Ursula Haverbeck: Jailed For Her Views About The Holocaust

cropped-cropped-400dpilogo2.jpg

 

It is illegal to question the holocaust (holocaust denial) in the following  countries:

  1. Austria
  2. Belgium
  3. Czech Republic
  4. France
  5. Germany
  6. Hungary
  7. Israel
  8. Liechtenstein
  9. Lithuania
  10. Luxembourg
  11. Netherlands
  12. Poland
  13. Portugal
  14. Romania
  15. Switzerland.

The following countries do not have laws against holocaust denial:

  1. Afghanistan
  2. Albania
  3. Algeria
  4. Andorra
  5. Angola
  6. Antigua and Barbuda
  7. Argentina
  8. Armenia
  9. Australia
  10. Azerbaijan
  11. Bahamas, The
  12. Bahrain
  13. Bangladesh
  14. Barbados
  15. Belarus
  16. Belize
  17. Benin
  18. Bhutan
  19. Bolivia
  20. Bosnia and Herzegovina
  21. Botswana
  22. Brazil
  23. Brunei
  24. Bulgaria
  25. Burkina Faso
  26. Burundi
  27. Cambodia
  28. Cameroon
  29. Canada (as of R. v. Zundel)
  30. Cape Verde
  31. Cayman Islands
  32. Central African Republic
  33. Chad
  34. Chile
  35. China PR
  36. Colombia
  37. Comoros
  38. Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  39. Congo, Republic of the
  40. Costa Rica
  41. Cote d’Ivoire
  42. Cuba
  43. Cuba
  44. Cyprus
  45. Denmark
  46. Djibouti
  47. Dominica
  48. Dominican Republic
  49. Ecuador
  50. Egypt
  51. El Salvador
  52. Equatorial Guinea
  53. Eritrea
  54. Estonia
  55. Ethiopia
  56. Faroe Islands
  57. Fiji
  58. Finland
  59. Gabon
  60. Gambia, The
  61. Georgia
  62. Ghana
  63. Greece
  64. Grenada
  65. Guatemala
  66. Guinea
  67. Guinea-Bissau
  68. Guyana
  69. Haiti
  70. Holy See (Vatican City)
  71. Honduras
  72. Iceland
  73. India
  74. Indonesia
  75. Iran
  76. Iraq
  77. Ireland
  78. Italy
  79. Jamaica
  80. Japan
  81. Jersey
  82. Jordan
  83. Kazakhstan
  84. Kenya
  85. Kiribati
  86. Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of
  87. Korea, Republic of
  88. Kuwait
  89. Kyrgyzstan
  90. Laos
  91. Latvia
  92. Lebanon
  93. Lesotho
  94. Liberia
  95. Libya
  96. Liechtenstein
  97. Macedonia (FYROM)
  98. Madagascar
  99. Malawi
  100. Malaysia
  101. Maldives
  102. Mali
  103. Malta
  104. Mauritania
  105. Mauritius
  106. Mexico
  107. Micronesia, Federated States of
  108. Moldova
  109. Monaco
  110. Mongolia
  111. Montenegro
  112. Morocco
  113. Mozambique
  114. Myanmar
  115. Namibia
  116. Nauru
  117. Nepal
  118. New Zealand
  119. Nicaragua
  120. Niger
  121. Nigeria
  122. Norway
  123. Oman
  124. Pakistan
  125. Palau
  126. Palestine
  127. Panama
  128. Papua New Guinea
  129. Paraguay
  130. Peru
  131. Philippines
  132. Puerto Rico
  133. Qatar
  134. Rwanda
  135. Saint Kitts and Nevis
  136. Saint Lucia
  137. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  138. Samoa
  139. San Marino
  140. São Tomé and Príncipe
  141. Saudi Arabia
  142. Senegal
  143. Serbia
  144. Seychelles
  145. Sierra Leone
  146. Singapore
  147. Slovakia
  148. Slovenia
  149. Solomon Islands
  150. Somalia
  151. South Africa
  152. Spain
  153. Sri Lanka
  154. Sudan
  155. Suriname
  156. Swaziland
  157. Sweden
  158. Syria
  159. Taiwan
  160. Tajikistan
  161. Tanzania
  162. Thailand
  163. Timor-Leste
  164. Togo
  165. Tonga
  166. Trinidad and Tobago
  167. Tunisia
  168. Turkey
  169. Turkmenistan
  170. Tuvalu
  171. Uganda
  172. Ukraine
  173. United Arab Emirates
  174. United Kingdom
  175. United States
  176. Uruguay
  177. Uzbekistan
  178. Vanuatu
  179. Venezuela
  180. Vietnam
  181. Western Sahara
  182. Yemen
  183. Zambia
  184. Zimbabwe

What do you think about holocaust denial laws?

4 thoughts on “Ursula Haverbeck: Jailed For Her Views About The Holocaust

  1. Chester May 31, 2017 / 9:20 am

    It seems to me to be completely ridiculous that there would be laws on the books in certain countries that would prohibit scholarly debate about historical events.

    The fact that these laws exist in the first place should raise a huge red flag in the minds of any critical thinking individuals.

    Throughout this planet’s history there’s been numerous examples of historical records being uncovered that didn’t reflect the way events had been reported previously.

    Scholarly debate should not be prohibited about world events regardless of how difficult the subject matter might be for certain people to handle.

    Governments lie to their citizens. This is a fact. The best way to control a large number of people in a given country is to teach them a false history. This is a common practice employed by all ruling states.

    I am not writing that this woman’s perspective concerning the holocaust is accurate. However, it’s an interesting viewpoint that deserves to be heard and debated. If there’s new evidence that sheds doubt on the official story, intelligent people should want to hear the information.

    If something is based on the truth, it will survive all forms of public and private scrutiny.

    This woman being jailed for voicing a contrarian opinion about the holocaust is the real crime that was executed by her government.

  2. Jacita Valdeza May 31, 2017 / 12:41 pm

    Look at 911, Oklahoma City, Waco, Texas, The Madrid Bombings, Pearl Harbor, and countless other big events that have been presented to the masses by their masters in a disingenuous manner.

    If the truth about these happenings is discussed in public, the statements are immediately categorized as being conspiracy theories.

    Imagine a day when a person will be imprisoned for questioning the offical story regarding 911. It’s outrageous to think this could happen.

    It’s outrageous to imprison any person for questioning officialdom when we know that officialdom should always be questioned.

  3. Mitchell Goldstein May 31, 2017 / 3:35 pm

    Very good comments here.

    I am a Jew that sees the unfairness of these laws. In my considered opinion, I believe the holocaust industry has spun out of control.

    Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent each year by Hollywood studios in an effort to produce major motion pictures that keep the memory of the holocaust fresh in our collective psyche.

    It’s way over the top. It’s always in our face and it’s become a never ending agenda.

    There are plenty of instances where mass genocide has been committed against a group of people in this world. But you don’t see museums being built in Washington, D.C. honoring their memory.

    I have no doubt in my mind that many of my fellow brothers and sisters were treated horribly and murdered. So were a lot of Christian, Germans murdered.

    Were Jews systematically murdered as claimed by the history books? I am not so sure. We must rely on the powers that be for verification of such information. And the problem with doing that is obvious. The powers that be and their media companies lie.

  4. larryzb June 3, 2017 / 8:28 pm

    If the official story is accurate, the question arises why the exclusivity of Jewish suffering? Other groups have been killed in large numbers in the terrible 20th century. If the official story is wartime atrocity propaganda and is grossly distorted and exaggerated, one can rightly wonder why the story was invented and constantly thrown at the public over the past 70+ years. In other words, who benefits from the official account of the holocaust? (On our blog, we have addressed these questions as these are important.)

Comments are closed.