Tap water from your local municipality contains sodium fluoride or the chemical hexafluorosilicic acid. The rationale for placing a fluoridating agent in public drinking water, according to most public health officials, is to lower the number of dental caries within the general population.

For many years, people have been arguing with local and state governments about whether fluoride in drinking water can harm the human body. In one corner, fluoride advocates point to the benefits of fluoridating water supplies. They claim people enjoy fewer cavities because local water companies add fluoride to their products at treatment facilities. In the other corner, outspoken individuals claim fluoride is a toxic substance that causes irreparable harm to human beings.

At the center of this controversy is an essential question that proponents of fluoride refuse to address. Why are people being medicated without first having a proper medical evaluation? There are plenty of angry citizens objecting to the outrageous policy of mass-medicating the general population.

According to the National Toxicology Program, fluoride can cause genetic damage and cancer in humans. There is also strong evidence that fluoride can have damaging effects on the brain. (Chioca LR, et al. (2007). European Journal of Pharmacology Oct 25; [Epub]

But you don’t have to be a medical researcher to know that fluoride is poison. Just pick up a tube of everyday toothpaste and read the warning message on the back of the product. It reads like this: “WARNING: Keep out of reach of children under 6. If you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, seek professional help or contact a poison control center immediately.”

Some years back, I published an article on another website that discussed at length the possible dangers associated with human beings consuming fluoride.

Predictably, several Internet trolls immediately jumped on the site’s comment board and inundated the website with copy-and-paste posts allegedly originating from “peer-reviewed” studies. The research plastered all over that website, of course, defended the mainstream public health mindset that fluoride is a safe substance in appropriate concentrations, etc.

In almost every situation where I have written articles or released comments about the harmful effects associated with fluoride, amalgam fillings, and especially vaccinations, copied and pasted materials used to defend conventional paradigms magically appeared on the platform. The written words used by the posters to attack my position were almost always the same.

For example, a few years ago, I published a long comment about water fluoridation on a prominent website. Almost immediately, a dentist wrote the following reply:

“The great 16^th Century alchemist, Paracelsus said, ‘Every substance is a poison, and only the proper dose determines a poison from a cure.’

Then I received a similar reply to a different comment I posted on a different platform from another dentist, and he wrote practically the same thing:

“16^th Century European doctor and alchemist, Paracelsus, stated it well: ‘All substances are poisons: there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison and a remedy.’”

I began realizing that these posters were working off the same script. The materials were pre-written along with the “peer-reviewed” research so that any dentist, doctor, or pretender could easily copy and paste them to a given website to defend the position in question being attacked. It is a brilliant strategy and demonstrates just how prepared the mainstream paradigm managers are to keep members of society locked inside the box regarding certain subjects.

In 2025, AI robots are undoubtedly executing these scripts defending officialdom.

There is no evidence adding fluoride to drinking water benefits human physiology in any way whatsoever. There is, however, extensive evidence that humans consuming this neurotoxin are doing damage to their overall health.

Many proponents of this dangerous fluoridation practice argue that in small doses, fluoride added to drinking water has no adverse effects on human neurophysiology. This claim is invalid because the neurotoxin fluoride accumulates in human bones and teeth. Fluoride is a toxic poison that can accumulate in the brain and nervous tissues over time (Pineal Gland).

“A meta-analysis of 27 cross-sectional studies of children exposed to fluoride in drinking water, mainly from China, suggests an average IQ decrement of about seven points in children exposed to raised fluoride concentrations.⁴⁴ Confounding from other substances seemed unlikely in most of these studies. Further characterisation of the dose–response association would be desirable.” – The Lancet – 2/14/14

Fluoride is an industrial chemical known to cause developmental neurotoxicity in human beings. – (Source: The Lancet).

About Medical Research

Regardless of the number of “peer-reviewed” research pieces being copied and pasted on this website or any other alternative news platform, readers must realize that much scientific research is flawed and does not accurately represent the truth about the questions being examined.

There is a tremendous amount of bias in medical research due to the heavy influence that pharmaceutical companies have on institutions of higher learning and the federal government of the United States. This situation is fast becoming a severe problem for the scientific community, as was reported in 2012 in an article published in the Washington Post.

According to another article written and published in The Atlantic magazine, “Much of what medical researchers conclude in their studies is misleading, exaggerated, or flat-out wrong.”

A publication by the University of California at Berkeley reported, “Almost 75% of U.S. clinical trials in medicine are paid for by private companies.” With statistics like these, how can there ever be “peer-reviewed” research that is truly unbiased and representative of the truth regarding medicines and their effectiveness or ineffectiveness regarding human subjects?

In the cases of fluoride, Mercury, and vaccines, I have always found that it is probably better to rely on a little bit of common sense versus “peer-reviewed” research that often seems to defy logic.

What do you think about this subject?

A New Free Book!

Over 17K Downloads! 👍

What if Artificial Intelligence is not what we’ve been led to believe?

Free Download!

Visit Johnreizer.net

Curing Cancer Was A Mistake!

Target List (Feature Film)

Millions Have Watched, Have You?

Official Movie Website

Gareth Icke – Derby, England

“Target List had me on the edge of my seat throughout. Not the least because of its believability!“

GARETH ICKE – DIRECTOR OF THE DAVID ICKE WEBSITE

Target List is an independent action-comedy-thriller film from 2023. The story centers on two scientists who invent a groundbreaking, non-invasive cure for cancer, which puts them on the run from a ruthless assassin hired by a corrupt pharmaceutical company.

Plot summary

The invention: Scientists Donna (Rachel Alig) and Clyde (Justin Ray) have developed a medical device called “WAND” that can cure cancer using wave-particle-fluctuation physics without surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation.
Big pharma’s threat: After the invention is announced, the pair and their research team are targeted by a fictional pharmaceutical corporation named Orphium. The company hires an assassin to eliminate the scientists and suppress the cure.
The chase: Following an initial attack, Donna and Clyde escape, only to find themselves framed for the murder of their colleagues. The film follows their fast-paced, action-filled journey as they try to outrun the assassin and clear their names.
Action and comedy: While the premise is serious, the film is noted for its mix of action and humor, with comedic moments arising from the chemistry between the protagonists as they find themselves in a high-stakes situation.

Filmmakers and cast