Pfizer Whistleblower Karen Kingston Confirms Nanotechnology is Present in Pfizer/Moderna Injections

By Ashley Hayes

I recently relayed a story reported by Brian Shilhavy on Pfizer Whistleblower Karen Kingston’s fleeing to Mexico because she had been informed she had/has a (CIA) target on her back due to her truth-telling about the ingredients and technologies contained within the “Covid” injections. (You know, the injections for the virus that mysteriously stopped outside the doors of the globalist-owned big-box stores, yet was so dangerous it caused hundreds of thousands of small businesses to close permanently.)

Karen has recently reported she feels safe where she is right now (though I don’t know how) and will be returning to the US soon. For those unfamiliar with her, Karen’s role with Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies was deciphering patents and all the legal mumbo-jumbo and translating them into laypeople’s terms. She did the same with the “Covid” injections, almost from Day One of their release. She has shown there is no question that they contain life-altering/humanity-destroying nanotechnology, and I encourage readers to watch her videos and follow her substack.

Multiple NoFakeNews articles have also shown, complete with sources and direct quotes, that nanotechnology is absolutely in these injections. (Moderna co-founder Robert Langer created the technology that allows remote access to bodies.) And if there is any doubt about the role these injections, and the nanotechnology and synthetic biology they contain, are playing in the psychopathic Singularity-seeking affiliate network’s efforts to mock God and destroy humanity, I encourage you to re-read the stories contained within the various links of my recent article here entitled, Ray Kurzweil Should Be Imprisoned.

Open genocide is underway. Will you follow the science [fiction] and sign up to be slaughtered, or will you follow the evidence and do something about it?

Sources:
https://karenkingston.net/about-karen-kingston
https://nofakenews.net/2023/08/12/pfizer-whistleblower-karen-kingston-is-being-targeted-for-assassination/

https://www.cas.org/resources/cas-insights/drug-discovery/therapeutic-potential-nanotechnology-covid-19
https://www.cas.org/sites/default/files/documents/lipid-nanoparticles-whitepaper-spreads.pdf
https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/is-pfizer-liable-for-knowingly-contaminating
https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/shot_of_a_lifetime_how_pfizer_developed_its_own_raw_materials_to_ensure_a_steady_supply_for_the_covid_19_vaccine

____________________

Click here to learn more!

____________________

What would happen if someone discovered how to cure all cancers?

The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie

“Curing cancer was their first mistake!”

An Andrew Arguello & MJ Palo Film

____________________

Watch For Free Right now!

Click an Arrow to Watch!

____________________

Film Journalists:

“A top-class film. Definitely on my ‘target list’ of must-watches.”

OLIVIA BALLINGTON – INDY REVIEWS

“Target List is a great view for anyone who wants a compelling and suspenseful flick with a message that matters.”

RICHARD PROPES – THE INDEPENDENT CRITIC

“Tightly paced and full of thrills, Target List is a potent action film that manages to both entertain and impress.”

INDIE WRAP MAGAZINE

Please rate our movie on IMDb!

Target List IMDb Page

IMDb Rating Scale Guide

10 – A movie that is in a class of its own!

9 – An excellent movie.

8 – A great movie.

7 – A good movie.

6 – A better than average movie.

5 – An average movie.

4 – A worse than average movie.

3 – Bad.

2 – Awful.

1 – Terrible! Unwatchable!

Click An Image Below To Buy From Your Favorite US Platform

______________________

_____________________

____________________

____________________

Watch Now In:

🇦🇺  Australia 🇧🇪  Belgium 🇧🇬 Bulgaria

🇨🇦 Canada 🇨🇿 Czech Republic 🇩🇰 Denmark

🇪🇪 Estonia 🇫🇮 Finland 🇬🇷 Greece

🇭🇺 Hungary 🇮🇪 Ireland 🇮🇱 Israel

🇱🇹  Lithuania 🇲🇺 Mauritius 🇲🇽 Mexico

🇲🇿 Mozambique 🇳🇴  Norway

🇵🇭  Philippines 🇵🇱  Poland 🇵🇹 Portugal

🇸🇮 Slovenia 🇸🇪 Sweden 🇨🇭 Switzerland

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

___________________

TheTargetListMovie.com

©Target List LLC

Whistleblowers and Wrongful Termination Lawsuits: How the Laws Protect Employers

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at NoFakeNews.net

Any person that has ever had the unfortunate experience of taking on a company over a wrongful termination issue knows how frustrating the process can be. If a company has unfairly removed you from your job, the chances of seeing justice served through the U.S. legal system are slim to none.

Even when plaintiffs have an airtight case and a ‘smoking gun,’ so to speak, for evidence, it’s quite difficult to defeat companies over wrongful termination issues in a court of law. Legal expenses alone make it impractical for most individuals to fight for their rights or, in many cases, the rights of others. In addition, the costs involved with assembling a legal team, solely dedicated to fighting an individual’s private cause, are frightening. On the other side of the fence, big corporations usually have ample funds and can easily outlast individual plaintiffs that might be brave enough to launch lawsuits against them.

If, for example, Joe Blow is unfairly terminated from his place of employment because he blew the whistle on company administrators, after observing fellow employees being exposed to dangerous working conditions, he might find it virtually impossible to seek justice for his premature and unfair dismissal in a court of law.

In many states, employees are hired ‘at will’. This means that most employees can be terminated for virtually any reason and without recourse. In a lot of situations, the level of accountability for supervisors and administrators, of a particular company, is next to nothing.

The hardest concept for workers to comprehend is the fact that supervisors can fire them on the spot for any reason whatsoever. The supervisors are aware of how the labor laws protect them from employees during wrongful termination disputes and aren’t afraid to communicate this fact to employees.

The laws of the land, in many instances, are a direct product of earlier legal decisions. The legal decisions handed down, yesterday, through the courts are the legal precedents cited by present day attorneys. If a whistleblower is successful in proving his or her case through a court of law and is fortunate enough not to get the decision overturned in a court of appeals, the case could, potentially, set a legal precedent and be the key component cited in future cases. It is for this reason that the ‘little people’ sometime make the tough decision to go after big corporations that have harmed them. It’s not always about winning a monetary award. Sometimes affected persons believe it’s just the appropriate course of action to take. Thank goodness there are individuals that have the guts and stamina to standup for what’s right. It’s, perhaps, the only way the little guy can ever hope to change unfair and unethical laws.

Many corporations, unfortunately, have the financial resources to protect themselves from lawsuits brought about by former or current employees. In a nutshell, the laws have been designed to protect big corporations. In the past, many judges have ruled in favor of corporate America. Their legal decisions have definitely created precedents that practicing attorneys point to when defending big companies against plaintiffs like Joe Blow.

Even in situations where corporate abuse is blatant, it’s often difficult to get cases into the courts. Companies will go to great lengths in order to protect their public images as well as the images of CEO’s and other executive officers. Image is everything to big corporations and they’ll take extreme measures to protect themselves.

If a particular company cannot intimidate a plaintiff into submission; dismiss the case through a legal technicality, there’s always the old fashion option of settling with the little guy. ‘Hush money’ is an important option used to protect a corporation, as a last resort, from what executive officers view as the most damaging scenario – a court room.

A corporation that is, on the rare occasion, forced into a courtroom setting always loses regardless of the final verdict. In the courts, companies ultimately lose what they value even more than money – a good image. Once in the courts, everything becomes a matter of public record. The emperor, in a sense, is unclothed at this stage of the game, and all the dirty details are permanently released into the public domain.

Enter the settlement phase of a lawsuit, with its accompanying non-disclosure agreement, precluding Joe Blow from ever uttering a word about his case or said company again. You see, once Joe Blow is paid off by the corporation, to keep his lips permanently sealed, the corporation wins. Joe signs a contract in exchange for a monetary settlement that legally prohibits him from ever broaching the subject again. Once Joe signs on the dotted line, there’s no courtroom, no verdict, no legal precedent and most important, no change to the way the courts view corporations, in similar situations, under the law.