Made in China: Jade Rabbit Rover Heads to the Moon

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at


On December 2, 2013, China launched a rocket into deep space that was carrying a lunar, robotic device designed to crawl along the moon’s surface. According to mainstream media sources, China’s lunar robot, Jade Rabbit, is somewhat similar to the models used by NASA to explore the planet Mars.

As is always the case with deep space journeys sponsored by the world’s space agencies, the missions are quite limited with respect to their intended objectives. What I mean by that last sentence is that any space missions that have the ultimate ambition of leaving the comfy confines of Low Earth Orbits (LEO’s) will most assuredly be unmanned expeditions. The reason for this fact is pretty damn obvious. Unfortunately, nobody in the mainstream media seems to have the guts or the editorial permissions to write about the truth regarding space exploration. The truth be told, every space agency in the world most likely lacks the technological capabilities to properly construct space ships that can protect astronauts from the dangers that are inherently present in deep space. This is why they continuously send robotic rovers to the moon and Mars instead of men.

If it were truly possible to send human beings through the Van Allen Belts into deep space where a plethora of lethal micrometeorites, cosmic rays, and other problems that constantly challenge the lives of astronauts exist, we would, undoubtedly, see such missions taking place on a regular basis. In fact, this is the exact reason we do not see manned missions in deep space.

Since the Apollo missions occurred in the late 60’s and early 70’s, there have been zero manned missions executed in deep space by any government space agencies. Why have there not been other missions to the moon? Are we supposed to believe that countries such as Russia and China have not had an interest in deep space travel?

The official lines of disinformation routinely thrown around by NASA that claim human beings had the technological capability to travel to the moon forty years ago and then decided it was too expensive to continue the practice is absolutely preposterous. In the last 40 years there has not been one mission by any country that has attempted to send an astronaut on a voyage that even orbited the moon. Sure, we sent men to the moon, a strategic military destination that overlooks Earth, and then decided we would never go back again. This makes perfect sense and should raise no eyebrows whatsoever.

Can you think of any technologies that have been achieved, discovered, invented, or come to fruition that have not been significantly advanced since their inception? Automobiles, telephones, televisions, airplanes, radios, computers, military weapons, video games, and any other technologies you can possibly think of have all been significantly improved and made more effective than when they were originally designed.

Whatever happened to NASA’s Lunar Module technology? Why haven’t we seen this piece of equipment improved and used in newer missions to the moon? And what about NASA’s space suit technology? Has it been improved to the point where it can actually protect astronauts from the hazards encountered in deep space? There are countless accusations by many people that claim the Apollo space suits were inadequately designed and quite incapable of protecting astronauts from cosmic radiation during the lunar missions. Why hasn’t NASA proved the effectiveness of these garments? They could easily settle the debate by allowing scientists to use the suits to protect workers that are currently attempting to clean up the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant disaster? Certainly, a space suit that protected astronauts from deadly cosmic radiation on their way to the moon could be useful in protecting workers cleaning up a facility like Fukushima? Such a demonstration would go a long way in convincing skeptics about the effectiveness of the technology with respect to its ability to protect a person against radioactivity.

The fact that we continue to send robotic equipment instead of human beings on missions that venture past the Van Allen Belts is a telltale sign that man has probably never achieved successful deep space travel or been to the moon with Apollo.

What do you think about this subject?

The Rocket’s Red Glare…Probably Won’t Get You There!

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at

 reizer3On November 19, 2013, I watched the Eastern Carolina skies with great anticipation as NASA launched an impressive Minotaur rocket into space that was carrying a record number of 29 satellites. As that rocket raced through the earth’s atmosphere, people along the East Coast of the United States from Maine to Florida, and as far inland as Kentucky and Tennessee, were able to see the spacecraft as it made its way into orbit. It was quite a spectacular show for many people that were not precluded from viewing the experience due to excessive cloud cover.

I have to admit that it was a very memorable moment for me, standing outside watching a rocket hurtling towards the heavens. It was the kind of event that you remember for the rest of your life.

Years ago, as a young child, I remember watching another spectacular event that became permanently etched in my mind. I remember watching Neil Armstrong on a live television feed originating from the moon. My eyes were glued to the TV screen as he descended the steps of the Lunar Module and firmly planted the first human foot print on our satellite. It was quite a memorable moment for many people all over the world.

Forty-four years later I find myself doubting the authenticity of this alleged achievement by our nation’s space agency. On numerous occasions I have read many opinions regarding the subject of a possible Apollo, moon hoax. For the longest time I never paid much attention to theories that cast doubt about the authenticity of NASA’s Apollo program. Not until 12 years ago did I come to the conclusion that America and its citizens had been, yet again, deceived by the powers that be.

It was shortly after September 11, 2001 when I first came across a unique book titled, Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-blowers. In my opinion, the authors, Mary Bennett and David S. Percy, performed a fantastic job in dissecting and pointing out countless anomalies within the pictures that had been supposedly taken by astronauts while visiting the moon. After reading this book over and over again, there was no other conclusion I could come to other than the fact that the Apollo moon pictures had obviously been filmed somewhere on earth.

Bennett and Percy went way beyond pointing out the errors that were captured on film that proved the lunar photographs were not created on the moon. The authors spent lengthy amounts of time interviewing the camera makers and film companies that supplied Apollo with their equipment. They methodically demonstrated how the film allegedly used on these missions could not and would not have worked in deep space let alone on the lunar surface.

I am not going to go through all 568 pages of the book’s text and photography in this article. I will leave that chore to my readers. I will write, however, that reading this monster is well worth your time if you have a true desire to know the truth about Apollo.

Bennett and Percy do not make the claim that astronauts never visited the moon. They do, however, lay out a most convincing argument that NASA never went to the moon via Apollo.

Perhaps the most convincing part of the authors’ argument against the integrity of Apollo was revealed through the mounds of information they provided in their book about rocket technology and the presence of deadly, cosmic radiation that exists throughout the parameters of deep space. They reported that in order to achieve deep space travel, human beings need constant protection from cosmic radiation and that the space suits that were worn in the late 60’s and early 70’s by our astronauts did not offer the adequate protection those human beings would have required on a journey to the moon. They also made an ironclad argument that the Apollo rocket technology could not have offered astronauts the protection that would have been necessary to survive deep space missions. Bennett and Percy maintain that Apollo and its “astronots” never left the lower portions of the Earth’s orbit. This is why, according to the authors, NASA prescribed the space shuttle missions for so many years.

NASA’s real goal with the space shuttle program was to, ultimately, study the Van Allen Belts that protect Earth and its astronauts in low earth orbits (LEO’s) from radiation. LEO’s are where the space shuttle and other missions in outer (inner) space are carried out by the American Space Agency. In LEO’s, astronauts and their spacecrafts are still, very much, protected from cosmic radiation. According to Bennett and Percy, the Van Allen Belts were still, in 1999, an obstacle that NASA had not managed to solve.

Finally, Bennett and Percy wrote in their book about spinning disk technologies. Their claim was that this method of travel was necessary to successfully carry out manned, deep space missions. The authors pointed out that the rapid turning of a disk shaped space craft would potentially create a magnetic shield around a particular spaceship and protect its occupants from deadly, cosmic radiation. The best example of this spinning disk technology at work, they explained, was our spinning Earth. Its constant spinning action creates an atmosphere and an environment that shields human beings and life on the planet from cosmic radiation.

Evidently, as far as the moon and deep space are concerned, rockets and their red glare won’t get you there. But those rockets sure are pretty to look at and quite successful in launching men into LEO’s and unmanned crafts into deep space.

What do you think about this subject?

Does Our Moon Prove that an Advanced Ancient Civilization Existed on Earth?

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at


In 1994, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (U.S. Navy) and NASA launched the spacecraft, Clementine in an effort to map and photograph the entire lunar surface. Clementine was considered by mission experts as a resounding success. The photographic map that was constructed through photography associated with the Clementine mission is available for review at the website

In previous articles appearing on, I wrote extensively about Clementine producing photographic evidence of artificial structures on the surface of the moon. I also wrote about how the photographic evidence in question had been intentionally obfuscated in such a way that the true design of the artificial structures could not be determined.

Moon Picture Clementine NASA

Photo Credit: DOD-NRL-NASA

One has to seriously wonder why the Department of the Navy and NASA would obfuscate photos yielded from a publicly funded mission to the moon. This question really becomes important now that it is apparent that those publicly funded photos revealed artificial structures on our moon. In 2004, J.P. Skipper ( wrote an extensive report about artificial structures that were visible on the Clementine website. Then in 2010, a new browser was placed into service on the Clementine website and the photographs that once demonstrated the artificial structures on the lunar surface were suddenly gone. The original images are no longer visible to people accessing the official Clementine website.

Are the structures/buildings on our moon the property of the United States government? Are these objects the property of an alien civilization that has had, for the longest time, the best seat in the cosmos to view Earth? Both questions are fair ones and the people of our planet deserve to know the truthful answers. But what if these structures are not the property of the United States or another country on Earth? What if these structures are not the property of an alien civilization that is watching us? Then we have to ask the questions: Who put them there? And why did they put them there?

Is it possible that these intelligently built objects are the remnants of an ancient civilization that once lived on the Earth? Is it possible that another technologically advanced group of beings from Earth traveled to the moon? Did these beings colonize our moon? Did they build cities and laboratories there? Is it possible that many different civilizations from our planet have visited the moon, over the span of millions of years, and left their intelligent designs on the lunar landscape?

Without the presence of an atmosphere, is it possible that buildings that are a hundred thousand years old would remain in good condition? How about if the buildings were a million years old or perhaps 100 million years old? Don’t forget, it is estimated that our planet is 4 or 5 billion years old. How many intelligent civilizations have lived on Earth?

If technologically advanced civilizations existed on our planet prior to the current human race, they would have, undoubtedly, visited the moon. Depending on how technologically advanced a given civilization might have become, they could have placed a spaceship or even a city on the moon. From the looks of the photographic evidence that was produced by Clementine, it is quite apparent that somebody very technologically advanced has been there.

Is it possible that the most precious secrets of Earth’s past civilizations are not buried on Earth, but rather on the moon above us?

What do you think about this subject?

The Mainstream Media’s Bait and Switch Techniques are Designed to Keep Us in the Box

By Dr. John Reizer

Editor at

reizer3It never ceases to amaze me how incredibly predictable the mainstream news companies have become when reporting on their fluff filled stories that attempt to misinform and deceive the public they are supposed to be serving.

On August 22, 2013, released an off world story that was picked up by Yahoo News. This particular piece was featured with the sensational title, “Astronaut Sees ‘UFO’ Near Space Station.” Really? Do you honestly believe the “lamestream” news companies would be allowed to release a story like that to the American public?

The title, in this situation, is the bait and when the reader (sucker) clicks on the link to view the article, they soon figure out that the “UFO” the astronaut supposedly saw was a piece of space garbage that happened to be floating by the International Space Station. And so the sensational title (the bait) is followed by a nonsense article (the switch) that has no real news content in it whatsoever. Why is this even being packaged and discussed as news? The answer is because it helps to keep people firmly planted within the parameters of conventional thinking. This type of garbage story assures readers that there is nothing of importance going on off world. Think again!

I am pretty sure there are plenty of real UFO’s passing by the astronauts and the International Space Station everyday. It is pretty obvious that the mainstream news companies and NASA are not going to report on the existence of these encounters. They would rather report on how an astronaut observed the passing by of space junk and related debris.

I challenge and NASA to seriously discuss the structures and buildings that exist on our moon and Mars. I challenge them to seriously discuss many of the photos that depict artificial structures on these foreign worlds. And I challenge our space agency to seriously discuss, in a public forum, the photographs that show evidence of intelligent life on other worlds that are currently on file on NASA’s own websites. These photos exist and the funny thing about them is that they are all in the public domain. They are available for public viewing, yet no one even pays attention to the evidence.

We are such a complacent and apathetic society that it is scary. Even when the evidence exists, we couldn’t care less about looking at it.

What do you think about this subject?

Public Domain Photos of the Moon and Mars: A Large Collection of Obfuscated Images

By Dr. John L. Reizer

Editor at


Since my early childhood, I have always wondered why we (the U.S. Space Agency) went to the moon, in the late 60’s and early 70’s, and then abruptly pulled the plug on the Apollo program as well as any other campaigns that might have been planned to explore our nearest celestial neighbor.

The moon, without a doubt, is the most logical target for NASA to have its cross-hairs focused on. Completely within its reach, one would think our space agency would be overly ambitious to return to the lunar surface. The 6 manned, space missions to the moon the United States managed to pull off 40 years ago should have only scratched the surface of scientific curiosity. I am not exaggerating when I write that there are many scientists today that would love to have an opportunity to explore the moon’s surface. Let’s face facts, our satellite is an extraordinary object, and it’s strategically positioned to offer the best seat in the universe when it comes to keeping an eye on planet earth. For that reason alone, our military leaders are undoubtedly champing at the bit to have access to this lunar lookout.

Why, then, did we abandon all future plans to return to the moon? Some of the answers that have been offered by NASA are, “It’s too expensive” and “We’ve been there and accomplished that. The moon is a dead, rocky,  barren world and we don’t need to go back.” Those responses are almost laughable. When was the last time the U.S. government ever worried about spending too much money? For God’s sake, they print money, out of thin air, and bail out banks that are too big to fail like some people change their underwear. Besides the financial considerations, when was the last time our government invaded a strategic territory and then decided to withdraw from that location at a later date? The answer is never.

The truth about NASA and the U.S. government is that they have never lost their desire to return to the moon. We spent money sending the Clementine spacecraft there in 1994. The Clementine mission was designed to thoroughly photograph every nook and cranny of the lunar surface, and that it did. According to the government’s official website, “The mission results were spectacular.”

If our government really had no interest in returning to the “dead moon” then why did it bother to map the entire planetoid? When all those photos were being taken by Clementine, did the U.S. government see something so disturbing on our satellite that they made a decision to never return there again?

Researcher Joseph P. Skipper ( has compiled numerous photos, courtesy of NASA and JPL, which clearly show both the moon and planet Mars have artificial structures (buildings) on their respective surfaces. According to Skipper, NASA has been obfuscating images of the lunar and Martian surfaces for many years. The catalogs of photographs on his website, made exclusively from property released into the public domain by NASA, show huge buildings on our moon. The catalogs also contain numerous photographs clearly showing large buildings, cityscapes, lakes, rivers, vegetation, civilization evidence, and fossil remains on Mars.

The questions I have are not centered on whether there’s life on the moon or Mars. I would like to know who is on our moon and what type of civilization resides on Mars.

Recently, photos coming from Mars probes, that have been sent to photograph the Martian surface, have revealed pictures of what appear to be small mammals and lizards. There certainly seems to be a lot of strange things happening on both the moon and Mars. It would be wonderful, and a breath of fresh air, if we were one day permitted to view un-obfuscated photos of these foreign worlds that have been taken by our space agency. It should be mentioned that American taxpayers have funded all of these missions and the associated equipment that was used to create said photos in the first place.

It is one thing to make photos available in the public domain. It is quite another thing to make the photos available so that they accurately reflect what was captured at the locations where the pictures were taken. Enough already, NASA, with all the smudges, airbrushing, and computer generated obfuscation techniques you are creating.

What do you think about this subject?

The Moon: A Dead Planetoid or a Thriving Base for Extraterrestrials?

By Dr. John Reizer

For a very long time, human beings have been taught that our moon, the celestial object we’re all so accustomed to seeing overhead, is a dead and barren world devoid of any life whatsoever. According to our space agency (NASA), the Apollo missions of the 60’s and 70’s confirmed that the lunar surface was littered with nothing but useless moon rocks and dust.

Ordinary citizens can’t visit the moon and commercial telescopes, sold in stores, aren’t strong enough to offer contrary visual evidence that would dispute the official claims of our trusted sources.

In 1994, the Clementine spacecraft was sent to the moon to photograph the entire lunar surface. This was a joint venture between the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (U.S. Navy) and NASA. The recorded photographs from that unmanned lunar mission were cataloged and made available as public domain documents. Those images can be accessed at the website,

The Clementine project proved to be an overwhelming success according to the Department of the Navy and NASA. The images were considered spectacular and helped the United States military have a much better understanding about many of the surface features of our only satellite.

On February 13, 2010, the military’s Clementine Lunar Browser (CLIB 1.5) was retired and replaced with a newer version (CLIB 2.0). The upgraded browser supposedly improved the viewing experience for people accessing the various images made available through the Clementine mission.

Under the original browser, a number of interesting lunar surface images were published on the Clementine website and they clearly demonstrated artificially constructed buildings and shapes. The photographs of these structures are undeniable. They were also obviously obfuscated (but not entirely) by someone that didn’t want the public to be made aware of such important evidence.

The newly updated (CLIB 2.0) software, that is active on the Clementine website, does not show any evidence of the previously visible artificial buildings and structures on the lunar surface. The new images have been thoroughly sanitized so that the public’s perception of the moon remains consistent with the false history of the planetoid we’ve been spoon-fed throughout our lives.

For those people that aren’t brainwashed and are capable of understanding the significance of the evidence originally presented via (CLIB 1.5), there’s no longer a need to question whether or not the moon is inhabited by intelligent beings. Instead, the question that needs to be answered is what or who resides on the lunar surface?

The fact that NASA has canceled or not planned any additional manned space missions to the moon, or to any other venue for that matter, speaks volumes about who might be occupying our moon. It’s obviously not human beings up there. But if it’s not human beings residing on the moon, then what type of alien civilization exists directly above us? Why has an alien civilization decided to build huge bases on our moon? Are they watching us? Are they studying our tendencies? How long have they been there and what are their intentions? Are these beings secretly involved with our planet, species, and governments? And, finally, is there anything we can do about it? Unfortunately, we’re going to have a very difficult time getting such questions answered.

The official sources that carefully control the release of space related information, science and other data are not permitted to acknowledge the existence of extraterrestrials on the moon or at any other celestial locations (Mars).

Everyday, average citizens are so consumed with earthly responsibilities that they’re not overly concerned with what’s happening on the moon. But maybe they should be concerned. Maybe we have been presented with such a false understanding of reality that when we are given a glimpse of the truth, it appears to us as science fiction. Perhaps, we can not recognize the truth?

What do you think?