
Uh-Oh!

Neil Armstrong’s Space Boots

Neil Armstrong’s Moon Boot Print

Whistle-blowers?
One would think that the architects of this space psyop had to have massive funding from taxpayers’ dollars. Why would the hoaxers make so many photographic mistakes that ultimately blew the whistle on the scam?
Did the people running the Moon landing hoax accidentally leave behind photographic evidence for future forensic photography investigators, or were some Apollo whistle-blowers working secretly and trying to inform the public about the fakery by providing clues in the Apollo photographic catalogs?
– Dr. Reizer
____________________
The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie

Critical Reviews
“Rachel Alig is terrific as Donna while Justin Ray as Clyde also manages to impress. Combining witty commentary with a constant threat to life, script writers Palo and Reizer develop a narrative that is funny and charming while ensuring that none of the thrill and danger is lost in the process.”
– INDIE WRAP MAGAZINE
“Drama, thrills, comedy and so much more: Directors Andrew Arguello and MJ Palo’s Target List has all the fixings of a great movie. Combining a fantastic cast with the witty writing of MJ Palo and John Reizer, whichever way you flip this film, it lands on its feet with feline agility.”
– INDY REVIEWS
“The script by Palo with John Reizer, for the most part, rides that perfect balance between its more dramatic moments and perfectly placed moments of humor that never distract. While they’re probably not going to get invited to any big pharma conventions anytime soon, Reizer and Palo have a point, and they make it beautifully.”
“Target List is a great view for anyone who wants a compelling and suspenseful flick with a message that matters.”
– RICHARD PROPES – THE INDEPENDENT CRITIC
Gareth Icke – Derby, England

“Target List had me on the edge of my seat throughout. Not the least because of its believability!“
GARETH ICKE – DIRECTOR OF THE DAVID ICKE WEBSITE
Target List

From Mad Wife Productions
Our film addresses a well-known conspiracy theory within modern medicine that subscribes to the idea that the pharmaceutical industry is willing to hold back and even destroy healthcare inventions and discoveries that might help humanity have a better expression of health for the pursuit of monetary gain.
____________________
The Target List Pilot Auditions – Dec 2020

Jessica Culaciati & Rob Russo auditioning for the pilot film The Target List ©Mad Wife Productions
____________________
Watch Target List On Tubi TV
Watch It For Free!
We’re Aiming for a Million Tubi Views
Inventing a cancer cure was their first mistake!
Click on the Image to Watch the Movie
Watch the full movie on YouTube
Get Target List on DVD (Trepstar)
CLICK HERE FOR ALL MOVIE WATCH OPTIONS
TheTargetListMovie.com
©Target List LLC




No, it didn’t happen, Lisa. Armstrong can’t describe the lunar conditions, nor can he tell anyone about the outer space environment he allegedly experienced because everything affiliated with Apollo and the Moon landings was scripted.
Thanks again for sharing, Lisa!
John
And, yes, John. Why doesn’t the excitement of experiencing such a miraculous event shine through in Armstrong’s voice and in his demeanor? His words are bland, stiff and not very informational from a personally perspective view. You would think that if someone really experienced such a fantastic journey that they would want to be ecstatically talking about it a mile a minute, not avoiding any questions the best you can!
It didn’t happen. It’s lies, all lies! 🤣
Lisa
🙂
Wow! Fantastic job, Lisa, coming up with that material. Armstrong’s response didn’t sound like it came from someone who had visited the Moon!
Thanks so much for sharing! 🙂👍
John
Neil Armstrong’s statement from an interview when asked to describe what the sky looked like from the moon, stars and sun.
Neil Armstrong: ”The sky is erm a deep black, errr, when viewed from the moon as it is when viewed from er cislunar space, the space between the Earth and the Moon. (Pause.)”
(Analysis of this statement from Peter Hyatt. An expert in deception detection.)
“This is a somewhat lengthy answer, which begins with two pauses for thought
The subject is presupposed to have been on the moon; something of great rarity of the time of this interview. The subject is intelligent and well trained. The expectation is that he will, report what he himself saw.
In any singular, or “exclusive ” event, there is an expectation of heightened importance and when we speak from experiential memory, the structure of the sentence is reliable.
Expected: Given the unique experience of being on the moon, we first note that the subject does not begin his answer with the pronoun “I”. In analysis, the reduces reliability. Given the context of unique experience, the pronoun “I” would have shown the psychological strength of experiential memory. Its absence is noted.
Next, we note the use of passive voice with “when viewed from the moon.” Passive voice removes the subject, himself, personally from the statement. The use of passivity is found in concealing identity and/or responsibility in statements.
Here, the subject is describing a ‘universal’ viewing and avoiding the singular experience that is expected.
He has, thus far, avoided giving us personal experience that is expected with such an event. This is an implication of ‘avoidance’ of the response.”
Neil Armstrong: “The erm, the Earth is the only visible object other than the sun that can be seen although there have been some reports of seeing planets.”
“I myself did not see planets from the surface, but I suspect they might er be visible.”
Peter Hyatt:
“The rule of the Negative:
Truthful people tell us what they saw and heard and experienced. When he went on tell us what they did not see, hear or experience, the analyst recognized that this sentence increases in importance.”
And the interviewing and analysis continues on at length. But, John, I just wanted to share a segment of the analysis. And I almost shared it yesterday, but today seemed like a better Neil Armstrong day with those mismatched boot prints!
Lisa