I have been unable to confirm the information below regarding an independent poll that has Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton. In my attempts to validate this information, I have only turned up additional postings of the same material. Does anyone have information regarding this independent poll? I am of the opinion that this poll is a hoax.
I have taught many graduate students in my career and they usually have proper command of the English language. The graduate student that wrote the post below made some grammatical errors and this makes me believe this is inaccurate information.
We have enough fake polls being promoted by the mainstream media with regards to the presidential election. We don’t need additional data that has been faked!
Here is what a Real Poll looks like in America. Please take the Time to Read.. A Total of 50,000 people Polled in 50 States….
PG Farnsworth We have just completed our own poll since we cannot get factual information from the mainstream media!! We called 1000 homes in each of the 50 states and asked basic questions on the economy, terrorism, immigration and presidential pick.
Economy was the number one factor that Americans are concerned about and terrorism was number two.
Presidential pick was Trump by a large percentage.
Trump 33478 votes 67%
Clinton 9788 Votes 19%
Undecided or other 6739 votes 13%
My friends and I are all Graduate students from all walks of life we meet to discuss stuff. 13 people who like and have served in the Military. It took us most of two weeks to be sure our calls were to all people and not just one party or an other we called Americans.. our poll is by taking registered voter lists and we accumulated 33% repub, 33% dems and 34% ind.. our poll consisted of 1000 calls per state. all 50 states. 50,000 people are in this poll not the 100 like other polls.
Please everyone copy and paste to your status so everyone knows that the other polls are rigged!
The European Union’s smallest member country, Malta, has officially begun the process of completely banning Monsanto’s toxic glyphosate from the 122 square mile island nation in the Mediterranean Sea. Labeled a ‘probable carcinogenic’ by the World Health Organization, controversy over the use of glyphosate, a primary ingredient in the popular gardening product RoundUp, is a globally contentious issue, yet very few nation states have sided with precautionary reasoning when considering the continued use of this toxic herbicide and crop desiccant.
Furthermore glyphosate is severely disruptive to the gut microbiome of the human body, which is now being understood as a ‘second brain,’ responsible in major ways for regulating mood, the emotional body, our immune system, and influencing mental health conditions like depression.
“Glyphosate is such an effective killer because it gets into plants and prevents them from taking up their normal nutrients – thus starving them to death. Glyphosate depletes micronutrients(such as calcium, zinc, magnesium, sulfur and cobalt, just to name a few) which are essential for health in plant and animal organisms. Specifically, glyphosate interferes with the shikimate pathway, a metabolic function in plants which allows them to create essential amino acids or proteins. Without this pathway functioning properly, the plant cannot survive.
Although animals and humans don’t have a shikimate pathway, here comes the glyphosate problem: the bacteria in our gut (microbiome or microbiota) do have this pathway, and we are reliant upon this microbiome in our gut for our health, immunity and our “second brain”. When we allow glyphosate to infiltrate our system, it destroys our gut and subsequently our immune system.” [Source]
Additionally, it is widely known that misuse, abuse and overuse of agrichemicals such as glyphosate is a common international problem, as is highlighted in the case of Argentina, where agrochemicals are causing widespread and terrifying health problems for citizens, especially those living close to farms and agricultural facilities in rural areas.
With such an overwhelming body of evidence linking so many health issues to this chemical, it would stand to reason that governments around the world should err on the side of caution, which is a point also made by Malta’s environment minister.
“Environment Minister José Herrera has said that Malta’s opposition to glyphosate is based on the precautionary principle, which states that potentially hazardous protects should not be used unless they can be proven safe.” [Source]
France may be next in considering an outright national ban on glyphosate, indicating that we may be on the brink of triggering a global domino effect, hopefully allowing consumer and public concern to be recognized above the interests of multi-national corporations. If the political will to ban the risky chemical can be mustered by one nation, it can be mustered by any nation.
“The decision shows courage from government’s side as it chose to listen to the concerns of experts and individuals who have demanded that our fields, streets and gardens would be free from this risky weed killer.” [Source]
For a comprehensive look at the risks involved with the use of glyphosate, please visit our database on this critical public health issue, here. Watch this telling interview with a Monsanto lobbyist who makes the claim that glyphosate is safe to drink, but refuses to do so when offered the chance, saying, “I am not an idiot.”
I don’t care if you’re a Republican or a Democrat at heart, you can’t be proud of what’s transpiring in America concerning Hillary Clinton and our FBI. How can anyone seriously endorse or embrace a person like Mrs. Clinton as the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States after hearing how she mishandled sensitive and classified materials while serving as Secretary of State?
The FBI’s recent decision not to recommend criminal prosecution of Senator Clinton makes our justice system look like it lacks integrity. The FBI’s shield displays the words: Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity. Where is the integrity of this agency with regards to their decision in the Clinton investigation?
Mrs. Clinton should be disqualified from running for president. She should also be banned from ever handling classified documents in the future. In my opinion, any reasonable prosecutor would have had a field day in a court of law with this case.
The FBI found evidence that Mrs. Clinton repeatedly broke the law over a period of four years and then they let her get away with it. The lack of integrity between the FBI and candidate Clinton is mind-blowing.
Regardless of what you think about Donald Trump, he’s absolutely right in his analysis of the entire situation. The entire political process seems to be rigged.
I learned earlier today that the FBI will not recommend criminal charges be filed against former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton for her involvement in releasing classified, government information through her private email servers.
Although the FBI’s investigation uncovered numerous classified emails (110 of them to be exact) that had their security status compromised by Mrs. Clinton, the agency decided not to recommend that the Department of Justice pursue criminal charges against the former Secretary of State.
FBI Director, James Comey prefaced his opening remarks by stating that the American people deserved to have complete transparency with regards to the investigative process that had been undertaken by his agency. The director then went on to state that his decision to speak to the American public on Tuesday morning was independent of political happenings taking place and that the entire investigative process had been conducted in a professional manner and politics never had anything to do with the agency’s final decision.
While Mr. Comey was speaking on national television, Mrs. Clinton and President Barack Obama were boarding Air Force One, on their way to Charlotte, NC for a set of campaign speeches scheduled later in the day. It’s very hard to imagine how uncomfortable that plane ride would have been if the FBI would have recommended criminal charges be filed against the presumptive democratic nominee.
I believe that Mr. Comey’s remarks and the timing of his announcement were purposely coordinated with the President and Mrs. Clinton’s travel itinerary to Charlotte. (This is such a sad day for America and its rigged justice system.)
Director Comey stated in the FBI’s report that Clinton was “extremely careless” in her handling of the emails. He went on to explain that the reason the FBI was not recommending filing charges against Senator Clinton was primarily because there was no precedent in charging a person in this kind of case. Basically speaking, the FBI had never come across a similar case that they could examine where a person had been charged for similar actions.
Comey further stated that, “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.” In addition, the Director stated, “This investigation was done honestly, competently and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear. Opinions are irrelevant. … We did our investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way.”
So there you have it, America. The decision that many of us had been waiting on for so long was delivered right in time to spare the President of the United States any embarrassment that might have existed from traveling and campaigning for Mrs. Clinton. The entire charade reeks of corruption and has the telltale signs of being totally scripted.
Although the FBI’s final report did not recommend criminal charges be filed against Mrs. Clinton, it surely suggested she was less than competent in her previous position and would have been fired by the president if she was still acting Secretary of State. This is the same president that is endorsing her for the highest position in the United States Government. (You just can’t make this stuff up!)
