Big Pharma

How Big Pharma Influences Scientific Research and the Medical Establishment

Gina FloresLeave a comment

By Gina Flores

Editor at NoFakeNews

I am currently winding up a lengthy business trip to Spain, Germany and Italy and getting ready to return to the United States next week. I have had little time recently to contribute to the blog but will be adding more content later this May.

I finally had a few moments of downtime and came across an interesting video that discusses how pharmaceutical companies regularly buy scientific research and ultimately influence the medical establishment.

I am also including a video interview with Dr. Stephanie Seneff discussing the link between MMR and Autism, and a video of an insider talking about the dangers of vaccines. All of this stuff is obviously connected, and what many of our readers already know to be the truth, but it’s certainly a breath of fresh air when we see and hear professional people in the medical and scientific arenas spilling the beans on their own industry.

Avere un buon fine settimana a tutti!  🙂

 

This Is One of the Most Egregious Crimes Ever Committed Against Children

NoFakeNews1 Comment

By Dr. John L Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

Every year there are children being irreparably harmed from vaccine injuries. The cases very rarely, if ever, make it into the mainstream news. Vaccine injuries reported to medical physicians are usually not recorded as such and get lost in an intentionally manufactured abyss, from a statistical perspective. Make no mistake about this subject matter, there is a concerted effort by medicine and Big Pharma to keep a lid on the biggest secret within the medical profession; vaccines are the lifeblood of medicine and the etiological cause of autoimmune disorders as well as many physiological expressions of cancer.

This is, without a doubt, one of the most egregious crimes ever committed against children. But that is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to examining this huge conspiracy. As painful as it might be for people to learn the truth, that the pharmaceutical industry has been and continues to be involved in the mother of all cover-ups that systematically harms children throughout the world, it is something that must be exposed and done so on a broad scale platform.

As the vaccine injury conspiracy is examined in more detail in the months and years to come, the public will learn that the cover-up goes far beyond the parameters of the pharmaceutical industry. There is much more involved here than greed and the quest for profits from huge corporations. Don’t get me wrong, there is money and profits driving this monster, but those elements are only the modalities being employed to help accomplish the agenda.

If this cover-up was only about drug companies and their pursuit of money, the CDC and other government agencies in the United States and other countries would have discovered the abuse and put an end to it long ago. But this is not the case. In fact, when the light of day has been allowed to shine on this issue, it’s been quite clear that the CDC and other agencies have helped the pharmaceutical companies in maintaining the conspiracy. In a nutshell, they’re all in bed together. The very same agencies that have been created to protect and serve the interests of the public are actively conspiring with drug companies against innocent healthcare consumers.

The newly released documentary, “VAXXED” shows just how deep the rabbit hole goes with regards to the CDC and its involvement in the cover-up to keep people uninformed about the link between vaccines and diseases like Autism, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, autoimmune problems and many forms of cancer.

Take a few minutes to watch an interview with the film’s producer that discuses why Big Pharma and others don’t want people watching “VAXXED” or anything else that takes a serious look at the truth about vaccines and the irreparable injuries they cause children and adults.

Eight Drugs Doctors Won’t Take When Dealing With Their Own Health Problems:

NoFakeNews3 Comments

By Dr. John Reizer

Founder of NoFakeNews

One of the biggest impediments to the average health care consumer’s good health is the plethora of synthetic prescription and over the counter drugs people constantly take. It’s a serious problem and one that does not get enough attention in the corporately owned mainstream media. Nevertheless, the problem continues to make sick people sicker.  This is a national epidemic in the United States.

I found an interesting article earlier today with regards to this topic and thought I would share it with our readers, Please click this link to read: Eight Drugs Doctors Won’t Take When Dealing With Their Own Health Problems 

A Snapshot of Sick Care in America

Gina Flores1 Comment

aa-dees-obamacare

Op-ed by Jillian Perkins

If you wanted to make sick people sicker, how would you do it?

Suppose, as a thought exercise, you wanted to make sick people sicker. Maybe you are a psychopath or sadist, or maybe you’re just curious. Well, if a bunch of people sat down and brainstormed some of the most effective ways of worsening an urgent illness or injury, they might come up with something like this:

• Make them wait intolerably long times in uncomfortable seats in a room filled with other sick people.
• Make sure that they pay, or agree to pay in writing, before you treat them. Make them fill out lots of paperwork, most of it irrelevant, and force them to stand at a desk for 15 minutes while entering every piece of data about them from birth onwards into an archaic computer system that assimilates information at the speed of a sloth.
• Make them wait even longer in little tiny airless rooms that have been filled with a variety of sick people, one after the other, all day long for years.
• Make sure the room is brightly lit with fluorescent lights and has no comfortable resting place.

• Ignore them completely while you busily assault them with a variety of tests that are mostly or completely irrelevant to whatever illness or injury they are suffering from. The more invasive the tests, the better. Make sure they are constantly in motion, whether to open a mouth for a thermometer, offer their arm to a blood pressure cuff, or to step on a scale.
• Don’t let them tell you what’s wrong. Ask a bunch of questions about what medications they are taking and maybe a few yes or no questions about specific symptoms. Act as if you are only interested in data points, and not at all in their experience.
• After they answer your questions, leave them again without any indication of whether or not they are going to get any help. Make them wait again, preferably as long as possible.
• When you come back, offer the following:

* A. the conclusion that their suffering is mostly in their heads, as the tests all came back negative. Berate them for wasting your time and send them away. Do not even consider the money they have spent and the hours they have waited and the suffering that is not relieved.
* B. a meaningless diagnosis that simply describes their symptoms. Offer medications that carry risks of serious side effects, which may very well make them sicker even while managing the symptoms. Make sure to be as patronizing as possible while explaining the treatment.

• Make it so that your “help” may bankrupt them.

If you want to make people sicker, the best kind of people to manage sick people would be people who have been indoctrinated to believe:

• That they are in a class of exalted people who know best all the time.
• That human bodies are machines; they are all alike, and they all work the same way.
• That diseases need to be treated with pharmaceuticals and surgery. There are no other tools available – anything else is quackery.
• That testing counts as a treatment.
• That the long-term effects of dangerous chemicals are worth the short-term benefits of concluding that you have treated your patient successfully.
• That good practice in medicine is completely objective, and doesn’t have anything to do with a patient’s feelings.
• That all patients should have to provide proof of their suffering that fits the standard (outdated) tests in common practice.
• That medical science understands all there is to know about the human body and its functioning, and is the pinnacle of human knowledge.
• That they have ultimate authority over you.

If you want to make people sicker, then by all means DON’T:

• Treat them gently and try to make them as comfortable as possible with a clean, comfortable, homey space that has soft resting places and gentle lighting.
• Work with them to understand what the problem is and then collaboratively decide what tests would help further that understanding.
• Acknowledge that as a unique human being, they know their body better than you no matter how much training you may have, and that they can provide the information that will be key to treating them.
• Empathize with their suffering, and seek to address the root cause of it regardless of whether it fits into a standard model.
• Look at possible treatment options that include nutritional choices, supplements, or even – God forbid – plant medicines.
• Explore treatment choices together, and discuss them as if you were partners.

A hundred years from now, we will look back at our medical system and recognize how barbaric and primitive it is. Modern medical schools and research have all been funded by pharmaceutical companies, which have engineered a standard medical philosophy and eviscerated any opposing views. Medical science is narrow and limited, with a dim understanding of the complexities of the human body/mind.

They have chosen to ignore the effects of consciousness, or even just psychology, on a person’s health, with the result being that most causes of illness are completely inexplicable to them. Because natural food and medicine cannot be patented, they do not play a role in medicine, regardless of how valuable they might be to healing. The only tools available are dangerous synthetic chemicals which have massive deleterious effects on the body that are poorly understood. Modern medicine is based on treating disease, not on supporting health.

Medical practice reflects the limited view of medical science, ignoring the patients’ actual needs in favor of churning people through standard treatment protocols to address symptoms that match established criteria. Curiously, the patient, who they are ostensibly trying to help, doesn’t really figure into it much, and their comfort doesn’t seem to matter. The entire process of western “healthcare” couldn’t possibly be better designed to make a patient feel worse, as outlined above. From the condescension of healthcare workers to unnecessary tests, getting caught in that system would be horrible on a good day. When you’re feeling awful, it’s pure torture.

Modern medicine is the leading cause of death in the United States. It’s time to open our minds; we don’t just need to refigure how we pay for and provide healthcare, we need to retool what healthcare is.

Image: Dees Illustration

Jillian Perkins is a writer and independent researcher out of Portland, Oregon, focused on helping to free the world of medical dogma, economic and mental slavery, and chemical poisoning. 

This article (A Snapshot of Sick Care in America) can be republished with attribution to the author and NaturalBlaze.com

The Highly Profitable Vaccine Industry

Gina Flores1 Comment

By Melissa Reizer

Staff Writer at NoFakeNews
w-Melissa52_bwSome of the biggest profits earning corporations in the world are pharmaceutical companies. Add vaccines to the list of products a particular company offers to potential healthcare consumers, and those financial rewards are that much larger.

Regardless of your position on the controversial subject of vaccines, it’s easy to see that these medicinal concoctions continue to generate large sums of money for Big Pharma. There are enormous financial incentives for pharmaceutical companies to enter the vaccine arena.

According to an article that was published in Silent Crow News, the lucrative vaccine market is about to skyrocket to even higher levels and surpass the impressive financial rewards it’s previously provided for these monster petrochemical corporations.

Read more about this subject by clicking here!

Why, Oh Why, Does Everyone BELIEVE Big Pharma’s Shtick?

Gina Flores2 Comments

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Up front, I raise and use 17 U.S. Code §107 Fair Use for news reporting and educating healthcare consumers in quoting excerpts from Dr Gotzsche’s book Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime.

The centerpiece of the US Organized Crime Control Act from 1870 is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).Racketeering is the act of engaging in a certain type of offence more than once. The list of offenses that constitute racketeering include extortion, fraud, federal drug offences, bribery, embezzlement, obstruction of justice, obstruction of law enforcement, tampering with witnesses, and political corruption.Big pharma does so much of this all the time that there can be no doubt that its business model fulfils the criteria for organised [sic] crime. [1]

The above quote by Dr Peter C Gotzsche, MD, certainly is chilling, if not a wakeup call, for those who have “full faith and trust” in the allopathic paradigm of the healing arts and, especially, their chemicals known as prescription drugs, which are reimbursed financially (partially) by health insurance companies and providers, which has led to the “legal drug culture” in the USA, since many citizens take two or more Rx drugs daily [2]!

Dr Gotzsche is more than qualified to make such an assessment, as he’s a specialist in internal medicine and has worked in clinical trials and regulatory affairs in the drug industry. Furthermore, he co-founded the prestigious Cochrane Collaboration in 1993 and also The Nordic Cochrane Center that very same year. He’s been a professor of Clinical Research Design and Analysis at the University of Copenhagen. In addition, he’s published more than 50 papers in the BMJ, Lancet, JAMA, Annals of Internal Medicine, and New England Journal of Medicine. He’s also an editor at the Cochrane Methodology Review Group. Personally, I think no one would consider him a “tin hatter”!

What got him started on his medical career path? He worked for a while as a pharmaceutical company drug salesman in Sweden. So, he knows what goes on from that aspect of the “drug culture.”

While reading his exceptionally well-documented book, I could not help but make annotations, especially since he so effectively cites the fraud and criminal activities Big Pharma engages in repeatedly, only to receive a “slap on the wrist” monetary fine and then be allowed to continue on their financially-rewarding ways of harming and killing unsuspecting patients due to Pharma’s influences and monetary gifts to medical doctors. All that sad pharma ‘politics’ is very well-documented with “chapter and verse,” as they say. Here are some examples.

“In 2012, Pfizer agreed to pay $60 million to settle a US federal investigation into bribery over seas.” [1] Pg. 23

“Pushing drugs that people don’t need is a highly lucrative business, particularly when the drugs affect brain functions. Roche pushed Valium (diazepam) to become the top-selling drug in the world, although many indications for its use were highly doubtful and the wholesale price was 25 times the price of gold.” [1] Pg. 25

“The BMJ comes out weekly and most issues describe one or more scandals related to the drug industry in its News section or elsewhere.” [1] Pg. 25

“An amount of $1 billion was levied to resolve the allegations that Pfizer paid bribes and offered lavish hospitality to healthcare providers to encourage them to prescribe the four drugs, and six whistle-blowers would receive $102 million.” [1] Pg. 26

“Novartis agreed to pay $423 million in 2010. [….] The company unlawfully marketed Trileptal and five other drugs, causing false claims to be submitted to government healthcare programmes [sic]. [….] The whistle-blowers, all former employees of Novartis, would receive payment of more than $2.5 million, and Novartis signed a Corporate Integrity Agreement.” [1] Pg. 27

“GlaxoSmithKline to pay $3 billion in 2011. This is the largest healthcare fraud settlement in US history. GlaxoSmithKline pleaded guilty to having marketed a number of drugs illegally for off-label use, including Wellbutrin (bupropion, an antidepressant), Paxil (paroxetine, an antidepressant), Advair (fluticasone + salmeterol, an asthma drug), Avandia (rosiglitazone, a diabetes drug) and Lamictal (lamotrigine, an epilepsy drug). [….] The company paid kickbacks to doctors, …. [….] Avandia was withdrawn in Europe in 2010 because it increases cardiovascular deaths.” [1] Pg. 27

“AstraZeneca to pay $520 million in 2010 to settle fraud case. The charges were that AstraZeneca illegally marketed one of its best-selling drugs, the antipsychotic drug Seroquel (quetiapine), to children, the elderly, veterans and inmates for uses not approved by the FDA, including aggression, Alzheimer’s, anger management, anxiety, attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dementia, depression, mood disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and sleeplessness.” [1] Pg. 28

“Roche convinces governments to stockpile Tamiflu. Roche has committed what to me [Dr Gotzsche] looks like the biggest theft in history, but no one has yet dragged the company to court. [….] Based on unpublished trials, Roche has claimed that Tamiflu reduces hospital admissions by 61%, secondary complications by 67%, and lower respiratory tract infections requiring antibiotics by 55%. Curiously, the company convinced the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to approve the drug for prevention of influenza complications, and the agency’s summary of product characteristics stated that lower respiratory tract complications were reduced from 12.7% to 8.6% (P=0.001). [….] There is no convincing evidence that Tamiflu prevents influenza complications or reduces the spread of influenza to other people. However, Roche used ghostwriters, and one of the ghosts said: ‘The Tamiflu accounts had a list of key messages that you had to get in. It was run by the marketing department and you were answerable to them.’” [1] Pp. 28-29

“Johnson & Johnson fined more than $1.1 billion in 2012. A jury found that the company and its subsidiary Janssen had downplayed and hidden risks associated with its antipsychotic drug Risperdal (risperidone). The judge found nearly 240 000 violations under Arkansas’ Medicaid- fraud law.” [1] Pg. 30

“Merck to pay $670 million over Medicaid fraud in 2007. Merck had failed to pay the appropriate rebates to Medicaid and other government healthcare programmes [sic], and had also paid kickbacks to doctors and hospitals to induce them to prescribe various drugs.” [1] Pg. 31

“Eli Lilly to pay more than $1.4 billion for illegal marketing in 2009. Eli Lilly entered into a settlement with the Department of Justice concerning a wide-ranging, off-label marketing scheme for its top-selling antipsychotic drug, Zyprexa (olanzapine), with worldwide sales of nearly $40 billion between 1996 and 2009. [….] Lilly successfully marketed Zyprexa for numerous off-label uses including Alzheimer’s, depression and dementia, particularly in children and the elderly, although the harms of the drug are substantial, including heart failure, pneumonia, considerable weight gain and diabetes.” [1] Pg. 31

“Abbott to pay $1.5 billion for Medicaid fraud in 2012. Abbott settled allegations of Medicaid fraud for the company’s illegal marketing of the epilepsy drug Depakote (valproate); $84 million would be paid to the whistle-blowers. Abbott would pay $800 million in civil damages and penalties to compensate Medicaid, Medicare and various federal healthcare programmes [sic] for harm suffered as a result of its conduct.” [1] Pg. 32

Dr Gotzsche’s research indicates that Big Pharma corporate crime is common, “ruthlessly carried out” and repeatedly, with total disregard for deaths and other serious harmful adverse health effects! One has to wonder how the U.S. CDC and FDA, in particular, benefit from such crime. We don’t have to question that for very long, since the fines are very ‘healthy’, but where does that money go? That’s the million-dollar-question all healthcare consumers should be asking of Congress, since Big Pharma corporate crime and fines punishment are a constant in the pharmaceutical industry.

So, why does everyone trust Big Pharma’s advertisements in newspapers, magazines, on radio and TV and, especially, from your medical doctor, who contributes to the problem of disseminating fraud, including that perpetrated against Medicare and Medicaid?

Dr Gotzsche says, to answer my question above, “…although the criminal investigators recommended the FDA to examine whether Sanofi-Aventis had been involved in systematic fraud. The FDA didn’t follow the advice and it exerted internal pressures on its scientists to alter their conclusions in favor of the drug, which, as we shall see later, seems to be the standard practice at the FDA.” [1] Pg. 31

Personally and intellectually, I think I have to agree with Dr Gotzsche’s assessment when he says, “I think these people are drug pushers, just like street drug pushers … It is outrageous that these people pushed this drug [Purdue Pharma’s OxyContin (oxycondone)], addictive as they knew it was, onto the market and in effect damaged millions of innocent people.” [1] Pg. 36

But that’s not the only drugs that Big Pharma drug pushers push! Vaccines are the quintessential money-makers, and Pharma have no legal liability for damages caused by vaccines! That’s Congress’s fault and Congress needs to get on the ball to change that, as other countries in the world are taking Big Pharma to court and suing them for damaging innocent children and adults. Here are a few examples:

Gardasil Vaccine: Spain Joins Growing List of Countries to File Criminal Complaints
https://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2015/02/28/gardasil-vaccine-spain-joins-growing-list-of-countries-to-file-criminal-complaints/

Brain Damaged Victims Of Swine Flu Vaccine Win $63 Million Lawsuit [in the U.K.]
http://naturalsociety.com/brain-damaged-victims-of-swine-flu-vaccine-win-63-million-lawsuit/

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Vaccine Empire on Trial in India
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1170073

5 Families Sue Big Pharma in France for Vaccine Damages to Children
http://www.whale.to/a/5_families_sue_big_pharma.html

Recent Italian Court Decisions on Vaccines and Autism
http://www.ageofautism.com/2015/01/recent-italian-court-decisions-on-vaccines-and-autism.html

The above constitute a sampling of what’s going on outside the USA where there’s a media embargo on vaccine damage and how it’s handled in other countries that are not controlled by the U.S. FDA.

Dr Gotzsche’s book, Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime, How big pharma corrupted healthcare, is a treasure trove of what really goes on in the name of medical science: Crime in many instances from their science to their journals, and especially to Pharma’s marketing sales techniques and gifting to doctors and scientists, which is nothing short of “graft,” in my opinion.

According to the Free Legal Dictionary by Farlex,

Graft is the personal gain or advantage earned by an individual at the expense of others as a result of the exploitation of the singular status of, or an influential relationship with, another who has a position of public trust or confidence. The advantage or gain is accrued without any exchange of legitimate compensatory services. [3]

Shouldn’t healthcare consumers be asking if Big Pharma should be prosecuted for numerous crimes against humanity, plus violations of the Nuremberg Code and the U.S. RICO Act?

References:

[1] Gotzsche, Peter C. Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime, How big pharma has corrupted healthcare. London: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd., 2013; Pg. 38.
[2] http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/drug-use-therapeutic.htm
[3] http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/graft

Resources:

Braithwaite, John. Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1984.
http://www.amazon.com/Corporate-Crime-Pharmaceutical-Industry-Braithwaite/dp/0710200498

Attorney Suggests Suing Government and Big Pharma Regarding Vaccinations
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/09/attorney-suggests-suing-government-and-big-pharma-regarding-vaccinations.html

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

The Vaccines Keep Coming

NoFakeNews2 Comments

By Gina Flores

Staff Writer at NoFakeNews.net

Year after year the vaccines seem to keep coming. Big Pharma has hundreds of new medicinal concoctions in the works that are eventually slated to be injected in human beings. What does this mean in the grand scheme of things? It means that millions of unsuspecting people will have their immune systems assaulted to an even larger extent than is currently taking place.

Vaccines are the ultimate guarantee that big drug companies will never run out of customers. They are the seeds of today that have been planted by sinister corporations and they will grow into the new diseases of tomorrow. Those new diseases will then be managed indefinitely by a never ending catalog of patented pharmaceutical products that will yield monetary profits in the billions of dollars.

Read the article below for more on this subject:

271 New Vaccines in Big Pharma’s Pipeline

The Recent Measles Scare: More Vaccination Propaganda in Play

NoFakeNews1 Comment

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net 

Long before the development and introduction of a measles vaccine, children worldwide would contract this childhood disease and recover in a relatively short period of time without complications and with true lifelong immunity. The same could be also said in regards to cases of Mumps and Rubella. (1)

The childhood diseases are believed by some health care specialists to be a natural primer to the human immune system. In other words, children that contract these diseases prior to puberty can benefit from a stronger and more efficient immune system response against other and more potentially devastating health challenges later in life.

At the center of the vaccination controversy is the well documented anger of many families that have had to endure pain and suffering because their children were permanently harmed or killed from adverse vaccine reactions. A family asking for compensation for damages stemming from vaccine injuries to their child is not a new concept. Pharmaceutical companies, in the past, have had to pay out large monetary awards in an effort to settle lawsuits generated from vaccination injuries to small children.

Recently, new legislation has been passed that limits the monetary awards parents can recover when seeking damages caused from vaccine injuries. Such cases are now heard in a special vaccine injury court. This venue limits all monetary awards at $250,000. In addition to that, it is quite cumbersome to enter specialized vaccine courts and many cases are thrown out before they get started. Unlike other courtroom scenarios, the vaccine cases are heard by a special vaccine judge and you can pretty much imagine how biased and unfair, in the direction of the pharmaceutical manufacturers, this process has become.

Despite the tremendous risks associated with vaccinating children and the relatively benign nature of most childhood diseases as well as other maladies being protected against, the pharmaceutical industry has managed to brainwash most parents and health care consumers into believing that the human body is completely defenseless against a never ending assortment of deadly microbes.

Most recently, a measles outbreak originating in California in the Disneyland Park has been promoted ad nauseum by the corporately owned mainstream media. It has reached the point of becoming a witch hunt on many news programs as people have been featured on television calling out parents that have chosen not to vaccinate their children for fear of what these very harmful drugs can potentially do to their children. All of this rubbish came about because 84 people in the entire United States have been infected by measles in 2015 as of this writing. This is craziness and a lot of propaganda being promoted by Big Pharma.

My point of contention remains quite simple and logical to understand. If the people getting vaccinated feel unsafe due to the fact that others around them are unvaccinated, how effective can the vaccines really be? The truth be told, the vaccines are not very effective at all. And the medical profession over the years has alluded to this fact in their professional journals.

An article written in JAMA, May, 1990 stated, “In an era when physicians are relatively unfamiliar with the disease, failure to detect measles in some vaccinated people will lead to calculation of artificially low attack rates for the vaccinated population.” (2)

It appears when one reviews the large number of claims being made today that a lot of children might be getting needlessly harmed from vaccines. This is not something that can be hidden, any longer, as the complaints continue to pile up in the vaccine courts and the accusatory finger has been pointed in the face of the Medical Establishment for their involvement in possibly causing more harm than good when it comes to the vaccine issue.

Some health care experts believe that vaccines are very dangerous drugs and make people weaker, sicker, and more vulnerable to diseases they would otherwise not have to contend with. Some doctors also believe that these medicines do not create immunity and that the vaccine ingredients are toxic beyond belief and bad for all human beings.

In 1998, the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet, published a controversial paper that linked MMR vaccinations to Autism. The MMR vaccine is a preventive, medicinal concoction against Measles, Mumps, and Rubella.

According to mainstream health sources, The Lancet article caused a major panic in the minds of parents in both Britain and the United States. Because of the study, many parents chose not to vaccinate their children and opted for safer measures to maintain the health and well being of younger family members. (3)

An independent investigative journalist, Brian Deer, determined that the author of the famous article, Andrew Wakefield, M.D., had manipulated evidence in his study and had also broken several ethical standards within the field of research. As a result of Deer’s investigation, Wakefield’s study was retracted by The Lancet in 2010. Dr. Wakefield was later reprimanded by the medical profession and stripped of his license to practice medicine. (4)

The news about the Wakefield Study being retracted was given worldwide exposure by the corporately, owned mainstream media. In fact, anytime a person attempts to type anything relating to vaccines and Autism into an Internet search engine, the results are littered with references about the now famous retraction of the Wakefield study. How convenient and considerate it was for the news services to have provided this information for all health care consumers in the world.

Since the retraction of the study, many health care professionals have indicated that the Wakefield article was singled out and crushed by representatives of Big Pharma in order to protect the vaccine industry. Obviously, a lot of money was at stake in the way of potential lawsuits against vaccine makers, as well as the British and United States governments. Enough said!

One impressive article that was featured in the online publication, Natural News.com, implied that several of the key players responsible for having the Wakefield study retracted were tied to major pharmaceutical companies that had deep financial interests in the vaccine industry. (5)

As has been reported for a very longtime by many independent researchers, Big Pharma seems to have very rigid ties to medical research as well as the journals that publish medical studies. (6) These corporations have the ultimate power to greatly influence research so that the studies being released each year routinely support the petrochemical industry’s products. They also appear to have the power to erase important studies that slip through the cracks and speak out against the dangers of various medicines.

To this day, Dr. Wakefield maintains his innocence and credibility regarding the famous 1998 paper. (7) As is the case with many things in this world, if you want to know the truth about a particular situation, you simply follow the money trail.

Very simply written, the immunization industry remains the holy grail of modern medicine and is carefully protected by followers and financiers within the church of medicine. Any health care practitioner that attempts to shed light on the dangers associated with vaccinating our children can expect to be ridiculed, attacked, or ostracized from their profession. And for those individuals that doubt the authenticity of such claims, they only have to look at the unfair treatment of Dr. Andrew Wakefield.

What do you think about this subject?

Sources:

(1) What About Immunizations? Exposing The Vaccine Philosophy: A Parent’s Guide to the Vaccination Decision – Cynthia Cournoyer – © 1991 Fifth Edition Nelson’s Books

(2) E. Markowitz, S.R. Preblud, W.A. Orenstein, et al. “Patterns of Transmissions in measles outbreaks in the United States, 1985-1986.” New England Journal of Medicine 1989; 320:75-81, as cited by Randall Neustaedter, The Immunization Decision: A Guide For Parents.

(3) Online Link

(4) Online Link

(5) Online Link

(6) Online Link

(7) Online Link

October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month: Don’t Support the Pink Campaign!

NoFakeNews6 Comments

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

Once again it is the month of October. That means it is “Breast Cancer Awareness Month” and everyone from professional football players to local community organizations is wearing pink in order to demonstrate a wide range of support for the national campaign.

An organized effort to raise funds to find a cure for cancer is in progress. It’s got the support and cooperation of professional athletes, business people, and everyday citizens. Almost everyone wants to cure cancer in the worst way except for the petrochemical corporations that have, behind the scenes, bankrolled the fundraising campaigns we constantly see being promoted on radio and television.

Almost every single month there is another disease that is recognized nationally and promoted by the medical brain trust. In actuality, these campaigns are all cleverly planned and promoted on a regular calendar by large petrochemical companies that profit enormously by keeping individual diseases in the forefront of the collective psyche of the American people.

Many years ago, while studying to become a health care professional, I discovered the truth about drug companies and the incredible influence they have on cancer promotion and scientific research. It was an eye-opening experience for me to learn that the funds being collected by various organizations, in an effort to eliminate cancer, were actually being used by drug companies to make toxic drugs that did absolutely nothing in the way of curing diseases. Give a healthy person these same potions and they would get sick and die. How could sick people take the products and expect to get well?

What I learned, a long time ago, was that there has never been any organized research performed by drug companies to find a cure for cancer or other diseases. Medical research’s sole point of emphasis has always been centered on developing drugs to manage symptoms. Many, if not all, of these toxic chemicals make people sicker and actually cause additional health related problems that require newer drugs to combat the reactions from the primary cancer remedies.

In all the years “the medical powers that be” have been fighting a never-ending battle with the dreaded “C” word, the only solutions they have come up with have been an assortment of chemotherapeutic drugs that are far worse than the diseases they are supposed to treat; radiation therapy which causes additional cancer down the road, and the surgical removal of cancerous cells which is the equivalent of removing the flower portion from the tops of thousands of Dandelions littering a large field. None of these modalities work to cure the human body from active diseases.

The funds being donated in support of the “pink campaign” and others like it are used to promote awareness about diseases that are huge cash cows for multinational drug companies. The monies collected from willing donors are also used to create additional drugs and a national support base for a plethora of useless, but very profitable, medical procedures that offer false hope to desperate patients. Modern cancer treatments, regularly administered to compromised individuals, do not cure the diseases they have been designed to treat. Instead, they make patients sicker and create enormous financial hardship for surviving relatives and loved ones.

Cancer treatments, in a nutshell, are moneymaking opportunities for drug companies. There has never been any credible medical research (pharmaceutical research) performed that has had the intention of identifying a way to eliminate cancer or any other profitable diseases. Why would a drug company pay for research that would lead to a cure for a disease process that regularly earns them billions of dollars?

If you’re sitting around naively thinking that a group of scientists are working in a laboratory and are on the verge of finding a cure for a specific disease, you’re sadly mistaken. It’s not going to happen in your lifetime or your child’s lifetime. This is not how the cancer/medical industry operates.

By removing your support and donations from the “pink campaign” and others like it, you will actually help society to have a viable cure for cancer revealed sooner than later. Legitimate solutions to all of these diseases are already known. They have been available for a long time.

As long as the majority of people continue to embrace the false paradigms being promoted by drug companies in regards to managing diseases instead of curing them, the same fraudulent practices will continue to be offered to human beings and the real cures will never be made available to the people that truly need them.