Democracy, discusses how a Government-funded Silicon Valley elite has abused their access to our data without our consent, and has sold and traded that data in their own exclusive market, for decades, becoming billionaires many times over.
Another name for the “digerati” — and a much more accurate one — is the “nanomafia.”
The Nanomafia
Credit: Depositphotos.com
Mafia is defined as a criminal group using extortion or other criminal methods to achieve their goals, and also as “a closed group of people in a particular field, having a controlled influence.”
The nanomafia is a close-knit affiliate network of brillant computer hackers, human genome (DNA) hackers, synthetic biologists, and code-writers, including Silicon Valley long-timers and genius 18-year-olds who have rarely ever been away from a keyboard, who long ago joined forces with individuals within our government (particularly the Department of Defense) to accomplish the greatest crime against humanity ever known: the mind control and enslavement of every man, woman and child. This long-planned, highly coordinated tyranny is designed to be accomplished via remote-access nanotechnology that has been unknowingly injected, ingested or absorbed into the bodies (via airborne nanoparticles) of nearly every human walking the earth, without our knowledge or consent.
Professor David Salinas Flores, M.D., Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru, published an important article in 2018 entitled The Nanomafia: Nanotechnology’s Global Network of Organized Crime. The abstract of his article states: [N]anotechnology has become a billionaire industry with multiple potential applications on human beings; however, experimentation in humans is high risk, for that reason, the transnational nanotechnology companies would be resorting to criminal methods like the organized crime to achieve that purpose. Thus, mafias of nanotechnology, “nanomafias”, would being created, mainly in Latin America, which would be multiplying vertiginously due to several factors like the ignorance in society regarding the use of nanotechnology as criminal weapon, the “invisibility” of this mafia for being used as its tool, the wifi, its economic power, the extortion with the Brain net, the silence and participation of the press and the health unions, the media disinformation campaign, its world interconnection, being an organized crime and the possible participation of authorities of the national police, the prosecutor’s office and the judiciary, and the intelligence services. Nanomafia aims to become the greatest organized crime network in the world, therefore, the world society shall know, be alert and report the crimes committed by this nanomafia.”
While his article points to Latin America as the hub of the nanomafia, I attest it is alive and well in the United States and throughout the world. You can see Dr. Flores’ full article here: https://medcraveonline.com/IPMRJ/the-nanomafia-nanotechnology39s-global-network-of-organized-crime.html. Ramola D also published his article, along with several informative, related links, as well as information on the Brain Net (aka “Cerebral Internet”) Dr. Flores mentions. (Links are below)
The World Health Organization would not be able to accomplish its sinister goals of enslavement without the active participation of the nanomafia. (It is well- documented that the mass injections that took place in 2020 and 2021 contained nanoparticles. These nanoparticles via synthetic/man-made RNA are, in fact, remotely accessible, leading WHO contributor Yuval Noah Harari to state, “Free will is over” and “Humans are now hackable animals.”
In truth, humans have been “hackable” for some time, their/our minds able to be read, their/our behavior directed and controlled. The methods previously used for these purposes included physical torture, laboratories, and wired connections to the victim. While these methods are undoubtedly continuing, remote-access, invisible technology used by the nanomafia is accomplishing the same thing. These include directed-energy weapons such as high-energy lasers (HELs), high-power microwaves (HPMs), extremely low frequency microwaves (ELFs), 5g and, most importantly, nanotechnology.
Remotely-accessible nanobots have been used in medicine for decades. While there are, undoubtedly, success stories that have come from their use, we will never know how many innocent individuals have been murdered by a bad actor having had remote access to their bodies. Now, with the proliferation of nanoparticles/nanobots in bodies everywhere, coupled with cold, hard greed (and sadistic tendencies), the nanomafia’s playground has exploded in size. With a nanoparticle/nanobot-filled human, they can not only access more data (a process that has created more billionaires than ever before), they can control the thoughts of that individual. They can control the feelings and desires of that individual. They can control the movements of that individual. They can control the speech of that individual — literally, remotely making a person say a particular sentence, or ask a specific question.
Furthermore, they work directly with the state fusion centers, whose corruption has been well-documented on this site, and elsewhere. Together, they use their multitude of invisible technologies to commit domestic terrorism against innocent targets. For instance, with regard to illegal surveillance, I have personally witnessed multiple thefts that have occurred because the nanomafia/fusion center affiliates were able to see where something was hidden (on multiple occasions, spanning many years) via their technology. Then, also via their invisible technology, were able to steal the hidden, vital evidence that would implicate them and their fellow criminals they are covering for.
That may sound like science fiction, but it’s not. Keeping us in the dark about these technologies and their capabilities (which are, truly, indistinguishable from magic) has been key to their advancement. Making the possible seem utterly implausible via disinformation campaigns and gaslighting has been part of their m.o.
When you carefully read Dr. James Giordano’s warnings about aerosolized nanobots, you can understand the plausibility of perpetual surveillance of someone without the use of traditional tiny cameras/spy gadgets. He plainly states that there is no protection from nanobots, that “they can move up to two feet in enclosed spaces,” can penetrate even the most robust armor, and enter any opening in the body. He stresses that their remote accessibility is dangerous and should be sending blaring alarms to Congress, urging a revisit of the rules of biological warfare.
Finally, while my previous articles on Singularitarian Ray Kurzweil have discussed, in detail, nanotechnology and its capabilities, I want to call attention to utility fog or “foglets.” These enable crimes to occur in plain sight, yet invisibly.
Kurzweil stated (18 years ago): “We will incorporate MNT-based [molecular nanotechnology-based] fabrication into ourselves, so we’ll be able to rapidly alter our physical manifestation at will. … Foglets . . . are able to link together to form a great variety of structures . . . Using them a person can modify his body or his environment.”
Keep in mind, these statements by Kurzweil — who works directly with our military and Department of Defense — were in his book, The Singularity Is Near, which was published in 2005, an eternity in the world of technology. Common sense combined with the knowledge that technology changes exponentially (or mind-blowingly fast, if you will) dictates that foglets have been in play for some time. (This type of technology is what enabled the lead character from the old show Bewitched to transport, and transform, herself.)
For most, it’s difficult to wrap our brains around how this technology could be possible. But with nanotechnology’s having changed everything we ever thought we knew about science — literally altering the laws of physics at that size — it is not only possible, but no doubt probable, in its use by the nanomafia, our military, law enforcement, and their extensive proxy/affiliate network.
Those individuals wanting to control your reality, your very life, consider themselves to be kings in the “land of the blind.” They consider themselves gods holding the code, and therefore, the power, over you and your loves ones. These are dangerous individuals who work in secret and who work in concert with politicians who are attempting to fool the public into willingly submitting to their own, very real enslavement.
If you believe their lies, I have a completed wall I’d like to sell you.
Knowledge is vital. Please share this article wherever you can . . . .
Ashley Hayes is a former business entrepreneur, patented inventor, researcher, and writer seeking to bring attention to the clearly-organized crimes of unlawful and corrupt law enforcement and fusion center personnel against innocent Americans and citizens worldwide, as well as crimes committed by military contractors via 21st-century technology, and to the pandemic of child trafficking by those in power.
After announcing a ground-breaking cancer cure, five research team members are targeted by an assassin hired by big pharma. Two researchers soon find themselves framed for the crime and on the killer’s target list when they escape the attack.
NoFakeNews 