Have a look at the meme below. It seems to suggest a pretty logical premise at first glance, in my opinion. Still, my educated guess is that mainstream science has a sophisticated answer to bring us back to a ball model of Earth spinning on its axis at 1000 miles per hour.
The powers that be have lied to the general public since the beginning of recorded history. The lies include all subjects imaginable and perhaps many more genres that go beyond the parameters of human imagination.
Several years ago, I had an opportunity to professionally care for a commercial airline pilot in my private practice. I had several conversations with the pilot about his job.
I asked the man if he had ever seen a UFO during a flight. He had not, but knew several colleagues who had. I asked my patient if he ever saw the curvature of the Earth. He had not.
Recently, my wife and I watched a YouTube video about a commercial airline pilot’s life. The guy was answering common questions about flying. The question came up: is the Earth flat? The pilot paused momentarily before saying with a straight face, “It looks pretty flat to me!”
I am not an aviation expert by any stretch of the imagination, but I always wanted to know if commercial pilots, when flying thousands of miles to a particular destination, had to consider the curvature of the Earth. It turns out they don’t! Pilots make no altitude adjustments to keep the aircraft aligned horizontally.
If you are on a plane flying above flat terrain, I can grasp in my mind how the altitude of the aircraft would be maintained without making any instrument adjustments. If, however, you are on a plane flying above a ball, how is it possible that the altitude of the aircraft wouldn’t increase without the pilot constantly having to nose the plane downward to account for the curvature of the planet?
The conventional answer you get regarding the above question tells us that gravity automatically keeps the plane’s nose adequately aligned with the upcoming horizon. Even though the plane is traveling around a ball, the illusion we are traveling through an infinite flat plane is just that- an illusion. Of course, when you ask this fundamental question on a public forum, you are met with many posters trying to shame you for even broaching the subject. You will be labeled a flat Earther – an anti-science-minded moron. Gee, where did I encounter those personalities before? Perhaps I met some of these folks in the years 2020 – 2023!
So, the science answer we are routinely pitched (no pun intended) when questioning the positioning of the aircraft’s nose in relation to the horizon is that gravity adjusts the plane’s nose automatically. This answer is necessary for the globe model scenario to be relevant because if gravity is not making the corrective adjustment to the aircraft, and neither is the pilot, there will be a severe problem sooner than later. There will also be a problem with the ball-Earth model.
The other possibility is that the Earth is the shape of an infinite plane and not the shape of a ball, and there is no need for gravity or a pilot to adjust the aircraft’s nose alignment with the horizon.
Well, what about the spinning ball? Does the Earth’s spin affect an aircraft while in flight?
According to conventional mainstream science and physics, the Earth’s spin affects wind currents, affecting aircraft. But the spin of Earth does not directly affect a flying plane. The reason is that the Earth’s atmosphere and the spinning ball move in unison. In other words, the stuff in the sky (the atmosphere) is in sync with the ground. Again, on a spinning globe model, the idea of a viscous atmosphere tethered to the ground beneath is a must to make the entire ball of wax narrative work.
The other possibility is that we are not on a spinning ball of wax but on a flat, motionless plane of land with movement in the atmosphere above it.
What about ICBMs and spacecraft that travel beyond the parameters of the Earth’s atmosphere? Are these vehicles affected by the Earth’s spin, its constant outward expansion into the cosmos, and any other motions from the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago? It’s a darn good question I can’t get any solid answers to.
Our Solar System Moving Through Space
According to officialdom, ICBMs and spacecraft have to account for the Earth’s spin and other unique movements, unlike aircraft flying within the parameters of Earth’s atmosphere.
But let’s be honest here: there aren’t any air or spacecraft leaving LEOs or the Earth’s atmosphere anytime soon! So, how would anyone know what affects or does not affect spacecraft outside the Earth’s atmosphere?
____________________
The Big Pharma Conspiracy Movie
Inventing a cancer cure was their first mistake!
Critical Reviews
“Rachel Alig is terrific as Donna while Justin Ray as Clyde also manages to impress. Combining witty commentary with a constant threat to life, script writers Palo and Reizer develop a narrative that is funny and charming while ensuring that none of the thrill and danger is lost in the process.”
– INDIE WRAP MAGAZINE
“Drama, thrills, comedy and so much more: Directors Andrew Arguello and MJ Palo’s Target List has all the fixings of a great movie. Combining a fantastic cast with the witty writing of MJ Palo and John Reizer, whichever way you flip this film, it lands on its feet with feline agility.”
– INDY REVIEWS
“The script by Palo with John Reizer, for the most part, rides that perfect balance between its more dramatic moments and perfectly placed moments of humor that never distract. While they’re probably not going to get invited to any big pharma conventions anytime soon, Reizer and Palo have a point, and they make it beautifully.”
“Target List is a great view for anyone who wants a compelling and suspenseful flick with a message that matters.”
– RICHARD PROPES – THE INDEPENDENT CRITIC
Gareth Icke – Derby, England
GARETH ICKE – DIRECTOR OF THE DAVID ICKE WEBSITE“Target List had me on the edge of my seat throughout. Not the least because of its believability!“
From Mad Wife Productions
Our film addresses a well-known conspiracy theory within modern medicine that subscribes to the idea that the pharmaceutical industry is willing to hold back and even destroy healthcare inventions and discoveries that might help humanity have a better expression of health for the pursuit of monetary gain.
____________________
Watch Target List On Tubi TV
Watch It For Free!
We’re Aiming for a Million Tubi Views
Inventing a cancer cure was their first mistake!
Click on the Image to Watch the Movie
Watch the full movie on YouTube
CLICK HERE FOR ALL MOVIE WATCH OPTIONS
TheTargetListMovie.com
©Target List LLC
NoFakeNews 
I have seen those stories about the strange flight paths. I have also read that specific flights are listed on a schedule but disappear when travelers attempt to buy them.
It is all bizarre!
John
My pleasure John and Lisa!
I tell you. The only thing that’s spinning about the ball vs flat earth is my head! 😂
Another thing I remember hearing about is the strange flight paths taken from certain parts that appear to go ridiculously out of their way.
Like from south America to Australia maybe? Instead of going directly across, as the globe would indicate should be possible, the plane ends up going up through Los Angeles or Alaska, depending on the situation.
There have been several incidents involving emergency landings because of say pregnancies for example in which cases the plane has according to the globe model had to go 700 miles out of its way to make the landing. Which is preposterous for any kind of emergency!
Yet when you go look on the flat earth map it suddenly makes sense!
🙂👍
Thanks, Roark. And you bring up some interesting scenarios in your comment!
Lisa
It’s a pleasure, John, I love sharing the knowledge that I find in addition to commenting. 👍🙂
Lisa
Yes, I am right there with you, Roark. The ball-Earth idea has plenty of problems attached to it. The ones you cite in your reply are excellent examples that make the official narrative look bad, in my opinion.
How crazy is it that we have been lied to about so many different things by the few who control the many that we don’t even know the shape of Earth or whatever it is we are experiencing life on? 🤣
John
Thank you, Lisa! 🙂
I appreciate your doing additional research to add value to the post. That is fascinating information about the different theories concerning gravity. A lot of people do question if gravity is real or not.
Thanks again!
John
Specifically about the shape of the earth John, I think there are just too many problems with the ball earth model, the way eclipses would work differently than they do, and on and on.
The atmosphere might tend to follow the globe somewhat, but atmosphere is generally a gas or liquid and not solid. So the best it could do is try and catch up with the spin of the ball but it wouldn’t catch up. So for us to see clouds hardly moving at all much of the time is a dead giveaway, I think.
Would gravity (assuming it exists) change the tilt of the plane only? I think it would affect the altitude of the plane, but not just the tilt.
The curvature isn’t there. Not at a distance of 3 miles or even 100 miles or so just 6 feet above the surface. Not at 80,000 feet up, looking across a thousand miles or more!
There are rivers that are hundreds of miles long. The water would simply not make it from one end to the other with curvature along the way.
Pilots don’t compensate by constantly descending, just like engineers of things like the Suez canal and bridges don’t have to take into account the curvature of the earth at each step of the way.
As you say John, we’ve been lied to about so much. It just doesn’t seem like a stretch to me for yet another lie, in this case, the biggest and possibly the first!
This is a superb article you have written, John. You make great points!
Also, it’s very interesting that you got to ask a pilot about whether or not he has ever seen the curvature of the earth. And he had not. Wow!
And the controlling powers like to use the word “gravity” as their answer to these puzzling questions. But what is gravity really, and is it even real at all?
Lisa
Flat Earth by James W. Lee:
GRAVITY DOESN’T EXIST; IT’S SIMPLY BUOYANCY, WEIGHT & DENSITY
“Simply the weight, the size and how dense and buoyant something is, determines if something falls or elevates. Objects will seek it’s own equilibrium and balance as in nature. Nature balances, that’s what she does. A rock in a pond will sink while a beach ball will float. Density, weight and buoyancy.”
“The source of gravity is defined by modern science as: ‘the mutual attraction principle determined solely by density, mass.’ The word weight is only used to measure the gravitational pull between two objects.
According to etymology, which defines the origin and root of words, ‘gravis’ means weight from the Latin word gravitas, which means ‘weight’ or ‘heaviness’. Sir Issac Newton Law of Universal Gravitation completely omit the word ‘weight’ from the accepted definition of gravity altogether!
“Furthermore, this magnetic-like attraction of massive objects gravity is purported to have can be found nowhere in the natural world. There is no example in nature of a massive sphere or any other shaped-object which by virtue of its mass alone causes smaller objects to stick to it!
There is nothing on Earth massive enough that it can be shown to cause even a dust-bunny to stick to or orbit around it! Try spinning a wet tennis ball or any other spherical object with smaller things placed on its surface and you find that everything falls or flies off, and nothing still or orbits it. To claim the existence of a physical ‘law’ without a single practical evidential example is hearsay, not science.”- Eric Dubay, Flat Earth Conspiracy
You bet, Roark! 🙂
John
Hi John, this is one of my favorite topics as you probably know, so thank you!!
Lisa, this is Melissa Red Pill’s latest.
https://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2024/04/new-melissa-redpill-trump-is-biblical-on-the-clock-tuesday-4-23-24-2551600.html